| Literature DB >> 34945147 |
Franziska Koppe-Schmeißer1, Melanie Schwaderlapp2, Julian Schmeißer1, Jörn F Dopheide3,4,5,6, Thomas Münzel1, Andreas Daiber1, Christine Espinola-Klein2.
Abstract
In patients with intermittent claudication, exercise training ameliorates inflammation by reducing oxidative stress. A total of 41 patients with intermittent claudication (Rutherford 3) were included in the study (with 21 patients treated by endovascular revascularization (ER), and 20 patients without ER). All patients were referred to home-based exercise training. Absolute and initial claudication distance (ACD, ICD) and ABI (ankle-brachial index) were measured. ROS (reactive oxygen species) formation was measured using the luminol analogue L-012. Follow-up was performed after 3 months. ROS production after NOX2 (NAPDH oxidase 2) stimulation showed a significant reduction in both groups at follow-up (PTA group: p = 0.002, control group: p = 0.019), with a higher relative reduction in ROS in the PTA group than in the control group (p = 0.014). ABI measurements showed a significant increase in the PTA (peripheral transluminal angioplasty) group (p = 0.001), but not in the control group (p = 0.127). Comparing both groups at follow-up, ABI was higher in the PTA group (p = 0.047). Both groups showed a significant increas ACD and ICD at follow-up (PTA group: ACD: p = 0.001, ICD: p < 0.0001; control group: ACD: p = 0.041, ICD: p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between both groups at follow-up (ACD: p = 0.421, ICD: p = 0.839). Endovascular therapy in combination with exercise training leads to a lower leukocyte activation state with a reduced NOX2-derived ROS production paralleled by an improved ABI, ACD and ICD. Our data support the strategy to combine exercise training with preceding endovascular therapy.Entities:
Keywords: exercise training; oxidative stress; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; peripheral arterial disease; reactive oxygen species
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945147 PMCID: PMC8708777 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Baseline categorical characteristics of the study population.
| Controls ( | PTA ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.00 (60.00; 76.00) | 63.00 (58.50; 76.00) | 0.51 |
| Gender (male) (%) | 13(65.00) | 12 (57.14) | 0.75 |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 9 (45.00) | 8 (38.10) | 0.76 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 7 (35.00) | 9 (42.86) | 0.75 |
| CAD (%) | 6 (30.00) | 4 (19.05) | 0.48 |
| Family history (%) | 14 (70.00) | 14 (66.67) | 1.00 |
| Active smoking (%) | 8 (40.00) | 10 (47.62) | 0.37 |
| Former smoking (%) | 12 (60.00) | 10 (47.62) | |
| Never smoking (%) | 0 | 1 (4.76) | |
| Pack-years | 47.00 (31.00; 67.25) | 52.50 (37.50; 60.00) | 0.71 |
| Aspirin (%) | 16 (80.00) | 15 (71.43) | 0.72 |
| Clopidogrel (%) | 1 (5.00) | 3 (14.29) | 0.61 |
| Marcumar (%) | 0 | 0 | |
| NOAK (%) | 1 (5.00) | 3 (14.29) | 0.61 |
| ACE-inhibitors/AT1-blocker (%) | 16 (80.00) | 12 (57.14) | 0.18 |
| Statin treatment (%) | 15 (75.00) | 18 (85.71) | 0.45 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.40 (24.90; 30.30) | 28.10 (25.10; 29.70) | 0.74 |
Values are given as median (25th percentile/75th percentile).
Baseline laboratory characteristics and markers of inflammation in the study population.
