Andrea E Daddato1, Elizabeth W Staton2, Brianne M Bettcher3, Prajakta Shanbhag1, Hillary D Lum1,4. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 3. Alzheimer's and Cognition Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 4. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While advance care planning (ACP) is critical for ensuring optimal end-of-life outcomes among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), many individuals who may benefit from ACP have not initiated this process. This article aims to describe the iterative design of an MCI group visit-based intervention and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used human-centered design, rapid-cycle prototyping, and multiple methods to adapt an ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention. We convened an advisory panel of persons with MCI and care partners (n = 6 dyads) to refine the intervention and conducted a single-arm pilot of 4 MCI ENACT intervention prototypes (n = 13 dyads). We used surveys and interviews to assess outcomes from multiple perspectives. RESULTS: The advisory panel affirmed that ACP is a priority for individuals with MCI, described the need for ACP in a group setting, and suggested refinements to ACP resources for the MCI ENACT intervention. Feasibility of recruitment was limited. MCI ENACT intervention participants strongly agreed that group discussions provided useful information and recommended the intervention. Themes supporting acceptability included (a) feedback on acceptability of the intervention, (b) previous experiences with ACP, and (c) reasons for participation, including desire for discussions about MCI and how it relates to ACP. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite stakeholders' positive ratings of acceptability of the MCI ENACT intervention, future work is needed to enhance the feasibility of recruitment to support implementation into clinical settings. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America 2021.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: While advance care planning (ACP) is critical for ensuring optimal end-of-life outcomes among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), many individuals who may benefit from ACP have not initiated this process. This article aims to describe the iterative design of an MCI group visit-based intervention and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used human-centered design, rapid-cycle prototyping, and multiple methods to adapt an ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention. We convened an advisory panel of persons with MCI and care partners (n = 6 dyads) to refine the intervention and conducted a single-arm pilot of 4 MCI ENACT intervention prototypes (n = 13 dyads). We used surveys and interviews to assess outcomes from multiple perspectives. RESULTS: The advisory panel affirmed that ACP is a priority for individuals with MCI, described the need for ACP in a group setting, and suggested refinements to ACP resources for the MCI ENACT intervention. Feasibility of recruitment was limited. MCI ENACT intervention participants strongly agreed that group discussions provided useful information and recommended the intervention. Themes supporting acceptability included (a) feedback on acceptability of the intervention, (b) previous experiences with ACP, and (c) reasons for participation, including desire for discussions about MCI and how it relates to ACP. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Despite stakeholders' positive ratings of acceptability of the MCI ENACT intervention, future work is needed to enhance the feasibility of recruitment to support implementation into clinical settings. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America 2021.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dementia; End-of-life care planning; Stakeholder engagement
Authors: Rebecca L Sudore; Hillary D Lum; John J You; Laura C Hanson; Diane E Meier; Steven Z Pantilat; Daniel D Matlock; Judith A C Rietjens; Ida J Korfage; Christine S Ritchie; Jean S Kutner; Joan M Teno; Judy Thomas; Ryan D McMahan; Daren K Heyland Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jee Hyang Jeong; Hae Ri Na; Seong Hye Choi; Jungeun Kim; Duk L Na; Sang Won Seo; Juhee Chin; Sun Ah Park; Eun-Joo Kim; Hyun Jeong Han; Seol-Heui Han; Soo Jin Yoon; Jae-Hong Lee; Kyung Won Park; So Young Moon; Moon Ho Park; Mun Seong Choi; Il-Woo Han; Jun Hong Lee; Jung Seok Lee; Yong S Shim; Jeong Yeon Kim Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Brie A Williams; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Hillary D Lum; Joanna Dukes; Andrea E Daddato; Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga; Prajakta Shanbhag; Jean S Kutner; Cari R Levy; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 7.538