| Literature DB >> 34934531 |
Thaís Correia Costa1, Mateus Pies Gionbelli2, Marcio de Souza Duarte1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: epigenetic modifications; livestock; maternal nutrition; skeletal muscle development
Year: 2021 PMID: 34934531 PMCID: PMC8683153 DOI: 10.1093/af/vfab061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Front ISSN: 2160-6056
Figure 1.(A) Photomicrograph (20× of magnification) of skeletal muscle of beef cattle showing the muscle fibers (red), and intramuscular collagen (blue). (B) Photomicrograph (20× of magnification) of skeletal muscle of beef cattle showing preadipocytes and adipocytes (indicated by white arrows) within muscle fibers.
Figure 2.Influence of epigenetic marks on livestock phenotype. (A) DNA methylation in CpG islands catalyzed by enzymes DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) leads to gene silencing, which can be reverted by DNA demethylases, represented by the enzyme ten-eleven translocation (TET). (B) Histone modification influencing the chromatin structure. The mark H3K27me3 result in a condensed chromatin (heterochromatin) and consequently gene silencing, while the marks H3K4me3 and H3K9Ac result in an unpacked chromatin (euchromatin) facilitating transcriptional factors to bind and proceed gene transcription. HMTs and HATs transfer the methyl and acetyl group to the residues of amino acids in the histone tails, respectively. While HDM and HDAC remove the methyl and acetyl group, respectively. (C) Inhibitory role of microRNAs (miRNAs) on the target mRNA. In case of imperfect base pairing with the target mRNA, miRNAs aim to inhibit translation and consequently protein synthesis, while the perfect complementation cause the degradation of the target mRNA.