| Literature DB >> 34930321 |
Jia-Yi Zhang1,2,3, Wei-Wen Zhu1,2,3, Meng-Yao Wang1,2,3, Run-Dong Zhai1,2,3, Qiong Wang1,2,3, Wei-Li Shen1,2,3, Lai-Kui Liu4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), the most abundant cells in the tumor microenvironment, have prominent roles in the development of solid tumors as stromal targets. However, the underlying mechanism of CAFs' function in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) development remains unclear. Here, we investigated the role of lysyl oxidase (LOX) expression in CAFs in tumor stromal remodeling and the mechanism of its effect on OSCC progression.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer-associated fibroblasts; Epithelial–mesenchymal transition; Lysyl oxidase; Matrix stiffness; Oral squamous cell carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34930321 PMCID: PMC8686394 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03181-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1LOX expressed in tumor stroma is colocalized with CAFs. A Distribution of LOX expression was detected by multiple IHC staining. Representative images at 100 × magnification. FAP (green), EPCAM (red), LOX (cyan), DAPI (blue). B Colocalization of LOX and CAFs in the stroma were shown. Representative images of high and low expression levels of FAP, α-SMA and LOX in tumor stroma at 100 × magnification. FAP (green), α-SMA (red), LOX (cyan), DAPI (blue). C The Kaplan–Meier survival curves of prognostic models based on LOX expression in tumor stroma for patients with OSCC
The relationships between α-SMA and LOX expression in tumor stroma in OSCC
| Variable | No. | LOX expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | P | ||
| α-SMA expression | ||||
| Low | 42 | 21 | 21 | |
| High | 54 | 13 | 41 | |
No. Number of patients; Bold values signify P < 0.05.
Associations between clinical variables and expression levels of α-SMA and LOX in stroma
| Variable | No. | α-SMA expression | LOX expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Low | High | ||||
| Sex | 0.731 | 0.356 | |||||
| Male | 59 | 25 | 34 | 23 | 36 | ||
| Female | 37 | 17 | 20 | 11 | 26 | ||
| Age(years) | 0.854 | 0.54 | |||||
| ≤ 50 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 13 | ||
| > 50 | 74 | 32 | 42 | 25 | 49 | ||
| Tumor location | 0.308 | 0.662 | |||||
| Tongue | 32 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 21 | ||
| Gingiva | 21 | 6 | 15 | 9 | 12 | ||
| Buccal mucosa | 26 | 12 | 14 | 7 | 19 | ||
| Others | 17 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Tumor size | 0.212 | ||||||
| T1 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 9 | 9 | ||
| T2 | 43 | 18 | 25 | 14 | 29 | ||
| T3 | 22 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 14 | ||
| T4 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.496 | 0.527 | |||||
| N0 | 58 | 27 | 31 | 22 | 36 | ||
| N | 38 | 15 | 23 | 12 | 26 | ||
| Distant metastasis | |||||||
| M0 | 96 | 42 | 54 | 34 | 62 | ||
| M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Clinical stage | |||||||
| I | 13 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 6 | ||
| II | 25 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 14 | ||
| III | 30 | 13 | 17 | 9 | 21 | ||
| IV | 28 | 8 | 20 | 7 | 21 | ||
| Pathological grade | 0.986 | 0.208 | |||||
| I | 58 | 25 | 33 | 23 | 35 | ||
| II | 30 | 14 | 16 | 9 | 21 | ||
| III | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||
No., number of patients; N0, no lymph node metastasis; N, lymph node metastasis; M0, no metastasis; M, metastasis; Bold values signify P < 0.05.
Univariate COX regression analysis of overall survival
| Variables | P-value | Risk ratio | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male, female) | 0.464 | 1.444 | (0.54, 3.862) |
| Age (≤ 50, > 50) | 0.805 | 0.995 | (0.957, 1.035) |
| Tumor location (tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa, palate, lower lip, jaw, others) | 0.803 | 0.964 | (0.725, 1.283) |
| Tumor size (T1–T4) | 0.63 | 1.128 | (0.69, 1.844) |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.977 | 1.01 | (0.522, 1.954) |
| Clinical stage (I, II, III, IV) | 0.633 | 1.122 | (0.7, 1.798) |
| Pathological grade | 0.96 | 0.98 | (0.434, 2.213) |
| Local infiltration | 0.816 | 0.881 | (0.303, 2.562) |
| α-SMA in tumor stroma (low, high) | 0.928 | 0.955 | (0.35, 2.603) |
| ( |
CI confidence interval
Bold values signify P-value < 0.05.
