| Literature DB >> 34932582 |
Ahmad Sher1, Muhammad Yasir Arfat1,2, Sami Ul-Allah1, Abdul Sattar1, Muhammad Ijaz1, Abdul Manaf2, Abdul Qayyum3, Ali Tan Kee Zuan4, Omaima Nasif5, Kristina Gasparovic6.
Abstract
Sunflower production is significantly lower in arid and semi-arid regions due to various crop management problem. Conservation of tillage provides the most excellent opportunity to reduce degradation of soil reserves and increase soil productivity. The main objective of this study was to investigate the combined effects of conservation tillage and drought stress on growth and productivity of different sunflower hybrids. Experimental treatments included two sunflower hybrids ('NK-Senji' and 'S-278'), two drought stress treatments (i.e., well-watered and drought stress at flowering and grain filling stages) and three tillage practices (i.e., conservation, minimum and deep tillage). The results indicated that morphological and physiological parameters, and yield-related traits were significantly (P≤0.05) affected by all individual factors; however, their interactive effects were non-significant. Among sunflower hybrids, 'NK-Senji' performed better for morphological, physiological, and yield-related traits than 'S-278'. Similarly, conservation tillage observed better traits compared to the rest of the tillage practices included in the study. Nonetheless, conservation tillage improved growth and yield-related traits of hybrid 'NK-Senji' under drought stress. Hence, it is concluded that conservation tillage can improve the productivity of sunflower under low moisture availability. Therefore, conservation tillage could be suggested in the areas of lower water ability to improve sunflower production. Nonetheless, sunflower hybrids or varieties need thorough testing for their adaptability to conservation tillage and low moisture availability before making recommendations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34932582 PMCID: PMC8691641 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Average maximum and minimum temperature and rainfall during sunflower growth period during 2018 and 2019.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of morphological and yield-related traits of sunflower hybrids as influenced by various tillage practices and water availability regimes.
| Source | df | Mean square | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plant height | Stem diameter | Head diameter | Number of achenes head-1 | 1000-achene weight | Biological yield | Achene yield | |||||||||
| 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | ||
| Replication | 2 | 388.1 | 383.7 | 1.31 | 1.01 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 111.1 | 8154 | 55.8 | 2043.5 | 644136 | 668344 | 359 | 3658 |
| Tillage (T) | 2 | 4148.6 | 4131.4 | 10.9 | 20.52 | 42.3 | 36.7 | 18065.6 | 408076 | 1680.6 | 3164.8 | 2113269 | 1790519 | 199905 | 716325 |
| Main plot error | 4 | 100.5 | 101.9 | 0.8 | 3.36 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 702.9 | 5905 | 98.2 | 8.7 | 164990 | 93303 | 2006 | 22517 |
| Drought (D) | 1 | 2085.4 | 2070.3 | 2.6 | 19.05 | 21.1 | 8.8ns | 12806.7 | 340472 | 1921.4 | 1521.0 | 1716100 | 1964669 | 1583822 | 336593 |
| T × D | 2 | 142.2 ns | 144.3ns | 0.8 | 3.45ns | 0.5ns | 0.2ns | 1751ns | 4591ns | 131.4ns | 156.3ns | 47308ns | 46919ns | 11482 ns | 3930ns |
| Sub plot error | 6 | 245.1 | 245.3 | 0.04 | 0.81 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 763.6 | 3776 | 63.6 | 63.7 | 95922 | 117061 | 2997 | 32957 |
| Hybrids (H) | 1 | 1089.0 | 1100.0 | 6.2 | 20.69 | 15.3 | 43.6 | 9900.2 | 322056 | 294.7 | 940.4 | 3336711 | 3553225 | 31506 | 280017 |
| T × H | 2 | 96.6ns | 94.1ns | 2.6 | 3.57ns | 4.6 | 3.7ns | 228.6ns | 6265ns | 7.2ns | 10.1ns | 46936ns | 85908ns | 505ns | 75ns |
| D × H | 1 | 40.1ns | 38.0ns | 0.5ns | 0.02ns | 3.3 | 0.2ns | 3154.7ns | 42367 | 283.4 | 18.8ns | 15211ns | 145669ns | 462ns | 182ns |
| T × D × H | 2 | 10.2ns | 10.1ns | 0.1ns | 0.11ns | 1.2ns | 0.1ns | 266.4ns | 516ns | 30.5ns | 14.8ns | 51586ns | 54253ns | 432ns | 1339ns |
| Error | 12 | 111.0 | 111.6 | 0.2 | 1.09 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1052.4 | 4021 | 33.8 | 30.42 | 156453 | 173994 | 915 | 25937 |
Ns = non–significant;
* = significant at P ≤ 0.05;
