| Literature DB >> 34944352 |
Glenda Vélez-Calabria1, David Sánchez Peñaranda1, Miguel Jover-Cerdá1, Silvia Martínez Llorens1, Ana Tomás-Vidal1.
Abstract
The aquaculture of carnivorous fish is in continuous expansion, which leads to the need to reduce the dependence on fishmeal (FM). Plant proteins (PP) represent a suitable protein alternative to FM and are increasingly used in fish feed. However, PP may lead to stunted growth and enteritis. In the current study, the effect of high FM substitution by PP sources on the growth, mortality and intestinal health of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) was evaluated in terms of the histological intestine parameters and expression of genes related to inflammation (IL-1β, IL-8 and TGF-β) and immune responses (Transferrin, IgT and IFN-γ). The results show that a total substitution registered lower growth and survival rates, probably due to a disruption to the animal's health. Confirming this hypothesis, fish fed FM0 showed histological changes in the intestine and gene changes related to inflammatory responses, which in the long-term could have triggered an immunosuppression. The FM10 diet presented not only a similar expression to FM20 (control diet), but also similar growth and survival. Therefore, 90% of FM substitution was demonstrated as being feasible in this species using a PP blend of wheat gluten (WG) and soybean meal (SBM) as a protein source.Entities:
Keywords: amino acid supplement; fishmeal substitution; immune system; inflammation response; interleukins; intestinal track
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944352 PMCID: PMC8698200 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Formulation and proximate composition of experimental diets.
| Experimental Diets | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FM0 | FM10 | FM20 | |
|
| |||
| Fishmeal 1 | 0 | 100 | 200 |
| Wheat meal 2 | 116 | 158 | 201 |
| Wheat gluten 3 | 214 | 201 | 180 |
| Soybean meal 4 | 400 | 300 | 200 |
| Soybean oil | 88 | 89 | 90 |
| Fish oil | 100 | 91 | 82 |
| Calcium phosphate | 38 | 33 | 28 |
| Taurine 5 | 20 | 10 | 5 |
| Valine 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| L- Methionine 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| L-Lysine Clh 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Vitamin-mineral mix 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
|
| |||
| Dry matter (DM) | 913 | 912 | 912 |
| Crude protein (CP) | 446 | 440 | 434 |
| Crude lipid (CL) | 191 | 190 | 192 |
| Ash | 42 | 68 | 75 |
|
| |||
| Carbohydrates (CHO) 7 | 322 | 302 | 299 |
| Calculated GE (MJ kg−1) 8 | 22.5 | 22.6 | 23.3 |
1 Fishmeal: (93.2% DM, 70.7% CP, 8.9% CL, 15.1% Ash); Vicens I Batllori S.L., Girona, Spain. 2 Wheat meal (92.4% DM, 17.1% CP, 2.4% CL, 78.3% CHO, 2.4% Ash); Piensos Y Cereales Desco, Museros, Valencia, Spain. 3 Wheat gluten: (70.9% CP, 1.3% CL, 34.1% CHO, 1.5% Ash); Dadelos Agrícola, Valencia, Spain. 4 Soybean meal: (88.2% DM, 49.9% CP, 2.2% CL, 7.1% Ash); Piensos Y Cereales Desco, Valencia, Spain. 5 Taurine, Valine, L-Methionine and L-Lysine: Guinama S.L.U. 6 Vitamin and mineral mix (values are g kg−1 except those in parentheses): Premix: 25; Choline, 10; DL-α-tocopherol, 5; ascorbic acid, 5; (PO4)2Ca3, 5. Premix composition: retinol acetate, 1,000,000 IU kg−1; calcipherol, 500 IU kg−1; DL-α-tocopherol, 10; menadione sodium bisulphite, 0.8; thiamine hydrochloride, 2.3; riboflavin, 2.3; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 15; cyanocobalamine, 25; nicotinamide, 15; pantothenic acid, 6; folic acid, 0.65; biotin, 0.07; ascorbic acid, 75; inositol,15; betaine, 100; polypeptides 12. Zn, 5; Se, 0.02; I, 0,5; Fe, 0.2; CuO, 15; Mg, 5.75; Co, 0.02; Met, 1.2; Cys, 0.8; Lys, 1.3; Arg, 0.6; Phe, 0.4; Trcp, 0.7; excpt. 1000 g. 7 Carbohydrates (g kg−1) = 100−CP (g kg−1)−CL (g kg−1)−Ash (g kg−1). 8 Calculated energy (MJ kg−1) = [(51.8 × C)–(19.4 × N)]. The C–N was analyzed by way of the Dumas principle (TruSpec CN; Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA). Calculated according to Brouwer [47].
General information about the target and reference genes.
| Category | Gen/Protein Description | Abbrev. | Primer Sequence | GenBank | BP Size | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | Reverse | ||||||
| Housekeeping genes |
|
| GCCGGCCGCGACCTCACAGACTAC | CGGCCGTGGTGGTGAAGCTGTAAC | EZ908974 | 73 | Evenhuis and Cleveland, [ |
|
|
| ACCCTCCTCTTGGTCGTTTC | TGATGACACCAACAGCAACA | AF498320 | 63 | Kania et al. [ | |
|
| 5’CCACCTCCAGGGCCATTAAATG3’ | 5’ATCCACCGCTATGGCATCTGCC3’ | D89083 | Talbot et al. [ | |||
| Immune |
|
| AACATCACCTGGCACATCAA | TTCAGGTTGCCCTTTGATTC | AY870265 | 80 | Evenhuis and Cleveland, [ |
|
|
| CTGTTCAACGGAAACCCTGT | AACACCCTCCGATCACTGTC | NM 001160503 | 62 | Evenhuis and Cleveland, [ | |
|
|
| ACATTGCCAACCTCATCATCG | TTGAGCAGGTCCTTGTCCTTG | AJ223954 | 91 | Pérez-Sánchez et al. [ | |
| Inflammatory |
|
| CTCGCAACTGGACTGACAAA | TGGCTGACATTCTGATGCTC | AJ279069 | 148 | Evenhuis and Cleveland, [ |
|
|
| TCCGCTTCAAAATATCAGGG | TGATGGCATTTTCATGGCTA | X99303 | 71 | Evenhuis and Cleveland, [ | |
Effect of the different diets on growth and nutritive parameters in rainbow trout.
