Naoto Matsumoto1, Kenji Matsui1, Yatsumu Saitou1, Tsuyoshi Takamura1, Shuichiro Yamanaka2, Takashi Yokoo2, Eiji Kobayashi3. 1. MD. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension - Department of Internal Medicine - The Jikei University School of Medicine - Tokyo, Japan. 2. MD, PhD. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension - Department of Internal Medicine - The Jikei University School of Medicine - Tokyo, Japan. 3. MD, PhD. Department of Kidney Regenerative Medicine - The Jikei University School of Medicine - Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a microsurgical technique to transplant extremely fragile renal organoids in vivo, created by in-vitro reaggregation of metanephros from fetal mice. These organoids in reaggregation and development were examined histologically after transplantation under the renal capsule. METHODS: Initially, metanephros from fetal mice were enzymatically treated to form single cells, and spheroids were generated in vitro. Under a microscope, the renal capsule was detached to avoid bleeding, and the outer cylinder of the indwelling needle was inserted to detach the renal parenchyma from the renal capsule using water pressure. The reaggregated spheroid was aspirated from the culture plate using a syringe with an indwelling needle outer cylinder and carefully extruded under the capsule. Pathological analysis was performed to evaluate changes in reaggregated spheroids over time and the effects of co-culture of spinal cord and subcapsular implantation on maturation. RESULTS: In vitro, the formation of luminal structures became clearer on day 5. These fragile organoids were successfully implanted without tissue crapes under the renal capsule and formed glomerular. The effect of spinal cord co-transplant was not obvious histrionically. CONCLUSIONS: A simple and easy method to transplant fragile spheroids and renal under the renal capsule without damage was developed.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a microsurgical technique to transplant extremely fragile renal organoids in vivo, created by in-vitro reaggregation of metanephros from fetal mice. These organoids in reaggregation and development were examined histologically after transplantation under the renal capsule. METHODS: Initially, metanephros from fetal mice were enzymatically treated to form single cells, and spheroids were generated in vitro. Under a microscope, the renal capsule was detached to avoid bleeding, and the outer cylinder of the indwelling needle was inserted to detach the renal parenchyma from the renal capsule using water pressure. The reaggregated spheroid was aspirated from the culture plate using a syringe with an indwelling needle outer cylinder and carefully extruded under the capsule. Pathological analysis was performed to evaluate changes in reaggregated spheroids over time and the effects of co-culture of spinal cord and subcapsular implantation on maturation. RESULTS: In vitro, the formation of luminal structures became clearer on day 5. These fragile organoids were successfully implanted without tissue crapes under the renal capsule and formed glomerular. The effect of spinal cord co-transplant was not obvious histrionically. CONCLUSIONS: A simple and easy method to transplant fragile spheroids and renal under the renal capsule without damage was developed.
In the 1950s, small cell aggregates could be generated from animal fetal cells using
pellet culture and other methods to autonomously form structures similar to adult
tissues in vitro
1. This classic finding of self-assembly in
cell aggregation is an essential biological phenomenon in the field of regenerative
medicine research and an extremely important principle for the creation of organoids
and even organs from human stem cells.Recently, researchers have attempted to self-organize various microtissues and
reported that organoids, which are the buds of tissues such as the brain, eye cup,
and kidney, can be produced from small cell aggregates generated from human stem
cells2. To create kidney organoids, it is
essential to create cell assemblies that enable cell-cell interactions on a larger
scale in multiple cell groups, such as nephron progenitors, ureteric buds, stromal
progenitors, and even endothelial progenitors3
,
4. The contraction of mesenchymal cells may
provide an important principle for this cell aggregate to become an organoid, which
is the bud of the organ5. Furthermore, the
original development of the kidney in the same location is noteworthy.This study established a method to effectively transplant organoids, which are
fragile cellular reaggregates, under the renal capsule, in which the kidney
originally develops. As previously reported6
,
7, fetal kidneys were dispersed to a
single-cell level and reaggregated in vitro, and the degree of
development of renal organoids was pathologically verified. The effect of spinal
cord co-culture8 was also examined. Then,
using a modified renal organoid transplantation method, we conducted an
in-vivo transplantation study to induce further differentiation
and maturation under the renal capsule, which has the same location as the original
kidney.
