| Literature DB >> 34938483 |
Kazuhisa Yamasaki1,2, Ken Tabuchi3, Akihiko Takahashi4, Takeshi Osawa5, Akira Yoshioka6, Yasushi Ishigooka7, Shigeto Sudo8, Mayura B Takada1,9.
Abstract
The mirid bugs Stenotus rubrovittatus and Trigonotylus caelestialium, which cause pecky rice, have become a threat to rice cultivation in Asia. Damage caused by these pests has rapidly become frequent since around 2000 in Japan. Their expansion pattern is not simple, and predicting their future spread remains challenging. Some insects with wide ranges have locally adapted variations in life-history traits. We performed laboratory rearing experiments to assess the geographical scale of intraspecific variations in life-history traits of S. rubrovittatus and T. caelestialium. The experiments were aimed at increasing the accuracy of occurrence estimates and the number of generations per year. These results were compared with previous research, and differences in development rates were observed between populations of different latitudes, but not of the same latitude. Finally, plotting the timing of adult emergence and the potential number of generations per year on maps with a 5-km grid revealed that they differed greatly locally at the same latitude. These maps can be used for developing more efficient methods of managing mirid bugs in integrated pest management.Entities:
Keywords: development rate; effective accumulated temperature; geographic variation; local adaptation; risk map
Year: 2021 PMID: 34938483 PMCID: PMC8668747 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1Sites where T. caelestialium and S. rubrovittatus were collected. ○ Both species collected within this study in (1) Iwate Prefecture in 2016 and (2) Akita Prefecture in 2017. ∆ T. caelestialium collected by (1) Okuyama and Inouye (1975) and (2) Takahashi and Higuchi (2001). □ S. rubrovittatus collected by (1) Hayashi (1991) and (2) Shigehisa (2004). Coastlines and boundaries were obtained from the Database of Global Administrative Areas (https://gadm.org/)
Models of the development rates of S. rubrovittatus and T. caelestialium in three latitudinally different populations of each species
| No. | Models |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 1 | Three populations + temperature |
| 2 | Three populations + temperature + three populations × temperature |
| 3 | Populations (Tohoku‐Shiga vs. Hiroshima) + temperature |
| 4 | Populations (Tohoku‐Shiga vs. Hiroshima) + temperature +populations (Tohoku‐Shiga vs. Hiroshima) × temperature |
| 5 | Populations (Tohoku vs. Shiga‐Hiroshima) + temperature |
| 6 | Populations (Tohoku vs. Shiga‐Hiroshima) + temperature +populations (Tohoku vs. Shiga‐Hiroshima) × temperature |
| 7 | Temperature |
| 8 | Intercept |
|
| |
| 1 | Three populations + temperature |
| 2 | Three populations + temperature + three populations × temperature |
| 3 | Populations (Hokkaido vs. Touhoku‐Niigata) + temperature |
| 4 | Populations (Hokkaido vs. Tohoku‐Niigata) + temperature +populations (Hokkaido vs. Tohoku‐Niigata) × temperature |
| 5 | Populations (Hokkaido‐Tohoku vs. Niigata) + temperature |
| 6 | Populations(Hokkaido‐Tohoku vs. Niigata) + temperature + populations(Hokkaido‐Tohoku vs. Niigata) × temperature |
| 7 | Temperature |
| 8 | Intercept |
Effects of each parameter on the development rates of S. rubrovittatus in Iwate and Akita
| Stage | Parameter | Numerator | Denominator |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg | Temperature | 1 | 15 | 713.2863 | <.001 |
| Population | 1 | 15 | 0.0079 | .9304 | |
| Temperature × population | 1 | 15 | 0.0160 | .9010 | |
| Sex | 1 | 15 | 0.0396 | .8450 | |
| Nymph | Temperature | 1 | 15 | 177.7902 | <.001 |
| Population | 1 | 15 | 0.0003 | .9864 | |
| Temperature × population | 1 | 15 | 0.0002 | .9893 | |
| Sex | 1 | 15 | 2.9207 | .1081 | |
| Preoviposition | Temperature | 1 | 5 | 33.6871 | .0021 |
| Population | 1 | 5 | 0.0011 | .9748 | |
| Temperature × population | 1 | 5 | 0.0002 | .9900 |
FIGURE 2Relationships between temperature and development rate of (a) S. rubrovittatus and (b) T. caelestialium in Iwate (○) and Akita (●) populations at each developmental stage
Effects of each parameter on the development rates of T. caelestialium in Iwate and Akita
| Stage | Parameter | Numerator | Denominator |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg | Temperature | 1 | 14 | 846.8975 | <.001 |
| Population | 1 | 14 | 2.2722 | .1539 | |
| Temperature × population | 1 | 14 | 2.3549 | .1472 | |
| Sex | 1 | 14 | 0.0128 | .9115 | |
| Nymph | Temperature | 1 | 14 | 547.4894 | <.001 |
| Population | 1 | 14 | 0.0160 | .9011 | |
| Temperature × population | 1 | 14 | 0.0097 | .9230 | |
| Sex | 1 | 14 | 1.2371 | .2848 | |
| Preoviposition | Temperature | 1 | 5 | 77.1744 | <.001 |
| Population | 1 | 5 | 0.0151 | .9070 | |
