Literature DB >> 34933954

Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons Are Required for Contending Strategy Selection While Solving Spatial Navigation Problems.

Juan P Beccaria1, Carlos A Pretell Annan1, Ettel Keifman1, M Gustavo Murer1, Juan E Belforte2.   

Abstract

How do animals adopt a given behavioral strategy to solve a recurrent problem when several effective strategies are available to reach the goal? Here we provide evidence that striatal cholinergic interneurons (SCINs) modulate their activity when mice must select between different strategies with similar goal-reaching effectiveness. Using a cell type-specific transgenic murine system, we show that adult SCIN ablation impairs strategy selection in navigational tasks where a goal can be independently achieved by adopting an allocentric or egocentric strategy. SCIN-depleted mice learn to achieve the goal in these tasks, regardless of their appetitive or aversive nature, in a similar way as controls. However, they cannot shift away from their initially adopted strategies, as control mice do, as training progresses. Our results indicate that SCINs are required for shaping the probability function used for strategy selection as experience accumulates throughout training. Thus, SCINs may be critical for the resolution of cognitive conflicts emerging when several strategies compete for behavioral control while adapting to environmental demands. Our findings may increase our understanding about the emergence of perseverative/compulsive traits in neuropsychiatric disorders with a reported SCIN reduction, such as Tourette and Williams syndromes.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Selecting the best suited strategy to solve a problem is vital. Accordingly, available strategies must be compared across multiple dimensions, such as goal attainment effectiveness, cost-benefit trade-off, and cognitive load. The striatum is involved in strategy selection when strategies clearly diverge in their goal attainment capacity; however, its role whenever several strategies can be used for goal reaching-therefore making selection dependent on additional strategy dimensions-remains poorly understood. Here, we show that striatal cholinergic interneurons can signal strategy competition. Furthermore, they are required to adopt a given strategy whenever strategies with similar goal attainment capacity compete for behavioral control. Our study suggests that striatal cholinergic dysfunction may result in anomalous resolution of problems whenever complex cognitive valuations are required.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barnes maze; allocentric–egocentric navigation; cell type-specific ablation; cognitive flexibility; problem-solving strategies; striatal cholinergic interneurons

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34933954      PMCID: PMC8883862          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1130-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  60 in total

1.  Involvement of rodent prefrontal cortex subregions in strategy switching.

Authors:  M E Ragozzino; C Wilcox; M Raso; R P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Role of the dorsomedial striatum in behavioral flexibility for response and visual cue discrimination learning.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino; Katharine E Ragozzino; Sheri J Y Mizumori; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Differential effects of M1 muscarinic receptor blockade and nicotinic receptor blockade in the dorsomedial striatum on response reversal learning.

Authors:  Arianna Tzavos; Jane Jih; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Thalamic-prefrontal cortical-ventral striatal circuitry mediates dissociable components of strategy set shifting.

Authors:  Annie E Block; Hasina Dhanji; Sarah F Thompson-Tardif; Stan B Floresco
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Spatial and nonspatial escape strategies in the Barnes maze.

Authors:  Fiona E Harrison; Randall S Reiserer; Andrew J Tomarken; Michael P McDonald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Adults with Williams syndrome. Preliminary study of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.

Authors:  M Davies; O Udwin; P Howlin
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Properties of the corticostriatal long term depression induced by medial prefrontal cortex high frequency stimulation in vivo.

Authors:  Barbara Y Braz; Juan E Belforte; M Gustavo Murer; Gregorio L Galiñanes
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Affiliative behavior in Williams syndrome: social perception and real-life social behavior.

Authors:  Anna Järvinen-Pasley; Ralph Adolphs; Anna Yam; Kiley J Hill; Mark Grichanik; Judy Reilly; Debra Mills; Allan L Reiss; Julie R Korenberg; Ursula Bellugi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning.

Authors:  M G Packard; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Orbitofrontal and striatal circuits dynamically encode the shift between goal-directed and habitual actions.

Authors:  Christina M Gremel; Rui M Costa
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.