Methods
Fetuses of pregnant B6 mice (purchased from SLC Japan) were used as donors, and
mature male NOD/Shi-scid and IL-2RγKOJic mice (NOG mice) (purchased from CLEA Japan)
were used as recipients. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal
Experiment Committee of Jikei University School of Medicine (permit no. 2021-017).
Experiments were conducted in conformance with the National Institutes of Health
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Every effort was made to minimize
animal suffering.
Fetal kidney single cell
Pregnant female B6 mice were used for each spheroid production experiment (N=10).
The procedure was performed based on the method by Unbekant et
al.6. Briefly, the steps
were as it follows: pregnant B6 (E13) mice were induced with isoflurane
inhalation anesthesia, fetuses were harvested, and pregnant mice were euthanized
by injection of pentobarbital (120 mg/kg). Removed fetuses were immediately
euthanized by decapitation. Fetal mouse metanephroi were harvested from
decapitated fetuses under an operating microscope and collected in 1.5-mL tubes
containing minimum essential medium α (MEMα) (Cat# 12561056; Gibco). Then, the
tubes were centrifuged at 700 G for 3 min, the supernatant was removed, and 1 mL
of Accutase at room temperature was dispensed and mixed by vortexing. Next, the
cells were incubated for 5 min, pipetted, and agitated again, and centrifuged at
300 G for 5 min. So, the supernatant Accutase was removed. Moreover, 1,000 μL of
medium containing 10 μM Y2763 (Cat# 257-00511; Wako) in MEMα with 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS) was added, and the cell component solution was filtered
through a 40-μm cell strainer (BD Falcon, Oxford, United Kingdom) to confirm
that a single-cell suspension was obtained.The cell count of this single-cell suspension was determined and adjusted with
medium to 1.5 × 106 cells/mL. The cells were divided into 96-well U-bottoms,
each containing an average of 3 × 105 cells/well. Finally, the cells were
centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 4 min and incubated under an incubator at 37°C.
In-vitro culture of renal organoids
On the next day (day 1), it was confirmed that the single cells had formed
aggregated spheroid. Then, Y27632 was removed from the culture medium, and the
cells were cultured in medium supplemented with MEMα + 10% FBS and 1%
penicillin/streptomycin for the next six days (until day 7). As the renal
organoids form fetal mice were gradually deteriorated in our culture condition
after day 7, their observation and sampling were completed at day 7 (Fig. 1a).
Figure 1
Flowchart of the experimental outline. (a)
In-vitro assay for cell aggregation of fetal renal
cells. Fetal metanephros were dispersed by enzymatic treatment. After
centrifuging, cell aggregation was cultured for seven days.
(b)
In-vitro assay for renal cell aggregation with or
without co-culture of spinal cord. Reaggregated spheroids prepared as
described before were co-cultured with or without spinal cord for three
days to test them for histological maturation. (c)
In-vivo transplantation of reaggregated spheroids under
the renal capsule of immunodeficient mice. The reaggregated spheroids
prepared as already described were transplanted using the new
transplantation method developed in this study.
Aggregated spheroids were observed under an inverted microscope (Leica DMi1) and
obtained for pathological verification on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Samples were
fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in 20% sucrose, and compounded with
optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, and sections were prepared at the
thickness of 8 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining was performed using
standard procedures for histological analysis.Furthermore, in the separated samples, in-vitro experiments were
performed to test whether early organoids (Day 1) after cell reaggregation had
any effect on differentiation by co-culturing the spinal cord of inbred mice.
Fetal mouse spinal cords were harvested from pregnant B6 mice (E12.5) and
incubated on polycarbonate filters at both ends of the spheroids aggregated on
the air-liquid interface (0.8 mm; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, United States of
America) for three days (N=4) (Fig.
1b).Whole-mount staining was performed to evaluate the number of cap mesenchymes and
morphology of the spheroids imaged in the z-stack, both with and without spinal
cord co-culture.
