| Literature DB >> 34944972 |
Quentin Fovez1, William Laine1, Laure Goursaud1,2, Celine Berthon2, Nicolas Germain1,3, Claire Degand1, Jean-Emmanuel Sarry4, Bruno Quesnel1,2, Philippe Marchetti1,3, Jerome Kluza1.
Abstract
Resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) exhibits mitochondrial energy metabolism changes compared to newly diagnosed AML. This phenotype is often observed by evaluating the mitochondrial oxygen consumption of blasts, but most of the oximetry protocols were established from leukemia cell lines without validation on primary leukemia cells. Moreover, the cultures and storage conditions of blasts freshly extracted from patient blood or bone marrow cause stress, which must be evaluated before determining oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Herein, we evaluated different conditions to measure the oxygen consumption of blasts using extracellular flow analyzers. We first determined the minimum number of blasts required to measure OXPHOS. Next, we compared the OXPHOS of blasts cultured for 3 h and 18 h after collection and found that to maintain metabolic organization for 18 h, cytokine supplementation is necessary. Cytokines are also needed when measuring OXPHOS in cryopreserved, thawed and recultured blasts. Next, the concentrations of respiratory chain inhibitors and uncoupler FCCP were established. We found that the FCCP concentration required to reach the maximal respiration of blasts varied depending on the patient sample analyzed. These protocols provided can be used in future clinical studies to evaluate OXPHOS as a biomarker and assess the efficacy of treatments targeting mitochondria.Entities:
Keywords: OCR; XFe24 Seahorse; XFe96 Seahorse; energy metabolism; functional biomarker; leukemia; resistance; uncoupling respiration
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944972 PMCID: PMC8699320 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Patient characteristics including sex, age, the French-American-British (FAB) classification of AML and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification: favorable (1), intermediate (2) or adverse risk (3), s-AML: secondary AML, N.D.: No Data and NA: Not Applicable.
| Patient | Sex | Age | FAB | ELN | Cytogenetic Karyotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML#1 | F | 88 | M5a | 3 | 47, XX, +6, +8, del(9)(q21), −12, +13, del(17)(p11) |
| AML#2 | M | 65 | M2 | N.D. | 46, XY, t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), der(16) t(1;16)(q21;q24) |
| AML#3 | F | 75 | M1 | 2 | 46, XX, add(9)(q3?) |
| AML#4 | M | 69 | M0 | 3 | 46XY, Isochomosomy 11, del(17), t(17,21) |
| AML##5 | M | 78 | M2 | 3 | 45, XY, t(3;3)(q21;q26), −7 |
| AML#6 | M | 65 | N.D. | 3 | 46,XY,del(7)(q12q36)/47,XY,+21/46,XY |
| AML#7 | M | 70 | M1 | 2 | 46,XY |
| AML#8 | M | 50 | M1 | 2 | 46,XY |
| AML#9 | M | 71 | M5a | 3 | 47,XY,t(1;14)(p32;q32),del(7)(q22q34),der(7)t(7;11)(q34;q22),+13 |
| AML#10 | F | 49 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| AML#11 | M | 38 | s-AML | NA | N.D. |
| AML#12 | F | 46 | M2 | 1 | 46,XX,t(8;21)(q22;q22)/45,sl,-X,del(9)(q22) |
| AML#13 | M | 54 | M1 | 1 | 46,XY |
| AML#14 | F | 67 | M1 | 2 | 46,XX |
| AML#15 | F | 58 | N.D. | 2 | 46,XX |
| AML#16 | M | 34 | N.D. | 3 | 45,XY,−7,−12,+mar |
| AML#17 | F | 86 | M4 | 3 | 44,X,-X,del(4)(q21),−8,add(9)(p24),add(11)(p15),−16,−17,−12,+19,−20,add(21)(p13),+mar |
| AML#18 | F | 67 | N.D. | 2 | 46,XX,i(7)(p10)/46,XX |
| AML#19 | M | 69 | M4 | 3 | 46,XY,t(7;21), RUNX1 |
| AML#20 | F | 86 | N.D. | 3 | 46,XX,−6,+8, del(7p) add17p |
| AML#21 | M | 30 | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| AML#22 | M | 67 | M3 | 1 | 46,XY,t(15;17)(q24;q21)/46,XY, PML-RARα |
| AML#23 | M | 59 | M4 | 2 | 46,XY, EVI1 overexpression |
| AML#24 | F | 90 | N.D. | N.D. | 46,XX |
| AML#25 | M | 72 | M4 | 1 | 46,XY,inv(16)(p13q22) |
| AML#26 | F | 81 | M4 | 2 | 46,XX |
| AML#27 | F | 63 | M5a | 3 | 48,XX,+8,t(9;11)(p22;q23),+ider(9)(p10).ish t(9;11)(3’KMT2A+;5’KMT2A+),ider(9)(3’KMT2Ax2), KMT2A-MLLT3, EVI1 overexpression |
XFe24 Settings for mitochondrial OXPHOS measurement.
