| Literature DB >> 34937192 |
Sabina Davidsson1, Jessica Carlsson1, Larry Greenberg2, Jonny Wijkander3, Bo Söderquist4,5, Ann Erlandsson1,2.
Abstract
Tumors and infectious agents both benefit from an immunosuppressive environment. Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) is a bacterium in the normal skin microbiota, which has the ability to survive intracellularly in macrophages and is significantly more common in prostate cancer tissue compared with normal prostate tissue. This study investigated if prostate cancer tissue culture positive for C. acnes has a higher infiltration of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and if macrophages stimulated with C. acnes induced the expression of immunosuppressive genes that could be linked to an increase of Tregs in prostate cancer. Real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISA) were used to examine the expression of immunosuppressive genes in human macrophages stimulated in vitro with C. acnes, and associations between the presence of C. acnes and infiltration of Tregs were investigated by statistically analyzing data generated in two previous studies. The in vitro results demonstrated that macrophages stimulated with C. acnes significantly increased their expression of PD-L1, CCL17, and CCL18 mRNA and protein (p <0.05). In the cohort, Tregs in tumor stroma and tumor epithelia were positively associated with the presence of C. acnes (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.046, respectively). Since the macrophages stimulated with C. acnes in vitro increased the expression of immunosuppressive genes, and prostate cancer patients with prostatic C. acnes infection had higher infiltration of Tregs than their noninfected counterparts, we suggest that C. acnes may contribute to an immunosuppressive tumor environment that is vital for prostate cancer progression. IMPORTANCE In an immune suppressive tumor microenvironment constituted by immunosuppressive cells and immunosuppressive mediators, tumors may improve their ability to give rise to a clinically relevant cancer. In the present study, we found that C. acnes might contribute to an immunosuppressive environment by recruiting Tregs and by increasing the expression of immunosuppressive mediators such as PD-L1, CCL17, and CCL18. We believe that our data add support to the hypothesis of a contributing role of C. acnes in prostate cancer development. If established that C. acnes stimulates prostate cancer progression it may open up avenues for targeted prostate cancer treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Cutibacterium acnes; cancer; macrophages; prostate; prostate cancer; regulatory T-cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34937192 PMCID: PMC8694172 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01497-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Representative images of the change of macrophage morphology after stimulation with C. acnes type II. (A) Unstimulated macrophages in culture plate after 48 h of incubation (x20). (B) Macrophages in culture plate stimulated with 10 MOI C. acnes type II for 48 h of culture (x20). (C) Macrophages stimulated with 10 MOI C. acnes type II for 48 h of culture followed by Giemsa staining (x20). (D) Macrophages stimulated with 10 MOI C. acnes type II for 48 h of culture, scraped off the culture plate and stained with Giemsa staining (×100, scale bar 30 μm).
FIG 2Expression of CCL17, CCL18, and PD-L1 in unstimulated macrophages (control) and macrophages stimulated with C. acnes type IA or type II. (A) mRNA expression in unstimulated control and C. acnes type IA or type II stimulated macrophages, presented as mean +/- SD of log ΔCT (i.e., the mRNA expression of the gene of interest minus the expression of the housekeeping gene POLR2F). The lower the ΔCt value, the higher the expression of the mRNA of interest. (B) Protein expression in unstimulated control and C. acnes type IA or type II stimulated macrophages, presented as mean +/- SD of log pg/ml. The statistical analysis were performed using repeated measurements ANOVA with two within subject factors (treatment and replicates). The treatments were unstimulated (control), stimulated with C. acnes type IA or with C. acnes type II. The number of replicates were three, done with three different macrophage donors. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Infiltration of Tregs in 151 tumors (stromal and epithelial compartment) from 137 prostate cancer patients with and without prostatic C. acnes infection
| Infiltration of Tregs | Patients with no | Patients with |
|---|---|---|
| Tregs in tumor stroma (%) | ||
| Yes | 17 (30) | 39 (70) |
| No | 57 (60) | 38 (40) |
| Tregs in tumor epithelia (%) | ||
| Yes | 15 (33) | 30 (67) |
| No | 59 (56) | 47 (44) |