| Temperature × population | 1 | 5 | 0.0212 | .8899 |
Eight candidate models explaining the development rate in each stage of S. rubrovittatus and T. caelestialium and their information‐theoretic statistics
| Model | Variables included in the model | Egg | Nymph | Preoviposition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AICc | ΔAICc | AICc | ΔAICc | AICc | ΔAICc | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| 1 | Temperature | Population (Tohoku, Shiga, vs. Hiroshima) | −106.5 | 5.47 | −109.9 | 0.00 | −42.5 | 1.76 | |
| 2 | Temperature | Population (Tohoku, Shiga, vs. Hiroshima) | Their interaction | −99.9 | 11.99 | −107.2 | 2.70 | −42.3 | 1.96 |
| 3 | Temperature | Population (Tohoku‐Shiga vs. Hiroshima) | −110.8 | 1.16 | −105.8 | 4.05 | − | − | |
| 4 | Temperature | Population (Tohoku‐Shiga vs. Hiroshima) | Their interaction | −111.9 | 0.00 | −103.2 | 6.71 | − | − |
| 5 | Temperature | Population (Tohoku vs. Shiga‐Hiroshima) | −99.5 | 12.38 | −104.5 | 5.33 | − | − | |
| 6 | Temperature | Population (Tohoku vs. Shiga‐Hiroshima) | Their interaction | −95.8 | 16.17 | −104.1 | 5.78 | − | − |
| 7 | Temperature | −100.9 | 11.04 | −96.1 | 13.81 | −44.29 | 0.00 | ||
| 8 | Intercept only | −50.3 | 61.58 | −65.7 | 44.21 | −22.32 | 21.96 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| 1 | Temperature | Population (Hokkaido, Tohoku, vs. Niigata) | −79.66 | 2.98 | −74.36 | 21.83 | −42.02 | 28.06 | |
| 2 | Temperature | Population (Hokkaido, Tohoku, vs. Niigata) | Their interaction | −74.78 | 7.86 | −81.58 | 14.62 | −62.46 | 7.63 |
| 3 | Temperature | Population (Hokkaido vs. Touhoku‐Niigata) | −81.38 | 1.26 | −79.51 | 16.69 | −46.65 | 23.44 | |
| 4 | Temperature | Population (Hokkaido vs. Touhoku‐Niigata) | Their interaction | −82.64 | 0.00 | −96.19 | 0.00 | −70.09 | 0.00 |
| 5 | Temperature | Population (Hokkaido‐Tohoku vs. Niigata) | −80.43 | 2.21 | −77.53 | 18.66 | −37.67 | 32.41 | |
| 6 | Temperature | Population (Hokkaido‐Tohoku vs. Niigata) | Their interaction | −75.82 | 6.82 | −76.14 | 20.05 | −33.77 | 36.31 |
| 7 | Temperature | −77.80 | 4.84 | −80.12 | 16.07 | −38.99 | 31.09 | ||
| 8 | Intercept only | 37.78 | 120.42 | −52.99 | 43.20 | −21.29 | 48.80 | ||
No data was available from Hayashi (1991).
ΔAICc is the difference between the AICcs of a focal model and that of the model having the lowest AICc.
FIGURE 3Relationships between temperature and development rate of (a) S. rubrovittatus in Tohoku region (○), Shiga (□), and Hiroshima (■) Prefectures and (b) T. caelestialium in Tohoku region (○), Niigata (▲), and Hokkaido (∆) Prefectures at each developmental stage. Each line indicates the relationship between temperature and development rate in each population
Effects of each parameter on the development rates of S. rubrovittatus and T. caelestialium in Tohoku
| Stage | Parameter |
| Sum Sq |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg | Species | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.4471 | 0.5286 |
| Temperature | 1 | 0.0118 | 222.2840 | <0.001 | |
| Species × temperature | 1 | 0.0001 | 1.3827 | 0.2842 | |
| Residuals | 6 | 0.0003 | |||
| Nymphal | Species | 1 | 0.0000 | 2.3140 | 0.1790 |
| Temperature | 1 | 0.0032 | 215.5026 | <0.001 | |
| Species × temperature | 1 | 0.0001 | 3.7696 | 0.1002 | |
| Residuals | 6 | 0.0001 | |||
| Preoviposition | Species | 1 | 0.0009 | 5.7406 | 0.0536 |
| Temperature | 1 | 0.0418 | 281.3929 | <0.001 | |
| Species × temperature | 1 | 0.0038 | 25.3141 | 0.0024 | |
| Residuals | 6 | 0.0009 |
FIGURE 4Relationships between temperature and development rate of S. rubrovittatus (○) and T. caelestialium (□) in Tohoku populations
Effects of each parameter on the thorax width of S. rubrovittatus
| Parameter |
| Sum Sq |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 1 | 0.0210 | 4.9147 | 0.0294 |
| Sex | 1 | 0.3270 | 76.1879 | <0.001 |
| Population × sex | 1 | 0.0020 | 0.4416 | 0.5082 |
| Residuals | 81 | 0.3480 |
FIGURE 5Thorax width (mean ± SE) of male (□) and female (■) (a) S. rubrovittatus and (b) T. caelestialium in Iwate and Akita populations
Effects of each parameter on the thorax width of T. caelestialium
| Parameter |
| Sum Sq |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 1 | 0.0170 | 4.4743 | 0.0371 |
| Sex | 1 | 0.2000 | 52.3055 | <0.001 |
| Population × sex | 1 | 0.0090 | 2.2384 | 0.1380 |
| Residuals | 93 | 0.3550 |
FIGURE 6Average theoretical emergence dates of first generation of (a) S. rubrovittatus and (b) T. caelestialium in 2013 based on their EAT and developmental zero points. Grid cells having white color (Others) could not be calculated the emergence dates of first generation due to low temperature
FIGURE 7Average theoretical number of annual generations of (a) S. rubrovittatus and (b) T. caelestialium in 2013 based on their EAT and developmental zero points