| Literature DB >> 34945297 |
Madalina Simona Baltatu1, Andrei Victor Sandu1,2, Marcin Nabialek3, Petrica Vizureanu1, Gabriela Ciobanu4.
Abstract
Over the last decade, researchers have been concerned with improving metallic biomaterials with proper and suitable properties for the human body. Ti-based alloys are widely used in the medical field for their good mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. The TiMoZrTa system (TMZT) evidenced adequate mechanical properties, was closer to the human bone, and had a good biocompatibility. In order to highlight the osseointegration of the implants, a layer of hydroxyapatite (HA) was deposited using a biomimetic method, which simulates the natural growth of the bone. The coatings were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), micro indentation tests and contact angle. The data obtained show that the layer deposited on TiMoZrTa (TMZT) support is hydroxyapatite. Modifying the surface of titanium alloys represents a viable solution for increasing the osseointegration of materials used as implants. The studied coatings demonstrate a positive potential for use as dental and orthopedic implants.Entities:
Keywords: TiMoZrTa system; biomaterials; biomimetic deposition; titanium alloys
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945297 PMCID: PMC8704239 DOI: 10.3390/mi12121447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Metallic load for the experimental substrate alloys.
| Alloy | Element | Batch Weight | Ingot Weight | Efficiency | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti | Mo | Zr | Ta | |||||
| S1 | Ti15Mo7Zr5Ta | 51.20 | 10.52 | 5.00 | 3.62 | 70.34 | 70.33 | 99.99 |
| S2 | Ti15Mo7Zr10Ta | 63.02 | 15.08 | 7.04 | 15.00 | 70.55 | 70.45 | 99.86 |
| S3 | Ti15Mo7Zr15Ta | 44.11 | 10.70 | 5.07 | 10.61 | 70.49 | 70.20 | 99.59 |
Elemental compositions of substrate alloys.
| Sample | Ti | Mo | Zr | Ta | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Average | 73.94 | 14.57 | 6.75 | 4.74 |
| Stdev | ±0.20 | ±0.30 | ±0.10 | ±0.10 | |
| S2 | Average | 68.75 | 15.10 | 6.80 | 9.35 |
| Stdev | ±0.20 | ±0.10 | ±0.10 | ±0.30 | |
| S3 | Average | 63.71 | 14.85 | 6.99 | 14.45 |
| Stdev | ±0.50 | ±0.30 | ±0.2 | ±0.20 | |
The ionic concentration (Mmol/L) of the simulated body fluid (SBF) solution vs. human blood plasma.
| Ion | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | K+ | Cl− | (HPO4)2− | (SO4)2− | (HCO3)− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBF | 142.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 147.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 4.2 |
| Blood plasma | 142.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 103.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 27.0 |
Figure 1Microscopy images of substrate materials: (a) Ti15Mo7Zr5Ta; (b) Ti15Mo7Zr10Ta; (c) Ti15Mo7Zr15Ta.
Figure 2Structural aspects of the surface of coated samples at 500×: (a) S1-HA; (b) S2-HA; (c) S3-HA; and 1000×: (d) S1-HA; (e) S2-HA; (f) S3-HA.
Figure 3EDS elemental mapping of the metallic surface: (a) S1-HA; (b) S2-HA; (c) S3-HA.
The thickness of the deposited layers.
| Sample | Layer Thickness (µm) |
|---|---|
| S1-HA | 35 ± 3 |
| S2-HA | 29 ± 4 |
| S3-HA | 31 ± 2 |
Figure 4Representative aspects layer of HA on titanium alloys.
Figure 5X-ray diffraction (XRD) graph of the coated alloys.
Micro-indentation results *.
| Sample | Loading Deformation | Release Deformation | Young Modulus | Stiffness | Specimen Poisson Ration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-HA | 13.35 ± 0.4 | 12.75 ± 0.3 | 55.35 ± 0.3 | 6.35 ± 0.1 | 0.27 |
| S2-HA | 13.25 ± 0.5 | 12.10 ± 0.1 | 56.25 ± 0.2 | 6.25 ± 0.2 | 0.27 |
| S3-HA | 13.75 ± 0.4 | 12.35 ± 0.2 | 56.45 ± 0.3 | 5.75 ± 0.2 | 0.27 |
* Five determinations were carried out in different areas of the samples with dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 5 mm.
Figure 6Micro-indentation graphic: (a) S1-HA, (b) S2-HA, (c) S3-HA.
Water contact angle values on the surface of alloys studied.
| Alloy | S1-HA | S2-HA | S3-HA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liquid used | Water | ||
| Contact angle (degrees) | 73.61 | 45.64 | 57.93 |
Figure 7Images of the water drop on the surface of the alloys: (a) S1-HA, (b) S2-HA, (c) S3-HA.