Literature DB >> 34937595

Comparison of four different threshold values of shock index in predicting mortality of COVID-19 patients.

Rohat Ak1, Fatih Doğanay2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to examine the accuracy in pre-hospital shock index (SI) for predicting intensive care unit (ICU) requirement and 30-day mortality among from COVID-19 patients transported to the hospital by ambulance.
METHOD: All consecutive patients who were the age ≥18 years, transported to the emergency department (ED) by ambulance with a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in the pre-hospital frame were included in the study. Four different cut-off points were compared (0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1.0) to examine the predictive performance of both the mortality and ICU requirement of the SI. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) was employed to evaluate each cut-off value discriminatory for predicting 30-day mortality and ICU admission.
RESULTS: The total of 364 patients was included in this study. The median age in the study population was 69 (55-80), of which 196 were men and 168 were women. AUC values for 30-day mortality outcome were calculated as 0.672, 0.674, 0.755, and 0.626, respectively, for threshold values of 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0. ICU admission was more likely for the patients with pre-hospital SI> 0.9. Similarly, the mortality rate was higher in patients with pre-hospital SI> 0.9.
CONCLUSION: Early triage of COVID-19 patients will ensure efficient use of healthcare resources. The SI could be a helpful, fast and powerful tool for predicting mortality status and ICU requirements of adult COVID-19 patients. It was concluded that the most useful threshold value for the shock index in predicting the prognosis of COVID-19 patients is 0.9.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Intensive care units; Mortality; Pre-hospital; Shock Index; Triage

Year:  2021        PMID: 34937595      PMCID: PMC8924560          DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2021.374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep        ISSN: 1935-7893            Impact factor:   1.385


  23 in total

1.  Importance of vital signs to the early diagnosis and severity of sepsis: association between vital signs and sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Tsuneaki Kenzaka; Masanobu Okayama; Shigehiro Kuroki; Miho Fukui; Shinsuke Yahata; Hiroki Hayashi; Akihito Kitao; Daisuke Sugiyama; Eiji Kajii; Masayoshi Hashimoto
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 1.271

2.  Pre-hospital modified shock index for prediction of massive transfusion and mortality in trauma patients.

Authors:  Il-Jae Wang; Byung-Kwan Bae; Sung-Wook Park; Young-Mo Cho; Dae-Sup Lee; Mun-Ki Min; Ji-Ho Ryu; Gil-Hwan Kim; Jae-Hoon Jang
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The clinical utility of shock index to predict the need for blood transfusion and outcomes in trauma.

Authors:  Ayman El-Menyar; Priya Goyal; Elizabeth Tilley; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department.

Authors:  M Y Rady; H A Smithline; H Blake; R Nowak; E Rivers
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Simple triage scoring system predicting death and the need for critical care resources for use during epidemics.

Authors:  Daniel Talmor; Alan E Jones; Lewis Rubinson; Michael D Howell; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Comparative study on quick sequential organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and the shock index in prehospital emergency patients: single-site retrospective study.

Authors:  Masahiro Harada; Takeshi Takahashi; Yoshio Haga; Takeshi Nishikawa
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-02-05

8.  Shock index as a predictor of mortality among the Covid-19 patients.

Authors:  Fatih Doğanay; Fuat Elkonca; Avni Uygar Seyhan; Erdal Yılmaz; Ayşe Batırel; Rohat Ak
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Epidemiological, demographic, and clinical characteristics of 47 cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease from Saudi Arabia: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Abdullah Assiri; Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Abdullah A Al-Rabeeah; Fahad A Al-Rabiah; Sami Al-Hajjar; Ali Al-Barrak; Hesham Flemban; Wafa N Al-Nassir; Hanan H Balkhy; Rafat F Al-Hakeem; Hatem Q Makhdoom; Alimuddin I Zumla; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 25.071

10.  Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing.

Authors:  Sijia Tian; Nan Hu; Jing Lou; Kun Chen; Xuqin Kang; Zhenjun Xiang; Hui Chen; Dali Wang; Ning Liu; Dong Liu; Gang Chen; Yongliang Zhang; Dou Li; Jianren Li; Huixin Lian; Shengmei Niu; Luxi Zhang; Jinjun Zhang
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 6.072

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prehospital shock index in predicting mortality among patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Rohat Ak; Fatih Doğanay
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.093

2.  Prognostic Performance of Shock Index, Diastolic Shock Index, Age Shock Index, and Modified Shock Index in COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Authors:  Mustafa Avci; Fatih Doganay
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.556

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.