Literature DB >> 34931582

Symptoms at disease onset predict prognosis in COVID-19 disease.

Aiyuan Zhou1,2,3,4,5, Qing Song6, Yating Peng6, Xin Liao7, Peng Huang8, Wenlong Liu9, Zhi Xiang10, Qimi Liu11, Mingyan Jiang12, Xudong Xiang13, Dingding Deng14, Ping Chen6.   

Abstract

The main clinical manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) onset are respiratory symptoms, including cough, sputum, and dyspnea. However, a significant proportion of patients initially manifested non-respiratory symptoms, such as fever, myalgia, and diarrhea. Here, we compared the different characteristics and outcomes between the patients with respiratory symptoms and non-respiratory symptoms at illness onset. The patients admitted to the respiratory departments from eight hospitals in Hunan and Guangxi Province with nucleic acid-positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) were recruited. Epidemiological information, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, and radiological characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes data were recorded and analyzed. The median age of the recruited 541 subjects was 43 years (IQR, 33-55). Of the 541 subjects, 404 (74.5%) subjects had initial symptom that were respiratory, while 137 (25.5%) subjects had non-respiratory symptoms. Respiratory COVID-19 subjects had more secondary bacterial infections (8.7% vs 0.0%, P < 0.001), needed the intensive care unit more (9.7% vs 2.2%, P = 0.005), non-invasive ventilation more (7.2% vs 1.5%, P = 0.004), developed ARDS more (11.4% vs 2.2%, P = 0.001) and needed longer time to recover (18.5 vs 16.7 days, P = 0.003) compared to predominately non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects. The multivariate model showed that age (OR = 1.04, P = 0.01), dyspnea (OR = 4.91, P < 0.001) and secondary bacterial infection (OR = 19.8, P < 0.001) were independently associated with development of ARDS among COVID-19 patients. We identify COVID-19 subjects with dyspnea at disease onset who have a worse prognosis. We also demonstrate age and secondary bacterial infections to be independently associated with ARDS development in subjects with COVID-19.ABBREVIATIONS: COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome; IQR: interquartile range; ICU: intensive care unit; CDC: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARDS; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; outcome; symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34931582      PMCID: PMC8725726          DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2021.2010338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Libyan J Med        ISSN: 1819-6357            Impact factor:   1.657


Introduction

Starting December 2019, multiple cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology were reported in Wuhan, Hubei province, China [1]. The causative agent, a novel coronavirus, was subsequently identified (January 7th, 2020) by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and has been named Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). So far, COVID-19 has claimed more cases and fatalities than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [2,3]. This fact could be related to potentially more sources of viral transmission, including aerosolized droplets, direct contact and potentially fecal-oral transmission [4,5]. The lack of medical staff and personal protective equipment may also have contributed to the high number of deaths. These various transmission sources are mirrored in the COVID-19 clinical syndrome, which includes some subjects with predominant respiratory symptoms at disease onset and others with more non-respiratory symptoms. In this study, we sought to explore baseline characteristics and outcomes in subjects with COVID-19 with particular attention to differences in symptoms at disease onset (respiratory versus non-respiratory). We also identify risk factors for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Materials and methods

