| Literature DB >> 34945224 |
Abstract
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is characterized by delays in diagnosis and modest effect of treatment in terms of joint response. An understanding of molecular pathomechanisms may aid in developing diagnostic and prognostic models. Genetic susceptibility (e.g., HLA class I genes, IL-23-related genes) can be responsible for the pattern of psoriatic manifestations and affinity for tissue involvement. Gene expression analysis indicates an inflammatory profile that is distinct for PsA, but disparate across tissues. This has clinical implications, as for example, dual blockade of IL-17A and IL-17F can lead to superior clinical effects if there is differential expression of IL-17 receptors in tissues. Structural and functional impairment of barrier tissue, including host-microbiome interactions, may be the source of immune activation. Interplay between different cell populations of innate and adaptive immunity is emerging, potentially providing a link between the transition of skin-to-joint disease. Th17 subsets, IL-17A, IL-17F and IL-23 are crucial in PsA pathogenesis, with both clinical and experimental evidence suggesting a differential molecular landscape in cutaneous and articular compartments.Entities:
Keywords: immune; inflammation; interleukin-17; interleukin-23; modulation; pathomechanism; psoriatic arthritis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945224 PMCID: PMC8706996 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1A proposed schematic of psoriatic arthritis pathogenesis with associated points of origin and cellular interactions. Panel A shows three main factors that interact with and shape the psoriatic sub-phenotype: (1) genetic susceptibility (e.g. gene alterations involving T-cell activity, IL-23/Th17 signaling or TNF pathways), which could dysregulate an immune response (also mechanisms akin to spondyloarthritis, in which HLA-B27 misfolding can enhance IL-23 production), (2) infection or dysbiosis, which disturbs skin and gut microenvironment and can incite pro-inflammatory responses by contact with pathogen- or damage- associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs), (3) biomechanical stress that leads to processes of injury and repair, which, if augmented due to genetic predisposition (e.g., entheseal disease susceptible to low mechanical stress and MHC Class I or IL-23 receptor polymorphisms), could influence resident immune cell populations towards production pro-inflammatory cytokines. Panel B and C depict pathological processes in gut and entheseal tissues that could incite, uphold or alter the immune processes leading to PsA (e.g., certain strains can augment Th17 type responses; IL-23 production following endoplasmic reticulum stress can be triggered by bacteria; for a detailed discussion on pathobionts in spondyloarthropathy see [47]). In entheses and/or gut mucosa, triggers such as PAMPs/DAMPs engage a variety of local cells, promote IL-23 production and stimulate immune cell infiltration and production of cytokines. Depending on the tissue, IL-17 and IL-22 may have positive or negative effects on barrier integrity that are weighed with respect to inflammatory TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6 activity. Panel D complex interactions between immune cells and microenvironment can lead to bone remodeling (based on [23], more detailed discussion on pathways is provided therein). Antigen-presenting cells release a host of cytokines in response to stimulus (e.g., IL-1beta, IL-6, TNFα, PAMPs/DAMPs) and can also present self-antigens. Th1 and Th17 cells respond and produce several cytokines and growth factors, as depicted, that jointly interact to regulate ongoing processes of osteoblastogenesis/osteoclastogenesis. Bone resorption or new bone formation can alternate depending on the shift between cellular interactions and respective signaling. For example, the effects of cytokines could be stimulating or inhibiting depending on a number of additional factors (e.g., local cytokine milieu or state of cell differentiation).
Theoretical explanations to clinical questions of interest based on the studies discussed in this review.