Transplantation method of newly developed renal organoids
Eight-week-old male immunodeficient NOD/SCID mice (Jackson Immuno Research
Laboratories, West Grove, PA, United States of America) were used as
recipients for kidney organoid transplantation (N=4). Transplantation of
renal capsular was conducted on both left and right kidneys (Fig. 1c).Organoids are extremely fragile, and various attempts have been made to
transplant them into the renal capsule9
-
12. However, the differences between
our new orthotopic transplantation method and other methods are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1
Previous sub-renal capsular transplantation
Ref. No.
Method
Transpl.
12
Left kidney was exteriorized, and a small
insertion was made in the renal capsule. Kidney organoids
were transplanted onto the left kidney capsule of mice using
24 Ghz catheter.
Kidney organoids
9
An incision was made in the flank, the kidney
was exposed outside the body, and a small incision was made
in the renal capsule. Kidney organoids were transplanted
under the renal capsule.
Kidney organoids
10
The host kidney capsule was incised
approximately 2 mm from the caudal end of the kidney, and
the rod was carefully inserted laterally with
forceps.The inserted rod was positioned to create a
V-shaped free space, and the capsule membrane was briefly
cauterized with electrocautery to prevent deviation from the
initial position. Finally, iPS-derived aggregates containing
the spinal cord of mouse embryos and mixture spheres were
inserted through the incised window using a 20-gaugeplastic
indwelling needle connected to a P-200 Gilson pipette.
HUVEC+MSC Agarose gel rodiPS-derived aggregates
11
The kidneys were exposed through an incision on
the dorsal flank. After making an incision of approximately
2 mm in the host kidney capsule with a 23-gauge needle, a
PE50 tube containing 10-20 kidney organoids was carefully
placed under the kidney capsule. The kidney organoids were
injected by carefully blowing from the other side of the
PE50 tube.
First, the recipient mouse was anesthetized with isoflurane inhalation, and a
1.5-cm midline abdominal incision was made.Although there have been reports of transplantation without laparotomy using
a posterior-dorsal approach, in this method, the recipient was transplanted
under the microscope through laparotomy.
Renal capsule pocket creation method
The intestine was moved to the left or right to expose the kidney, and the
renal capsule in the lower part of the kidney was detached by approximately
1 mm using the micro-shear (Fig. 2a).
The tip of a 20-G Surflo needle was cut at an angle. The Surflo needle with
a smooth cutting surface to prevent damage to the renal detachment surface
was gently inserted through the incision in the capsule, and detachment was
performed while adding a small amount of saline and keeping the cutting
surface facing the renal parenchyma (Fig.
2b).
Figure 2
Newly developed method of spheroid implantation into the renal
capsule. (a) Incision and dissection of the renal
capsule. (b) Insertion of a perfusion tube under the
renal capsule. (c) Inhalation of reaggregated spheroid.
(d) Post-implantation of spheroid.
The water pressure of the syringe was adjusted by pressing the syringe with a
hand. In case of poor detachment, the Surflo needle should not be pushed in,
but a cotton swab should be pushed in while guiding the coated side. This
manipulation does not cause even the smallest amount of bleeding and does
not leave any blood in the peeling pocket. Then, the spheres were inhaled in
culture in a 96-well U-bottom using the same 20-G Surflo needle outer tube
(Fig. 2c). For aspiration, culture
medium was aspirated as little as possible as if turning a push syringe, and
the organoid was positioned at the leading edge of the Surflo tube. Again,
the same Surflo needle was positioned into the incision, and the fragile
renal organoid was gently implanted into the pocket (Fig. 2d). Then, the incision was closed with a 5-0
thread running suture.Postoperatively, recipient mice were sacrificed to death on day 7 of
transplantation, and pathology was harvested after tissue confirmation under
magnification of the transplantation site.
Whole-mount staining
Cultured spheres were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 60 min at 4°C and washed
three times with PBS. Samples were blocked with 1% donkey serum, 0.2% skim milk,
and 0.3% Triton X/PBS for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary
antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing three times with PBS, samples were
incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488, 546, and
647 for 1 h at room temperature. The samples were incubated for 1 h at room
temperature. The samples were mounted with ProLong Gold mounting medium
containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Each sample was observed under
a fluorescence microscope (LSM 880 Confocal; Carl Zeiss, Munich, Germany).
