Literature DB >> 34937789

Predicting Outcome in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: International Validation of the Modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score.

Alex Y Doets1, Hester F Lingsma1, Christa Walgaard1, Badrul Islam1, Nowshin Papri1, Amy Davidson1, Yuko Yamagishi1, Susumu Kusunoki1, Mazen M Dimachkie1, Waqar Waheed1, Noah Kolb1, Zhahirul Islam1, Quazi Deen Mohammad1, Thomas Harbo1, Soren H Sindrup1, Govindsinh Chavada1, Hugh J Willison1, Carlos Casasnovas1, Kathleen Bateman1, James A L Miller1, Bianca van den Berg1, Christine Verboon1, Joyce Roodbol1, Sonja E Leonhard1, Luana Benedetti1, Satoshi Kuwabara1, Peter Van den Bergh1, Soledad Monges1, Girolama A Marfia1, Nortina Shahrizaila1, Giuliana Galassi1, Yann Péréon1, Jan Bürmann1, Krista Kuitwaard1, Ruud P Kleyweg1, Cintia Marchesoni1, María J Sedano Tous1, Luis Querol1, Isabel Illa1, Yuzhong Wang1, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio1, Simon Rinaldi1, Angelo Schenone1, Julio Pardo1, Frederique H Vermeij1, Helmar C Lehmann1, Volkan Granit1, Guido Cavaletti1, Gerardo Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez1, Fabio A Barroso1, Leo H Visser1, Hans D Katzberg1, Efthimios Dardiotis1, Shahram Attarian1, Anneke J van der Kooi1, Filip Eftimov1, Paul W Wirtz1, Johnny P A Samijn1, H Jacobus Gilhuis1, Robert D M Hadden1, James K L Holt1, Kazim A Sheikh1, Summer Karafiath1, Michal Vytopil1, Giovanni Antonini1, Thomas E Feasby1, Catharina G Faber1, Cees J Gijsbers1, Mark Busby1, Rhys C Roberts1, Nicholas J Silvestri1, Raffaella Fazio1, Gert W van Dijk1, Marcel P J Garssen1, Chiara S M Straathof1, Kenneth C Gorson1, Bart C Jacobs2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical course and outcome of the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) are diverse and vary among regions. The modified Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (mEGOS), developed with data from Dutch patients, is a clinical model that predicts the risk of walking inability in patients with GBS. The study objective was to validate the mEGOS in the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) cohort and to improve its performance and region specificity.
METHODS: We used prospective data from the first 1,500 patients included in IGOS, aged ≥6 years and unable to walk independently. We evaluated whether the mEGOS at entry and week 1 could predict the inability to walk unaided at 4 and 26 weeks in the full cohort and in regional subgroups, using 2 measures for model performance: (1) discrimination: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and (2) calibration: observed vs predicted probability of being unable to walk independently. To improve the model predictions, we recalibrated the model containing the overall mEGOS score, without changing the individual predictive factors. Finally, we assessed the predictive ability of the individual factors.
RESULTS: For validation of mEGOS at entry, 809 patients were eligible (Europe/North America [n = 677], Asia [n = 76], other [n = 56]), and 671 for validation of mEGOS at week 1 (Europe/North America [n = 563], Asia [n = 65], other [n = 43]). AUC values were >0.7 in all regional subgroups. In the Europe/North America subgroup, observed outcomes were worse than predicted; in Asia, observed outcomes were better than predicted. Recalibration improved model accuracy and enabled the development of a region-specific version for Europe/North America (mEGOS-Eu/NA). Similar to the original mEGOS, severe limb weakness and higher age were the predominant predictors of poor outcome in the IGOS cohort. DISCUSSION: mEGOS is a validated tool to predict the inability to walk unaided at 4 and 26 weeks in patients with GBS, also in countries outside the Netherlands. We developed a region-specific version of mEGOS for patients from Europe/North America. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that the mEGOS accurately predicts the inability to walk unaided at 4 and 26 weeks in patients with GBS. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT01582763.
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34937789      PMCID: PMC8826467          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  27 in total

Review 1.  Guillain-Barré syndrome and Fisher syndrome: case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.

