Literature DB >> 34928688

The organizational trauma resilience assessment: Methods and psychometric properties.

Leslie Lauren Brown1, Jacquelyn Pennings2, Sukey Steckel3, Michiel Van Zyl4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite many strengths of trauma-informed care (TIC), critics argue TIC is necessary but alone insufficient, can be deficit focused, lacks construct operationalization, and requires greater inclusion of resilience theory. We sought to address these critiques by creating an assessment tool through an iterative and community-engaged process.
METHOD: We collected cross-sectional data between May and June 2019 with a convenience sample from 12 sites across the United States (N = 861). Data were analyzed through application of classical test theory and item response theory, using principal components analysis.
RESULTS: The final 40-item Organizational Trauma Resilience Assessment (OTRA) is sufficiently unidimensional and has a five-factor solution with strong validity and reliability.
CONCLUSION: We believe this instrument marks the first of its kind to synthesize tenets of organizational resilience with TIC principles. Creation of the OTRA progresses the TIC knowledge base and is a cost-effective and valid method for evaluating organizational culture of trauma resilience. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34928688      PMCID: PMC9326844          DOI: 10.1037/tra0001184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Trauma        ISSN: 1942-969X


  13 in total

1.  Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Tyler M Moore; Mark G Haviland
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2010-11

2.  Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis.

Authors:  R L Gorsuch
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1997-06

3.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The independence of positive and negative affect.

Authors:  E Diener; R A Emmons
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-11

5.  Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Yu-Fang Li; Nancy D Sharp; Anne E Sales
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.

Authors:  Mark S Bauer; Laura Damschroder; Hildi Hagedorn; Jeffrey Smith; Amy M Kilbourne
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

8.  Action steps using ACEs and trauma-informed care: a resilience model.

Authors:  Laurie Leitch
Journal:  Health Justice       Date:  2017-04-28

Review 9.  Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

Authors:  David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 10.  Outcomes for implementation science: an enhanced systematic review of instruments using evidence-based rating criteria.

Authors:  Cara C Lewis; Sarah Fischer; Bryan J Weiner; Cameo Stanick; Mimi Kim; Ruben G Martinez
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.