Multivariate COX regression analysis of overall survival
| Variables | P-value | Risk ratio | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male, female) | 0.841 | 1.117 | (0.378, 3.299) |
| Age (≤ 50, > 50) | 0.795 | 0.995 | (0.954, 1.037) |
| Tumor location (tongue, gingiva, buccal mucosa, palate, lower lip, jaw, others) | 0.906 | 1.02 | (0.737, 1.41) |
| Tumor size (T1–T4) | 0.656 | 1.231 | (0.492, 3.081) |
| Lymph node metastasiss | 0.894 | 1.089 | (0.309, 3.845) |
| Clinical stage (I, II, III, IV) | 0.762 | 0.834 | (0.256, 2.712) |
| Pathological grade | 0.516 | 0.72 | (0.267, 1.94) |
| Local infiltration | 0.676 | 1.313 | (0.367, 4.702) |
| α-SMA in tumor stroma (low, high) | 0.62 | 0.735 | (0.217, 2.487) |
CI confidence interval
Bold values signify P-value < 0.05
Fig. 2LOX expressed by CAFs affects the biological characteristics of OSCC cells. A Gene expression of LOX in three paired NFs and CAFs measured by RT-qPCR. B Protein levels of LOX in three paired NFs and CAFs determined by western blot. C CCK-8 assay was used to evaluate the proliferation ability of Cal27 and HN6 cells. D The invasion ability in Cal27 and HN6 cells were evaluated by transwell assay. Representative images of invaded cells and quantification data were shown. E The migration ability in Cal27 and HN6 cells were detected by the scratch test. Representative images were shown. F Expression of EMT markers in Cal27 and HN6 cells were examined by western blot. G Quantitation of EMT markers mRNA levels were determined by RT-qPCR. GAPDH served as loading control; β-actin served as loading control. The data are presented as the means ± SD (n = 3); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 3LOX expressed by CAFs affects ECM remodeling in vitro. A NFs and CAFs were co-cultured with collagen gels and the contraction of collagen gels was assessed photographically at 0 h and 72 h. Collagen gels diameter was measured every day. B The diameter of collagen in each group was statistically analyzed. C Representative microscope images of collagen co-cultured with NFs and CAFs were taken by SEM. D Quantitative analysis of collagen pore size was calculated by ImageJ. E Relative stiffness of collagen were measured by MARS60 microinfrared rheometer. Data was representative of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 4Matrix stiffness mediated by CAFs-derived LOX promotes invasion ability of OSCC cells. A Elastic modulus(G’) of type I collagen stimulated by CM from CAFs cells appeared to change over time. B Relative stiffness of collagen in each groups under stable condition was shown. Elastic modulus(G’) were measured by MARS60 microinfrared rheometer. C Representative immunofluorescence images of F-actin staining in Cal27 cells were shown. Green: F-actin; Blue: DAPI (400 ×). D Representative H&E staining images of Cal27 cells cultured with NFs and CAFs in 3D co-culture system were shown. (A1-H1, 100 × ; A2-H2, 200 × ; A3-H3, 400 ×). E The depth of Cal27 cells invasion into the collagen was calculated using imageJ (n = 5 per condition). F The protein expression of LOX and EMT markers in Cal27 cells cultured on collagen gels were measured by western blot assays. β-actin served as loading control. The data are presented as the means ± SD; Scale bar: 50 μm; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 5Matrix stiffness mediated by CAFs-derived LOX promotes OSCC progression via FAK signaling pathway. A The protein expression of p-FAK and FAK were measured by western blot assay in Cal27 cells cultured on collagen gels. B, C, The proliferation ability of Cal27 cells on collagen gels after FAKi treatment was measured by CCk-8 assay. D The invasion ability of Cal27 cells after FAKi treatment was measured via transwell chambers coated with collagen gels. Representative images and quantification data were shown. E The protein expression of p-FAK, FAK and EMT-related markers were measured by western blot assay in Cal27 cells after FAKi treatment. β-actin served as loading control. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001