Literature DB >> 34930028

In Vitro Activity of Gepotidacin against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Anaerobes.

Meredith A Hackel1, James A Karlowsky1,2, Michele A Canino3, Daniel F Sahm1, Nicole E Scangarella-Oman3.   

Abstract

Gepotidacin (formerly GSK2140944) is a first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial currently in phase III clinical trials. When tested against Gram-negative (n = 333) and Gram-positive (n = 225) anaerobes by agar dilution, gepotidacin inhibited 90% of isolates at concentrations of 4 and 2 μg/mL, respectively. Given gepotidacin's in vitro activity against the anaerobic isolates tested, further study is warranted to better understand the utility of gepotidacin in the treatment of infections caused by clinically relevant anaerobic organisms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaerobes; gepotidacin; inhibitor; topoisomerase; triazaacenaphthylene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34930028      PMCID: PMC8846401          DOI: 10.1128/aac.02165-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


INTRODUCTION

Anaerobic bacteria are etiologic agents in a wide variety of human infections and are most commonly identified as components of mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections (1). Commonly isolated anaerobes from clinical specimens include Bacteroides spp., Fusobacterium spp., Prevotella spp., Porphyromonas spp., Actinomyces spp., Clostridium spp., and Gram-positive cocci (1). Increases in resistance to commonly prescribed anti-anaerobic agents have been widely reported for clinical isolates of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive anaerobes (2–7). New antimicrobial agents with spectra of activity that target or include anaerobes via novel mechanisms of action would enhance our therapeutic armamentarium. Gepotidacin (formerly GSK2140944) is a first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor that is currently in phase III clinical trials as an oral treatment for uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT04010539) and uncomplicated urinary tract infections (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT04020341). Phase II clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of gepotidacin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT02045797), uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT02294682), and uncomplicated urinary tract infections (ClinicalTrials registration number NCT03568942) (8–11). Bacteria typically possess two distinct type II topoisomerases, namely, DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV (12). DNA gyrase primarily introduces negative supercoils into DNA, mediated by the C-terminal domain of its DNA binding subunit (GyrA), while topoisomerase IV decatenates DNA and relaxes positive supercoils (12). Gepotidacin selectively inhibits both bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV by interacting with the bacterial subunits GyrA (DNA gyrase) and ParC (topoisomerase IV) using a novel mode of binding (13–15). Specifically, molecular dynamics simulations have shown that D82 in the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase and the homologous position D79 in the ParC subunit of topoisomerase IV form an intermolecular salt bridge with gepotidacin (16). Once bound, gepotidacin associates with uncleaved or single-stranded cleaved DNA complexes to inhibit bacterial DNA replication and cell division. Gepotidacin is active in vitro against fastidious and nonfastidious aerobic, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including isolates that are resistant to fluoroquinolones and antimicrobial agents of other antimicrobial classes (8, 11, 17–19). To date, only a single study has been published on the in vitro activity of gepotidacin against anaerobes, and it included only Clostridium perfringens (n = 101; MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL) (18). In the current study, 649 clinically significant anaerobic pathogens that had been previously collected by IHMA surveillance/clinical studies in North America (n = 315 [48.5% of isolates]) and Europe (n = 334 [51.5% of isolates]) in 2000 to 2017 were included for testing. The anatomical sites of organism isolation included intraabdominal (n = 237 [36.5% of total]), skin and skin structure (n = 214 [33.0%]), other or unknown (n = 110 [16.9%]), blood (39 [6.0%]), genital (n = 23 [3.5%]), respiratory tract (n = 18 [2.8%]), and urinary tract (n = 8 [1.2%]). The isolate collection analyzed included Gram-negative (n = 333) and Gram-positive (n = 225) anaerobes. A collection of Lactobacillus strains (n = 91) was also analyzed. All isolates used in this study were preserved at −70°C; the majority were collected in 2013 to 2016 (n = 432 [66.6% of isolates]). Isolates were identified to the species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltronics, Bremen, Germany) (library version MBT Compass 4.1.60.). MICs were determined by agar dilution for all isolates and by both agar dilution and broth microdilution for Bacteroides strains (20, 21). The 316 Gram-positive isolates tested included 91 isolates of Lactobacillus spp. The CLSI document M45-A3 recommends determining MICs for Lactobacillus spp. using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 2.5% to 5% laked horse blood, with panels incubated at 35°C in 5% CO2 for 24 to 48 h (22). However, the Lactobacillus isolates included in this study grew poorly in 5% CO2 and required anaerobic conditions for optimal growth; therefore, they were tested by anaerobic agar dilution (12), as suggested in the CLSI document M45-A3 (22). MICs generated against Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates other than Lactobacillus spp. were interpreted using CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints (21). Lactobacillus data were reported separately from data for other Gram-positive isolates, with MICs interpreted using CLSI M45-A3 breakpoints (22). Ceftriaxone, metronidazole, and piperacillin powders were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Clindamycin, imipenem, moxifloxacin, and tazobactam powders were obtained from the U.S. Pharmacopeia (Rockville, MD). Gepotidacin was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (Collegeville, PA). All antimicrobial agents were dissolved and diluted following CLSI guidelines (21). Quality control testing was performed on each day of testing as specified by the CLSI, using Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25825, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, Eggerthella lenta ATCC 43055, and Clostridioides difficile ATCC 700057 (21). It is important to note that CLSI quality control MIC ranges have not yet been established for gepotidacin tested against anaerobes. The in vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against Gram-negative anaerobes are shown in Table 1. The gepotidacin MIC90 for all Gram-negative isolates (tested by agar dilution) was 4 μg/mL. Gepotidacin was more potent on a weight basis than ceftriaxone (MIC90, 512 μg/mL), clindamycin (MIC90, >8 μg/mL), moxifloxacin (MIC90, 8 μg/mL), and piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC90, 16 μg/mL) but was less potent than imipenem (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL) and metronidazole (MIC90, 2 μg/mL) against this collection of Gram-negative anaerobes. Gepotidacin MIC90 values ranged from 0.12 μg/mL for Veillonella spp. to 4 μg/mL for both Bacteroides spp. and Prevotella spp. The MIC90 for gepotidacin against the B. fragilis group was 1 doubling dilution lower when tested by broth microdilution (2 μg/mL) than when tested by agar dilution (4 μg/mL). Gepotidacin at concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 μg/mL inhibited 79.0%, 88.9%, 96.4%, 98.2%, and 99.1% of Gram-negative isolates (Table 2).
TABLE 1

In vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against 333 isolates of Gram-negative anaerobes

Organism group and antimicrobial agentMIC (μg/mL)a
MIC interpretation (%)
MIC rangeMIC50MIC90SusceptibleIntermediateResistant
All Gram negative (333 isolates)
 Gepotidacin≤0.015 to >320.54NAbNANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to >512≤851258.68.732.7
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >80.5>873.35.421.3
 Imipenem≤0.015 to >80.120.599.10.30.6
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to >160.25298.501.5
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to >80.5878.110.811.1
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to >640.51697.61.50.9
Bacteroides fragilis groupc (191 isolates)
 Agar dilution testing
  Gepotidacin≤0.015 to 3214NANANA
  Ceftriaxone≤8 to >51264>51234.013.652.4
  Clindamycin≤0.25 to >81>864.47.927.8
  Imipenem0.03 to >80.25199.00.50.5
  Metronidazole≤0.12 to 20.25110000
  Moxifloxacin0.12 to >81871.711.516.8
  Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to >641899.001.1
 Broth microdilution testing
  Gepotidacin≤0.015 to 160.52NANANA
  Ceftriaxone≤4 to >5121625651.316.831.9
  Clindamycin≤0.03 to >161>1664.98.426.7
  Imipenem0.03 to >80.120.598.40.51.1
  Metronidazole≤0.12 to 81210000
  Moxifloxacin0.12 to >81872.39.418.3
  Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.015 to >6411699.001
Bilophila wadsworthia (26 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.03 to 20.250.5NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to ≤8≤8≤810000
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to ≤0.25≤0.25≤0.2510000
 Imipenem≤0.015 to 0.25≤0.0150.1210000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to 0.25≤0.12≤0.1210000
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to 0.50.250.510000
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 41410000
Fusobacterium spp.d (25 isolates)
 Gepotidacin≤0.015 to >320.122NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to >512≤8≤896.004.0
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25488.04.08.0
 Imipenem≤0.015 to 10.030.1210000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to 2≤0.120.510000
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to 40.25296.04.00
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 32≤0.060.2510000
Porphyromonas spp.e (26 isolates)
 Gepotidacin≤0.015 to >320.061NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 128≤8≤896.203.9
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25>884.6015.4
 Imipenem≤0.015 to >80.060.596.203.9
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to >16≤0.12296.203.9
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to 40.25296.23.90
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 320.12810000
Prevotella spp.f (30 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.06 to 40.54NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 512≤812870.010.020.0
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25>876.7023.3
 Imipenem≤0.015 to 0.120.030.0610000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to 20.5210000
 Moxifloxacin0.25 to 81473.320.06.7
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 2≤0.060.2510000
Sutterella wadsworthensis (10 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.25 to 10.51NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 16≤81610000
 Clindamycin0.5 to 11110000
 Imipenem0.25 to 0.50.50.510000
 Metronidazole2 to >164>1660.0040.0
 Moxifloxacin0.12 to 10.250.510000
 Piperacillin-tazobactam32 to 64326480.020.00
Veillonella spp.g (25 isolates)
 Gepotidacin≤0.015 to 0.250.120.12NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to >512≤8≤896.004.0
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25>872.08.020.0
 Imipenem0.06 to 20.5210000
 Metronidazole0.5 to 42410000
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to >81864.024.012.0
 Piperacillin-tazobactam0.25 to >64166484.012.04.0

