| Literature DB >> 34938332 |
Yingchao Zhang1, Fengran Xiong1, Ruxuan Zhao1, Tingting Shi1, Jing Lu1, Jinkui Yang1.
Abstract
Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is a reversible intermediate hyperglycemia stage with an increasing risk of diabetes and related complications. Our study was designed to identify the relationship between the serum anion gap and the risk of progressing to impaired fasting glucose and diabetes. Here, we performed a prospective, population-based study among 1191 Chinese individuals aged 22-87 years who took health examinations annually between 2006 and 2012 including clinical features and plasma metabolites. All of the participants had no history of diabetes or related chronic complications. Logistic regression analysis was designed to examine the associations between clinical and metabolomic factors and the risk of developing IFG or diabetes. Among them, 58 subjects whose fasting glucose were between 6.1 and 7 mmol/L were diagnosed as IFG or diabetes. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), potassium, and albumin at baseline, the participants in the upper tertiles of serum anion gap (SAG) had higher odds of progressing to IFG or diabetes than those in the lower tertiles. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was analyzed, and the optimal cutoff level for the anion gap to predict incident IFG or diabetes was 13.76 mmol/L, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.623. Our data demonstrate that a higher serum anion gap is associated with the risk of developing IFG or diabetes.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34938332 PMCID: PMC8687806 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4350418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Baseline characteristics of participants by tertiles of serum anion gap.
| By tertiles of serum anion gap |
| Overall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (≤12.51) | Middle (12.52–14.80) | High (≥14.81) | |||
| n | 397 | 397 | 397 | 1191 | |
| Age (years) | 34.6 (9.88) | 32.7 (8.18) | 30.7 (6.53) | <0.0001 | 32.6 (8.46) |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 161 (40.6%) | 209 (52.6%) | 262 (66.0%) | <0.0001 | 632 (53.1%) |
| Female | 236 (59.4%) | 188 (47.4%) | 135 (34.0%) | 559 (46.9%) | |
| Height (cm) | 166 (8.59) | 169 (8.72) | 170 (8.28) | <0.0001 | 168 (8.65) |
| Weight (kg) | 64.1 (13.3) | 67.4 (13.8) | 69.2 (13.9) | <0.0001 | 66.9 (13.8) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.0 (3.46) | 23.4 (3.56) | 23.8 (3.65) | 0.0053 | 23.4 (3.57) |
| Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.04 (0.33) | 5.04 (0.34) | 4.97 (0.34) | 0.0016 | 5.02 (0.34) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 109 (12.5) | 112 (12.1) | 114 (12.7) | <0.0001 | 112 (12.6) |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 71.0 (9.07) | 73.4 (8.48) | 75.6 (8.75) | <0.0001 | 73.3 (8.96) |
| ALT (U/L) | 21.1 (16.8) | 24.4 (17.7) | 28.0 (20.6) | <0.0001 | 24.5 (18.6) |
| K+ (mmol/L) | 4.13 (0.273) | 4.19 (0.314) | 4.23 (0.310) | <0.0001 | 4.18 (0.302) |
| Ca2+ (mmol/L) | 2.37 (1.06) | 2.36 (0.0808) | 2.38 (0.0792) | 0.89 | 2.37 (0.613) |
| AST (U/L) | 25.3 (8.89) | 26.5 (8.11) | 28.6 (8.41) | <0.0001 | 26.8 (8.58) |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.48 (0.361) | 1.43 (0.367) | 1.40 (0.357) | 0.015 | 1.44 (0.363) |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 2.80 (0.688) | 2.92 (0.829) | 2.99 (0.700) | 0.001 | 2.90 (0.744) |
| Cr (umol/L) | 68.4 (14.7) | 71.7 (14.1) | 76.0 (14.6) | <0.0001 | 72.1 (14.8) |
| Albumin (g/L) | 43.4 (2.74) | 44.3 (2.71) | 45.5 (2.62) | <0.0001 | 44.4 (2.82) |
| IFG/DM | |||||
| Yes | 10 (2.5%) | 16 (4.0%) | 32 (8.1%) | 0.001 | 58 (4.9%) |
| No | 387 (97.5%) | 381 (96.0%) | 365 (91.9%) | 1133 (95.1%) | |
Data are n (%) or mean (SD). ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; Cr, serum creatinine. Fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes mellitus (DM).
Risk of fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes mellitus (DM) among individuals with a higher serum anion gap, by different adjustment strategies, compared with that of individuals with lower serum anion gap.
| Model information | By tertiles of serum anion gap, OR (95% CI) |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (≤12.51) | Middle (12.52–14.80) | High (≥14.81) | ||
| No. of IFG/DM events (%) | 10 (2.5%) | 16 (4.0%) | 32 (8.1%) | — |
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.67 (0.739, 3.75) | 4.15 (1.95, 8.83) | 0.00023 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.54 (0.681, 3.49) | 3.77 (1.75, 8.1) | 0.00069 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.50 (0.656, 3.42) | 3.38 (1.53, 7.46) | 0.0018 |
High vs. low. Model 1: adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: model 1+adjusted for body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Model 3: model 2+adjusted for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), K+, and serum creatinine and albumin.
Figure 1Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of anion gap for predicting impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes mellitus (DM). The optimal cutoff point for the anion gap was 13.76 mmol/L.
Figure 2Incidence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes mellitus (DM) by different levels of the baseline serum anion gap.