**, P ≤ 0.01.
The impact of different tillage practices and water availability regimes on morphological and yield-related related traits of sunflower hybrid type in 2018 and 2019.
| Tillage Practices | Plant height (cm) | Stem diameter (cm) | Head diameter (cm) | Number of seeds head-1 | 1000-achene weight (g) | Yield (g ha-1) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological | Achene | |||||||||||||
| 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|
| 149.6 a | 154.6 a | 2.22 a | 3.67 a | 9.65 a | 9.49 a | 1225.7 a | 1484.3 a | 91.7 a | 107.17 a | 7391.7 a | 7866.7 a | 1623.8 a | 1852.9 a |
|
| 127.3 b | 132.2b | 1.83 b | 2.51 b | 7.26 b | 7.85 b | 1182.3 b | 1244.9 b | 80.1 b | 96.83 b | 6959.2 b | 7488.3 a | 1481.4 b | 1573.1 b |
|
| 112.7 c | 117.7 c | 1.32 c | 2.06 c | 5.95 c | 6.04c | 1148.3 c | 1121.7 c | 68.0 c | 75.33 c | 6552.5 c | 7094.2 b | 1366.1 c | 1366.1 c |
|
| 11.4 | 11.4 | 1.02 | 2.07 | 1.01 | 1.22 | 30.05 | 87.09 | 11.23 | 3.35 | 460.4 | 346.23 | 50.7 | 170.09 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| 137.4 a | 142.4 a | 1.53 a | 3.14 a | 8.39 a | 8.28 a | 1204.3 a | 1380.9 a | 87.2 a | 99.61 a | 7186.1 a | 7716.7a | 1694.2 a | 1705.1 a |
|
| 122.2 b | 127.3 b | 0.99 b | 1.68 b | 6.86 b | 7.29 b | 1166.6 b | 1186.4 b | 72.6 b | 86.61 b | 6749.4 b | 7249.4 b | 1280.7 b | 1500.7 b |
|
| 12.7 | 12.8 | 0.16 | 0.73 | 1.08 | 1.55 | 22.53 | 50.12 | 6.50 | 6.51 | 252.6 | 279.06 | 44.7 | 148.07 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| 135.3 a | 140.4 a | 1.67 a | 3.17 a | 8.27 a | 8.88 a | 1202.0 a | 1378.2 a | 82.8 a | 98.22 a | 7272.2 a | 7797.2 a | 1520 a | 1685.6 a |
|
| 124.3 b | 129.3 b | 0.84 b | 1.65 b | 6.97 b | 6.68 b | 1168.8 b | 1189.1 b | 77.0 b | 88.0 | 6663.3 b | 7168.9 b | 1460.8 b | 1509.2 b |
|
| 7.65 | 7.67 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 23.56 | 46.05 | 4.22 | 4.00 | 287.3 | 302.95 | 21.9 | 116.97 |
Letter sharing same number in each column does not have significant (P≤0.05) difference.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of chlorophyll index and physiological traits of sunflower hybrids as influenced by various tillage practices and water regimes.