Study design and subjects

We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from eight COVID-19 designated hospitals in Hunan and Guangxi Province, including the first Attached Hospital of Shaoyang University, the Affiliated Shaoyang Central Hospital of the University of South China, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Yueyang Second People’s Hospital, the First People’s Hospital of Huaihua affiliated to the University of South China, the Second People’s Hospital of Guilin, Xiangtan Central Hospital, and Loudi Central Hospital. This research was approved by the local Ethics Committee (2020002). All hospitalized patients who tested positive for COVID-19 by real-time polymerase chain reaction between 1 January and 31 March 2020 were included. Asymptomatic subjects were excluded from the analysis. The asymptomatic subjects were those being tested positive due to intimate contact with confirmed cases. We obtained baseline demographic, and clinical manifestations from a questionnaire designed by the CDC [6]. The treatment regimens and outcome data were collected from the electronic medical record. Respiratory symptoms at disease onset (termed ‘respiratory COVID-19’) were adjudicated to include patients who reported their first COVID-19 symptoms as respiratory (i.e. dry cough, sputum production, sneeze, nasal congestion, runny nose, sore throat, dyspnea, chest tightness, and hemoptysis). Similarly, predominantly non-respiratory symptoms at disease onset (termed ‘non-respiratory COVID-19’) were adjudicated to include patients who reported their first symptoms outside the respiratory system (i.e. fever, headache, fatigue, myalgia, diarrhea, palpitation, nausea, vomit, and loss of appetite). The initial symptoms or signs were defined as the first symptoms noticed by the patients. The date of disease onset was defined as the day when the first symptom was reported. For those asymptomatic patients, the date onset was specified as the day the positive nuclear acid was reported. The disease of severity was identified according to the diagnosis and treatment protocol for COVID-19 [6]. ARDS was defined according to the Berlin definition. Briefly, the ARDS was diagnosed based on hypoxemia, which is a ratio of PaO2 to fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) (PaO2/FiO2) ≤ 300 mmHg [7]. Secondary bacterial infection was diagnosed if the patients had clinical symptoms and signs. Briefly, if two or more of the following clinical features are present: temperature greater than 38°C or less than 36°C, leukopenia or leukocytosis, purulent tracheal secretions and decreased PaO2, and the absence of an alternative infective focus mandates that a chest radiograph be performed. Then if the radiograph shows alveolar infiltrates or an air bronchogram sign, or if the findings have worsened, it is recommended that the CPIS be calculated which is more than 6 scores. Or laboratory findings of nosocomial pneumonia or bacteremia not present on admission [8].

Statistical analysis

Means for continuous variables were compared by independent group t-tests or Mann-Whitney test. Proportions of categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Adjusted multiple logistic regression models were performed to determine risk factors for ARDS development. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 software. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes among COVID-19 subjects

We recruited 541 cases in the final analysis. The median age of the recruited subjects was 43 years (IQR, 33–55). Of the 541 subjects, 173 (32.0%) had one or more coexisting medical conditions. Hypertension (14.2%) and diabetes (8.7%) were the most common comorbidities. Respiratory COVID-19 subjects were more likely to be classified into the severe and very severe groups and had longer hospital days (17 vs 14, P = 0.03) relative to non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects. All the patients received antiviral therapy. Respiratory COVID-19 subjects received more corticosteroids (26.5 vs 14.6, P = 0.005) and antibiotics (48 vs 36.5, P = 0.02) compared to non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects. Respiratory COVID-19 subjects also had more secondary bacterial infections (P < 0.001), needed the intensive care unit more (P = 0.005), non-invasive ventilation more (P = 0.004), developed ARDS more (P = 0.001) and needed longer to recover (P = 0.003) compared to predominately non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects. No non-respiratory COVID-19 subject required advanced support, including invasive mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and continuous renal replacement therapies. There were no significant differences in laboratory findings between the two groups (Table 1).
Table 1.

