Literature DB >> 3493794

Single-shot i.v. anaesthesia for outpatient dental surgery. Comparison of 2,6 di-isopropyl phenol and methohexitone.

M R Logan, J E Duggan, I D Levack, A A Spence.   

Abstract

A single i.v. bolus dose of propofol 3 mg kg-1 was compared with methohexitone 2 mg kg-1 as the sole anaesthetic agent for simple dental extraction in outpatients. Induction of anaesthesia was smoother with propofol, with a lower incidence of excitatory phenomena. Pain on injection was a common complication of both drugs and related to the site of injection. The Leeds Psychomotor Tester was used to assess psychomotor performance during the recovery. Rate of recovery from anaesthesia was similar with both agents, and there was little residual impairment of psychomotor function 40 min after induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3493794     DOI: 10.1093/bja/59.2.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  4 in total

1.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry journal literature, January 1986-December 1987.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

2.  Comparison of propofol infusion and isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia for dentistry in mentally retarded patients.

Authors:  H Antila; J Valli; M Valtonen; J Kanto
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992

3.  Randomised Comparative Study on Propofol and Diazepam as a Sedating Agent in Day Care Surgery.

Authors:  Amit S Nirwan; Neha Jain; Micheal Pragasm; Deepashri Kamblimath; Anurag Bhargava; Saba Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-06-15

Review 4.  Propofol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic.

Authors:  M S Langley; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.