MIC50 and MIC90 values were calculated only for genera or species for which >10 isolates were tested.

NA, not available. CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints are not published for this antimicrobial agent.

Bacteroides fragilis group isolates included Bacteroides caccae (n = 2), Bacteroides fragilis (n = 114), Bacteroides ovatus (n = 11), Bacteroides stercoris (n = 3), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (n = 48), Bacteroides uniformis (n = 4), and Bacteroides vulgatus (n = 9).

Fusobacterium isolates included Fusobacterium necrophorum (n = 3), Fusobacterium nucleatum (n = 17), and Fusobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 5).

Porphyromonas isolates included Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (n = 9), Porphyromonas endodontalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas gingivalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas levii (n = 1), Porphyromonas somerae (n = 5), and Porphyromonas not identified at the species level (n = 7).

Prevotella isolates included Prevotella bivia (n = 11), Prevotella buccae (n = 10), Prevotella denticola (n = 5), Prevotella disiens (n = 1), and Prevotella melaninogenica (n = 3).

Veillonella isolates included Veillonella alcalescens (n = 1), Veillonella parvula (n = 9), and Veillonella not identified at the species level (n = 15).

TABLE 2

Distribution of gepotidacin and comparator MICs against Gram-negative and Gram-positive anaerobic isolates

Organism group and antimicrobial agentNo. (cumulative %) of isolates with gepotidacin MIC of:
≤0.015 μg/mL0.03 μg/mL0.06 μg/mL0.12 μg/mL0.25 μg/mL0.5 μg/mL1 μg/mL2 μg/mL4 μg/mL8 μg/mL16 μg/mL32 μg/mL>32 μg/mL
All Gram negativea (333 isolates)
 Gepotidacin17 (5.1)9 (7.8)22 (14.4)33 (24.3)40 (36.3)67 (56.5)75 (79.0)33 (88.9)25 (96.4)6 (98.2)3 (99.1)1 (99.4)2 (100)
 Ceftriaxone169 (50.8)26 (58.6)29 (67.3)109 (100)
 Clindamycin129 (38.7)47 (52.9)41 (65.2)27 (73.3)18 (78.7)71 (100)
 Imipenem39 (11.7)27 (19.8)62 (38.4)67 (58.6)70 (79.6)37 (90.7)22 (97.3)5 (98.8)1 (99.1)3 (100)
 Metronidazole129 (38.7)43 (51.7)88 (78.1)33 (88.0)22 (94.6)12 (98.2)1 (98.5)5 (100)
 Moxifloxacin8 (2.4)21 (8.7)88 (35.1)71 (56.5)49 (71.2)23 (78.1)36 (88.9)37 (100)
 Piperacillin-tazobactam82 (24.6)33 (34.5)44 (47.7)19 (53.5)30 (62.5)22 (69.1)20 (75.1)37 (86.2)17 (91.3)21 (97.6)8 (100)
All Gram positiveb (225 isolates)
 Gepotidacin12 (5.3)15 (12.0)16 (19.1)12 (24.4)14 (30.7)22 (40.4)69 (71.1)43 (90.2)10 (94.7)3 (96.0)2 (96.9)2 (97.8)5 (100)
 Ceftriaxone85 (37.8)19 (46.2)53 (69.8)68 (100)
 Clindamycin98 (43.6)7 (46.7)12 (52.0)32 (66.2)41 (84.4)35 (100)
 Imipenem27 (12.0)22 (21.8)27 (33.8)14 (40.0)13 (45.8)17 (53.3)4 (55.1)13 (60.9)60 (87.6)28 (100)
 Metronidazole70 (31.1)93 (72.4)41 (90.7)12 (96.0)5 (98.2)1 (98.7)3 (100)
 Moxifloxacin6 (2.7)29 (15.6)20 (24.4)12 (29.8)69 (60.4)17 (68.0)17 (75.6)55 (100)
 Piperacillin-tazobactam36 (16.0)24 (26.7)23 (36.9)6 (39.6)5 (41.8)2 (42.7)10 (47.1)85 (84.9)15 (91.6)19 (100)

