| Literature DB >> 34943151 |
Abstract
Monitoring fish health in a repeatable and accurate manner can contribute to the profitability and sustainability of aquaculture. Haematological and blood biochemistry parameters have been powerful tools and becoming increasingly common in aquaculture studies. Fish growth is closely related to its health status. A fish with a higher growth rate is more likely to be a healthy one. Any change in the physiological status of the fish, from pollution to nutritional stress, can cause changes in the blood parameters. Various aquaculture studies have measured the following components: red blood cells, white blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit, and total protein. However, because these parameters do not always follow the same trend across experimental fish, it is difficult to draw a firm conclusion about which parameter should be considered. Therefore, Blood Performance (BP) as a new formula is introduced, which is a more reliable indicator. This formula is simple and sums up the natural logarithm of the five above-mentioned parameters. More than 90 published peer-reviewed articles that measured these five parameters in the last six years confirmed the reliability and validity of this formula. Regardless of which supplements were added to the diets, the fish with a higher growth rate had higher BP as well. In addition, in 44 studies out of 53 articles, there was a significant positive correlation between specific growth rate and BP. Under different stressful situations, from pollution to thermal stress, the fish under stress had a lower BP than the control. Fish meal and fish oil replacement studies were further evidence for this formula and showed that adding excessive alternative proteins decreased growth along with BP. In conclusion, BP can be a reliable indicator of fish health and growth when it is compared between groups in the same experiment or farm. Although there was a positive correlation between specific growth rate and BP, comparing BP between experiments is not recommended. Standardising the haematological assays can improve the reliability and accuracy of BP across experiments.Entities:
Keywords: haematocrit; haemoglobin; red blood cell; total protein; white blood cell
Year: 2021 PMID: 34943151 PMCID: PMC8698978 DOI: 10.3390/biology10121236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
The result of coefficient regression with five independent variables (haemoglobin, haematocrit, red blood cell, white blood cell, total protein) to determine the portion of them in the Blood Performance formula. The sample size was 441 samples collected from literature reported in Table 1 and 10 complete raw datasets.
| Variables | Unstandardised | Standardised | 95.0% Confidence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | Beta | t | Sig. | Lower bound | Upper | |
| Haemoglobin | 0.079 | 0.074 | 4.839 | 0.000 | 0.057 | 0.930 |
| Haematocrit | 0.282 | 0.242 | 20.70 | 0.000 | 0.255 | 0.309 |
| Red blood cell | 0.146 | 0.278 | 23.11 | 0.000 | 0.134 | 0.159 |
| White blood cell | 0.195 | 0.518 | 48.67 | 0.000 | 0.187 | 0.203 |
| Total protein | 0.334 | 0.495 | 40.21 | 0.000 | 0.318 | 0.350 |
Dependent variable is Blood Performance. The R square of the model was 0.956 and significant (p-value = 0.00000). The stepwise method was tried as well, and the results showed the highest R square occurs when we include all five variables.
Correlation analysis between Blood Performance and its components extracted from collected 410 sample data. The correlation between SGR and other parameters were in 380 sample data.
| Blood | Ln | Ln | Ln Red | Ln White Blood Cell | Ln Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood Performance | 1 | |||||
| Ln Haemoglobin | 0.497 ** | 1 | ||||
| Ln Haematocrit | 0.282 ** | 0.346 ** | 1 | |||
| Ln Red blood cell | 0.632 ** | 0.205 ** | 0.001 | 1 | ||
| Ln White blood cell | 0.676 ** | 0.213 ** | 0.009 | 0.074 | 1 | |
| Ln Total protein | 0.667 ** | 0.104 * | 0.255 ** | 0.471 ** | 0.161 * | 1 |
| Specific growth rate | 0.35 ** | 0.054 | 0.252 ** | 0.051 | 0.284 ** | 0.188 * |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.00005 level (2-tailed), which is corrected p value according to Bonferroni method.
Figure 1Distribution and relation between Blood Performance with haemoglobin, haematocrit, red blood cells, white blood cells and total protein. Each point indicates one sample from the raw data or published articles, and the number of samples is 441.
Figure 2Distribution and relation between Blood Performance with specific growth rate. Each point indicates one sample from the raw data or published articles, and the number of samples is 380.