| Literature DB >> 34944305 |
Ran Di1, Fengyan Wang1, Ping Yu1, Xiangyu Wang1, Xiaoyun He1, Joram Mwashigadi Mwacharo2,3, Linxiang Pan4, Mingxing Chu1.
Abstract
Litter size is an important economic trait in the mutton sheep industry. BMP15 is one of the key candidate genes for litter size in sheep. In this study, the entire ORF region of BMP15 was sequenced in 154 Luzhong mutton ewes, and the novel variations were determined. The association between polymorphism in BMP15 and litter size was analyzed using a general linear model. Six out of a total of thirteen variations were identified to be novel. Association analysis indicated that four (SNPs ENSOART00000010201.1:c.352+342C>A, c.352+1232T>C, c.352+1165A>G and c.353-2036T>A) were significantly associated with litter size. The joint analysis among three major genes (BMP15, BMPR1B and GDF9) exhibited significant interaction effects in three combinations (FecB and c.352+1232T>C of BMP15; FecB and c.352+1165A>G of BMP15; c.352+342C>A of BMP15 and ENSOART00000014382.1:c.994G>A of GDF9). For the SNPs c.352+1232T>C and c.352+342C>A, the global distribution of allele frequencies showed that the highest variation frequency occurs in Western Europe. In conclusion, the results demonstrated that BMP15 is a major gene for litter size in Luzhong mutton sheep and candidate SNPs associated with litter size were identified.Entities:
Keywords: BMP15; FecB; GDF9; litter size; sheep
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944305 PMCID: PMC8698048 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Amplification primers for the BMP15 gene in Luzhong mutton sheep.
| Primer Name | Primer Sequence (5′–3′) | Annealing Temperature/°C | Amplified Fragment/bp |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTGCCTGCCAGCCTTTCAT | 60 | 718 | |
| ACATCAATGAGTTGCCCTG | |||
| GGGAAAACCGCACCATTG | 60 | 843 | |
| CAGAAGCAACTATGAGGGAA | |||
| GGCTGTTTGTCTTGTTTTAT | 60 | 892 | |
| GAAGATGTGGGTTTGAT | |||
| AGGTGTGTGTGCGAACTCAG | 60 | 488 | |
| CATTTGCTGTGCTGTACCAC | |||
| CATCTTCCGTGTTTCCT | 60 | 703 | |
| CCTATTTCATTCTTTGGT | |||
| AGGCATTGTTCTAGGTGTTGG | 60 | 1084 | |
| CCTTTTACCTGCTGGTAAACAC | |||
| TTCCTGGCCCTGATCCTTAG | 60 | 1021 | |
| CACTGTTTCCCCATCTATTTGC | |||
| GTTCATGGATTCAGTGGAGAAGG | 60 | 1179 | |
| CCAAACTGTGATGCTGACACC | |||
| GTTTGGGTGAACTCCAGGAGT | 60 | 1061 | |
| CATTTTGCAGACGAGGAAACT | |||
| TGTATTTGAGGTGTTTTTCTCCG | 60 | 1381 | |
| AAGTACAATGCTGAAGGCAAGG |
Figure 1Sequence profiles of 13 variations in the BMP15 gene in Luzhong mutton sheep. (A) Sequence profile of the CTT base deletion at the ENSOART00000010201.1: c.58_60 in exon 1. (B) Sequence profile of the 12 base substitutions in intron 1 and exon 2.
The detailed information of 13 variations in the BMP15 gene in Luzhong sheep.
| Region | Location in ENSOART000 | Genomic Location | Wild | Mutant | Amino Acid Change | Variations in Ensembl Database |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exon 1 | c.58_60del | 50986688–50986686 | CTT | del | Leu (L)11 del | Yes (rs592773279) |
| Exon 2 | c.782T>C | 50980656 | T | C | Leu (L) 252 Pro (P) | Yes (rs55628000) |
| c.747G>T | 50980691 | G | T | Gln (Q) 240 His (H) | No | |
| Intron 1 | c.353-1303T>G | 50982388 | T | G | - | No |
| c.353-1453T>C | 50982538 | T | C | - | Yes (rs403715147) | |
| c.353-2036T>A | 50983121 | T | A | - | No | |
| c.352+1937T>C | 50984457 | T | C | - | No | |
| c.352+1778C>T | 50984616 | C | T | - | No | |
| c.352+1323C>T | 50985071 | C | T | - | Yes (rs420350765) | |
| c.352+1232T>C | 50985162 | T | C | - | Yes (rs400940002) | |
| c.352+1165A>G | 50985229 | A | G | - | No | |
| c.352+419G>A | 50985975 | G | A | - | Yes (rs412881200) | |
| c.352+342C>A | 50986052 | C | A | - | Yes (rs426251007) |
Population genetic analysis for variations of BMP15 in Luzhong mutton sheep.
