Literature DB >> 34933288

Noninvasive estimation of local speed of sound by pulse-echo ultrasound in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver.

Arsenii V Telichko1, Rehman Ali2, Thurston Brevett2, Huaijun Wang1, Jose G Vilches-Moure3, Sukumar U Kumar1, Ramasamy Paulmurugan1, Jeremy J Dahl1.   

Abstract

Objective. Speed of sound has previously been demonstrated to correlate with fat concentration in the liver. However, estimating speed of sound in the liver noninvasively can be biased by the speed of sound of the tissue layers overlying the liver. Here, we demonstrate a noninvasive local speed of sound estimator, which is based on a layered media assumption, that can accurately capture the speed of sound in the liver. We validate the estimator using an obese Zucker rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and correlate the local speed of sound with liver steatosis.Approach.We estimated the local and global average speed of sound noninvasively in 4 lean Zucker rats fed a normal diet and 16 obese Zucker rats fed a high fat diet for up to 8 weeks. The ground truth speed of sound and fat concentration were measured from the excised liver using established techniques.Main Results. The noninvasive, local speed of sound estimates of the livers were similar in value to their corresponding 'ground truth' measurements, having a slope ± standard error of the regression of 0.82 ± 0.15 (R2= 0.74 andp< 0.001). Measurement of the noninvasive global average speed of sound did not reliably capture the 'ground truth' speed of sound in the liver, having a slope of 0.35 ± 0.07 (R2= 0.74 andp< 0.001). Decreasing local speed of sound was observed with increasing hepatic fat accumulation (approximately -1.7 m s-1per 1% increase in hepatic fat) and histopathology steatosis grading (approximately -10 to -13 m s-1per unit increase in steatosis grade). Local speed of sound estimates were highly correlated with steatosis grade, having Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients both ranging from -0.87 to -0.78. In addition, a lobe-dependent speed of sound in the liver was observed by theex vivomeasurements, with speed of sound differences of up to 25 m s-1(p< 0.003) observed between lobes in the liver of the same animal.Significance.The findings of this study suggest that local speed of sound estimation has the potential to be used to predict or assist in the measurement of hepatic fat concentration and that the global average speed of sound should be avoided in hepatic fat estimation due to significant bias in the speed of sound estimate.
© 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NAFLD; liver; speed of sound; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34933288      PMCID: PMC8885567          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  55 in total

1.  Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations.

Authors:  Seung Soo Lee; Seong Ho Park; Hye Jin Kim; So Yeon Kim; Min-Yeong Kim; Dae Yoon Kim; Dong Jin Suh; Kang Mo Kim; Mi Hyun Bae; Joo Yeon Lee; Sung-Gyu Lee; Eun Sil Yu
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 25.083

2.  The Speed of Sound in Rat Liver With Steatohepatitis: Ex Vivo Analysis Using Two Types of Ultrasound Systems.

Authors:  Hideki Kumagai; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Koji Yokoyama; Kimito Katsuyama; Hiroaki Yamamoto; Shoji Hara; Norio Hirota; Kouichi Itoh; Takanori Yamagata
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Correlations of sound speed with tissue constituents in normal and diffuse liver disease.

Authors:  T Lin; J Ophir; G Potter
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Elastography Assessment of Liver Fibrosis: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Giovanna Ferraioli; Mark L Palmeri; Zachary D Goodman; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Jonathan Rubin; Brian Garra; Robert P Myers; Stephanie R Wilson; Deborah Rubens; Deborah Levine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Hepatic steatosis and reduction in steatosis following bariatric weight loss surgery differs between segments and lobes.

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Kathryn J Fowler; Adrija Mamidipalli; Tanya Wolfson; Cheng William Hong; Yesenia Covarrubias; Jonathan C Hooker; Ethan Z Sy; Alexandra N Schlein; Jennifer Y Cui; Anthony C Gamst; Gavin Hamilton; Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Accuracy of Liver Fat Quantification With Advanced CT, MRI, and Ultrasound Techniques: Prospective Comparison With MR Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Perry J Pickhardt; Mark A Kliewer; Diego Hernando; Guang-Hong Chen; James A Zagzebski; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Dual-energy CT in the diagnosis and quantification of fatty liver: limited clinical value in comparison to ultrasound scan and single-energy CT, with special reference to iron overload.

Authors:  M H Mendler; P Bouillet; A Le Sidaner; E Lavoine; F Labrousse; D Sautereau; B Pillegand
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  An evaluation of hepatic ultrasound speed in injury models in rats: correlation with tissue constituents.

Authors:  T Matsuhashi; N Yamada; H Shinzawa; T Takahashi
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Current status of imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Qian Li; Manish Dhyani; Joseph R Grajo; Claude Sirlin; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-27

10.  Noninvasive Diagnosis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Quantification of Liver Fat with Radiofrequency Ultrasound Data Using One-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Aiguo Han; Michal Byra; Elhamy Heba; Michael P Andre; John W Erdman; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 29.146

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.