| Literature DB >> 34944294 |
Robert Kasprzak1, Anna Beata Grzeszkiewicz1, Aleksandra Górecka1.
Abstract
Little to no research has been conducted thus far regarding aquarium fish nutrition. In order to ensure the welfare of house-kept ornamentals, such studies should take into account that there are distinct biological differences occurring between different fish species/taxa, especially in regard to the structure of their digestive organs. Accordingly, a 12-week trial was executed to assess the effects of two commercial flakes and a mix of lyophilized natural food on the condition of co-reared neon tetras, Paracheirodon innesi (Characidae), and glowlight rasboras, Trigonostigma hengeli (Danionidae). The four feeding groups were as follows: (T)-Tetra flakes; (O)-Omega flakes; (TO)-Tetra + Omega; (TOL)-Tetra + Omega + Lyophilizate (twice a week). There were no differences in final body weight (FBW) between the feeding groups of either species, but in the case of neon tetras, FBW increased significantly from the initial value only for the T group. However, histological observations and measurements of digestive organs (livers, intestines) showed pronounced differences between the two species. The supplementation with natural food in group TOL caused lipoid hepatic degeneration only in the rasboras. The healthiest histological structure of livers and longest intestinal folds were found in group T of the tetras and group TO of the rasboras. Whole-mount staining for bone and cartilage did not reveal any significant deformities or differences in terms of bone mineralization. In conclusion, it was outlined that concurrent feeding of co-housed, anatomically diverse ornamental fish species is a highly ambiguous task, because the nutritional strategy applied for a community tank may yield radically divergent effects, most of which may remain unnoticed when depending only on external body observations and measurements. Most emphatically, this was highlighted in regard to the dietary supplementation with natural food-although no significant effects were observed in neon tetras, severe lipoid liver degeneration occurred in glowlight rasboras.Entities:
Keywords: aquaristics; digestive organs; histology; liver; ornamental fish; skeletal double staining
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944294 PMCID: PMC8697964 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123520
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Proximate composition and main ingredients of the three feeds used in the study.
| TetraMin Flakes | Omega One Freshwater Flakes | Lyophilizate Mix | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein * (%) | 47.8 | 43.3 | 36.4 |
| Crude fat * (%) | 10.4 | 11.6 | 7.7 |
| Crude fiber * (%) | 2.7 | 0.9 | 5.4 |
| Ash * (%) | 6.3 | 8.0 | 4.9 |
| Moisture (%) | 5.7 | 6.6 | 5.2 |
| Main ingredients | Fish and fish derivatives, | Salmon (20%), Halibut (16%), | Lyophilized: |
| Additives | Vit. A (37,680 IU/kg), | Vit. A (15,400 IU/kg), Vit. C (0.88 g/kg), | N/A |
*—Calculated as a percentage of dry matter (DM).
Weekly feeding schedule applied for the four experimental groups during the trial period of 12 weeks.
| Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday | Saturday | Sunday | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meal Time | 9:00 | 16:00 | 9:00 | 16:00 | 9:00 | 16:00 | 9:00 | 16:00 | 9:00 | 16:00 | 9:00 | 16:00 | 9:00 | 16:00 |
| Group T |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No meals | |
| Group O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group TO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Group TOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
T—TetraMin Flakes; O—Omega One Freshwater Flakes; L—Lyophilizate mix.
FBW, IBW, SGR and final survival of neon tetras and glowlight rasboras in the trial.
| T | O | TO | TOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neon | IBW (mg) | 275 ± 44 | 269 ± 48 | 272 ± 50 | 274 ± 58 |
| FBW (mg) | 384 | 344 ± 72 | 371 ± 118 | 343 ± 47 | |
| SGR (% day−1) | 0.398 | 0.289 | 0.371 | 0.269 | |
| Survival | 12/16 (75%) | 9/16 (56%) | 11/16 (69%) | 13/16 (81%) | |
| Glowlight | IBW (mg) | 225 ± 64 | 229 ± 61 | 226 ± 56 | 228 ± 89 |
| FBW (mg) | 352 | 348 | 359 | 380 | |
| SGR (% day−1) | 0.534 | 0.497 | 0.548 | 0.609 | |
| Survival | 16/16 (100%) | 15/16 (94%) | 16/16 (100%) | 12/16 (75%) |
Initial body weight (IBW) and final body weight (FBW) were given as group means ± SD. *—Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the IBW and FBW of each group.
Figure 1Histological pictures of lipoid degeneration found in liver parenchyma of studied fish. Transition zones between regular hepatocytes (RH) and adipocyte-like hepatocytes (✱) were shown in a specimen of neon tetra from group O (a,b) and two specimens of glowlight rasbora from group TOL (c,d). Hematoxylin-eosin stain, scale bars = 50 µm.
Hepatocyte parameters of neon tetras and glowlight rasboras in the experiment.
| “Initial” | T | O | TO | TOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neon | NA (µm2) | 20.76 | 21.23 | 22.08 | 20.91 | 23.01 |
| CA (µm2) | 79.74 | 55.87 | 62.32 | 47.66 | 45.61 | |
| NCI (%) | 28.78 | 45.32 | 44.94 | 49.15 | 59.01 | |
| Glowlight | NA (µm2) | 17.23 | 17.18 | 17.46 | 16.88 | 18.13 |
| CA (µm2) | 164.98 | 139.52 | 113.35 | 98.95 | 204.39 | |
| NCI (%) | 10.89 | 14.03 | 16.41 | 18.66 | 12.38 |
Nuclear area (NA), cytoplasmic area (CA) and nucleo-cytoplasmic index (NCI) were given as group means ± SD. Means with no common superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Representative histological pictures of liver parenchyma in each of the studied experimental groups of neon tetras and glowlight rasboras (subpictures named accordingly to group abbreviations). Hematoxylin-eosin stain, scale bars = 50 µm.
Figure 3Representative histological pictures from: (a) the post-pyloric part of the gut of neon tetras and (b) the anterior part of the gut of glowlight rasboras. Green lines depict the intestinal fold length measurements. Hematoxylin-eosin stain, scale bars = 100 µm.
Intestinal fold length (µm) of neon tetras and glowlight rasboras in the experiment.
| “Initial” | T | O | TO | TOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neon tetra FL | 157.76 | 259.03 | 231.00 | 171.77 | 215.55 |
| Glowlight rasbora FL | 158.91 | 157.55 | 160.77 | 179.18 | 159.01 |
Intestinal fold length (FL) was given as group means ± SD. Means with no common superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 4The image of a skeletal deformity found in a specimen of glowlight rasbora from group T. The black arrow points towards an abnormal flexion angle (compression) between the 4th and 5th caudal vertebrae. Whole-mount double staining for bone and cartilage, scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 5Representative images of caudal sections of the axial skeleton in each of the studied experimental groups of neon tetras and glowlight rasboras (subpictures named accordingly to group abbreviations). Whole-mount double staining for bone and cartilage, scale bars = 200 µm.
Figure 6Representative images of the cranium in each of the studied experimental groups of neon tetras and glowlight rasboras (subpictures named accordingly to group abbreviations). Whole-mount double staining for bone and cartilage, scale bars = 200 µm.