| Literature DB >> 34941080 |
Lijun Wang1, Hao Wang2, Song Wei2, Zhihong Zhang2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The tumor microenvironment has an important impact on tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, anti-tumor immune tolerance, and prognosis. The present study aimed to explore female lung adenocarcinoma microenvironment-associated tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and genes that predict prognosis in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Gene expression profiles of female patients with lung adenocarcinoma were downloaded from TCGA. Base on the CIBERSORT algorithm, we determined the fractions of TILs. By applying the ESTIMATE algorithm, immune scores and stromal scores were derived. According to the immune and stromal scores, we categorized the female patients with lung adenocarcinoma into high and low score groups. We also identified the fractions of TILs and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were significantly related with prognosis. The proportion of M1 macrophages was significantly negatively related to overall survival in female patients with lung adenocarcinoma. There were 269 upregulated genes and 35 downregulated genes both in immune scores and stromal scores. PTPRC (protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C) and GIMAP6 (GTPase, IMAP family member 6) were not only hub genes, but also were significantly related to overall survival in the Kaplan-Meier Plotter online and TCGA databases. In summary, our study provided new insight into the tumor microenvironment-related cellular and molecular mechanisms of women with lung adenocarcinoma. The results will be useful for future clinical studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34941080 PMCID: PMC8702234 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Clinical features grouped by age.
| Group | <65 Y | >=65 Y | χ2 |
|
| T1&2 | 90 | 124 | 6.620 | .008 |
| T3&4 | 24 | 13 | ||
| N1&2 | 95 | 115 | 0.003 | .550 |
| N3&4 | 16 | 19 | ||
| M0 | 69 | 94 | 0.627 | .314 |
| M1 | 6 | 5 | ||
| StageI&II | 90 | 109 | 0.014 | .514 |
| StageIII&IV | 24 | 28 |
Figure 1The differences among 22 subpopulations of immune cells between tumor and normal lung tissue. (A) Violin plots illustrating whether there was a significantly different fraction between tumor and normal lung tissue. (B) The correlations between the proportions of the 22 TIL subsets were weak.
Figure 2The correlation between the proportions of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the patients’ clinicopathological characteristics or overall survival. (A) The proportion of M1 macrophages was significantly negatively related with overall survival. (B) The fractions of Plasma cells were significantly higher in N0&N1 lymph nodes than in N2&N3 lymph nodes. (C) The fractions of M2 macrophages were significantly lower in N0&N1 lymph nodes than in N2&N3 lymph nodes. (D) The fractions of neutrophils were significantly lower in N0&N1 lymph nodes than in N2&N3 lymph nodes. (E) The fractions of Resting natural killer (NK) cells were significantly lower in N0&N1 lymph nodes than in N2&N3 lymph nodes. (F) The fractions of plasma cells were significantly higher in N0&N1 lymph nodes than in N2&N3 lymph nodes. (G) The fractions of CD4+ memory T cells were significantly higher in N0&N1 lymph nodes than in N2&N3 lymph nodes. (H) The fraction of T gamma delta cells was significantly higher in patients ≥65 years old than in patients <65 years old.
Figure 3The correlation of immune scores or stromal scores with overall survival. (A) Median overall survival was longer in cases with low immune scores than in cases with high immune scores, P = .347. (B) Median overall survival was longer in cases with low stromal scores than in cases with high stromal scores P = .81.
Figure 4The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high immune/stromal scores and low immune/stromal scores. (A) A heatmap of gene expression according to the immune scores. (B) A heatmap gene expression according to the stromal scores. (C) There were 269 upregulated genes that were associated with both the immune scores and stromal scores. (D) There were 35 downregulated DEGs that were associated with both the immune scores and stromal scores.
Figure 5Enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene ontology (GO) categories:(A) BP, biological process; (B) CC, cellular component. (C) MF, molecular function; (D) KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis.
Figure 6The protein-protein interaction network and hub genes. The small circle represents the hub genes. The large circle plus the small circle are the differentially expressed genes. Red represents upregulation and green represents downregulation.
Thirty DEGs significantly related with overall survival in TCGA database.
| Group | Differentially expressed genes |
| Upregulated genes associated with good prognosis | |
| Downregulated genes associated with good prognosis |
|
Figure 7Eight differentially expressed genes were significantly related to overall survival, in TCGA database.
Figure 8Eight differentially expressed genes were significantly related to overall survival, in Kaplan–Meier Plotter online database.