Literature DB >> 3493535

Mental disorders and ecological structure in Nottingham.

J A Giggs.   

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a specifically geographical investigation of the incidence, distribution and social/environmental correlates of mental disorder in Nottingham. Three diagnostic groups were examined, namely schizophrenia and paranoia, the effective psychoses (or manic depression) and the non-psychotic mental disorders. Analysis of two distinct cohorts of first contact patients for both the schizophrenia and affective psychoses diagnoses yielded markedly dissimilar incidence rates. It is therefore suggested that observed variations in the incidence of specific mental disorders between cities probably reflect such nosocomial (i.e. service related) factors as diagnostic accuracy and the levels of local psychiatric services. It is therefore dangerous to ascribe the variations solely to the contrasting social/environmental milieux found in these cities. The spatial distributions of the selected mental disorders within Nottingham were analysed in the context of a set of 12 distinct ecological areas. These areas were derived from a matrix comprising 105 sub-areas and 40 variables via principal components analysis and a non-hierarchical clustering algorithm. Marked spatial variation in the incidence of all the mental disorders was demonstrated via both traditional mapping and probability mapping techniques. Pearson product-moment analysis revealed that the distributions of the two diagnostically distinct schizophrenia and affective psychoses cohorts were virtually identical. The relationships between the inception rates for the mental disorders and social/environmental attributes were analysed. Stepwise multiple regression models for both the principal components and the individual census variables revealed strong and systematic relationships with all the mental disorders. Although such ecological analysis has limited explanatory power it nevertheless provides useful insights into mental disorder-environmental relationships. It is argued that these can be subsequently best examined at a disaggregated (i.e. behavioural) level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3493535     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90252-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Social disadvantage and schizophrenia. A combined neighbourhood and individual-level analysis.

Authors:  Marjan Drukker; Lydia Krabbendam; Ger Driessen; Jim van Os
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 2.  Review: the wider social environment and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Judith Allardyce; Jane Boydell
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Small area-level variation in the incidence of psychotic disorders in an urban area in France: an ecological study.

Authors:  Andrei Szoke; Baptiste Pignon; Grégoire Baudin; Andrea Tortelli; Jean-Romain Richard; Marion Leboyer; Franck Schürhoff
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  The stability of the ecological distribution of the incidence of treated mental disorders in the city of Mannheim.

Authors:  S Weyerer; H Häfner
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Urbanicity, social adversity and psychosis.

Authors:  Andreas Heinz; Lorenz Deserno; Ulrich Reininghaus
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 6.  Incidence of schizophrenia and other psychoses in England, 1950-2009: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  James B Kirkbride; Antonia Errazuriz; Tim J Croudace; Craig Morgan; Daniel Jackson; Jane Boydell; Robin M Murray; Peter B Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: the distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology.

Authors:  John McGrath; Sukanta Saha; Joy Welham; Ossama El Saadi; Clare MacCauley; David Chant
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 8.775

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.