Demographics, clinical variables and outcomes among COVID-19 subjects

VariablesAll(N = 541)Respiratorya(N = 404)Non-respiratoryb(N = 137)Pc
Age (IQR)43.0 (33.0–55.0)45.0 (34.0–57.0)38.0 (29.0–50.0)<0.001
Gender: Female (%)270 (49.9)204 (50.5)67 (48.9)0.64
Body mass index (IQR)23.3 (21.3–26.2)23.4 (21.3–26.2)23.1 (21.3–25.8)0.55
Contact with confirmed cases (%)417 (77.1)301 (404)116 (84.7)0.05
Comorbidities, any (%)173 (32.0)144 (35.7)29 (21.0)0.002
Diabetes (%)47 (8.7)38 (9.4)9 (6.5)0.31
Hypertension (%)77 (14.2)67 (16.6)10 (7.2)0.007
Cardiovascular disease (%)23 (4.3)21 (5.2)2 (1.5)0.06
COPD (%)10 (1.8)10 (2.5)0 (0.0)0.06
Asthma (%)13 (2.4)11 (2.7)2 (1.5)0.40
Malignancy (%)6 (1.1)4 (1.0)2 (1.5)0.65
Disease severity at admissiond35/436/47/2320/319/44/2115/117/3/2<0.001
Illness onset until hospitalization4.0 (2.0–7.0)5.0 (3.0–8.0)4.0 (2.0–6.0)0.16
Hospital days (IQR)17 (14–21)17 (12–24)14 (11–20)0.03
Day to recovery (IQR)21 (16–28)23 (17–28)18 (14–25)0.003
Clinical variables
Therapy    
Antiviral therapy (%)e541 (100)403 (100)138 (100)1
Corticosteroids (%)127 (23.5)107 (26.5)20 (14.6)0.005
Antibiotics244 (45.1)194 (48.0)50 (36.5)0.02
Secondary bacterial infection (%)36 (6.7)35 (8.7)1 (0.7)<0.001
Support    
NIV (%)31 (5.7)30 (7.4)1 (0.7)0.004
IMV (%)15 (2.8)15 (3.7)0 (0.0)0.02
ECMO (%)8 (1.5)8 (2.0)0 (0.0)0.10
CRRT(%)8 (1.5)8 (2.0)0 (0.0)0.14
Outcomes    
ICU admission (%)42 (7.8)39 (9.7)3 (2.2)0.005
ARDS (%)49 (9.1)46 (11.4)3 (2.2)0.001
In-hospital mortality (%)4 (0.4)4 (0.5)0 (0.0)0.24
Laboratory findings    
White blood cell count (× 109/L)4.6 (3.6–6.1)4.7 (3.6–6.2)4.6 (3.7–5.8)0.53
Neutrophil count (× 109/L)2.9 (2.2–4.1)3.0 (2.1–4.2)2.9 (2.3–3.8)0.78
Lymphocyte count (× 109/L)1.1 (0.8–1.6)1.1 (0.8–1.6)1.2 (0.9–1.6)0.96
Hemoglobin (g/L)133 (121–145)132 (121–145)134 (123–144)0.68
Platelet count (× 109/L)190 (146–247)188 (146–246)194 (147–248)0.77
D-dimer (mg/L)0.3 (0.2–0.6)0.4 (0.2–0.6)0.3 (0.15–0.53)0.11
Albumin (g/L)40.2 (36.2–43.7)39.8 (35.6–43.4)40.7 (37.7–44.4)0.74
Globulin (g/L)25.9 (23.2–28.6)26.2 (22.9–29.0)25.7 (23.3–28.1)0.27
Creatine kinase (U/L)68.7 (46.4–109.1)69.5 (46.8–109.3)65.8 (45.0–109.1)0.34
Prothrombin time (s)12.2 (11.1–12.9)12.2 (11.1–12.9)12.1 (11.1–12.8)0.77
Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L)21.0 (14.9–30.6)21.0 (14.9–31.4)21.0 (14.7–29.6)0.32
Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L)24.0 (19.2–31.4)24.5 (19.6–31.3)23.4 (19.0–32.2)0.41
Total bilirubin (umol/L)12.0 (7.7–18.5)12.0 (7.6–17.4)12.0 (8.8–21.1)0.13
Creatinine (umol/L)62.7 (50.6–76.1)63.0 (50.6–77.0)59.5 (49.4–73.0)0.16
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L)4.1 (3.2–5.1)4.1 (3.2–5.4)4.1 (3.3–4.6)0.29

COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, N = number of subjects, IQR = interquartile range, NIV = non-invasive ventilation, IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, CRRT = Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies, ICU = intensive care unit, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome. a Includes COVID-19 subjects with initial symptoms respiratory, b includes COVID-19 subjects with initial symptoms non-respiratory, c p value for statistical difference between respiratory COVID-19 subject and non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects, d severity of disease on admission (mild/moderate/severe/very severe). e includes abidol, lopinavir, ritonavir, interferon, g includes gamma globulin or thymosin. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation (if data were normally distributed) and median and interquartile range (if data were not normally distributed).

