| Literature DB >> 34945340 |
Yuhang Li1,2, Jin Meng1, Dehai Zhang1, Haotian Zhu1.
Abstract
The development of a millimeter-wave unbalanced frequency tripler based on the nonlinear characteristics of planar Schottky varactors is presented. The entire module is designed by hybrid integration. A frequency multiplier circuit model was established to reflect the influence of diode parameters and the impedance matching on the multiplier in different frequency bands. The effect of junction imbalance on the output power of the frequency multiplier was investigated and the multiplier was improved based on the basic design. The addition of a cut microstrip stub in the improved diode unit reduced the impact of a power imbalance on frequency multiplier performance. The characteristics of the multiplier circuit were analyzed by the full-wave electromagnetic simulation of the three-dimensional structure and the harmonic balance simulation of the circuit. Test results showed that the peak output power of the improved frequency tripler was 12.6 mW at 277 GHz with an input power of 200 mW, an effective 12% improvement over the basic design.Entities:
Keywords: Schottky varactor; cut microstrip stub; frequency tripler; junction imbalance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945340 PMCID: PMC8704504 DOI: 10.3390/mi12121490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Frequency tripler circuit model.
Circuit model results.
| Freq.3LO (GHz) | Zdiode_in | Zdiode_out | Anode Number | Pin (mW) | Bandwidth (GHz) | Efficiency (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 52 + j.103 | 25 + j.66 | 102 | 6 | 400 | 35 | 58 |
| 200 | 22 + j.85 | 55 + j.88 | 65 | 6 | 200 | 32 | 42 |
| 300 | 95 + j.131 | 67 + j.113 | 38 | 6 | 200 | 30 | 33 |
| 400 | 80 + j.61 | 14 + j.90 | 15 | 4 | 100 | 32 | 25 |
| 500 | 120 + j.50 | 44 + j.52 | 10.5 | 4 | 100 | 31 | 20 |
Figure 2Overall three-dimensional electromagnetic frequency tripler model.
Figure 3Junction imbalance simulation results, basic and improved design of Schottky diode unit. (a) Diode position in basic design; (b) Diode unit structure in basic design; (c) Output power imbalance of the 3rd harmonics at different junctions; (d) Output power vs. / (at fixed junction); (e) Diode position in improved design; and (f) Diode unit structure in improved design.
Figure 4S-parameter network model and results. (a) Nine-port s-parameter network model and (b) Simulation results of basic designed frequency tripler and improved frequency tripler (Output power vs.).
Figure 5Block diagram of the test system.
Figure 6Test results (a) Fundamental drive source output power; (b) Efficiency vs. input power (at fixed frequency point 270 GHz); (c) Efficiency vs. input power (at fixed frequency point 271 GHz); and (d) Output power vs. frequency (fixed input power of 200 mW).
Comparison of reported frequency multipliers.
| Ref. | Frequency (GHz) | Multiply Factor | Anode Number | Pin (mW) | Pout (mW) | Efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 190–225 | 2 | 4 | 85.5 | 8.25 | 6–9.6 |
| [ | 220–325 | 3 | 4 | - | 0.32–1.9 | 1.6–6.6 |
| [ | 280–288 | 3 | 4 | 100 | 2.5 | 1.9–2.5 |
| [ | 260–290 | 3 | 4 | 100 | 3.9–5.75 | 3.9–5.75 |
| [ | 258–290 | 3 | - | 50–500 | 1–31 | 1.5–7 |
| This work | 270–280 | 3 | 6 | 120–200 | 9.9–12.6 | 5–10.92 |