| Settings | Cycles | Mix | Wait | Measure | Total Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | 3 | 2 min 40 s | 2 min | 2 min | 20 min |
| Oligomycin (2 µM) | 2 | 1 min 40 s | 2 min | 2 min | 11 min 20 s |
| FCCP1 (0.27–1.1 µM) or BAM15 (0.06–2 µM) | 2 | 1 min 40 s | 2 min | 2 min | 11 min 20 s |
| FCCP2 (0.55–2.2 µM) or BAM15 (0.13–2.5 µM) | 2 | 1 min 40 s | 2 min | 2 min | 11 min 20 s |
| Antimycin A + Rotenone (1 µM each) | 2 | 1 min 40 s | 1 min 20 s | 2 min | 10 min |
Figure 1AML cell numbers required to measure oxygen consumption with the XFe24 Seahorse. (A) Top panel: Cellular imaging of AML blasts (0.125 × 106 to 1 × 106 cells). Images display the wells of XFe24 cell plates obtained by brightfield light microscopy. Middle panel: Nuclei were stained using a Hoechst probe and visualized with a Cytation I fluorescence cell imager using a DAPI filter (scale bar = 1000 µm). The dotted rectangles represent the selected area of each well. Lower panel: Images obtained after Hoechst staining analyzed using Gen 5 software; the segmentations of the nuclei are shown in yellow (scale bar = 2000 µm). (B) Oxygen levels (mmHg) measured in the medium surrounding the AML blasts according to the number of cells per well. At the times indicated (see black arrows), the following drugs were injected: oligomycin A (Oligo; 2 µM), FCCP1 (1.1 µM), FCCP2 (2.2 µM), and antimycin A and rotenone (AA/Rot; 1 µM each). Red dots represent the oxygen levels measured in the wells containing only medium (used for background correction). (C) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR; pmol.min−1) of blasts from AML patients according to the number of cells per well. Data are the means ± SEM (at least n = 3 wells per group). All experiments were performed with blasts freshly collected from the blood of patient #16.
Figure 2Range of FCCP concentrations required to achieve maximal oxygen consumption in AML blasts. (A) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR; pmol∙min−1∙250,000 cells−1) of blasts from AML patients. After 20 min, 2 µM oligomycin (gray) or medium (black) was injected as indicated, followed by exposure to FCCP1 (1.1 µM), FCCP2 (2.2 µM) and antimycin A and rotenone (AA/Rot; 1 µM each). Experiments were performed with the blasts from the patients indicated in the upper right corner of the OCR profile. The histograms represent the maximal OCR, which corresponds to the highest OCR value measured during FCCP treatment for each condition. (B) Top panel-Oxygen consumption rate (OCR; pmol∙min−1∙250,000 cells−1) of the blasts from 20 AML patients according to the concentration of FCCP. Basal OCRs were measured before oligomycin A injection. Black arrows indicate the highest OCR value obtained after FCCP injection (maximal OCR). Data are the means ± SEM (at least n = 3 wells per group). Statistical analyses were conducted with Dunnett’s unidirectional ANOVA multiple comparison test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001). Bottom panel-Heat map of the OCR values obtained according to FCCP concentration. Data are expressed as a percentage of the maximal OCR.
Figure 3Assessment of the viabilities and OXPHOS parameters of blasts freshly collected from blood and cultured in RPMI medium. Cells were cultured in full RPMI medium for 3 h/18 h or in full RPMI medium supplemented with cytokines (CTK) for 18 h (see the Materials and methods section for the composition and concentrations of cytokines). Experiments were performed with blasts from AML patients #24 and #27. (A) Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Data are the means ± SD (n = 3). (B) OXPHOS parameters of blasts cultured as indicated (basal OCR, ATP turnover, proton leak, maximal OCR, non-Mt (nonmitochondrial respiration) and SRC (spare reserve capacity)). Data are the means ± SEM (at least n = 3 wells per group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Assessment of the viabilities and OXPHOS parameters of thawed AML blasts cultured for 18 h after cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen. (A–C) Thawed blasts were cultured in full RPMI (for 18 h) or in full RPMI supplemented with cytokines (18 h + CTK). (A) Viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Data are the means ± SD (n = 3). (B) Viable blasts were identified under both conditions by flow cytometry following Annexin V and SYTOX blue staining, and the percentages of blasts with a high mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨM) values were determined by TMRM labeling (percentages are indicated in the top right corner of the cytometric profile). The experiment was conducted with blasts from patient #21. (C) OXPHOS parameters (basal OCR, ATP turnover, proton leak, maximal OCR, non-Mt (nonmitochondrial respiration) and SRC (spare reserve capacity)) of the thawed blasts cultured as indicated. Data are the means ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.0001. Experiments were performed with the blasts from the AML patients indicated in the upper right corner of the histograms.
Figure 5Assessment of the OXPHOS parameters (Basal OCR (A), ATP-turnover (B), Proton leak (C) Maximal OCR (D), Nonmitochondrial OCR (E), Spare respiratory capacity (F)) of freshly collected blasts compared to their corresponding thawed blasts after cryopreservation. All samples were cultivated for 18 h in full RPMI medium supplemented with cytokines. Experiments were performed with the blasts from the AML patients indicated in the histograms. Data are the means ± SEM (at least n = 3 wells per group). * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 6OXPHOS parameters of the blasts isolated from the bone marrow or peripheral blood of AML patients. (A–F) OXPHOS parameters were measured in freshly isolated blasts from peripheral blood or bone marrow from 5 AML patients. (A) Basal OCR, (B) ATP turnover, (C) proton leak, (D) maximal OCR, (E) non-Mt (nonmitochondrial respiration) and (F) SRC (spare reserve capacity). All samples were cultivated for 18 h in full RPMI medium supplemented with cytokines. Data are the means ± SEM (at least n = 3 wells per group). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 7Schematic representation of the standardized protocol for evaluating OXPHOS in AML blasts. (A) Workflow representing each step required to analyze the OXPHOS of AML blasts with XFe24 or XFe96 Seahorse. The time required to complete each step is indicated. (B) Template organization of the plates used to analyze the OXPHOS parameters of the blasts from one AML patient with XFe24 Seahorse or for 6 AML patients with XFe96 Seahorse.