Demographics, clinical variables and outcomes among COVID-19 subjects COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, N = number of subjects, IQR = interquartile range, NIV = non-invasive ventilation, IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation, ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, CRRT = Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies, ICU = intensive care unit, ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome. a Includes COVID-19 subjects with initial symptoms respiratory, b includes COVID-19 subjects with initial symptoms non-respiratory, c p value for statistical difference between respiratory COVID-19 subject and non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects, d severity of disease on admission (mild/moderate/severe/very severe). e includes abidol, lopinavir, ritonavir, interferon, g includes gamma globulin or thymosin. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation (if data were normally distributed) and median and interquartile range (if data were not normally distributed).

Frequencies of initial symptoms and signs of patients with COVID-19 infection

Four hundred and four of the 541 (74.5%) subjects had an initial symptom that was respiratory, while 137 of the 541 (25.5%) subjects had non-respiratory symptoms. The most common respiratory symptom was dry cough (68.0%), followed by sputum production (30.5%) and dyspnea (16.5%), while the most common non-respiratory symptom was fever (74.3%) followed by fatigue (33.1%) and myalgia (12.9%) (Table 2).
Table 2.

Frequencies of initial symptoms and signs of patients with COVID-19 infection

VariablesAll(N = 541)Respiratorya(N = 404)Non-respiratoryb(N = 137)Pc
Respiratory only (%)103 (19.0)103 (25.5)0 (0.0)<0.001
Non-respiratory only (%)137 (25.3)0 (0.0)137 (100)<0.001
Combined (%)301 (55.6)301 (74.5)0 (0.0)<0.001
Initial symptom (respiratory)e    
Dry cough (%)368 (68.0)368 (91.1)0 (0.0)<0.001
Sputum production (%)165 (30.5)165 (40.8)0 (0.0)<0.001
Dyspnea (%)89 (16.5)89 (22.0)0 (0.0)<0.001
Runny nose (%)3 (0.6)3 (0.7)0 (0.0)0.31
Sore throat (%)38 (7.0)38 (9.4)0 (0.0)<0.001
Hemoptysis (%)26 (4.8)26 (6.4)0 (0.0)0.002
Chest tightness (%)26 (4.8)26 (6.4)0 (0.0)0.002
Nasal congestion (%)15 (2.8)15 (3.7)0 (0.0)0.02
Initial symptom (non-respiratory)f    
Fever (%)
Fatigue (%)179 (33.1)128 (31.7)51 (37.2)0.25
Myalgia (%)70 (12.9)54 (13.4)16 (11.7)0.61
Diarrhea (%)49 (9.1)31(7.7)18 (13.1)0.05
Headache (%)42 (7.8)26 (6.4)16 (11.7)0.05
Palpitation (%)3 (0.6)3 (0.7)0 (0.0)0.31
Nausea (%)32 (5.9)25 (6.2)7 (5.1)0.64
Loss of smell/taste (%)8 (1.5)7 (1.7)1 (0.7)0.40

aIncludes COVID-19 subjects with initial respiratory symptoms.

bincludes COVID-19 subjects with initial non-respiratory symptoms.

cP value for statistical difference between respiratory COVID-19 subject and non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects.

Frequencies of initial symptoms and signs of patients with COVID-19 infection aIncludes COVID-19 subjects with initial respiratory symptoms. bincludes COVID-19 subjects with initial non-respiratory symptoms. cP value for statistical difference between respiratory COVID-19 subject and non-respiratory COVID-19 subjects.