Results
In-vitro reaggregation sphere formation of fetal kidney cells
In-vitro reaggregation of single cells was performed by
centrifugation (Fig. 3 a,b). Moreover,
1-mm diameter spheroids were formed on day 1 (Fig. 3c). After seven days of incubation, no increase in the size of
the cell aggregates was observed (Fig. 3
d-f).
Figure 3
Changes in reaggregated spheroid from fetal kidney over time. Bright
field photograph of the 96-well culture. (a) Day 0 (before
centrifugation). (b) Day 0 (after centrifugation).
(c) Day 1. (d) Day 3. (e) Day
5. (f) Day 7. Scale: 1 mm.
HE staining was performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and no significant structures
were formed in the center, but tubular structures and surrounding cells formed
cap mesenchymes at the outer edge.As shown in Fig. 3c, the cell agglutination
was observed on day 1, but histological examination showed no significant cell
structure formation by use of HE staining (Fig.
4a). While fetal metanephros have been known that cap mesenchymes
might be formed around the ureteric bud, the reaggregated spheroid obtained from
day 3 showed that the formation of ureteric buds (*) and cap mesenchymes
(arrows) could start to be confirmed (Fig.
4b). Those morphological findings were clearer in the samples
obtained from day 5 and day 7 (Fig. 4
c,d).
Figure 4
Time course of reaggregated spheroid from fetal kidney. HE stained
photograph and immunostaining. (a) Day 1. (b)
Day 3. (c) Day 5. (d) Day 7. HE staining.
Scale bar: 100 μm. (e) Day 7 (immunostaining). Scale bar:
100 μm. Six2 (green), CK8 (white). (f) Organogram of
reaggregated renal spheroids. On day 1, the cells were agglutinated, but
no significant structures could be morphologically identified. On day 3,
immature structure of cap mesenchyme and ureteric tips was detected,
following day 5 and day 7, these structures could be clearly
observed.
At day 7, the distribution of nephron progenitor cells and ureteric buds was
evaluated by whole immunostaining for Six2 and CK8. Multiple cap mesenchyme
formation was observed around the ureteric buds. The ureteric buds with
surrounding cap mesenchyme structures were spherical and branched, but the
ureteric buds present alone had only spherical structures (Fig. 4e).The effect of in-vitro co-culture of kidney spheroids and spinal
cord co-culture of kidney spheroids with the spinal cord is known to trigger
epithelialization of metanephric mesenchyme and formation of luminal
structures8. However, to evaluate the
effect on reaggregation, immunostaining was performed after three days of
culture. As a result, there was no significant difference in the number of cap
mesenchymes and ureteric buds between spinal cord co-culture and sphere alone
(Fig. 5), neither in their
morphology.
Figure 5
Effect of spinal cord on mouse metanephros reaggregation spheroid
in vitro. (a) Whole immunostained
image of mouse reaggregated spheroid and spinal cord after three days of
co-culture (left, low magnification; right, high magnification).
(b) Whole immunostained image of mouse reaggregated
spheroid after three days in culture alone (left, low magnification;
right high magnification). Scale bar (low magnification: 1 mm, high
magnification: 200 μm).
In-vivo development of reaggregates in the new transplantation
methodSoft reaggregates on day 2 of reaggregation were transplanted into the renal
capsule using a new technique that reduced damage to the capsule.Even when the aggregated spheroids were cultured in vitro for
seven days, cap mesenchyme structure alone could be observed morphologically.
However, after transplantation of them under the renal capsule, mature
structures such as multiple glomerular structures (arrowhead) and S-shaped
structures (arrow) were detected (Fig. 6
a,b).
Figure 6
Effect of spinal cord on mouse metanephros reaggregation spheroid
during transplantation. (a) HE stained image of mouse
metanephros reaggregation spheroid transplanted alone (low
magnification). (b) High magnification. (c) HE
stained images of mouse spinal cord and mouse metanephros reaggregation
spheroid transplanted alone low magnification. (d) High
magnification. Scale bar: 200 μm. In the center of the tissue, glomeruli
and multiple tubular structures can be observed. There were no
significant differences between spheroids implanted with or without the
spinal cord.
