| Literature DB >> 34938747 |
Yuxin Li1, Yaxian Kong2, Ke Shi1, Yunyi Huang1, Qun Zhang1, Bingbing Zhu1, Hui Zeng3, Xianbo Wang1.
Abstract
Background: Survival of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) cannot be properly predicted based on clinical characteristics. Aims: This study aimed to develop a predictive model to evaluating the prognosis for hepatitis B virus-related ACLF (HBV-ACLF) based on specific laboratory and immune indicators.Entities:
Keywords: ACLF; CD200R; HBV; NLR; T cell; prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34938747 PMCID: PMC8685236 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Characteristics of the subjects included in the study.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| Age (year) | 34.5 (29.0,43.0) | 33.0 (28.0,42.0) | 44.5 ± 12.8 | <0.001 |
| Male/Female,% | 27/23 | 99/70 | 36/9 | 0.040 |
|
| ||||
| WBC (109/L) | 6.1 ± 12 | 5.4 ± 1.3 | 4.9 (4.0,6.7) | 0.004 |
| NC (109/L) | 3.6 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 3.0 (1.9,4.2) | 0.006 |
| LC (109/L) | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 1.8 (1.5,2.2) | 1.4 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| NLR | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 1.6 (1.2,2.0) | 2.4 (1.6,3.6) | <0.001 |
| ALT (U/L) | 13.5 (10.0,25) | 31.1 (23.0,200.6) | 355.5 (130.8,832.9) | <0.001 |
| AST (U/L) | 17.1 (15.3,21.4) | 24.0 (18.9,94.7) | 217.9 (94.9,453.0) | <0.001 |
| ALB (g/L) | 47.9 (46.7,49.9) | 47.0 (42.9,49.1) | 32.9 ± 4.8 | <0.001 |
| GLO (g/L) | 22.3 (21.1,25.0) | 26.7 (24.2,29.4) | 27.7 ± 6.7 | <0.001 |
| TBIL (μmoI/L) | 11.6 (9.4,12.9) | 13.8 (10.3,21.2) | 232.7 (148.9,325.8) | <0.001 |
| PTA (%) | / | 94.3 ± 13.2 | 35.9 ± 10.5 | <0.001 |
| INR | / | 1.1 (1.0,1.1) | 2.1 (1.8,2.5) | <0.001 |
| logHBVDNA log (IU/mL) | / | 6.1 (3.4,8.1) | 5.2 ± 1.7 | 0.160 |
HC, healthy control; CHB, chronic hepatitis B; ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; WBC, white blood cell; LC, lymphocyte count; NC, neutrophil count; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALB, albumin; GLO, globulin; TBIL, total bilirubin; PTA, prothrombin activity; INR, international normalized ratio; p values were calculated by χ.
Characteristics of the survival and non-survival groups in patients with HBV-ACLF.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Age (year) | 44.0 (30.8,58.5) | 47.0 (46.0,50.0) | 0.859 |
| Male/Female, % | 25/9 | 7/0 | 0.315 |
|
| |||
| WBC (109/L) | 4.7 (3.9,6.5) | 5.4 (5.2,13.1) | 0.079 |
| NC (109/L) | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 4.5 | <0.001 |
| LC (109/L) | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.352 |
| NLR | 2.3 (1.4,2.7) | 5.2 ± 3.3 | 0.031 |
| PLT (109/L) | 79.0 (61.6,109.4) | 125.7 ± 63.2 | 0.077 |
| ALT (U/L) | 344.2 (127.5,784.5) | 739.6 ± 839.1 | 0.905 |
| AST (U/L) | 217.6 (87.2,472.4) | 364.7 ± 276.4 | 0.552 |
| ALB (g/L) | 32.6 ± 4.6 | 33.2 ± 4.8 | 0.748 |
| GLO (g/L) | 28.0 ± 6.8 | 25.0 ± 7.5 | 0.312 |
| TBIL (μmoI/L) | 238.9 ± 119.6 | 251.0 (204.2,295.0) | 0.444 |
| Cr (μmoI/L) | 64.0 ± 13.6 | 63.3 (53.0,78.0) | 0.832 |
| Na (mmoI/L) | 135.0 (135.0,135.0) | 135.0 (135.0,135.0) | 0.690 |
| PTA (%) | 38.8 ± 9.6 | 26.4 ± 8.1 | 0.003 |
| INR | 2.0 (1.8,2.3) | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 0.003 |
| logHBVDNA log (IU/mL) | 5.0 ± 1.5 | 6.9 (3.5,7.3) | 0.158 |
CHB, chronic hepatitis B; ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; WBC, white blood cell; LC, lymphocyte count; NC, neutrophil count; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio; PLT, platelet; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALB, albumin; GLO, globulin; TBIL, total bilirubin; Cr, creatinine; Na, sodium; PTA, prothrombin activity; INR, international normalized ratio; p values were calculated by χ.
Figure 1Differentiation of circulating T cells. Representative flow data gated on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (A) and scatter dot plots of the percentage of TN, TCM, TEM, and TEMRA subsets gated on CD4+ (B) and CD8+T cells (C) in different groups. A one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze statistical differences. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 2CD200R+T cells in patients with ACLF and CHB. Representative dot plots of CD200R+CD4+ (A) and CD200R+CD8+ (B) T cell frequency for each group. A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze statistical differences. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 3CD200R is significantly upregulated on TCM and TEM cells in patients with ACLF. Scatter dot plots of CD200R expression in each group among four subsets (TN, TCM, TEM, and TEMRA) gated on CD4+T cells (A) and CD8+T cells (B). A one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze statistical differences. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with ACLF. (A) Comparison of the proportions of CD200R+CD4+T cells in ACLF survival and non-survival groups. (B) Comparison of NLR levels between survival and non-survival groups with ACLF. A Mann–Whitney test was used to analyze statistical differences.
Figure 5ROC curve of each factor and areas under ROC curves. Proportions of baseline CD200R+CD4+T cells, NLR, CD200R/NLR, MELD, MELD-Na, CTP and CLIF-C scores in predicting 90 d mortality in patients with HBV-ACLF.