| Literature DB >> 34940632 |
Melissa Quintero Escobar1,2, Ljubica Tasic2, Tassia Brena Barroso Carneiro da Costa2, Danijela Stanisic2, Silmara Montalvão1, Stephany Huber1, Joyce Maria Annichino-Bizzacchi1.
Abstract
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Studies on changes in the level of metabolites could have the potential to reveal biomarkers that can assist in the early detection, diagnosis, monitoring of DVT progression, response to treatment, or recurrence of DVT. In this scenario, the metabolomic analysis can provide a better understanding of the biochemical dysregulations of thrombosis. Using an untargeted metabolomic approach through magnetic resonance spectroscopy and multi- and univariate statistical analysis, we compared 40 patients with previous venous thrombosis and 40 healthy individuals, and we showed important serum differences between patients and controls, especially in the spectral regions that correspond to glucose, lipids, unsaturated lipids, and glycoprotein A. Considering the groups depending on risk factors and the local of the previous episode (lower limbs or cerebral system), we also noticed differences in metabolites linked to lipids and lactate. Comparative analyses pointed to altered ratios of glucose/lactate and branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs)/alanine, which might be associated with the fingerprints of thrombosis. Although samples for metabolomic analysis were collected months after the acute episode, these results highlighted that, alterations can still remain and may contribute to a better understanding of the complications of the disease.Entities:
Keywords: NMR; bleeding disorders; haemostasia; metabolomics; thrombosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34940632 PMCID: PMC8704499 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11120874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Clinical summary of patients with DVT. LLL: Lower-left limb, RLL: Lower-right limb; BMI: above (25–29.99), obesity I (30–34.99), obesity II (35–39.99), morbid obesity (>40). PTS: post-thrombotic syndrome. PE: pulmonary thromboembolism. * Age and body mass index (BMI) at thrombosis moment.
| Case No. | Gender | Age * (Years) | BMI * | Site | Time Between Blood Collection and Thrombotic Episode (Months) | PTS | Risk Factors | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 50s | 26.6 | LLL | 15 | Absent | Diabetes | |
| 2 | Male | 50s | 29.8 | LLL | 20 | Discreet | Dyslipidemia Factor V Leiden Heterozygous | |
| 3 | Female | 60s | 30.4 | RLL | 14 | Discreet | Obesity | Diabetes and Dyslipidemia |
| 4 | Male | 40s | NR | LLL | 7 | Discreet | Dyslipidemia | |
| 5 | Female | 50s | 37.6 | LLL | 10 | Absent | Obesity | PE Recurrence |
| 6 | Female | 70s | 19.8 | RLL | 15 | Absent | ||
| 7 | Male | 50s | 27.1 | LLL | 16 | Discreet | ||
| 8 | Male | 40s | NR | RLL | 9 | Discreet | Rivaroxaban at the collecting time | |
| 9 | Male | 60s | 30.8 | RLL | 5 | Discreet | Obesity | |
| 10 | Male | 70s | 27.1 | LLL | 1 | Moderate | Warfarin at the collecting time | |
| 11 | Female | 20s | 27.3 | LLL | 6 | Discreet | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 12 | Female | 20s | NR | LLL | 24 | Absent | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 13 | Female | 20s | 34.1 | RLL | 20 | Discreet | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 14 | Female | 20s | NR | RLL | 15 | Absent | Ankle immobilization | |
| Hormonal contraceptive | ||||||||
| 15 | Female | 20s | 28.1 | LLL | 10 | Absent | Hospitalization Gestational | C protein deficiency |
| 16 | Female | 30s | 29 | RLL | 6 | Discreet | Postpartum | Thrombin Heterozygous |
| 17 | Female | 40s | 59.6 | LLL | 9 | Moderate | Morbid obesity Surgery | Diabetes |
| 18 | Female | 20s | 27.9 | RLL | 11 | Absent | Hormonal contraceptive | Diabetes |
| 19 | Female | 20s | 32.7 | RLL | 21 | Moderate | Hormonal contraceptive | Warfarin at the collecting time |
| 20 | Female | 50s | 42.7 | LLL | 22 | Absent | Morbid obesity | Diabetes |
Clinical summary of patients with CVT. * Age and body mass index (BMI) at thrombosis moment; BMI: above (25–29.99), obesity I (30–34.99), obesity II (35–39.99), morbid obesity (>40).
