| Literature DB >> 34944124 |
Laura Falchi1, Maria Teresa Zedda1, Salvatore Pau1, Mauro Ledda1, Valentino Melosu1, Salvatore Pier Giacomo Rassu2.
Abstract
In ovine species, transcervical artificial insemination (TCAI) is limited by the poor quality of frozen-thawed semen and by the convoluted cervical lumen hampering the passage of inseminating devices. The aim of the study was to test the efficiency of three newly designed catheters with bent tips of 3.5 mm, 5.0 mm or 8.0 mm in terms of reproductive performances (experiment 1) and to compare the results of TCAI with the best performing catheter of experiment 1 to those obtained in ewes submitted to surgical incision of cervical folds (SICF) prior to insemination (experiment 2). The following parameters were assessed: time to pass the cervix; depth of cervical penetration; site of deposition of semen; pregnancy (PR); and lambing rates (LR). The results of experiment 1 indicated that the 5.0 mm tip catheter resulted in deeper and faster TCAI and higher PR and LR compared to 3.5 mm and 8.0 mm tip catheters (p < 0.05). In experiment 2, TCAI with the 5.0 mm catheter did not differ from TCAI after SICF in terms of depth of semen deposition, time to pass the cervix, PR and LR (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the use of a catheter that allowed transcervical uterine deposition of semen without excessive manipulation led to satisfactory pregnancy rates.Entities:
Keywords: TCAI; cervix; fertility; frozen–thawed semen; insemination gun; ovine
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944124 PMCID: PMC8698084 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Design of the two experiments. Abbreviations: N = number; D = day; TCAI = transcervical artificial insemination; SICF = surgical incision of cervical folds.
Figure 2(A) Tools used for transcervical artificial insemination. From top to bottom: Bozeman forceps for cervical retraction; Cassou insemination gun for small ruminants (IMV technologies, France), inserted into the insemination catheter, composed of a stainless-steel tube (length: 28.5 cm, inner diameter: 3.5 mm); (B) detail of one end of the catheter fitted with a screw system to keep the Cassou gun secured; (C) detail of the other end composed of a modified epidural needle (Ø 14 G) with a 45° bent rounded atraumatic tip of different lengths: 3.5 mm, 5.0 mm or 8.0 mm.
Figure 3(A) Cervix of a pluriparous Sarda ewe characterized by 5–6 cervical folds that protrude into the cervical lumen; position of the 5 mm tip catheter when semen was deposited beyond (B) the first two folds; (C) the 3rd–4th fold; (D) the 5th–6th fold; (E) in utero.
Pregnancy (PR) and lambing (LR) rates of ewes submitted to transcervical artificial insemination by three different catheters.
| Insemination Catheter Type | Ewes | PR | LR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 mm | 12 | 1 (8.3) a | 1 (8.3) a |
| 5.0 mm | 12 | 7 (58.3) b | 7 (58.3) b |
| 3.5 mm | 12 | 2 (16.6) ab | 2 (16.6) ab |
| Total | 36 | 10 (27.7) | 10 (27.7) |
Different superscripts (a,b) indicate within column significant differences for p < 0.05.
Pregnancy (PR) and lambing (LR) rates in relation to the site of semen deposition in the cervical lumen using three different catheters.
| Insemination Catheter Type | Site of Semen Deposition | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 Folds | 3–4 Folds | 5–6 Folds | In Utero | |||||||||
| Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | |
| 8.0 mm | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 a | 1 (20.0) | 1(20.0) | 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 a | 0 (0) a | 0 (0) a |
| 5.0 mm | 0 | - | - | 0 b | - | - | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 b | 7 (77.8) b | 7 (77.8) b |
| 3.5 mm | 0 | - | - | 4 a | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 | 1 (20.0) | 1(20.0) | 3 a | 1 (33.3) a | 1 (33.3) a |
| Overall | 2 | 0 (0) x | 0 (0) x | 9 | 1 (11.1) x | 1 (11.1) x | 13 | 1 (7.7) x | 1 (7.7) x | 12 | 8 (66.7) y | 8 (66.7) y |
Different superscripts indicate within column (a,b) and within row (x,y) significant differences for p < 0.05.
Pregnancy (PR) and lambing (LR) rates in relation to the time taken to reach the cervical lumen using three different catheters.
| Insemination Catheter Type | Time to Reach the Cervical Lumen | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <10 s | 10–30 s | 30–60 s | >60 s | |||||||||
| Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | |
| 8.0 mm | 0 a | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 11 a | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) |
| 5.0 mm | 4 b | 3 (75.0) | 3 (75.0) | 3 | 3 (100) | 3 (100) | 2 | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 3 b | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 3.5 mm | 1 ab | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 a | 1 (11.1) | 1 (11.1) |
| Overall | 5 | 4 (80.0) x | 4 (80) x | 4 | 3 (75.0) xy | 3 (75.0) xy | 4 | 1 (25.0) yz | 1 (25.0) yz | 23 | 2 (8.7) z | 2 (8.7) z |
Different superscripts indicate within column (a,b) and within row (x,y,z) significant differences for p < 0.05.
Pregnancy (PR) and lambing (LR) rates of ewes inseminated with two different methods for transcervical artificial insemination (TCAI).
| Transcervical Artificial | Ewes | PR | LR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catheter 5.0 mm tip | 30 | 19 (63.3) | 16 (53.3) |
| Surgical incision of cervical folds | 29 | 23 (79.3) | 21 (72.4) |
| Overall | 59 | 42 (71.2) | 37 (62.7) |
Pregnancy (PR) and lambing (LR) rates in relation to the time taken to reach the cervical lumen using two different methods for transcervical artificial insemination.
| Transcervical Artificial Insemination Method | Time to Reach The Cervical Lumen | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <10 s | 10–30 s | 30–60 s | >60 s | |||||||||
| Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | |
| Catheter 5.0 mm tip | 11 | 8 (72.7) | 6 (54.5) | 11 | 11 (100) | 10 (90.9) | 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Surgical incision of cervical folds | 17 | 14 (82.4) | 14 (82.4) | 6 | 6 (100) | 5 (83.3) | 5 | 3 (60.0) | 1 (20.0) | 1 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) |
| Overall | 28 | 22 (78.6) | 20 (71.4) | 17 | 17 (100) | 15 (88.2) | 9 | 3 (33.3) | 1 (11.1) | 5 | 1 (20.0) | 1 (20.0) |
Pregnancy (PR) and lambing (LR) rates in relation to the site of semen deposition using two different methods for transcervical artificial insemination.
| Transcervical Artificial Insemination Method | Site of Semen Deposition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Cervix | In Utero | |||||
| Ewes | PR | LR | Ewes | PR | LR | |
| Catheter 5.0 mm tip | 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 26 | 19 (73.1) | 16 (61.5) |
| Surgical incision of cervical folds | 4 | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 25 | 22 (84.6) | 20 (80.0) |
| Total | 8 | 1 (12.5) | 1 (12.5) | 51 | 41 (80.4) | 36 (70.6) |