Moreover, erythrocyte infiltration was observed in the stromal region, suggesting
that blood vessels had invaded into the graft from host.There were no granulation-like tissues, nor evidence of damage associated with
the renal subcutaneous graft transplantation.Similar structures were also observed when the spinal cord was transplanted under
the renal capsule with spheroids. Glomeruli were observed in the area indicated
by arrows. Many other luminal structures can be seen (Fig. 6 c,d). No histological differences were observed in
spinal cord co-culture.
Discussion
In this study, we initially examined reaggregation and differentiation maturation of
single-cell fetal kidneys in vitro. As previously reported,
single-cell fetal kidneys reaggregated to form spheroids after one day of
in-vitro culture. These spheroids showed clearer formation of
luminal structures from day 5, with many reconstituted uretic buds and some cap
mesenchyme formation around the ureteric buds.During nephrogenesis, metanephric mesenchyme is epithelialized and forms a lumenal
structure by receiving growth factor signals from ureteric buds. Wnt-4 is involved
in one of these signals, and Kispert et al.8 reported that secretion of Wnt-4 or a similar factor from the
dorsal side of the spinal cord causes differentiation of nephron progenitor cells
into tubules. In-vivo transplantation of organoids obtained by
co-culture of nephron progenitor cells and spinal cord also tends to induce the
formation of mature glomeruli10
,
13. However, the co-culture of reaggregated
spheres from single-cell mouse fetal kidneys and spinal cord used in this experiment
did not show obvious differences in the number and morphology of cap mesenchymes.
This is because both ureteric buds and nephron progenitor cells were present in the
reaggregating spheres and interacted with each other by receiving signals from each
other.Next, we examined the site of in-vivo cell aggregate implantation.
However, unlike tissue transplantation, the reaggregates are extremely fragile, and
it was necessary to devise a transplantation method. In previous studies, we have
reported the convenience of orthotopic transplantation14
,
15. The method we developed in the previous
study was also selected for orthotopic transplantation under the renal capsule, but
we established a method to detach the capsule, create a pocket space, and transplant
the fragile organoids under water pressure control. This method of transplanting the
fragile organoids into the recipient with water flow has been applied into a
laparoscopic transplantation device (unpublished).
Conclusions
In this study, we applied the same principles to develop a technique to transplant
soft renal organoids under the renal capsule without damage. When transplanting
under the renal capsule, bleeding can easily occur because the kidney is an organ
rich in blood vessels. Therefore, in the transplantation method developed this time,
the renal capsule and renal parenchyma were detached beforehand by water pressure to
avoid hemorrhage and create a space between the capsule and parenchyma, allowing the
spheroid to grow without pressure drainage. As shown in our previous study,
reaggregated spheroids formed glomeruli by subepithelial transplantation, which was
not observed in vitro, and it was confirmed that subepithelial
transplantation increased the degree of maturation.We have used metanephros as a scaffold to develop chimeric kidneys by subepithelial
transplantation of allogeneic and heterologous nephron progenitors16
-
18. In the future, we will use the
reaggregating spheroid transplantation method developed in this study to verify the
appropriate cell ratio in chimeras and the factors that strongly generate
interactions.
Authors: Minoru Takasato; Pei X Er; Han S Chiu; Barbara Maier; Gregory J Baillie; Charles Ferguson; Robert G Parton; Ernst J Wolvetang; Matthias S Roost; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Melissa H Little Journal: Nature Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sun Ah Nam; Eunjeong Seo; Jin Won Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Hong Lim Kim; Kyuryung Kim; Tae-Min Kim; Ji Hyeon Ju; Ivan G Gomez; Kohei Uchimura; Benjamin D Humphreys; Chul Woo Yang; Jae Yeon Lee; Jin Kim; Dong Woo Cho; Benjamin S Freedman; Yong Kyun Kim Journal: Exp Mol Med Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 8.718