| Experimental Diets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM0 | FM10 | FM20 | ||
| Initial weight (g) | 13.60 ± 0.23 | 13.43 ± 0.23 | 13.13 ± 0.23 | 0.3911 |
| Final weight (g) | 49.07 | 72.94 | 72.24 | 0.0001 |
| Survival (%) | 51.11 | 81.67 | 93.33 | 0.0046 |
| SGR 1 (% day−1). | 1.73 | 2.24 | 2.21 | 0.0043 |
| FI (g 100 g fish−1 day−1) 2 | 2.10 | 1.85 | 1.79 | 0.0188 |
| FCR 3 | 1.52 | 1.09 | 1.01 | 0.0018 |
| PER 4 | 1.62 | 2.31 | 2.49 | 0.0025 |
1 SGR, Specific growth rate = 100 × ln (final weight/initial weight)/days. 2 FI, feed intake = 100 × feed consumption (g)/average biomass (g) × days. 3 FCR, feed conversion ratio = feed consumption (g)/biomass gain (g). 4 PER, protein efficiency ratio = biomass gain (g)/protein intake (g). Means of triplicate groups. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Values in the same row with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Initial weight was considered as covariable for final weight and SGR.
Effect of the different diets on proximal and distal measurements in rainbow trout.
| Experimental Diets | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM0 | FM10 | FM20 | ||
|
| ||||
| VL (µm) | 782.8 ± 77.6 | 831.6 ± 56.0 | 715.2 ± 47.5 | 0.2850 |
| VT (µm) | 209.9 | 164.6 | 149.8 | 0.0026 |
| LP (µm) | 53.7 | 35.4 | 33.7 | 0.0012 |
| GC | 2.7 | 8.9 | 15.2 | 0.0000 |
| SL (µm) | 67.8 ± 5.3 | 55.3 ± 4.7 | 62.7 ± 4.6 | 0.2184 |
| ML (µm) | 152.7 ± 13.0 | 117.3 ± 11.6 | 140.6 ± 11.4 | 0.1214 |
| SML (µm) | 60.8 ± 5.0 | 59.3 ±4.5 | 57.5 ± 4.4 | 0.8834 |
|
| ||||
| VL (µm) | 547.5 ± 134.3 | 754.2 ± 54.8 | 756.8 ± 60.0 | 0.3396 |
| VT (µm) | 135.91 ± 26.9 | 160.88 ± 11.1 | 168.4 ± 11.8 | 0.5404 |
| LP (µm) | 26.9 ± 3.7 | 31.0 ± 1.5 | 33.2 ± 1.6 | 0.2633 |
| GC | 2.1 | 9.4 | 14.0 | 0.0006 |
| SL (µm) | 70.9 ± 12.6 | 80.0 ± 7.0 | 67.3 ± 9.6 | 0.5428 |
| ML (µm) | 93.3 ± 15.8 | 110.1 ± 8.7 | 110.4 ± 11.9 | 0.6266 |
| SML (µm) | 66.2 ± 7.1 | 50.1 ± 3.9 | 56.3 ± 5.3 | 0.1437 |
VL, villi length; VT, villi thickness; LP, lamina propria; GC, goblet cells; SL, serous layer; ML, muscular layer; SML, submucous layer. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 18). Different letters in the same line denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
p-values obtained after multifactor analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Function | Immune system | Immune system | Immune system | Inflammatory | Inflammatory | Inflammatory |
| Section | 0.1966 | 0.2457 | 0.7111 | 0.1358 | 0.201 | 0.4442 |
| Diet | 0.1905 | 0.2857 | 0.0042 | 0.0088 | 0.018 | 0.4428 |
| Interaction (section × diet) | ||||||
| FM0-Ant vs. FM10-Ant vs. FM20-Ant | 0.2137 | 0.0608 | 0.0177 | 0.014 | 0.0271 | 0.2446 |
| FM0-Pos vs. FM10-Pos vs. FM20-Pos | 0.4101 | 0.6864 | 0.2198 | 0.0512 | 0.2386 | 0.9588 |
| FM0-Ant vs. FM0-Pos | 0.8031 | 0.8249 | 0.5844 | 0.2244 | 0.7244 | 0.6994 |
| FM10-Ant vs. FM10-Pos | 0.1086 | 0.3628 | 0.1074 | 0.1703 | 0.2292 | 0.3474 |
| FM20-Ant vs. FM20-Pos | 0.2350 | 0.0620 | 0.5153 | 0.6035 | 0.3455 | 0.1546 |
Values with asterisk indicate significant differences were found (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Gene expression of (A) IgT; (B) Transferrin; (C) IFN-γ; (D) IL-8; (E) IL-1β and (F) TGF-β genes taking into consideration intestinal section (anterior and posterior) and diet (FM0, FM10 and FM20). Lowercase letters reflect significant differences (p < 0.05) between diets in anterior section and capital letters reflect significant differences in posterior section.