Literature DB >> 34932814

Electronically controlled cooling pads can improve litter growth performance and indirect measures of milk production in heat-stressed lactating sows.

Jay S Johnson1, Taylor L Jansen2, Michaiah Galvin2, Tyler C Field3, Jason R Graham2, Robert M Stwalley3, Allan P Schinckel2.   

Abstract

Heat stress (HS) decreases lactation output in sows due to an attempt to reduce metabolic heat production. However, this negatively affects litter growth performance. Therefore, the study objective was to determine whether electronically controlled cooling pads (ECP) would improve indirect measures of lactation output (e.g., total heat production [THP]) and litter growth performance in HS exposed sows. Over two repetitions, 12 multiparous (2.69 ± 0.85) lactating sows (265.4 ± 26.1 kg body weight [BW]) and litters were assigned to either an ECP (n = 3/repetition) or a non-functional ECP (NECP; n = 3/repetition) and placed into farrowing crates within indirect calorimeters from days 3.7 ± 0.5 to 18.7 ± 0.5 of lactation. Litters were standardized across all sows (11.4 ± 0.7 piglets/litter), and sows were provided ad libitum feed and water. All sows were exposed to cyclical HS (28.27 ± 0.26 °C nighttime to 33.09 ± 0.19°C daytime). On days 4, 8, 14, and 18 of lactation, indirect calorimetry was performed on each individual sow and litter to determine THP and THP/kg BW0.75. Body temperature (TB) was measured hourly using vaginal implants, and respiration rate (RR; breaths per minute [bpm]) was measured daily at 0700, 1100, 1300, 1500, and 1900 h. Sow feed intake (FI) was assessed daily. Litter weights were obtained at birth, on days 4, 8, 14, and 18 of lactation, and at weaning. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with sow and/or litter as the experimental unit. An overall decrease (P < 0.01; 25 bpm) in RR and maximum daily TB (P = 0.02; 0.40 °C) was observed in ECP vs. NECP sows. An increase in THP (P < 0.01; 20.4%) and THP/kg BW0.75 (P < 0.01; 23.1%) was observed for ECP when compared with NECP sows and litters. Litter average daily gain and weaning weight were increased (P < 0.05; 25.0 and 19.2%, respectively) for ECP vs. NECP litters. No FI differences were observed (P = 0.40) when comparing ECP (5.66 ± 0.31 kg/d) and NECP (5.28 ± 0.31 kg/d) sows. In summary, ECPs improve litter growth, thermoregulatory measures, and bioenergetic parameters associated with greater milk production in lactating sows exposed to cyclical HS. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cooling pad; heat stress; lactation; mitigation; pigs; sows

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34932814      PMCID: PMC8903144          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  27 in total

1.  Influence of high ambient temperatures on performance of multiparous lactating sows.

Authors:  N Quiniou; J Noblet
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Technical note: development of an indirect calorimetry system to determine heat production in individual lactating sows1.

Authors:  Jay S Johnson; Sai Zhang; Gabriela M Morello; Jacob M Maskal; Nathalie L Trottier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Relationship of lactation energy intake and occurrence of postweaning estrus to body and backfat composition in sows.

Authors:  D E Reese; E R Peo; A J Lewis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Early life indicators predict mortality, illness, reduced welfare and carcass characteristics in finisher pigs.

Authors:  Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz; Laura Ann Boyle; Alessia Diana; Finola Catherine Leonard; John Patrick Moriarty; Máire Catríona McElroy; Shane McGettrick; Denis Kelliher; Edgar García Manzanilla
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Photoperiod and heat stress influence on lactating sow performance and photoperiod effects on nursery pig performance.

Authors:  J J McGlone; W F Stansbury; L F Tribble; J L Morrow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Night feeding in lactating sows is an essential management approach to decrease the detrimental impacts of heat stress.

Authors:  YoHan Choi; Joseph Moturi; Abdolreza Hosseindoust; MinJu Kim; KwangYeol Kim; JunHyung Lee; ChangHyun Song; YoungHwa Kim; ByungJo Chae
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-30

7.  Effects of cooled floor pads combined with chilled drinking water on behavior and performance of lactating sows under heat stress.

Authors:  Y Zhu; L J Johnston; M H Reese; E S Buchanan; J E Tallaksen; A H Hilbrands; Y Z Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Post-weaning and whole-of-life performance of pigs is determined by live weight at weaning and the complexity of the diet fed after weaning.

Authors:  Cherie L Collins; John R Pluske; Rebecca S Morrison; Trevor N McDonald; Robert J Smits; David J Henman; Ingunn Stensland; Frank R Dunshea
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-01-06

9.  Emerging Roles of Heat-Induced circRNAs Related to Lactogenesis in Lactating Sows.

Authors:  Jiajie Sun; Haojie Zhang; Baoyu Hu; Yueqin Xie; Dongyang Wang; Jinzhi Zhang; Ting Chen; Junyi Luo; Songbo Wang; Qinyan Jiang; Qianyun Xi; Zujing Chen; Yongliang Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.