| Literature DB >> 34943369 |
Dimitrios Moutafidis1, Maria Gavra2, Sotirios Golfinopoulos2, Antonios Kattamis3, George Chrousos4, Christina Kanaka-Gantenbein1, Athanasios G Kaditis1.
Abstract
In contrast to studies of adults with emphysema, application of fixed thresholds to determine low- and high-attenuation areas (air-trapping and parenchymal lung disease) in pediatric quantitative chest CT is problematic. We aimed to assess age effects on: (i) mean lung attenuation (full inspiration); and (ii) low and high attenuation thresholds (LAT and HAT) defined as mean attenuation and 1 SD below and above mean, respectively. Chest CTs from children aged 6-17 years without abnormalities were retrieved, and histograms of attenuation coefficients were analyzed. Eighty examinations were included. Inverse functions described relationships between age and mean lung attenuation, LAT or HAT (p < 0.0001). Predicted value for LAT decreased from -846 HU in 6-year-old to -950 HU in 13- to 17-year-old subjects (cut-off value for assessing emphysema in adults). %TLCCT with low attenuation correlated with age (rs = -0.31; p = 0.005) and was <5% for 9-17-year-old subjects. Inverse associations were demonstrated between: (i) %TLCCT with high attenuation and age (r2 = 0.49; p < 0.0001); (ii) %TLCCT with low attenuation and TLCCT (r2 = 0.47; p < 0.0001); (iii) %TLCCT with high attenuation and TLCCT (r2 = 0.76; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, quantitative analysis of chest CTs from children without lung disease can be used to define age-specific LAT and HAT for evaluation of pediatric lung disease severity.Entities:
Keywords: CT densitometry; air-trapping; bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; lung hyperinflation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34943369 PMCID: PMC8700567 DOI: 10.3390/children8121172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1“Lung” was chosen as the imaging window so that other structures were not shown. Air located outside the chest (e.g., gastric air bubble) and outside the subject’s body was still visible and included in the automatically derived attenuation measurements. Thus, it was removed manually, and at the end of the process, only the lung parenchyma, the trachea and bronchi were depicted.
Figure 2The total lung and airways volume, as well as the minimum attenuation value, maximum attenuation value, and the mean and standard deviation of attenuation values of all voxels included in the images of lung parenchyma and central airways were automatically provided by the software.
Figure 3Left panel: Scatterplot and fit line depicting the significant linear association between total lung capacity measured by computed tomography scan (TLCCT) and age (r2 = 0.59; p < 0.0001). Right panel: Scatterplot and fit hyperbola curve describing the significant relationship between mean inspiratory lung attenuation and age (r2 = 0.48; p < 0.0001). Dots correspond to measured values for individual subjects.
Summary of mean attenuation values at full inspiration and low and high attenuation thresholds for individual subjects according to age group.
| Age Group | Mean Lung Attenuation at Full Inspiration, HU | Low Attenuation Threshold, HU | High Attenuation Threshold, HU |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-year-old | −730 (−758, −639) | −872.3 (−903.5, −788.2) | −584.7 (−612.5, −489.8) |
| 7-year-old | −732.5 (−790, −668.3) | −872.9 (−924.1, −808.5) | −592.2 (−655.9, −528) |
| 8-year-old | −742 (−774, −690) | −876.5 (−916.2, −829) | −601.5 (−916.2, −829) |
| 9-year-old | −766 (−777, −738) | −916.1 (−935.8, −882.1) | −597.9 (−637.9, −595.1) |
| 10-year-old | −803 (−819, −780) | −950.3 (−967.1, −916.6) | −662.4 (−671.3, −643.4) |
| 11-year-old | −785 (−805, −753) | −925.7 (−949.4, −894.1) | −644.3 (−662.3, −623.6) |
| 12-year-old | −792 (−825.3, −775.8) | −931.2 (−943.6, −902.1) | −657.7 (−707.8, −643.6) |
| 13-year-old | −809 (−819, −772) | −937.3 (−945.9, −903.6) | −672.1 (−686.6, −640.4) |
| 14-year-old | −812.5 (−820.5, −805) | −951.7 (−963.5, −945.3) | −674.1 (−682.5, −662.7) |
| 15-year-old | −832.5 (−839, −814) | −959.4 (−975.4, −949.4) | −691.8 (−710.7, −668.9) |
| 16-year-old | −814 (−836, −786) | −941.8 (−971.5, −907.1) | −680.2 (−705.6, −658.9) |
| 17-year-old | −831.5 (−853.8, −762.5) | −963.4 (−980.4, −911.9) | −699.7 (−725.2, −616.3) |
Values are expressed as: median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) (minimum, maximum). Low attenuation threshold for each subject was defined as: (mean lung attenuation −1SD). High attenuation threshold for each subject was defined as: (mean lung attenuation +1SD).