| Variations | Genotype Frequency | Allele Frequency |
|
|
| Chi-Square Test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c.352+342C>A | CC | AC | AA | C | A | ||||
| 0.844(130) | 0.156(24) | 0.000(0) | 0.922 | 0.078 | 0.133 | 0.144 | 1.168 | 0.294 | |
| c.352+419G>A | GG | AG | AA | G | A | ||||
| 0.974(150) | 0.026(4) | 0.000(0) | 0.987 | 0.013 | 0.025 | 0.026 | 1.026 | 0.870 | |
| c.352+1165A>G | AA | AG | GG | A | G | ||||
| 0.935(144) | 0.065(10) | 0.000(0) | 0.967 | 0.033 | 0.061 | 0.063 | 1.067 | 0.677 | |
| c.352+1232T>C | CC | CT | TT | C | T | ||||
| 0.234(36) | 0.532(82) | 0.234(36) | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.375 | 0.500 | 2.000 | 0.420 | |
| c.352+1323C>T | CC | CT | TT | C | T | ||||
| 0.299(46) | 0.558(86) | 0.143(22) | 0.578 | 0.422 | 0.369 | 0.488 | 1.952 | 0.073 | |
| c.352+1778C>T | CC | CT | TT | C | T | ||||
| 0.987(152) | 0.013(2) | 0.000(0) | 0.993 | 0.007 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 1.013 | 0.935 | |
| c.352+1937T>C | TT | CT | CC | T | C | ||||
| 0.974(150) | 0.026(4) | 0.000(0) | 0.987 | 0.013 | 0.025 | 0.026 | 1.026 | 0.870 | |
| c.353-2036T>A | TT | AT | AA | T | A | ||||
| 0.961(148) | 0.039(6) | 0.000(0) | 0.980 | 0.020 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 1.040 | 0.805 | |
| c.353-1453T>C | CC | CT | TT | C | T | 0.073 | |||
| 0.234(36) | 0.571(88) | 0.195(30) | 0.520 | 0.480 | 0.375 | 0.499 | 1.997 | ||
| c.353-1303T>G | TT | GT | GG | T | G | 0.935 | |||
| 0.987(152) | 0.013(2) | 0.000(0) | 0.994 | 0.007 | 0.013 | 0.013 | 1.013 | ||
| c.747G>T | GG | GT | TT | G | T | 0.497 | |||
| 0.896(132) | 0.104(22) | 0.000(0) | 0.948 | 0.052 | 0.094 | 0.099 | 1.109 | ||
| c.782T>C | CC | CT | TT | C | T | 0.000 | |||
| 0.013(2) | 0.662(102) | 0.325(50) | 0.344 | 0.656 | 0.349 | 0.451 | 1.823 | ||
| c.58_60del | CTT/CTT | CTT/--- | ---/--- | CTT | --- | 0.001 | |||
| 0.234(36) | 0.623(96) | 0.143(22) | 0.545 | 0.455 | 0.373 | 0.496 | 1.984 | ||
Least-square means and standard errors of litter size for different genotypes in Luzhong ewes.
| Variation | Genotype | Litter Size (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|
| c.352+342C>A | CA(24) | 2.083 a ± 0.647 |
| CC(130) | 1.531 b ± 0.648 | |
| c.352+419G>A | GG(150) | 1.620 a ± 0.681 |
| AG(4) | 1.500 a ± 0.535 | |
| c.782T>C | CT(102) | 1.686 a ± 0.702 |
| CC(2) | 1.500 a ± 0.000 | |
| TT(50) | 1.460 a ± 0.610 | |
| c.353-1453T>C | CC(36) | 1.611 a ± 0.595 |
| TT(88) | 1.833 a ± 0.785 | |
| CT(30) | 1.545 a ± 0.657 | |
| c.352+1323C>T | CC(46) | 1.652 a ± 0.636 |
| TT(22) | 1.558 a ± 0.623 | |
| CT(86) | 1.773 a ± 0.912 | |
| c.352+1232T>C | TT(36) | 1.861 a ± 0.827 |
| CT (82) | 1.639 ab ± 0.635 | |
| CC (36) | 1.500 b ± 0.591 | |
| c.352+1165A>G | AA(144) | 1.645 a ± 0.683 |
| AG(10) | 1.200 b ± 0.410 | |
| c.352+1778C>T | CC(152) | 1.612 a ± 0.670 |
| CT(2) | 2.000 a ± 1.155 | |
| c.352+1937T>C | TT(150) | 1.613 a ± 0.672 |
| CT(4) | 1.750 a ± 0.886 | |
| c.353-2036T>A | TT(148) | 1.608 b ± 0.675 |
| TA(6) | 1.833 a ± 0.718 | |
| c.353-1303T>G | TT(152) | 1.625 a ± 0.678 |
| TG(2) | 1.000 a ± 0.000 | |
| c.747G>T | GG(132) | 1.674 a ± 0.684 |
| GT(22) | 1.125 a ± 0.336 | |
| c.58_60del | CTT/---(96) | 1.573 a ± 0.643 |
| ---/---(22) | 1.727 a ± 0.634 | |
| CTT/CTT(36) | 1.667 a ± 0.787 |
Note: Different letters (a, b) for litter size indicates significant differences (p < 0.05). The number after the genotype denotes the number of ewes with a different genotype.
Results of interactive effects between FecB or GDF9 c.994G>A and four variations associated with litter size in the BMP15 gene.
|
| c.352+342C>A | 0.147 |
| 0.039 | ||
|
| c.352+1232T>C | 0.041 |
| 0.805 | ||
|
| c.352+1165A>G | 0.010 |
| 0.448 | ||
|
| c.353-2036T>A | 0.772 |
| 0.170 |
Figure 2Allele frequency distribution of the variation c.352+342C>A in the BMP15 gene.
Figure 3Allele frequency distribution of the variation c.352+1232T>C in the BMP15 gene.