Authors:  James J Sejvar; Katrin S Kohl; Jane Gidudu; Anthony Amato; Nandini Bakshi; Roger Baxter; Dale R Burwen; David R Cornblath; Jan Cleerbout; Kathryn M Edwards; Ulrich Heininger; Richard Hughes; Najwa Khuri-Bulos; Rudolf Korinthenberg; Barbara J Law; Ursula Munro; Helena C Maltezou; Patricia Nell; James Oleske; Robert Sparks; Priscilla Velentgas; Patricia Vermeer; Max Wiznitzer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  International Guillain-Barré Syndrome Outcome Study: protocol of a prospective observational cohort study on clinical and biological predictors of disease course and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Bart C Jacobs; Bianca van den Berg; Christine Verboon; Govindsinh Chavada; David R Cornblath; Kenneth C Gorson; Thomas Harbo; Hans-Peter Hartung; Richard A C Hughes; Susumu Kusunoki; Pieter A van Doorn; Hugh J Willison
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome with mycophenolate mofetil: a pilot study.

Authors:  M P J Garssen; R van Koningsveld; P A van Doorn; I S J Merkies; M Scheltens-de Boer; J A van Leusden; I N van Schaik; W H J P Linssen; F Visscher; A M Boon; C G Faber; J Meulstee; M J J Prick; L H van den Berg; H Franssen; J A P Hiel; P Y K van den Bergh; C J M Sindic
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  R P Kleyweg; F G van der Meché; P I Schmitz
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 5.  Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  A K Asbury; D R Cornblath
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 6.  Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Sylvie Chevret; Richard Ac Hughes; Djillali Annane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-27

7.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous immunoglobulin and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Krista Kuitwaard; Jenny de Gelder; Anne P Tio-Gillen; Wim C J Hop; Teun van Gelder; Albert W van Toorenenbergen; Pieter A van Doorn; Bart C Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Regional variation of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Alex Y Doets; Christine Verboon; Bianca van den Berg; Thomas Harbo; David R Cornblath; Hugh J Willison; Zhahirul Islam; Shahram Attarian; Fabio A Barroso; Kathleen Bateman; Luana Benedetti; Peter van den Bergh; Carlos Casasnovas; Guido Cavaletti; Govindsinh Chavada; Kristl G Claeys; Efthimios Dardiotis; Amy Davidson; Pieter A van Doorn; Tom E Feasby; Giuliana Galassi; Kenneth C Gorson; Hans-Peter Hartung; Sung-Tsang Hsieh; Richard A C Hughes; Isabel Illa; Badrul Islam; Susumu Kusunoki; Satoshi Kuwabara; Helmar C Lehmann; James A L Miller; Quazi Deen Mohammad; Soledad Monges; Eduardo Nobile Orazio; Julio Pardo; Yann Pereon; Simon Rinaldi; Luis Querol; Stephen W Reddel; Ricardo C Reisin; Nortina Shahrizaila; Soren H Sindrup; Waheed Waqar; Bart C Jacobs
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients.

Authors:  K J M Janssen; K G M Moons; C J Kalkman; D E Grobbee; Y Vergouwe
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Intravenous immunoglobulin for Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Authors:  Richard A C Hughes; Anthony V Swan; Pieter A van Doorn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Case Report: Delayed Guillain-Barré syndrome following trauma: A case series and manage considerations.

Authors:  Yiliu Zhang; Chuxin Huang; Wei Lu; Qing Hu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Validation and adjustment of modified Erasmus GBS outcome score in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Nowshin Papri; Alex Y Doets; Quazi D Mohammad; Hubert P Endtz; Hester F Lingsma; Bart C Jacobs; Zhahirul Islam
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 5.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.