| Case No. | Gender | Age * (Years) | BMI * | Sites | Time Between Blood Collection and Thrombotic Episode (Months) | Risk Factors | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 30s | 37.5 | Transverse sinus | 21 | Obesity | |
| 2 | Female | 40s | 25.7 | Left sinus | 5 | ||
| 3 | Male | 50s | 27.4 | Central sinus | 22 | ||
| 4 | Female | 30s | 23.9 | Central sinus | 13 | ||
| 5 | Female | 20s | 28.1 | Sigmoid and transverse sinus | 10 | Hormonal contraceptive | Warfarin |
| 6 | Female | 20s | 22.8 | Venous sinus | 15 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 7 | Female | 20s | NR | Sagittal sinus | 6 | Hormonal contraceptive | Warfarin |
| 8 | Female | 20s | 35.8 | Superior sagittal, transverse, and sigmoid sinus | Obesity | ||
| 6 | Hormonal contraceptive | ||||||
| 9 | Female | 20s | 32.8 | Venous sinus | Obesity | ||
| 33 | Hormonal contraceptive | ||||||
| 10 | Female | 20s | 24.8 | Sagittal and transverse sinus | 18 | Surgery | |
| 11 | Female | 30s | 27.7 | Transverse sinus | 17 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 12 | Female | 50s | NR | Transverse and straight sinus | 15 | Family history | Anemia |
| Hormonal contraceptive | |||||||
| 13 | Female | 30s | 26.7 | Transverse sinus | 9 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 14 | Female | 19s | 20.2 | Cavernous Sinus | 22 | Postpartum | Thrombin Deficiency |
| 15 | Female | 20s | 19.2 | Sagittal sinus | 12 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 16 | Female | 20s | 33.8 | Central sinus | 2 | Obesity | Warfarin |
| Hormonal contraceptive | |||||||
| 17 | Female | 20s | 19.9 | central, transverse, and sigmoid sinus | 13 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 18 | Female | 20s | 27.5 | central venous sinus and parietal venous infarction | 11 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 19 | Female | 18s | 23.2 | Transverse sinus | 15 | Hormonal contraceptive | |
| 20 | Female | 20s | 36.5 | Sigmoid sinus | Obesity | ||
| 10 | Hormonal contraceptive | ||||||
Clinical summary of patients with different types of venous thrombosis. DVT: deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs; CVT: cerebral veins thrombosis; BMI: body mass index.
| Variable | A. Thrombotic Patients ( | B. Controls ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A vs. B | ||||
| Age, mean years | 38 (18–78) | 40 (23–66) | 0.178 | |
| Male, | 8 (20) | 10 (25) | 1.000 | |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 29 (19-60) | 26 (18–36) | 0.038 | |
| DVT ( | CVT ( | 0.045 | ||
| Age, mean years | 45 (20–78) | 30 (18–52) | ||
| Male, | 7 (35) | 1 (5) | ||
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 32 (20–60) | 27 (19–38) | ||
| Risk factors | ||||
| Provoked, | 10 (50) | 16 (80) | ||
| Family history of VTE, | 2 (12.5) | 3 (16) | ||
| Hormonal contraceptive | 6 (30) | 15 (75) | ||
| Obesity | 7 (35) | 5 (25) | ||
| Surgery | 3 (15) | 1 (5) | ||
| Gestational/postpartum | 1 (5) | 1 (5) | ||
| Anticoagulant use at the moment of blood collection | ||||
| Warfarin, | 2 (10) | 3 (15) | ||
| Rivaroxaban, | 1 (5) | |||
Characteristics of patients in relation to BMI.
| Patients | Normal | Overweight | Obese Class I | Obese Class II | Morbid Obesity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI, mean (min–max), kg/m2 | 21.75 (19.27–24.80) | 27.60 (25.78–29.8) | 32.5 (30.40–34.10) | 36.9 (35.86–37.60) | 51.15 (42.70–59.60) |
| Participants, | 8 (20) | 14 (35) | 6 (15) | 4 (10) | 2 (5) |
| Women, | 8 (20) | 9 (18) | 5 (12.5) | 4 (10) | 2 (5) |
| Age, mean (min–max), years | 31 (18–78) | 40 (21–73) | 39 (22–67) | 35 (23–54) | 53 (49–56) |
| DVT, | 1 (2.5) | 8 (20) | 4 (10) | 1 (2,5) | 2 (5) |
| CVT, | 7 (17.5) | 6 (15) | 2 (5) | 3 (7.5) |
Characteristics of controls in relation to BMI.