| Clinical Questions of Interest | Potential Justification |
|---|---|
| Are clinical manifestations in PsA consistent with the theorized point of origin? |
Although the entheses are viewed as the origin point of psoriatic disease, clinical manifestations may begin with e.g., dactylitis or axial disease. Typical manifestations are rarely uniform in patient populations, just as arthritis is not always preceded by cutaneous disease. Recent data suggest that PsA that we diagnose clinically is a disease that has been ongoing subclinically for months to years and as such, the characteristic features that we tie to PsA rather represent tissue involvement at a chronic, established phase of disease. |
| Why is considerable heterogeneity present across spondyloarthritis and even psoriatic arthritis itself? |
Propensity for specific disease phenotype (i.e., the extent and time course of manifestations) seems to be based on genetic susceptibility (e.g., HLA-B and C-alleles; for instance, due to the autoimmune mechanisms associated with misfolding of MHC class complex) and the specifics of the maladaptive immune response (e.g., predominance of cytokine pathways in specific tissue, interactions between affected organs, immune priming). Environmental triggers or genetic changes may alter the antigen presenting cell state, promote inflammatory signaling and result in an autoimmune response to self-peptides. Each individual differs in their repertoire of peptide recognition, and thus heterogeneity in HLA class genes contributes to differential adaptive immune responses, which are further altered by stimulus from the local microenvironment. Interactions between susceptibility alleles may also compound to affect the risk and/or presentation of disease. |
| What can be responsible for variability in treatment response in PsA? | Clinical problem: Despite several biologic and small molecule drugs being extensively tested in PsA, the response rates remain suboptimal. Even drug changes with respect to cytokine-targets do not always alleviate refractory disease.
It can be suspected that immune pathways in PsA are driven by different combinations of infiltrating and resident cells, with numerous interactions between cells of the microenvironment (e.g., fibroblasts, synoviocytes and mesenchymal cells). Innate responses can trigger the adaptive arm of immunity, which underlies the importance of barrier tissues and the skin and gut microbiome. Synergism between cytokines can augment inflammatory processes. T-cell cytokine functionality should be considered as a potential explanation. Moreover, IL-17-producing cell subsets do not always require IL-23 stimulation, while IL-17A/F receptor expression and cytokine production differ considerably across cells and tissue, which can explain the difficulties with different biologics. An individual’s genotype may also alter interactions between immune subsets and promote signaling through certain pathways. The complex web of immune cell interactions is likely to significantly shift under the effects of targeting a single cytokine, and the change towards other pathways does not simply imply a resolution of disease. |
| Responses are based on the studies discussed in this review and particularly [ | |
Case-by-case summary of selected experimental studies discussed in this review.
| Reference | Design | Detailed Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Sherlock et al. [ | Murine model | IL-23 inhibition reduces entheseal inflammation, which is associated with downregulation of cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-1beta), chemokines (Cxcl1 and Cxcl2) and factors involved in bone remodeling (Rankl, Ctsk, MMPs). |
| Zayyadi et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | Inflammatory stimulus (IFN-gamma and TNF) enhances IL-22 receptor expression in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). |
| Baarsen et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | IL-17A is significantly elevated in synovium of inflammatory arthritis patients, but there is high heterogeneity across individuals. |
| Benham et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | IL-17+ and IL-22+ CD4+ T cells are elevated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of both PsA and PsO subjects, as compared with healthy subjects. |
| Wade et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | T-cell polyfunctionality with regard to cytokine expression is enhanced in synovial tissue and associated with disease activity, in contrast to monofunctional T cells. |
| Menon et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | PsA joints, but not those of RA patients, have enhanced levels of IL-17+ CD4- (CD8+) and IL-17+CD4+T cells. T cell subsets are associated with disease activity and erosive disease status. |
| Baricza et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | Naive CD4+CD45RO− T lymphocytes are shown to be predisposed to shift to Th17 and produce IL-17A and IL-22. |
| Uluckan et al. [ | Murine model | Increase in Th17 cells is concurrent with reduction in other T helper and regulatory cells (i.e., Th1, Th2 and Treg cells, which may prevent osteoclastogenesis). Osteoclast progenitor cells are likely to accumulate and RANKL may be enhanced due to augmentation of Th17 responses (In the experimental model of R26STAT3Cstopfl/fl CD4Cre mice). Conversely, osteoblasts are characterized by failure to develop. |
| Xu et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | CD4+ T cells are the major population in PsA synovial fluid and blood (as opposed to CD8+T cells). |
| Mulder et al. [ | In vitro experiment based on human tissue | Based on blood-based immune profiling, a reduction in CD4+ and CD8+ memory T-cell subsets, Treg cells and CD196+ and CD197+ monocytes in concert with elevated levels of differentiated CD4+ memory T-cells expressing CCR6 and CCR4 discriminates PsA from PsO. |