| Controls ( | PTA ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 100.00 (91.25; 124.75) | 111.00 (92.50; 178.00) | 0.24 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.85 (5.63; 6.50) | 6.0 0(5.70; 7.80) | 0.33 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 157.50 (89.50; 275.75) | 150.00 (109.00; 184.00) | 0.49 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 207.00 (147.00; 232.25) | 172.00 (155.50; 197.50) | 0.27 |
| LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 121.50 (65.25; 160.0) | 93.00 (73.00; 112.50) | 0.42 |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | 47.50 (40.25; 55.00) | 48.00 (40.00; 62.50) | 0.22 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 347.00 (312.00; 395.75) | 363.00 (310.00; 391.50) | 0.38 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 2.15 (0.93; 2.90) | 1.40 (0.77; 3.85) | 0.97 |
| Leucocytes/nL | 7.85 (6.11; 9.03) | 7.87 (6.73; 9.38) | 0.89 |
| Monocytes (%) | 6.60 (5.80; 8.00) | 6.60 (5.85; 7.35) | 0.82 |
| Monocytes/mL | 4.78 (4.02; 6.15) × 105 | 5.35 (4.25; 5.78) × 105 | 0.80 |
| PMN (%) | 61.60 (55.70; 67.40) | 61.10 (53.15; 64.25) | 0.56 |
| PMN/mL | 3.93 (3.20; 5.41) × 106 | 4.27 (3.16; 5.33) × 106 | 0.87 |
Values are given as median (25th percentile/75th percentile). Statistically significant changes are highlighted in bold.
ROS production.
| Admission | Follow-Up | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | |||
| Basal 20 min | 66.80 (42.10; 108.60) | 35.10 (19.80; 68.70) |
|
| PDBU 20 min | 42,349.10 (28,463.20; 58,558.10) | 30,313.10 (21,131.60; 46,581.10) | 0.05 |
| PTA | |||
| Basal 20 min | 57.10 (27.30; 94.10) | 20.30 (15.20; 38.70) |
|
| PDBU 20 min | 32,115.50 (23,013.70; 51,576.00) | 25,915.70 (17,244.30; 34,027.10) | 0.09 |
Values are given as median (25th percentile/75th percentile). Statistically significant changes are highlighted in bold.
Figure 1(a) Relative reduction in basal whole-blood (leukocyte) ROS production as % of the value at admission in the 2 treatment groups after 3 months. Data are presented as mean values. (b) Relative reduction in PDBu-stimulated ROS production as % of the value at admission in the 2 treatment groups after 3 months. Data are presented as mean values.
ABI, ACD and ICD at Baseline and after Follow-up in the PTA and Control Group.
| a. ABI, ACD and ICD at Baseline and after Follow-Up. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Controls ( | PTA ( | ||
| Ankle–brachial index (ABI) (m) | 0.84 (0.63;0.96) | 0.58 (0.50;0.75) |
|
| Ankle–brachial index (ABI) FU (m) | 0.73 (0.57; 0.86) | 0.90 (0.75; 1.00) |
|
| Absolute claudication distance (m) | 266.50 (123.75; 300.00) | 90.00 (73.50; 135.50) |
|
| Absolute claudication distance FU (m) | 300.00(180.00;300.00) | 300.00 (138.50; 300.00) | 0.42 |
| Initial claudication distance (m) | 115.00 (64.50; 235.00) | 60.00 (42.50; 93.00) |
|
| Initial claudication distance FU (m) | 200.00 (117.00; 300.00) | 200.00 (105.00; 300.00) | 0.84 |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Ankle–brachial index (ABI) (m) | 0.58 (0.50;0.75) | 0.90 (0.75; 1.00) |
|
| Absolute claudication distance (m) | 90.00 (73.50; 135.50) | 300.00 (138.50; 300.00) |
|
| Initial claudication distance (m) | 60.00 (42.50; 93.00) | 200.00 (105.00; 300.00) |
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Ankle–brachial index (ABI) (m) | 0.84 (0.63;0.96) | 0.73 (0.57; 0.86) | 0.13 |
| Absolute claudication distance (m) | 266.50 (123.75; 300.00) | 300.00 (180.00;300.00) |
|
| Initial claudication distance (m) | 115.00 (64.50; 235.00) | 200.00 (117.00; 300.00) |
|
Values are given as median (25th percentile/75th percentile). Statistically significant changes are highlighted in bold.
Figure 2(a) Absolute claudication distance in the 2 treatment groups at baseline and at follow-up after 3 months with exercise training in both groups. Data are presented as mean and SD. (b) Initial claudication distance in the 2 treatment groups at baseline and at follow-up after 3 months with exercise training in both groups. Data are presented as mean and SD.