Differences of symptoms between patients developed ARDS and no-ARDS

Compared with patients who did not develop ARDS, patients who developed ARDS had significantly higher percentage of dyspnea (63.3% vs 11.8%, P < 0.001), fever (93.9% vs 72.4%, P = 0.001) and fatigue (51% vs 31.3%, P = 0.005) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Differences in symptoms between patients who developed ARDS and non-ARDS

VariablesARDS(N = 49)No-ARDS(N = 492)P
Initial symptom (respiratory)   
Dry cough (%)38 (7.8)330 (67.1)0.13
Sputum production (%)18 (36.7)147 (29.9)0.32
Dyspnea (%)31 (63.3)58 (11.8)<0.001
Runny nose (%)0 (0)3 (0.6)0.58
Sore throat (%)2 (4.1)36 (7.3)0.40
Hemoptysis (%)5 (10.2)21 (4.3)0.06
Chest tightness (%)5 (10.2)21 (4.3)0.06
Nasal congestion (%)2 (4.1)13 (2.6)0.56
Initial symptom (non-respiratory)   
Fever (%)46 (93.9)356 (72.4)0.001
Fatigue (%)25 (51.0)154 (31.3)0.005
Myalgia (%)4 (8.2)66 (13.4)0.30
Diarrhea (%)6 (12.2)43 (8.7)0.42
Headache (%)6 (12.2)36 (7.3)0.22
Palpitation (%)0 (0)3 (0.6)0.58
Nausea (%)5 (10.2)27 (5.5)0.18
Loss of smell/taste (%)1 (2.0)7 (1.4)0.73

ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Differences in symptoms between patients who developed ARDS and non-ARDS ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Risk factors for ARDS incidence

Forty-nine of 541 subjects in the cohort developed ARDS, most coming from the respiratory COVID-19 population. Univariate analysis showed several risk factors for developing ARDS, including age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–1.07, P < 0.001), comorbidities (OR = 5.13, 95% CI = 2.74–9.61, P < 0.001), secondary bacterial infection (OR = 50.2, 95% CI = 21.7–116.0, P < 0.001), dry cough (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.85–3.40, P = 0.01), dyspnea (OR = 12.9, 95% CI = 6.78–24.5, P = 0.01), fever (OR = 5.86, 95% CI = 1.79–19.2, P = 0.003) and fatigue (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.26–4.11, P = 0.007). The multivariate model showed that age (OR = 1.04, P = 0.01) dyspnea (OR = 4.91, P < 0.001) and secondary bacterial infection (OR = 19.8, P < 0.001) were independently associated with development of ARDS (Table 4).
Table 4.

Univariate and stepwise multivariate analyses of risk factors for ARDS development

VariablesUnivariate
Multivariate
OR95% CIPOR95% CIP
Age (years)1.051.03–1.07<0.0011.041.01–1.060.01
Comorbidities5.132.74–9.61<0.0011.180.50–2.780.71
Bacterial infection50.221.7–116.0<0.00119.87.49–52.4<0.001
Dry cough1.700.85–3.400.010.960.40–2.330.93
Sputum production1.360.74–2.510.32---
Dyspnea12.96.78–24.5<0.0014.912.21–10.9<0.001
Chest tightness2.550.92–7.090.07---
Hemoptysis2.550.92–7.090.07---
Fever5.861.79–19.20.0033.761.01–14.00.05
Headache1.780.71–4.430.23---
Fatigue2.271.26–4.110.0071.670.77–3.630.20
Myalgia0.570.20–1.650.30---
Diarrhea1.460.59–3.620.42---

ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Univariate and stepwise multivariate analyses of risk factors for ARDS development ARDS = acute respiratory distress syndrome, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Discussion

