| Literature DB >> 34930122 |
Parvina Titus Kazahura1,2, Theophylly L Mushi3,4, Pedro Pallangyo5, Mohamed Janabi5, Rodrick Kisenge3, Mazen Albaghdadi6, Naizihijwa Majani4, Edward Kija3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is the most common acquired heart disease occurring in children and adolescents. RHD is associated with significant morbidity and mortality particularly in low and middle- income countries (LMICs) where the burden is estimated to be higher compared to high income countries. Subclinical RHD is the presence of valvular lesion diagnosed by echocardiography in a person with no clinical manifestation of RHD. This study aimed at determining the prevalence, types and factors associated with subclinical RHD among primary school children in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography screening; Rheumatic Fever; Subclinical RHD; Tanzania; Valvular heart lesions
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34930122 PMCID: PMC8686380 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02377-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
WHF criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of rhd for individuals ≤ 20 years
| Definite RHD (either A, B or C) |
| (A) Pathological MR and at least two morphological features of RHD of the MV |
| (B) MS mean gradient ≥ 4 mmHg |
| (C) Pathological AR and at least two morphological features of RHD of the AV |
| (D) Borderline disease of both the AV and MV |
| Borderline RHD (either A, B or C) |
| (A) At least two morphological features of RHD of the MV without pathological MR or MS |
| (B) Pathological MR |
| (C) Pathological AR |
| Normal echocardiographic findings (all of A, B, C and D) |
| (A) MR that does not meet all four Doppler echocardiographic criteria (physiological MR) |
| (B) AR that does not meet all four Doppler echocardiographic criteria (physiological AR) |
| (C) An isolated morphological feature of RHD of the MV (for example, vulvular thickening) without any associated pathological stenosis or regurgitation |
| (D) Morphological feature of RHD of the AV (for example, vulvular thickening) without any associated pathological stenosis or regurgitation |
| Normal echocardiographic findings (all of A, B, C and D) |
| (A) MR that does not meet all four Doppler echocardiographic criteria (physiological MR) |
| (B) AR that does not meet all four Doppler echocardiographic criteria (physiological AR) |
| (C) An isolated morphological feature of RHD of the MV (for example, vulvular thickening) without any associated pathological stenosis or regurgitation |
| (D) Morphological feature of RHD of the AV (for example, vulvular thickening) without any associated pathological stenosis or regurgitation |
| Criteria for Pathological mitral regurgitation |
| (All four Doppler echocardiographic criteria must be met) |
| Seen in two views (apical four chamber view and parasternal long axis or short axis view) |
| In at least one view, jet length ≥ 2 cm |
| Velocity ≥ 3 m/s for one complete envelope |
| Pan-systolic jet in at least one envelope |
| Criteria for Pathological aortic regurgitation |
| (All four Doppler echocardiographic criteria must be met) |
| Seen in two views |
| In at least one view, jet length ≥ 1 cm |
| Velocity ≥ 3 m/s in early diastole |
| Pan-diastolic jet in at least one envelope |
| Morphological features of RHD in the MV |
| AMVL thickening ≥ 3 mm |
| Chordal thickening |
| Restricted leaflet motion |
| Excessive leaflet tip motion during systole |
| Morphological features of RHD in the AV |
| Irregular or focal thickening |
| Coaptation defect |
| Restricted leaflet motion |
| Prolapse |
WHF World Heart Federation, MR mitral regurgitation, RHD rheumatic heart disease, MV Mitral valve, MS mitral stenosis, AR Aortic regurgitation, AV aortic valve, AMVL anterior mitral valve leaflet
Fig. 1CONSORT flow diagram
Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants (n = 949)
| Demographics | Mean ± SD/frequency (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age of children, Mean ± SD; Range | 10.8 ± 1.7, 7–17 years | |
| Sex N (%); Female, Male | 542 (57.1); 407 (42.9) | |
| BMI N (%) | ||
| Normal | 742 (78.2) | |
| Severe underweight | 20 (2.1) | |
| Underweight | 156 (16.4) | |
| Overweight | 23 (2.4) | |
| Obese | 8 (0.8) | |
| Age of the parents | Mother | Father |
| Mean ± SD | 36 ± 6.6 | 42 ± 9.3 |
| Range | 22–54 years | 23–76 years |
| Parents’ education level N (%) | Mother | Father |
| No formal education | 28 (3) | 12 (1.3) |
| Primary education | 461 (48.6) | 327 (34.5) |
| Secondary education | 298(31.4) | 336 (35.4) |
| Above secondary education | 140 (14.8) | 198 (20.9) |
| Parents’ occupation N (%) | Mother | Father |
| None | 224 (23.6) | 37 (3.9) |
| Rural Farmer | 23 (2.4) | 50 (5.3) |
| Small scale business | 517 (54.5) | 417 (43.9) |
| Large scale business | 43 (4.5) | 114 (12) |
| Employed | 127 (13.4) | 264 (27.8) |
| People living in one house N (%) | > 6 people | < 6people |
| 315 (33.2) | 595 (62.7) | |
| People sharing bedroom with the child N (%) | > 2 | < 2 |
| 206 (21.7) | 692 (72.9) |
Fig. 2Prevalence of subclinical RHD among screened primary school children in Dar es salaam. (n = 949)
Fig. 3Morphological and functional features of RHD of the MV. The prevalence of various (n = 33)
Univariate predictors of subclinical RHD
| Factor | N (%) | Chi-square | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| > 9 years | 31 (4.3) | 8.3 | 0.004 |
| * ≤ 9 years | 1 (0.4) | ||
| Hygiene | |||
| Poor | 22 (4.9) | 5.9 | 0.015 |
| *Good | 10 (2) | ||
| Overcrowding | |||
| Yes | 19 (4.6) | 3 | 0.08 |
| *No | 13 (2.5) | ||
| Mothers education | |||
| Low | 18 (3.9) | 0.16 | 0.69 |
| *High | 14 (3.2) | ||
| Family income | |||
| Low | 20 (4) | ||
| *Middle | 12 (2.9) | 1.7 | 0.19 |
| URTI | |||
| Recurrent | 20 (22) | 29.3 | 0.00 |
| *Non-recurrent | 12 (4.1) | ||
| Nutrition | |||
| Underweight | 8 (4.5) | 0.9 | 0.34 |
| *Not underweight | 24 (3.1) |
*Reference
Multivariate predictors of subclinical RHD
| Factor | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| > 9 years | 10.6 (1.4–78.2) | 0.02 | 10.8 (1.4–82.2) | 0.02 |
| *≤ 9 years | ||||
| Hygiene | ||||
| Poor | 2.5 (1.2–5.3) | 0.02 | 3 (1.3–6.8) | 0.009 |
| *Good | ||||
| Overcrowding | ||||
| Yes | 1.9 (0.9–3.8) | 0.09 | – | - |
| *No | ||||
| Family income | ||||
| Low | 1.7 (0.8–3.6) | 0.19 | – | - |
| *Middle | ||||
| URTI | ||||
| Recurrent | ||||
| *Non-recurrent | 19.6 (9.1–41.2) | 0.00 | 21 (9.6–46) | 0.00 |
*Reference