| Controls | Normal | Overweight | Obese Class I | Obese Class II |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI, mean (min–max), kg/m2 | 22.18 (18.87–24.92) | 27.79 (26.22–29.33) | 32.72 (30.08–33.95) | 35.75 |
| Participants, | 19 (47.5) | 12 (30) | 6 (15) | 1 (2.5) |
| Women, | 17 (42.5) | 7 (17.5) | 3 (7.5) | 1 (2.5) |
| Age, mean (min–max), years | 34 | 43 (23–66) | 47 (33–57) | 52 |
Figure 1(A) 1H-NMR CPMG spectra illustrating differences between thrombosis and control group. The identified metabolites were: 1. Fatty acyl chain terminal methyl group hydrogens -CH3; 2. Isoleucine; 3. Leucine; 4. Valine; 5. Lipids CH3(CH2)n; 6. Lactate; 7. Alanine; 8. Fatty acyl chain hydrogens from the -CH2- group next to the carboxyl group, as in CH2CH2C(O); 9. Fatty acyl chain CH2CH=; 10. Glutamine; 11. Multiple glucose hydrogens; 12. Tyrosine; 13. Histidine; 14. Phenylalanine; 15. Formate. The HDO (δ 4.70–5.50) regions were removed before the analyses, indicated with the dotted lines. The inset shows the expanded (δ 6.50–8.50) spectral regions; (B) Multivariate OPLS-DA; (C) Relative metabolite levels (measured as peak intensities) by VIP score. The black dots represent the metabolite levels in all samples, and the yellow diamond represents the average value. Patients (Thrombosis) are illustrated in red, and controls in blue.
¹H-NMR chemical shift assignments for the metabolites found between thrombosis vs. control groups. s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; dd, doublet of doublets. * Overlapping area.
| Peak | Metabolites | Moieties | δ 1H and Multiplicity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lipid | CH3 | 0.81–0.89 (m) |
| 2 | Isoleucine | CH3 | 0.91–0.94 (t), 1.01 (d) |
| 3 | Leucine | CH3 | 0.96 (t), 1.72 (m) |
| 4 | Valine | γCH3, βCH, αCH | 0.98 (d), 1.04 (d), 3.61 (d) |
| 5 | Lipid | (CH2) n | 1.24–1.37 (m) |
| 6 | Lactate | βCH3, αCH | 1.32 (d), 4.11 (q) |
| 7 | Alanine | βCH3, αCH | 1.47 (d), 3.77 (q) |
| 8 | Lipid | CH2CH2CO | 1.53–1.65 (m) |
| 9 | Lipid | CH2-CH= | 1.96–2.09 (m), |
| 10 | Glutamine | γCH2 | 2.12 (m), 2.45 (m), 3.77 (t) * |
| 11 | Glucose | C1H, C2H, C3H, C4H, C5H,1/2 CH2-O6 | 3.24 (dd), 3.39 (m), 3.46 (m), 3.53 (dd), 3.72 (m), 3.83 (m), 3.89 (dd), 4.65 (d), 5.24 (d) |
| 12 | Tyrosine | CH, CH | 6.89 (m), 7.19 (m) |
| 13 | Histidine | 4CH, CH2 | 7.02–7.08 (s), 7.74–7.85 (s) |
| 14 | Phenylalanine | βCH2, β’CH2, αCH, 2 or 6 CH,4CH, 3 or 5CH | 7.33 (d), 7.37 (m), 7.42 (m) |
| 15 | Formate | CH | 8.46 (s) |
Figure A1(A) Altered ratios of glucose/lactate (Glc/Lac), branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs: leucine, isoleucine, and valine/alanine) (BCAAs/Ala), and (B) total of lipoproteins based on mean intensity.
