| Literature DB >> 34938372 |
Vasileios Bampidis, Giovanna Azimonti, Maria de Lourdes Bastos, Henrik Christensen, Birgit Dusemund, Mojca Fašmon Durjava, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Secundino López Puente, Francesca Marcon, Baltasar Mayo, Alena Pechová, Mariana Petkova, Fernando Ramos, Yolanda Sanz, Roberto Edoardo Villa, Ruud Woutersen, Jaume Galobart, Maria Vittoria Vettori, Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium aluminosilicate, synthetic, as a technological feed additive for all animal species. The additive sodium aluminosilicate, synthetic, is proposed to be manufactured in two different forms, amorphous and crystalline, characterised by different ratios among the main components, silica, aluminium and sodium. In the absence of adequate data, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was not in the position to conclude on the safety of the additive sodium aluminosilicate, synthetic, in both the amorphous and crystalline forms, for the target species, the consumer and the user. The use of sodium aluminosilicate, synthetic, as a feed additive was considered safe for the environment. In the absence of appropriate data, the FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of sodium aluminosilicate, synthetic, as a technological additive.Entities:
Keywords: anti‐caking agent; efficacy; safety; sodium aluminosilicate synthetic; technological additives
Year: 2021 PMID: 34938372 PMCID: PMC8672359 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EFSA J ISSN: 1831-4732
Composition of the additive sodium aluminosilicate amorphous (on dried basis) by elemental analysis. Results expressed as minimum and maximum content analysed
|
SiO2 % |
Al2O3 % |
Na2O % | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
Composition of the additive sodium aluminosilicate amorphous. Results expressed as minimum and maximum content analysed
| Lead mg/kg | Mercury mg/kg | Cadmium mg/kg | Arsenic mg/kg | Nickel mg/kg | Dioxins | Sum of dioxins plus dioxin like PCBs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
ng WHO‐PCDD/F‐TEQ/kg.
ng WHO‐PCDD/F‐PCB‐TEQ/kg.
■■■■■
Composition of the additive sodium aluminosilicate crystalline (on dried basis) by elemental analysis. Results expressed as minimum and maximum content analysed
|
SiO2 % |
Al2O3 % |
Na2O % | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
■■■■■
Composition of the additive sodium aluminosilicate crystalline. Results expressed as minimum and maximum content analysed
| Lead mg/kg | Mercury mg/kg | Cadmium mg/kg | Arsenic mg/kg | Nickel mg/kg | Dioxins | Sum of dioxins plus dioxin like PCBs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
|
| ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ | ■■■■■ |
ng WHO‐PCDD/F‐TEQ/kg.
ng WHO‐PCDD/F‐PCB‐TEQ/kg.
■■■■■
■■■■■
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
|
| Dossier received by EFSA. Sodium aluminosilicate, synthetic for all animal species. Submitted by European Zeolites Producers Association (EUZEPA) & Association of Synthetic Amorphous Silica Producers (ASASP) |
|
| Reception mandate from the European Commission |
|
| Application validated by EFSA – Start of the scientific assessment |
|
| Request of supplementary information to the applicant in line with Article 8(1)(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 – Scientific assessment suspended. |
|
| Reception of the Evaluation report of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives |
|
| Comments received from Member States |
|
| Reception of supplementary information from the applicant ‐ Scientific assessment re‐started |
|
| Reception of spontaneous supplementary information from the applicant |
| Opinion adopted by the FEEDAP Panel. End of the Scientific assessment |