Literature DB >> 34929657

National trends in the surgical management of metastatic lung cancer to the spine using the national inpatient sample database from 2005 to 2014.

Aqib H Zehri1, Keyan A Peterson1, Katriel E Lee1, Carol A Kittel2, Joni K Evans2, Jonathan L Wilson1, Wesley Hsu3.   

Abstract

Optimal management of metastatic lung cancer to the spine (MLCS) incorporates a multidisciplinary approach. With improvements in lung cancer screening andnonsurgical treatment, the role for surgerymay be affected. The objective of this study is to assess trends in the surgical management of MLCS using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The NIS was queried for patients with MLCS who underwent surgery from 2005 to 2014. The frequencies of spinal decompression alone, spinal stabilization with or without (+/-) decompression, and vertebral augmentation were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the effect of patient characteristics on outcomes. The most common procedure performed was vertebral augmentation (10719, 44.3%), followed by spinal stabilization +/- decompression (8634, 35.7%) and then decompression alone (4824, 20.0%). The total number of surgeries remained stable, while the rate of spinal stabilizations increased throughout the study period (p < 0.001). Invasive procedures such as stabilization and decompression were associated with greater costs, length of stay,complications and mortality. Increasingcomorbidity was associated with increased odds of complication, especially in patients undergoing more invasive procedures. In patients with lowpre-operative comorbidity, the type of procedure did not influence the odds of complication. Graded increases in length of stay, cost and mortality were seen with increasing complication rate.The rate of spinal stabilizations increased, which may be due to either increased early detection of disease facilitating use of outpatient vertebral augmentation procedures and/or the recognition that surgical decompression and stabilization are necessary for optimal outcome in the setting of MLCS with neurological deficit.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Hospitalization cost; Lung cancer; Nationwide inpatient sample; Spinal cord tumor; Spinal metastasis; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34929657     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  2 in total

1.  The Fear of Surgery and Coronavirus in Patients Who Will Undergo a Surgical Intervention.

Authors:  Ayşe Gökçe Işıklı; Zeynep Kızılcık Özkan; Zuhal Buberka
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.295

2.  Clinical Efficacy of Single-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Three-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yueliang Xu; Yinxi Zhou; Feng Lv; Yongshi Liu; Xiang Ji
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.