Our observation that relatively young patients (median age 38) with non-respiratory symptoms at COVID-19 disease onset have better outcomes may aid frontline healthcare workers caring for these patients. While COVID-19 disease is known to range from asymptomatic disease to ARDS/death, there is limited data to identify where patients will fall on this disease continuum. Here, we demonstrate a COVID-19 population (non-respiratory COVID-19) that utilized fewer hospital resources, required no advanced respiratory support, and had quicker recovery. As the previous studies showed, the most common symptoms were dry cough and fever [9,10]. Similarly, identifying patients (older patients), symptoms (dyspnea) at disease onset, and clinical developments (secondary bacterial infections) associated with ARDS development may help healthcare providers identify patients at the highest risk of clinical worsening. Here, our data demonstrate that subjects who reported dyspnea at disease onset were more likely to have worse outcomes. Interestingly, comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension, were not associated with ARDS development but instead likely reflect the increased comorbidity burden associated with aging and were not a contributor to ARDS development itself. Rather, alterations in airway epithelium and dysregulated immune responses associated with aging are more likely causative [11]. Our study has strengths and limitations. The large, laboratory-confirmed, COVID-19 population (N = 541) from eight COVID-19 designed hospitals improves the generalizability of our observations to regions and hospital systems that designate hospitals to care for COVID-19 patients, but the mortality is not as high as reported for the COVID-19 patients, in China; the mortality is less than 1% except for Wuhan [12], which may due to the lack of medical staff and personal protective equipment in Wuhan at the early stage of the disease outbreak, and as such, the finding in this study may not apply to regions with severe outbreaks, such as New York and Lombardy. This is a retrospective study, and some rare symptoms might not have been noted, but the common symptoms of COVID-19 were all recorded in the questionnaire designed by CDC. Finally, we did not obtain microbiological information and for secondary bacterial infection definition, we referred to the standards as Rotstein et al. [8] reported. Because the management of patient specimens was very strict according to the official documents in China during the COVID-19 outbreak, ordinary laboratories were not allowed to conduct microbiological study for COVID-19 patients. In conclusion, we identify COVID-19 subjects with dyspnea at disease onset who have a worse prognosis. We also demonstrate age and secondary bacterial infections to be independently associated with ARDS development in subjects with COVID-19.
  11 in total

1.  Emerging human coronaviruses--disease potential and preparedness.

Authors:  Larry J Anderson; Ralph S Baric
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Aging and Lung Disease.

Authors:  Soo Jung Cho; Heather W Stout-Delgado
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  COVID-19 in a designated infectious diseases hospital outside Hubei Province, China.

Authors:  Qingxian Cai; Deliang Huang; Pengcheng Ou; Hong Yu; Zhibin Zhu; Zhang Xia; Yinan Su; Zhenghua Ma; Yiming Zhang; Zhiwei Li; Qing He; Lei Liu; Yang Fu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 13.146

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Coleman Rotstein; Gerald Evans; Abraham Born; Ronald Grossman; R Bruce Light; Sheldon Magder; Barrie McTaggart; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

8.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nanshan Chen; Min Zhou; Xuan Dong; Jieming Qu; Fengyun Gong; Yang Han; Yang Qiu; Jingli Wang; Ying Liu; Yuan Wei; Jia'an Xia; Ting Yu; Xinxin Zhang; Li Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.

Authors:  Michelle L Holshue; Chas DeBolt; Scott Lindquist; Kathy H Lofy; John Wiesman; Hollianne Bruce; Christopher Spitters; Keith Ericson; Sara Wilkerson; Ahmet Tural; George Diaz; Amanda Cohn; LeAnne Fox; Anita Patel; Susan I Gerber; Lindsay Kim; Suxiang Tong; Xiaoyan Lu; Steve Lindstrom; Mark A Pallansch; William C Weldon; Holly M Biggs; Timothy M Uyeki; Satish K Pillai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leiwen Fu; Bingyi Wang; Tanwei Yuan; Xiaoting Chen; Yunlong Ao; Thomas Fitzpatrick; Peiyang Li; Yiguo Zhou; Yi-Fan Lin; Qibin Duan; Ganfeng Luo; Song Fan; Yong Lu; Anping Feng; Yuewei Zhan; Bowen Liang; Weiping Cai; Lin Zhang; Xiangjun Du; Linghua Li; Yuelong Shu; Huachun Zou
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.072

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 and diabetes: Association intensify risk factors for morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma; Tapan Behl; Neelam Sharma; Sukhbir Singh; Ajmer Singh Grewal; Ali Albarrati; Mohammed Albratty; Abdulkarim M Meraya; Simona Bungau
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 7.419

2.  Evidence for Telemedicine's Ongoing Transformation of Health Care Delivery Since the Onset of COVID-19: Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Soumik Mandal; Batia M Wiesenfeld; Devin Mann; Katharine Lawrence; Rumi Chunara; Paul Testa; Oded Nov
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-10-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.