| Literature DB >> 34934408 |
Min Wang1, Shujuan Wang1, Qiang Su2, Tian Ma3.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of combining early chemotherapy with Zhipu Liujunzi decoction under the concept of strengthening and consolidating body resistance for gastric cancer patients and nursing strategy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34934408 PMCID: PMC8651398 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2135924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Comparison and statistics of general information ().
| Group | Experimental group | Control group | X2/ |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 23/27 | 26/24 | 0.36 | 0.55 | |
| Age (years) | 55.32 ± 6.80 | 55.77 ± 6.39 | 0.34 | 0.73 | |
| Height (cm) | 165.32 ± 9.42 | 165.64 ± 9.76 | 0.17 | 0.87 | |
| Weight (kg) | 70.83 ± 5.90 | 70.38 ± 5.64 | 0.39 | 0.70 | |
| Tumor staging | |||||
| Ib | 15 | 17 | 0.18 | 0.67 | |
| II | 26 | 23 | 0.36 | 0.55 | |
| III | 9 | 10 | 0.65 | 0.42 | |
| Pathological type | |||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 26 | 28 | |||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 24 | 22 | |||
| Histologic grade | 0.66 | 0.42 | |||
| Poor differentiation | 27 | 31 | |||
| Moderate differentiation | 23 | 19 | |||
| Albumin (g/L) | 30.24 ± 3.17 | 30.35 ± 3.23 | 0.172 | 0.864 | |
| Duration of disease (month) | 3.68 ± 1.69 | 3.72 ± 1.73 | 0.12 | 0.91 | |
| Smoking history (years) | 4.31 ± 1.33 | 4.27 ± 1.38 | 0.15 | 0.88 | |
| Drinking history (years) | 10.96 ± 1.38 | 10.52 ± 1.22 | 1.69 | 0.09 | |
| Hypertension (n) | 12 | 10 | 0.23 | 0.63 | |
| Diabetes (n) | 8 | 7 | 0.08 | 0.78 | |
| Hyperlipidemia (n) | 4 | 6 | 0.44 | 0.51 | |
| Educational level | Primary school and below (n) | 7 | 8 | 0.08 | 0.78 |
| Junior high school (n) | 15 | 12 | 0.46 | 0.50 | |
| Senior high school (n) | 28 | 30 | 0.16 | 0.69 | |
| Registration | Rural (n) | 33 | 30 | 0.39 | 0.53 |
| Urban (n) | 17 | 20 | |||
| Annual household income | Less than 50,000 yuan | 2 | 4 | 0.71 | 0.40 |
| 50,000∼100,000 yuan | 26 | 23 | 0.36 | 0.55 | |
| More than 100,000 yuan | 22 | 23 | 0.04 | 0.84 | |
Comparison of treatment results between the two groups [n(%)].
| Group |
| CR | PR | SD | PD | ORR (%) | DCR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 50 | 17 (34.00) | 19 (38.00) | 12 (24.00) | 4 (8.00) | 72.00 (36/50) | 92.00 (46/50) |
| Control group | 50 | 11 (22.00) | 15 (30.00) | 12 (24.00) | 12 (24.00) | 52.00 (26/50) | 76.00(38/50) |
|
| 4.006 | 4.762 | |||||
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 |
Figure 1Comparison of tumor marker levels after treatment (). (A) The comparison of CEA levels after treatment in patients between the two groups in μg/L, and the mean CEA levels of the experimental group and the control group were (18.86 ± 2.70) and (34.02 ± 10.01), respectively; indicates that the mean CEA levels after treatment of both groups were significantly different (t = 10.340, P < 0.001); (B) the comparison of CA19-9 levels after treatment in patients between the two groups in U/mL, and the mean CA19-9 levels of the experimental group and the control group were (32.92 ± 7.30) and (47.22 ± 7.54), respectively; and indicates that the mean CA19-9 levels after treatment of both groups were significantly different (t = 9.635, P < 0.001).
Comparison of immune function between the two groups (x ± s, μl−1).
| Group | CD3+ | CD4+ | CD8+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 843.59 ± 105.77 | 490.26 ± 87.73 | 475.00 ± 88.38 |
| Control group | 720.26 ± 94.65 | 332.10 ± 71.19 | 348.48 ± 74.18 |
|
| 6.14 | 9.90 | 7.75 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 2Comparison of clinical symptoms after treatment (). (A) The KPS scores after treatment of the experimental group and the control group, which were (77.13 ± 5.71) and (63.41 ± 5.62), respectively;
Comparison of sleep quality scores, mental state scores, and nursing satisfaction scores after treatment between the two groups (, scores).
| Group |
| PSQI | SAS | SDS | Nursing satisfaction scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | 50 | 4.27 ± 1.36 | 27.64 ± 4.27 | 30.62 ± 5.72 | 78.24 ± 4.26 |
| Control | 50 | 7.83 ± 1.45 | 32.16 ± 4.33 | 36.38 ± 4.86 | 63.21 ± 4.75 |
|
| 12.663 | 5.256 | 5.426 | 16.657 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of incidence rates of toxic side effects [n(%)].
| Group |
| Neurotoxic effects | Myelosuppression | Abnormal liver function | Gastrointestinal reaction | Total incidence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | 50 | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (4.00) | 6.00% (3/50) |
| Control group | 50 | 2 (4.00) | 2 (4.00) | 3 (6.00) | 3 (6.00) | 20.00% (10/50) |
|
| 4.332 | |||||
|
| <0.05 |