Literature DB >> 34927139

Improved wetland soil organic carbon stocks of the conterminous U.S. through data harmonization.

Bergit Uhran1, Lisamarie Windham-Myers2, Norman Bliss3, Amanda M Nahlik4, Eric Sundquist5, Camille L Stagg6.   

Abstract

Wetland soil stocks are important global repositories of carbon (C) but are difficult to quantify and model due to varying sampling protocols, and geomorphic/spatio-temporal discontinuity. Merging scales of soil-survey spatial extents with wetland-specific point-based data offers an explicit, empirical and updatable improvement for regional and continental scale soil C stock assessments. Agency-collected and community-contributed soil datasets were compared for representativeness and bias, with the goal of producing a harmonized national map of wetland soil C stocks with error quantification for wetland areas of the conterminous United States (CONUS) identified by the USGS National Landcover Change Dataset. This allowed an empirical predictive model of SOC density to be applied across the entire CONUS using relational %OC distribution alone. A broken-stick quantile-regression model identified %OC with its relatively high analytical confidence as a key predictor of SOC density in soil segments; soils less than 6% OC (hereafter, mineral wetland soils, 85% of the dataset) had a strong linear relationship of %OC to SOC density (RMSE = 0.0059, ~4% mean RMSE) and soils greater than 6% OC (organic wetland soils, 15% of the dataset) had virtually no predictive relationship of %OC to SOC density (RMSE = 0.0348 g C cm-3, ~56% mean RMSE). Disaggregation by vegetation type, or region did not alter the breakpoint significantly (6% OC) nor improve model accuracies for inland and tidal wetlands. Similarly, SOC stocks in tidal wetlands were related to %OC, but without a mappable product for disaggregation to improve accuracy by soil class, region or depth. Our layered, harmonized CONUS wetland soil maps revised wetland SOC stock estimates downward by 24% (9.5 vs. 12.5Pg C) with the overestimation being entirely an issue of inland, organic wetland soils, (35% lower than SSURGO-derived SOC stocks). Further, SSURGO underestimated soil carbon stocks at depth, as modeled wetland SOC stocks for organic-rich soils showed significant preservation downcore in the NWCA dataset (<3% loss between 0-30 cm and 30-100 cm depths) in contrast to mineral-rich soils (37% downcore stock loss). Future CONUS wetland soil C assessments will benefit from focused attention on improved organic wetland soil measurements, land history, and spatial representativeness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Soil organic carbon; organic matter; soil carbon density; soil carbon stock vulnerability; soil profile; wetland

Year:  2021        PMID: 34927139      PMCID: PMC8675062          DOI: 10.3389/fsoil.2021.706701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Soil Sci        ISSN: 2673-8619


  9 in total

1.  Assessing soil organic carbon stock of Wisconsin, USA and its fate under future land use and climate change.

Authors:  Kabindra Adhikari; Phillip R Owens; Zamir Libohova; David M Miller; Skye A Wills; Jason Nemecek
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Methane emission from natural wetlands: interplay between emergent macrophytes and soil microbial processes. A mini-review.

Authors:  Hendrikus J Laanbroek
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Networking our science to characterize the state, vulnerabilities, and management opportunities of soil organic matter.

Authors:  Jennifer W Harden; Gustaf Hugelius; Anders Ahlström; Joseph C Blankinship; Ben Bond-Lamberty; Corey R Lawrence; Julie Loisel; Avni Malhotra; Robert B Jackson; Stephen Ogle; Claire Phillips; Rebecca Ryals; Katherine Todd-Brown; Rodrigo Vargas; Sintana E Vergara; M Francesca Cotrufo; Marco Keiluweit; Katherine A Heckman; Susan E Crow; Whendee L Silver; Marcia DeLonge; Lucas E Nave
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning.

Authors:  Tomislav Hengl; Jorge Mendes de Jesus; Gerard B M Heuvelink; Maria Ruiperez Gonzalez; Milan Kilibarda; Aleksandar Blagotić; Wei Shangguan; Marvin N Wright; Xiaoyuan Geng; Bernhard Bauer-Marschallinger; Mario Antonio Guevara; Rodrigo Vargas; Robert A MacMillan; Niels H Batjes; Johan G B Leenaars; Eloi Ribeiro; Ichsani Wheeler; Stephan Mantel; Bas Kempen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Restoring tides to reduce methane emissions in impounded wetlands: A new and potent Blue Carbon climate change intervention.

Authors:  Kevin D Kroeger; Stephen Crooks; Serena Moseman-Valtierra; Jianwu Tang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Natural climate solutions for the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Fargione; Steven Bassett; Timothy Boucher; Scott D Bridgham; Richard T Conant; Susan C Cook-Patton; Peter W Ellis; Alessandra Falcucci; James W Fourqurean; Trisha Gopalakrishna; Huan Gu; Benjamin Henderson; Matthew D Hurteau; Kevin D Kroeger; Timm Kroeger; Tyler J Lark; Sara M Leavitt; Guy Lomax; Robert I McDonald; J Patrick Megonigal; Daniela A Miteva; Curtis J Richardson; Jonathan Sanderman; David Shoch; Seth A Spawn; Joseph W Veldman; Christopher A Williams; Peter B Woodbury; Chris Zganjar; Marci Baranski; Patricia Elias; Richard A Houghton; Emily Landis; Emily McGlynn; William H Schlesinger; Juha V Siikamaki; Ariana E Sutton-Grier; Bronson W Griscom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  The 2011 National Wetland Condition Assessment: overview and an invitation.

Authors:  Mary E Kentula; Steven G Paulsen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Carbon storage in US wetlands.

Authors:  A M Nahlik; M S Fennessy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Accuracy and Precision of Tidal Wetland Soil Carbon Mapping in the Conterminous United States.

Authors:  James R Holmquist; Lisamarie Windham-Myers; Norman Bliss; Stephen Crooks; James T Morris; J Patrick Megonigal; Tiffany Troxler; Donald Weller; John Callaway; Judith Drexler; Matthew C Ferner; Meagan E Gonneea; Kevin D Kroeger; Lisa Schile-Beers; Isa Woo; Kevin Buffington; Joshua Breithaupt; Brandon M Boyd; Lauren N Brown; Nicole Dix; Lyndie Hice; Benjamin P Horton; Glen M MacDonald; Ryan P Moyer; William Reay; Timothy Shaw; Erik Smith; Joseph M Smoak; Christopher Sommerfield; Karen Thorne; David Velinsky; Elizabeth Watson; Kristin Wilson Grimes; Mark Woodrey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.