| Source | df | Mean square | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorophyll content | CO2 concentration | Transpiration rate | Stomatal conductance | Photosynthetic rate | |||||||
| 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | ||
| Replication | 2 | 12.8 | 16.1 | 6445.4 | 6626.8 | 4.2 | 3.73 | 0.027 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 6.4 |
| Tillage (T) | 2 | 821.5 | 832.2 | 12970.4 | 12904.4 | 39.5 | 37.7 | 0.221 | 0.22 | 114.2 | 99.3 |
| Main plot error | 4 | 12.7 | 8.5 | 739.8 | 761.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.034 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 1.9 |
| Drought (D) | 1 | 99.3 | 121.4 | 17117.4 | 17380.0 | 18.2 | 16.8 | 0.036 | 0.04 | 49.5 | 44.8 |
| T × D | 2 | 10.4ns | 10.8ns | 1590.0ns | 1577.0ns | 0.3ns | 0.4ns | 0.021 | 0.02 | 1.2ns | 0.7ns |
| Sub plot error | 6 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 1141.9 | 1127.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.003 | 0.00 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Hybrids (H) | 1 | 220.0 | 457.2 | 17911.4 | 17556.3 | 34.1 | 32.1 | 0.134 | 0.13 | 63.3 | 67.8 |
| T × H | 2 | 14.2ns | 11.0ns | 3550.4 | 3571.1 | 0.4ns | 0.5ns | 0.102 | 0.10 | 0.4ns | 1.8ns |
| D × H | 1 | 11.8ns | 5.2ns | 2384.7ns | 2352.3ns | 0.1ns | 0.3ns | 0.004ns | 0.004ns | 0.1ns | 0.1ns |
| T × D × H | 2 | 11.3ns | 9.9ns | 392.7ns | 399.1 ns | 0.2ns | 0.2ns | 0.002ns | 0.002ns | 0.1ns | 0.2ns |
| Error | 12 | 19.4 | 15.9 | 614.6 | 636.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
Ns = non–significant;
* = significant at P ≤ 0.05;
**, P ≤ 0.01.
Chlorophyll contents and physiological attributes of two sunflower hybrids as affected by tillage practice and water availability regimes.
| Tillage Practices | Chlorophyll index | CO2 concentration | Transpiration rate | Stomatal conductance | Photosynthetic rate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|
| 43.6 a | 45.1 a | 271.7 a | 275.8 a | 9.4 a | 10.4 a | 0.33 a | 0.43 a | 12.9 a | 14.9 a |
|
| 34.1 b | 37.4 b | 239.3 b | 243.5 b | 7.6 b | 8.6 b | 0.09 b | 0.19 b | 9.7 b | 11.8 b |
|
| 27.1 c | 28.5 c | 205.9 c | 210.3 c | 5.8 c | 6.9 c | 0.08 b | 0.18 b | 6.8c | 9.1 c |
|
| 4.03 | 3.31 | 30.82 | 31.28 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 1.55 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 36.6 a | 38.8 a | 260.8 a | 265.2 a | 8.3 a | 9.3 a | 0.20 a | 0.30 a | 10.9 a | 13.1 a |
|
| 33.2 b | 35.2 b | 217.2 b | 221.2 b | 6.9 b | 7.9 b | 0.14 b | 0.23 b | 8.7 b | 10.8 b |
|
| 1.78 | 1.66 | 27.56 | 27.38 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 37.4 a | 40.6 a | 261.3 a | 265.3 a | 8.6 a | 9.6 a | 0.23 a | 0.33 a | 11.1 a | 13.3 a |
|
| 32.4 b | 33.4 b | 216.7 b | 221.1 b | 6.6 b | 7.7 b | 0.11 b | 0.21 b | 8.5 b | 10.6 b |
|
| 3.20 | 2.89 | 18.00 | 18.32 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
Letter sharing same number in each column does not have significant (P≤0.05) difference.