Gram-negative isolates included Bacteroides caccae (n = 2), Bacteroides fragilis (n = 114), Bacteroides ovatus (n = 11), Bacteroides stercoris (n = 3), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (n = 48), Bacteroides uniformis (n = 4), Bacteroides vulgatus (n = 9), Bilophila wadsworthia (n = 26), Fusobacterium necrophorum (n = 3), Fusobacterium nucleatum (n = 17), Fusobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 5), Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (n = 9), Porphyromonas endodontalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas gingivalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas levii (n = 1), Porphyromonas somerae (n = 5), Porphyromonas not identified at the species level (n = 7), Prevotella bivia (n = 11), Prevotella buccae (n = 10), Prevotella denticola (n = 5), Prevotella disiens (n = 1), Prevotella melaninogenica (n = 3), Sutterella wadsworthensis (n = 10), Veillonella alcalescens (n = 1), Veillonella parvula (n = 9), and Veillonella not identified at the species level (n = 15).

Gram-positive isolates included Actinomyces europaeus (n = 2), Actinomyces georgiae (n = 1), Actinomyces israelii (n = 1), Actinomyces meyeri (n = 1), Actinomyces neuii (n = 3), Actinomyces odontolyticus (n = 3), Actinomyces radingae (n = 3), Actinomyces turicensis (n = 2), Actinomyces not identified at the species level (n = 6), Bifidobacterium adolescentis (n = 5), Bifidobacterium breve (n = 3), Bifidobacterium dentium (n = 4), Bifidobacterium longum (n = 7), Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (n = 3), Bifidobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 4), Clostridioides difficile (n = 100), Collinsella aerofaciens (n = 5), Eggerthella lenta (n = 21), Eubacterium limosum (n = 2), Eubacterium nodatum (n = 1), Eubacterium not identified at the species level (n = 23), and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (n = 25).

In vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against 333 isolates of Gram-negative anaerobes MIC50 and MIC90 values were calculated only for genera or species for which >10 isolates were tested. NA, not available. CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints are not published for this antimicrobial agent. Bacteroides fragilis group isolates included Bacteroides caccae (n = 2), Bacteroides fragilis (n = 114), Bacteroides ovatus (n = 11), Bacteroides stercoris (n = 3), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (n = 48), Bacteroides uniformis (n = 4), and Bacteroides vulgatus (n = 9). Fusobacterium isolates included Fusobacterium necrophorum (n = 3), Fusobacterium nucleatum (n = 17), and Fusobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 5). Porphyromonas isolates included Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (n = 9), Porphyromonas endodontalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas gingivalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas levii (n = 1), Porphyromonas somerae (n = 5), and Porphyromonas not identified at the species level (n = 7). Prevotella isolates included Prevotella bivia (n = 11), Prevotella buccae (n = 10), Prevotella denticola (n = 5), Prevotella disiens (n = 1), and Prevotella melaninogenica (n = 3). Veillonella isolates included Veillonella alcalescens (n = 1), Veillonella parvula (n = 9), and Veillonella not identified at the species level (n = 15). Distribution of gepotidacin and comparator MICs against Gram-negative and Gram-positive anaerobic isolates Gram-negative isolates included Bacteroides caccae (n = 2), Bacteroides fragilis (n = 114), Bacteroides ovatus (n = 11), Bacteroides stercoris (n = 3), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (n = 48), Bacteroides uniformis (n = 4), Bacteroides vulgatus (n = 9), Bilophila wadsworthia (n = 26), Fusobacterium necrophorum (n = 3), Fusobacterium nucleatum (n = 17), Fusobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 5), Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (n = 9), Porphyromonas endodontalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas gingivalis (n = 2), Porphyromonas levii (n = 1), Porphyromonas somerae (n = 5), Porphyromonas not identified at the species level (n = 7), Prevotella bivia (n = 11), Prevotella buccae (n = 10), Prevotella denticola (n = 5), Prevotella disiens (n = 1), Prevotella melaninogenica (n = 3), Sutterella wadsworthensis (n = 10), Veillonella alcalescens (n = 1), Veillonella parvula (n = 9), and Veillonella not identified at the species level (n = 15). Gram-positive isolates included Actinomyces europaeus (n = 2), Actinomyces georgiae (n = 1), Actinomyces israelii (n = 1), Actinomyces meyeri (n = 1), Actinomyces neuii (n = 3), Actinomyces odontolyticus (n = 3), Actinomyces radingae (n = 3), Actinomyces turicensis (n = 2), Actinomyces not identified at the species level (n = 6), Bifidobacterium adolescentis (n = 5), Bifidobacterium breve (n = 3), Bifidobacterium dentium (n = 4), Bifidobacterium longum (n = 7), Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (n = 3), Bifidobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 4), Clostridioides difficile (n = 100), Collinsella aerofaciens (n = 5), Eggerthella lenta (n = 21), Eubacterium limosum (n = 2), Eubacterium nodatum (n = 1), Eubacterium not identified at the species level (n = 23), and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (n = 25). The in vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against Gram-positive anaerobes are shown in Table 3. The MIC90 for gepotidacin against all Gram-positive isolates combined was 2 μg/mL. Based on MIC90 values, gepotidacin was more potent on a weight basis than ceftriaxone (MIC90, 256 μg/mL), clindamycin (MIC90, >8 μg/mL), imipenem (MIC90, 8 μg/mL), moxifloxacin (MIC90, >8 μg/mL), and piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC90, 16 μg/mL) but was less potent than metronidazole (MIC90, 0.5 μg/mL). MIC90 values for gepotidacin against Gram-positive isolates ranged from 0.03 μg/mL for Peptostreptococcus anaerobius to >32 μg/mL for Actinomyces spp. C. difficile isolates (n = 100) had a gepotidacin MIC90 value of 2 μg/mL, while the remaining Gram-positive species had gepotidacin MIC90 values of ≤8 μg/mL. The MIC90 value for gepotidacin against Lactobacillus spp. was 1 μg/mL, and all isolates were inhibited by ≤2 μg/mL (Table 4). Gepotidacin at concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 μg/mL inhibited 71.1%, 90.2%, 94.7%, 96.0%, and 96.9% of Gram-positive isolates (Table 2).
TABLE 3

In vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against 225 isolates of Gram-positive anaerobes

Organism group and antimicrobial agentMIC (μg/mL)a
MIC interpretation (%)
MIC rangeMIC50MIC90SusceptibleIntermediateResistant
All Gram positive (225 isolates)
 Gepotidacin≤0.015 to >3212NAbNANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to >5123225646.223.630.2
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >81>866.218.215.6
 Imipenem≤0.015 to >80.5887.611.60.9
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to >160.250.598.701.3
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to >81>868.07.624.4
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 3281610000
Actinomyces spp.c (22 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.06 to >321>32NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 16≤81610000
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25>881.8018.2
 Imipenem≤0.015 to 0.250.060.1210000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to >16≤0.12≤0.1290.909.1
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to 81290.94.64.6
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 10.12110000
Bifidobacterium spp.d (26 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.03 to >320.250.5NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 16≤81610000
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25≤0.2596.203.9
 Imipenem≤0.015 to 0.50.030.1210000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to 0.5≤0.120.2510000
 Moxifloxacin0.12 to >82873.115.411.5
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 0.5≤0.060.2510000
Clostridioides difficile (100 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.12 to 812NANANA
 Ceftriaxone16 to >512321281.051.048.0
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >84>837.040.023.0
 Imipenem0.12 to >84872.026.02.0
 Metronidazole0.25 to 20.25110000
 Moxifloxacin0.25 to >81>856.07.037.0
 Piperacillin-tazobactam0.25 to 168810000
Collinsella aerofaciens (5 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.06 to 0.06NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to ≤810000
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to ≤0.2510000
 Imipenem0.03 to 0.0610000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to ≤0.1210000
 Moxifloxacin0.25 to >860.0040.0
 Piperacillin-tazobactam0.12 to 110000
Eggerthella lenta (21 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.06 to 3214NANANA
 Ceftriaxone32 to >512512>51209.590.5
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25>885.7014.3
 Imipenem0.12 to 0.50.50.510000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to 0.50.50.510000
 Moxifloxacin0.12 to >80.25>866.74.828.6
 Piperacillin-tazobactam8 to 32323210000
Eubacterium spp.e (26 isolates)
 Gepotidacin0.03 to 40.252NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 512≤81696.203.9
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25192.33.93.9
 Imipenem≤0.015 to 0.5≤0.0150.2510000
 Metronidazole≤0.12 to >16≤0.120.596.203.9
 Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to >80.25>888.5011.5
 Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 32≤0.06110000
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (25 isolates)
 Gepotidacin≤0.015 to 0.060.030.03NANANA
 Ceftriaxone≤8 to 16≤8≤810000
 Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25>888.0012.0
 Imipenem0.06 to 20.12210000
 Metronidazole0.25 to 0.50.50.510000
 Moxifloxacin0.12 to 80.12872.016.012.0
 Piperacillin-tazobactam0.12 to 160.251610000