Table showing the identified metabolites and their chemical shift properties elucidated by Table 2. 0; multip = multiplicity, where s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), dd (doublet of doublet), l (broad). In red are VIPs with p < 0.05, according to the linear regression model. * Overlapping area.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lipid CH2 | 1.34085 (l, CH2) | 5.87 | 0.287 | 0.018 |
|
| 3.23064 (dd, CH2); 3.73058 (m,CH); 3.5556 (dd, CH2); 3.8306 (m,CH); 3.3856 (m,CH) | 4.04; 3.40; 2.87; 2.51; 2.08 | −0.289; −0.284; −0.448; −0.229; −0.363 | 0.019; 0.050; 0.006; 0.017; 0.048 |
| Alanine | 1.47083 (d, CH3) | 3.23 | −0.369 | 0.002 |
| Valine | 1.03588 (d, CH) | 2.98 | −0.3429 | 0.003 |
| Lipid CH2-CH= | 2.04577 (l, CH2) | 2.37 | 0.1303 | 0.024 |
|
| 2.44073 (m, CH2) | 2.18 | −0.439 | 0.0009 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Glutamine | 2.106 (m, CH2); 2.111 (m, CH2); 2.116 (m, CH2) | 2.20; 2.26; 2.71 | −0.649; −0.659; −0.732 | 0.002; 0.002; 0.005 |
|
| 2.426 (m, CH2); 2.431 (m, CH2); 2.436 (m, CH); 2.456 (m, CH2) | 2.08; 2.54; 2.03; 2.74 | −1.244; −1.133; −0.676; −0.726 | 0.0001; 0.0001; 0.0001; 0.0013 |
|
| 3.556 (dd, CH2) | 3.62 | −0.743 | 0.0024 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alanine * | 1.466 (d, CH3); 1.471 (d, CH3); 3.766 (q, CH) | 2.14; 3.43; 2.90 | −0.493; −0.296; 0.297 | 0.0211; 0.0375; 0.0491 |
| Lipid CH2-CH= | 2.046 (l, CH2); 2.061(l, CH2) | 3.34; 2.09 | 0.147; 0.152 | 0.0375; 0.046 |
| Glucose | 3.436 (m,CH); 3.561 (dd, CH2); 3.791 (m,CH) | 2.13; 6.33; 2.40 | 0.298; 0.763; 0.38 | 0.043; 0.0008; 0.012 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lipid CH2 | 1.286 (l, CH2); 1.291 (l, CH2); 1.296 (l, CH2) | 9.05; 8.89; 8.013 | −0.494; −0.508; −0.465 | 0.037; 0.028; 0.032 |
| Lipid CH2-CH= | 2.086; 2.091 | 2.02; 2.01 | 0.359; 0.45 | 0.018; 0.019 |
| Glutamine | 2.106 (m, CH2); 2.111 (m, CH2) | 2.08; 2.10 | 0.488; 0.48 | 0.0014; 0.005 |
|
| 3.561 (dd, CH2) | 2.85 | 0.43 | 0.040 |
Figure A2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of serum metabolites that distinguished thrombosis. The greatest area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUC = 0.73) value was obtained for glutamate and valine. The optimal cutoff was represented on the curve with a red dot and with a line on the box plot.
Figure 2(A) PLS-DA according to the BMI (accuracy 53%, R2 0.265, and Q2 -0.05) (C). PLS-DA between provoked or unprovoked known risks (accuracy 0.253, and Q2 0.062) (B–D) Relative metabolite levels (shown as Normalized Conc. and measured as peak intensities) by VIP—lactate (δ 1.32–1.34) and lipids (δ 0.88–1.31) were responsible for class separation for obesity I and overweight groups, and for provoked and unprovoked groups, respectively. However, only spectral data at δ 0.90 presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the conditions. These regions correspond to lipids. The black dots represent the metabolite levels in all samples and the yellow diamond represents the average value. In red are thrombosis patients with normal BMI; in green, patients with obesity I; in dark blue, patients with obesity II; in light blue, overweight patients. Provoked are in red and unprovoked are in blue.
Figure 3Illustration of results of OPLS-DA from 1H-NMR CPMG data showing subgroups with the respective VIP responsible for class separations. The levels of metabolites, shown as Normalized Conc., were expressed as peak intensities. (A) DVT vs. DVT’s control R2X 30%, R2Y 35%, and Q2 13%; (B) CVT vs. CVT’s controls R2X 30%, R2Y 10%, and Q2 12%; (C) DVT vs. CVT patients R2X 8%, R2Y 10%, and Q2 19%.