| Literature DB >> 34937963 |
Jakub Chycki1, Adam Zajac1, Michał Toborek2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was the assessment of sodium bicarbonate supplementation (NaHCO3 -) on anaerobic and cognitive performance, assuming ergogenic effect of HCO3 by improving buffering capacity and greater lactate efflux, which may have indirect effect on circulating neurotrophin level (e.g BDNF, IGF-1) and memory. Sixteen well-trained judo athletes completed a randomized trial of either a NaHCO3 - (EG) (5000 mg x 2/day/90 min before training)or placebo for 21 days (CG). Before and after treatment, athletes completed double Wingate test (Wt) protocol following which they performed perceived Working Memory test (pWM). Results suggested significant increase in Upper Limb Total Work (with p = 0.011), Mean Power (with p = 0.001), post exercise LA concentration (from 15.51 mmol/L to 18.10 mmol/L with p = 0.01) and HCO3rest concentrations (from 27.37 mmol/l to 28.91 mmol/l with p = 0.001), when compared to baseline values in EG. The analysis showed statistically significant increase in values for IGF-1 (with p = 0.001) and decrease for cortisol and BDNF (with p = 0.001) in EG and CG, when pre and post exercise values were compared. We also revealed statistically significant decrease in values for display time after ingestion of HCO3 between pre and post exercise (with p = 0.002) In conclusion, the lack of a substantial relationship between exerkines (IGF-1, BDNF) and memory in the present study might suggest that exercise induced lactate levels is dominant mechanism improving working memory in well-train athletes.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic performance; BDNF; Bicarbonate; Cognitive function; Lactate metabolism
Year: 2020 PMID: 34937963 PMCID: PMC8670805 DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.96320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sport ISSN: 0860-021X Impact factor: 4.606
Characteristics of the study participants.
| Variables | Experimental Group (n = 8) Mean ± SD | Control Group (n = 8) Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs.) | 24.3 ± 0.5 | 23.2 ± 1.1 |
| Height (cm) | 181.0 ± 2.3 | 178 ± 2.0 |
| Body mass (kg) | 81.0 ± 2.4 | 84.2 ± 3.0 |
| TW–upper lumbs (J/kg) | 192.10 ± 5.5 | 195.1 ± 8.4 |
| TW–lower limbs (J/kg) | 246.0 ± 6.5 | 248.7 ± 12.4 |
| MP–upper limbs (W/kg) | 7.22 ± 0.47 | 7.12 ± 0.63 |
| MP– lower limbs (W/kg) | 9.14 ± 0.87 | 8.99 ± 0.43 |
| VO2max (ml/kg/min) | 59.7 ± 3.2 | 58.8 ± 2.1 |
Note: TW– Total Work; MP– Mean Power.
FIG. 1Overview of the experimental protocol.
FIG. 2Flowchart.
The differences in anaerobic performance variables – upper limbs, before and after bicarbonate ingestion in the experimental and control groups (placebo).
| Variables | EG | CGcontrol | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| TW/kg | Before | 195.55 ± 6.50 | 190.40 ± 13.42 |
| MP/kg | Before | 7.32 ± 0.67. | 7.26 ± 0.63 |
| PP/kg | Before | 12.73 ± 2.45 | 12.2 ± 2.96 |
Note: MP – Mean Power; PP – Peak Power; TW – Total Work ;
*- statistically significant difference. ; # statistically
The differences in POST exercise blood plasma lactate concentration, as well as the resting concentration of di-carbonate and blood pH values before and after bicarbonate ingestion in the experimental and control groups (placebo).
| Variables | EG | CGcontrol | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Before | 15.57 ± 1.06 | 15.21 ± .44 | |
| Before | 27.37 ± 0.07 | 27.20 ± .07 | |
|
| Before | 7.43 ± 0.003 | 7.43 ± 0.01 |
Note: LAmax – post exercise blood plasma lactate concentration; HCO3 – di-carbonate;
*- statistically significant difference.;# statistically
The differences in PRE- and POST- exercise BDNF concentrations before and after bicarbonate supplementation in the experimental and control groups.
| Variables | EG Mean ± SD | CG Mean ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Before | PRE exercise | 26,55 ± 7.84 | 26.31 ± 7.22 |
| POST exercise | 24.81 ± 10.08 | 23.73 ± 12.45 | ||
| After | PRE exercise | 28.62 ± 11.14 | 28.20 ± 13.30 | |
| POST exercise | 14.86 ± 7.83 | 20.20 ± 10.09 | ||
Note: *- statistically significant difference. ; # statistically
The differences in neurocognitive functions PRE and POST- exercise, as well as before and after bicarbonate supplementation in the experimental and control groups.
| Variables | EG | CG | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||
|
| Before | PRE exercise1 | 0.376 ± 0.101 | 0.392 ± 0.102 |
| PRE exercise2 | 0.357 ± 0.091# | 0.362 ± 0.353# | ||
| POST exercise1 | 0.310 ± 0.11 | 0.312 ± 0.21 | ||
| POST exercise2 | 0.233 ± 0.05# | 0.250 ± 0.09# | ||
|
| ||||
| After | PRE exercise1 | 0.396 ± 0.10 | 0.392 ± 0.103 | |
| PRE exercise1 | 0.367 ± 0.10$ | 0.371 ± 0.366$ | ||
| POST exercise1 | 0.276 ± 0.11 | 0.318 ± 0.10 | ||
| POST exercise2 | 0.217 ± 0.09$ | 0.250 ± 0.10$ | ||
Note: *- statistically significant difference. ;
# Pre – post before;.
$; # Pre – post after
FIG. 3The proposed exercise mechanism, regulating the improvement of brain executive functions in athletes. Control group – , Experimental Group – ∆