MIC50 and MIC90 values were calculated only for genera or species for which >10 isolates were tested.

NA, not available. CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints are not published for this antimicrobial agent.

Actinomyces isolates included Actinomyces europaeus (n = 2), Actinomyces georgiae (n = 1), Actinomyces israelii (n = 1), Actinomyces meyeri (n = 1), Actinomyces neuii (n = 3), Actinomyces odontolyticus (n = 3), Actinomyces radingae (n = 3), Actinomyces turicensis (n = 2), and Actinomyces not identified at the species level (n = 6).

Bifidobacterium isolates included Bifidobacterium adolescentis (n = 5), Bifidobacterium breve (n = 3), Bifidobacterium dentium (n = 4), Bifidobacterium longum (n = 7), Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (n = 3), and Bifidobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 4).

Eubacterium isolates included Eubacterium limosum (n = 2), Eubacterium nodatum (n = 1), and Eubacterium not identified at the species level (n = 23).

TABLE 4

In vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against 91 Lactobacillus isolates tested under anaerobic conditions using agar dilution

Antimicrobial agentMIC (μg/mL)
MIC interpretation (%)b
MIC rangeMIC50MIC90SusceptibleIntermediateResistant
Gepotidacin≤0.015 to 20.51NAcNANA
Ceftriaxone≤8 to 2563264NANANA
Clindamycin≤0.25 to >8≤0.25474.73.322.0
Imipenem≤0.015 to 80.25268.12.229.7
Metronidazole≤0.12 to >16>16>16NANANA
Moxifloxacin≤0.06 to >80.54NANANA
Piperacillin-tazobactam≤0.06 to 814NANANA

Lactobacillus isolates included Lactobacillus acidophilus (n = 1), Lactobacillus crispatus (n = 3), Lactobacillus fermentum (n = 5), Lactobacillus gasseri (n = 21), Lactobacillus iners (n = 2), Lactobacillus jensenii (n = 6), Lactobacillus plantarum (n = 1), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (n = 19), and Lactobacillus not identified at the species level (n = 33).

Clindamycin and imipenem MICs were interpreted using MIC breakpoints published in the CLSI document M45-A3 (22).

NA, not available. CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints are not published for this antimicrobial agent.

In vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against 225 isolates of Gram-positive anaerobes MIC50 and MIC90 values were calculated only for genera or species for which >10 isolates were tested. NA, not available. CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints are not published for this antimicrobial agent. Actinomyces isolates included Actinomyces europaeus (n = 2), Actinomyces georgiae (n = 1), Actinomyces israelii (n = 1), Actinomyces meyeri (n = 1), Actinomyces neuii (n = 3), Actinomyces odontolyticus (n = 3), Actinomyces radingae (n = 3), Actinomyces turicensis (n = 2), and Actinomyces not identified at the species level (n = 6). Bifidobacterium isolates included Bifidobacterium adolescentis (n = 5), Bifidobacterium breve (n = 3), Bifidobacterium dentium (n = 4), Bifidobacterium longum (n = 7), Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum (n = 3), and Bifidobacterium not identified at the species level (n = 4). Eubacterium isolates included Eubacterium limosum (n = 2), Eubacterium nodatum (n = 1), and Eubacterium not identified at the species level (n = 23). In vitro activities of gepotidacin and comparator agents against 91 Lactobacillus isolates tested under anaerobic conditions using agar dilution Lactobacillus isolates included Lactobacillus acidophilus (n = 1), Lactobacillus crispatus (n = 3), Lactobacillus fermentum (n = 5), Lactobacillus gasseri (n = 21), Lactobacillus iners (n = 2), Lactobacillus jensenii (n = 6), Lactobacillus plantarum (n = 1), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (n = 19), and Lactobacillus not identified at the species level (n = 33). Clindamycin and imipenem MICs were interpreted using MIC breakpoints published in the CLSI document M45-A3 (22). NA, not available. CLSI M100 MIC breakpoints are not published for this antimicrobial agent. Gepotidacin demonstrated potent in vitro activity against the majority of common, clinically relevant Gram-negative and Gram-positive anaerobes. Given the extent of gepotidacin’s in vitro activity against the isolates tested in this study, further analysis is warranted to fully assess the scope of activity of this novel option for the treatment of infections caused by anaerobes.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Anaerobes: antibiotic resistance, clinical significance, and the role of susceptibility testing.

Authors:  David W Hecht
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Rapid Evolution of Reduced Susceptibility against a Balanced Dual-Targeting Antibiotic through Stepping-Stone Mutations.

Authors:  Petra Szili; Gábor Draskovits; Tamás Révész; Ferenc Bogár; Dávid Balogh; Tamás Martinek; Lejla Daruka; Réka Spohn; Bálint Márk Vásárhelyi; Márton Czikkely; Bálint Kintses; Gábor Grézal; Györgyi Ferenc; Csaba Pál; Ákos Nyerges
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In Vitro Activity of Gepotidacin, a Novel Triazaacenaphthylene Bacterial Topoisomerase Inhibitor, against a Broad Spectrum of Bacterial Pathogens.

Authors:  D J Biedenbach; S K Bouchillon; M Hackel; L A Miller; N E Scangarella-Oman; C Jakielaszek; D F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Insights into the mechanism of inhibition of novel bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors from characterization of resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Sushmita D Lahiri; Amy Kutschke; Kathy McCormack; Richard A Alm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mechanistic and Structural Basis for the Actions of the Antibacterial Gepotidacin against Staphylococcus aureus Gyrase.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Gibson; Ben Bax; Pan F Chan; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.084

6.  Mechanism of action of the antibiotic NXL101, a novel nonfluoroquinolone inhibitor of bacterial type II topoisomerases.

Authors:  Michael T Black; Thérèse Stachyra; Denis Platel; Anne-Marie Girard; Monique Claudon; Jean-Michel Bruneau; Christine Miossec
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Increasing trends in antimicrobial resistance among clinically important anaerobes and Bacteroides fragilis isolates causing nosocomial infections: emerging resistance to carbapenems.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Liu; Yu-Tsung Huang; Chun-Hsing Liao; Li-Ching Yen; Hsiu-Ying Lin; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In Vitro Activity and Microbiological Efficacy of Gepotidacin from a Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter, Dose-Ranging Study in Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

Authors:  Nicole E Scangarella-Oman; Karen A Ingraham; Courtney A Tiffany; Lynn Tomsho; Stephanie F Van Horn; David N Mayhew; Caroline R Perry; Theresa C Ashton; Etienne F Dumont; Jianzhong Huang; James R Brown; Linda A Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Phase 2a Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Exploratory Efficacy Evaluation of Oral Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) in Female Participants with Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection (Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis).

Authors:  J Scott Overcash; Courtney A Tiffany; Nicole E Scangarella-Oman; Caroline R Perry; Yu Tao; Mohammad Hossain; Aline Barth; Etienne F Dumont
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Gepotidacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea: A Phase 2, Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Single-Oral Dose Evaluation.

Authors:  Stephanie N Taylor; David H Morris; Ann K Avery; Kimberly A Workowski; Byron E Batteiger; Courtney A Tiffany; Caroline R Perry; Aparna Raychaudhuri; Nicole E Scangarella-Oman; Mohammad Hossain; Etienne F Dumont
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.