Figure 4: Scatterplot and fit hyperbola curve describing the significant relationship between low attenuation threshold and age (r2 = 0.42; p < 0.0001). : Scatterplot and fit hyperbola curve depicting the significant relationship between high attenuation threshold and age (r2 = 0.50; p < 0.0001). Dots correspond to measured values for individual subjects.
Values of %TLCCT with low or high attenuation for individual subjects summarized according to age group and TLCCT.
| Age Group | %TLCCT with Attenuation | %TLCCT with Attenuation | TLCCT, mL | %TLCCT with Attenuation | %TLCCT with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-year-old | 1.46 (0.90, 7.99) | 12.47 (11.33, 14) | 897.3–1500 | 5.23 (2.88, 8.24) | 12.87 (12.35, 14.11) |
| 7-year-old | 2.85 (1.02, 5.96) | 11.66 (10.96, 13.32) | 1501–2000 | 2.01 (1.46, 2.76) | 11.67 (11.30, 11.88) |
| 8-year-old | 3.63 (1.22, 5.23) | 11.71 (10.70, 12.89) | 2001–2500 | 1.05 (0.64, 1.84) | 10.70 (10.18, 11.34) |
| 9-year-old | 1.51 (0.64, 1.84) | 11.34 (10.36, 12.43) | 2501–3000 | 1.50 (0.66, 1.86) | 10.43 (10.18, 11.01) |
| 10-year-old | 0.53 (0.40, 1.05) | 10.20 (10.12, 11.13) | 3001–3500 | 0.71(0.31, 1.56) | 10.34 (9.81, 10.74) |
| 11-year-old | 0.92 (0.56, 2.76) | 10.52 (10.13, 10.82) | 3501–4000 | 0.69 (0.54, 2.19) | 10.23 (9.77, 11.03) |
| 12-year-old | 1.45 (0.96, 3.49) | 10.30 (9.82, 11.10) | 4001–4500 | 0.89 (0.69, 2.37) | 10.07 (9.76, 10.76) |
| 13-year-old | 1.5 (0.89, 2.09) | 10.15 (9.66, 10.43) | 4501–5000 | 0.98 (0.23, 1.40) | 9.83 (9.41, 10.09) |
| 14-year-old | 0.77 (0.49, 1.06) | 9.97 (9.74, 10.23) | 5001–5500 | 0.69 | 9.65 |
| 15-year-old | 0.69 (0.48, 1.51) | 9.50 (9.16, 10.16) | 5501–6000 | 1.41 | 9.18 |
| 16-year-old | 1.17 (0.58, 2.37) | 10.23 (9.42, 10.76) | 6001–6500 | 0.50 (0.43, 0.58) | 9.42 (9.12, 9.56) |
| 17-year-old | 0.64 (0.37, 1.66) | 9.94 (8.97, 11.42) |
Values are expressed as: median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) (minimum, maximum). Low attenuation threshold for each subject was defined as: (mean lung attenuation −1SD). High attenuation threshold for each subject was defined as: (mean lung attenuation +1SD). TLCCT: Total lung capacity measured by computed tomography scan. %TLCCT with attenuation values < low attenuation threshold for each subject: Lung volume with attenuation values below (mean attenuation −1SD) divided by TLCCT and multiplied by 100% TLCCT with attenuation values > high attenuation threshold: Lung volume with attenuation values above (mean attenuation +1SD) divided by TLCCT and multiplied by 100.
Figure 5: Scatterplot outlining the significant, but weak association between % total lung capacity measured by computed tomography scan (TLCCT) with low attenuation and age (r2 = 0.17; p < 0.0001). : Scatterplot and fit hyperbola curve describing the significant relationship between %TLCCT with high attenuation and age (r2 = 0.49; p < 0.0001). Dots correspond to measured values for individual subjects.
Figure 6: Scatterplot and fit hyperbola curve depicting the association between % total lung capacity measured by computed tomography scan (TLCCT) with low attenuation and TLCCT (r2 = 0.47; p < 0.0001). : Scatterplot and fit hyperbola curve describing the significant relationship between %TLCCT with high attenuation and TLCCT (r2 = 0.76; p < 0.0001). Dots correspond to measured values for individual subjects.