Literature DB >> 34939050

Reproducible manuscript preparation with RMarkdown application to JMSACL and other Elsevier Journals.

Daniel T Holmes1,2, Mahdi Mobini1,3, Christopher R McCudden4,5,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With the rising complexity of modern multimarker analytical techniques and notable scientific publication retractions required for erroneous statistical analysis, there is increasing awareness of the importance of research transparency and reproducibility. The development of mature open-source tools for literate programming in multiple langauge paradigms has made fully-reproducible authorship possible.
OBJECTIVES: We describe the procedure for manuscript preparation using RMarkdown and the R statistical programming language with application to JMSACL or any other Elsevier journal.
METHODS: An instructional manuscript has been prepared in the RMarkdown markup language with stepwise directions on preparing sections, subsections, lists, tables, figures and reference management in an entirely reproducible format.
RESULTS: From RMarkdown code, a submission-ready PDF is generated and JMSACL-compatible LaTeX code is generated. These can be uploaded to the Editorial Manager.
CONCLUSION: A completely reproducible manuscript preparation pipeline using the R and RMarkdown is described.
© 2021 THE AUTHORS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data science; Executable document; LaTeX; Literate programming; Markdown; R language; RMarkdown; Reproducible research

Year:  2021        PMID: 34939050      PMCID: PMC8662334          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2021.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab        ISSN: 2667-145X


  7 in total

Review 1.  What does research reproducibility mean?

Authors:  Steven N Goodman; Daniele Fanelli; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  A multiparameter panel method for outcome prediction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Natacha Turck; Laszlo Vutskits; Paola Sanchez-Pena; Xavier Robin; Alexandre Hainard; Marianne Gex-Fabry; Catherine Fouda; Hadiji Bassem; Markus Mueller; Frédérique Lisacek; Louis Puybasset; Jean-Charles Sanchez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments.

Authors:  Keith A Baggerly; Jeffrey S Morris; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  An efficiency comparison of document preparation systems used in academic research and development.

Authors:  Markus Knauff; Jelica Nejasmic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature.

Authors:  Mark Ziemann; Yotam Eren; Assam El-Osta
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  A manifesto for reproducible science.

Authors:  Marcus R Munafò; Brian A Nosek; Dorothy V M Bishop; Katherine S Button; Christopher D Chambers; Nathalie Percie du Sert; Uri Simonsohn; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Jennifer J Ware; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

7.  Mistaken identifiers: gene name errors can be introduced inadvertently when using Excel in bioinformatics.

Authors:  Barry R Zeeberg; Joseph Riss; David W Kane; Kimberly J Bussey; Edward Uchio; W Marston Linehan; J Carl Barrett; John N Weinstein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Pathology and the Data Science revolution.

Authors:  Dustin R Bunch; Daniel T Holmes
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab       Date:  2022-03-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.