| Literature DB >> 34938633 |
Jayashankar Ca1, Manjunath Bm1, Venkata BharatKumar Pinnelli2, Venkataramana Kandi3, Shalini As1, Harsha A Mathew4, Honika Gundreddy1, Fareeha Afreen1, Sabitha Vadakedath5.
Abstract
Introduction Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is the second leading infectious cause of death worldwide. The higher prevalence of pulmonary TB in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a well-known fact. The inverse relationship is also being increasingly recognized. Very few studies are available on the correlation of glycemic parameters with grades of sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) positivity and disease severity. Hence, this study is undertaken to determine the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), new-onset T2DM, and to correlate glycemic parameters with sputum positivity grades in pulmonary TB patients. Methods The is a cross-sectional study that included 93 patients with confirmed pulmonary TB, who presented to the General Medicine and Pulmonary Medicine departments of a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern India. All the patients included in the study underwent oral glucose tolerance (OGTT; 75 g) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) tests. The results were analyzed and interpreted using statistical applications (SPSS software version 21, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Among the 93 patients included in the study, 73 (78.4%) were males and the mean age was 42.5+1.5 years. The OGTT revealed abnormal results in 44 (47.3%) patients. Thirteen (14%) patients showed IGT and 31 (33.3%) had newly been detected with T2DM. The mean HbA1C of the study participants was noted to be 6.413%. Conclusion The prevalence of IGT and T2DM among pulmonary TB patients was noted to be 14% and 33.3%, respectively. The grade of sputum positivity and the severity of the disease did not correlate with the serum of HbA1c levels.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; glycated hemoglobin; glycated hemoglobin (hba1c); impaired glucose tolerance; oral glucose tolerance test; tuberculosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34938633 PMCID: PMC8685191 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Distribution of study cases as per sputum grade
Scanty: 1-9 acid-fast bacilli in 100 oil immersion fields; 1+: 10-99 acid-fast bacilli in 100 oil immersion fields; 2+: 1-10 acid-fast bacilli in each oil immersion field; 3+: >10 acid-fast bacilli in each oil immersion field (grading was based on the Revised National Tuberculosis Program, India guidelines).
| Sputum grade | N | % |
| Scanty | 11 | 11.8% |
| 1+ | 20 | 21.5% |
| 2+ | 27 | 29.0% |
| 3+ | 35 | 37.6% |
| Total | 93 | 100.0% |
Comparison of oral glucose tolerance test results with sputum acid-fast bacilli grade
AFB: acid-fast bacilli; DM: diabetes mellitus; IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; Chi-square (χ2)=5.823, degrees of freedom (df)=6, p=0.443.
| Diagnosis | |||||||||
| DM | IGT | Normal | Total | ||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | ||
| Sputum AFB Grade | Scanty | 6 | 54.5% | 1 | 9.1% | 4 | 36.4% | 11 | 100.0% |
| 1+ | 5 | 25.0% | 1 | 5.0% | 14 | 70.0% | 20 | 100.0% | |
| 2+ | 8 | 29.6% | 5 | 18.5% | 14 | 51.9% | 27 | 100.0% | |
| 3+ | 12 | 34.3% | 6 | 17.1% | 17 | 48.6% | 35 | 100.0% | |
| Total | 31 | 33.3% | 13 | 14.0% | 49 | 52.7% | 93 | 100.0% | |
Mean comparison of blood sugar levels for oral glucose tolerance test among various sputum grades
OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed and a p-value <0.05 is considered as significant.
| Grade of sputum | N | Mean | SD | SE | 95% Confidence interval for mean | Minimum | Maximum | p-value | ||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||||||
| OGTT fasting | Scanty | 11 | 128.18 | 21.826 | 6.581 | 113.52 | 142.84 | 98 | 178 | 0.351 |
| 1+ | 20 | 120.20 | 24.859 | 5.559 | 108.57 | 131.83 | 72 | 201 | ||
| 2+ | 27 | 128.52 | 26.684 | 5.135 | 117.96 | 139.07 | 92 | 186 | ||
| 3+ | 35 | 132.77 | 23.650 | 3.997 | 124.65 | 140.90 | 100 | 202 | ||
| Total | 93 | 128.29 | 24.682 | 2.559 | 123.21 | 133.37 | 72 | 202 | ||
| OGTT at 1 hour | Scanty | 11 | 166.45 | 23.304 | 7.026 | 150.80 | 182.11 | 128 | 200 | 0.600 |
| 1+ | 20 | 161.60 | 24.221 | 5.416 | 150.26 | 172.94 | 116 | 225 | ||
| 2+ | 27 | 225.37 | 327.956 | 63.115 | 95.64 | 355.11 | 111 | 1858 | ||
| 3+ | 35 | 177.86 | 33.774 | 5.709 | 166.26 | 189.46 | 126 | 260 | ||
| Total | 93 | 186.81 | 177.911 | 18.448 | 150.17 | 223.45 | 111 | 1858 | ||
| OGTT at 2 hours | Scanty | 11 | 151.82 | 24.024 | 7.244 | 135.68 | 167.96 | 128 | 192 | 0.336 |
| 1+ | 20 | 138.70 | 21.767 | 4.867 | 128.51 | 148.89 | 110 | 210 | ||
| 2+ | 27 | 144.15 | 24.323 | 4.681 | 134.53 | 153.77 | 110 | 200 | ||
| 3+ | 35 | 150.69 | 29.316 | 4.955 | 140.62 | 160.76 | 120 | 240 | ||
| Total | 93 | 146.34 | 25.890 | 2.685 | 141.01 | 151.68 | 110 | 240 | ||
Mean comparison of glycated hemoglobin among various sputum grades
HBA1c: glycated hemoglobin; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; p-value <0.05 is considered as significant.
| HbA1c | p-value | ||||||||
| N | Mean | SD | SE | 95% confidence interval for mean | Minimum | Maximum | |||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||||
| Scanty | 11 | 6.418 | 0.9020 | 0.2720 | 5.812 | 7.024 | 4.8 | 7.8 | 0.575 |
| 1+ | 20 | 6.290 | 1.2226 | 0.2734 | 5.718 | 6.862 | 4.8 | 9.2 | |
| 2+ | 27 | 6.293 | 1.1422 | 0.2198 | 5.841 | 6.744 | 4.2 | 8.6 | |
| 3+ | 35 | 6.651 | 1.1587 | 0.1959 | 6.253 | 7.049 | 5.2 | 9.2 | |
| Total | 93 | 6.442 | 1.1359 | 0.1178 | 6.208 | 6.676 | 4.2 | 9.2 | |
Distribution of study cases as per the results of oral glucose tolerance test
OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; IGT: impaired glucose tolerance; DM: diabetes mellitus
| OGTT | N | % |
| Normal | 49 | 52.7% |
| IGT | 13 | 14.0% |
| DM | 31 | 33.3% |
| Total | 93 | 100.0% |