Derek R Case1, Ren Gonzalez2, Jon Zubieta1, Robert P Doyle1. 1. 111 College Place, Department of Chemistry, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, United States. 2. Balchem Corporation, 52 Sunrise Park Road, New Hampton, New York 10958, United States.
Abstract
Human chronic latent magnesium deficiency is estimated to impact a substantive portion of the world's population. A number of magnesium compounds have been developed to combat this deficiency; however, none are ideal due to issues of solubility, absorption, side effects (e.g., laxation) and/or formulation. Here, we describe the pH-dependent synthesis, chemical characterization (inductively coupled plasma and thermal analysis, infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance (1D and 2D) spectroscopies, and electrospray mass spectrometry) and in vitro uptake (in a cell model of the large intestine (CaCo-2 cells)) of a magnesium complex of the glycine dimer (HG2). Results demonstrate that the HG2 ligand assumes a tridentate coordination mode with an N2O donor set and an octahedral coordination sphere completed with coordinated waters. The magnesium:HG2 complex exhibits significant solubility and cellular uptake.
Human chronic latent magnesium deficiency is estimated to impact a substantive portion of the world's population. A number of magnesium compounds have been developed to combat this deficiency; however, none are ideal due to issues of solubility, absorption, side effects (e.g., laxation) and/or formulation. Here, we describe the pH-dependent synthesis, chemical characterization (inductively coupled plasma and thermal analysis, infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance (1D and 2D) spectroscopies, and electrospray mass spectrometry) and in vitro uptake (in a cell model of the large intestine (CaCo-2 cells)) of a magnesium complex of the glycine dimer (HG2). Results demonstrate that the HG2 ligand assumes a tridentate coordination mode with an N2O donor set and an octahedral coordination sphere completed with coordinated waters. The magnesium:HG2 complex exhibits significant solubility and cellular uptake.
Due
to insufficient dietary intake, it is now estimated that up
to 30% of people living in developed countries may be magnesium-deficient.[1,2] Magnesium supplements comprise the primary means of palliating the
effects of such magnesium deficiency (hypomagnesemia, defined as <0.75
mmol/L in serum), an issue estimated to affect approximately 45% of
Americans alone.[3−9] Although providing a relatively efficacious means of treatment,
current magnesium supplements are not ideal as they are often suffering
from laxative effects,[10,11] a lack of water solubility that
limits dosing options, incomplete characterization (affecting formulation
and dosing), and/or possessing poor gastrointestinal (GI) absorption.[12] As such, new ligands that may mitigate these
issues are of utmost importance.First synthesized in 1901 by
Fischer and Fourneau,[13] glycylglycine (Figure ; HG2)—the
simplest canonical peptide—is
naturally occurring, having been isolated, along with glycylglycylglycine
(triglycine) by Fowden et al. in 1968.[14] Martell et al. predicted that the HG2 ligand would assume
a tridentate coordination mode given that no increased complex stability
arises upon forming an 8-membered ring.[15] Given the likely coordination chemistry and its substantial water
solubility (22.8 g/100 mL),[16,17] HG2 is an
intriguing ligand for magnesium chelation and the subsequent production
of a pharmaceutical-grade magnesium supplement. Additionally, previous
studies have indicated the substantial uptake of short glycine peptides
in man, including HG2, providing evidence for the efficacious
treatment of deficiencies utilizing ligands of this type.[18]
Figure 1
Structure of the dipeptide glycylglycine (HG2).
Structure of the dipeptide glycylglycine (HG2).To this end, the work herein describes
the synthesis and full characterization
of an HG2 chelate of magnesium (1) that builds
upon and finally completes the initial 1955–1957 work of Martell
et al.[15,19] Complete solution- and solid-state characterization
and in vitro uptake of 1 in a standard cell model of
the large intestine (CaCo-2), is described.
Experimental
Section
Materials
Magnesium oxide (99.99%
metal basis) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
HG2 (Gly–Gly, ≥99%), MgCl2 (BioReagent,
≥97.0%), citric acid (ACS Reagent, ≥99.5%), D2O, and DMSO-d6 NMR solvents, ethanol,
and potassium bromide (KBr) for FT-IR analysis were purchased through
Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). DI water was obtained in-house.
Magnesium uptake colorimetric assay kits (catalog #385-100; includes
magnesium enzyme mix, assay developer, and magnesium assay buffer)
were purchased from BioVision (Milpitas, CA, USA). Stock solutions
for magnesium uptake assays were made in-house, with magnesium bisglycinate
(MgBG) provided by Balchem Corp (New Hampton, NY, USA) and confirmed
for purity in-house by 1H NMR and magnesium triglycine
(MgG3) provided in-house. CaCo-2 (HTB-37) cells and Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle medium (30–2002) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas,
VA, USA). Penicillin streptomycin (10,000 U/mL), fetal bovine serum
(FBS), and trypsin/EDTA (0.25%) were purchased from Gibco (Waltham,
MA, USA). White clear-bottomed 96-well Armadillo assay plates (Catalog
#AB2396) were purchased from ThermoFisher (Waltham, MA, USA).
Methods
Electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry was carried out on a Shimadzu 8040 LC-MS/MS with samples
analyzed utilizing a solvent system of H2O/MeOH/0.1% TFA
at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min over a 1.5 min time frame and evaluated
from 0–600 m/z. 1D and 2D
NMR were conducted on a Bruker Avance III HD 400 MHz instrument. FT-IR
was carried out on a Nicolet infrared spectrophotometer. Thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) was carried out on a TA Instrument Q500 from 20–800
°C with sample weights of 5–10 mg. ICP was conducted by
Intertek Pharmaceutical Services (Whitehouse, NJ, US). Uptake of magnesium
in CaCo-2 cells was determined on a Molecular Devices FlexStation
3 (Molecular Devices). Cellular uptake data was plotted using Prism
8 graphing software.
Synthesis of Magnesium
Glycylglycine (1)
HG2 (1.02 g, 7.57 mmol) was
dissolved in DI H2O (∼20 mL) in a 50 mL round-bottom
flask, with constant heating
at 90 °C and stirring. A separate solution of magnesium oxide
(MgO; 0.336 g, 8.33 mmol) was taken up in DI H2O (∼20
mL), with an addition of citric acid (CA; 0.364 g, 2.08 mmol (0.25
equiv)), constantly stirred and heated to 90 °C. The MgO/CA solution
was added to the HG2 solution—upon addition, the
combined solution turned an opaque white and was observed as translucent
white/clear after about 10 min and up until reaction completion. The
reaction was left to run for 1 h at 90 °C. The reaction was cooled
to room temperature, centrifuged to pellet any remaining solid, and
the supernatant was filtered through a 40 μm filter. The pH
of the solution was noted as 10.2. The solution was concentrated in
vacuo to approximately 3 mL, and the solid was precipitated with anhydrous
ethanol. Centrifugation was employed to pellet the solid, and the
ethanol was decanted off. The solid was triturated with diethyl ether
ad libitum and centrifuged. The ether was decanted off. To ensure
that no trace solvent remained, the solid was reconstituted in DI
H2O (∼50 mL), flash-frozen, and dried in vacuo on
a lyophilizer. The dried material was collected and massed to 1.28
g. Yield was found to be 74% relative to magnesium and 82.6% pure
with a 17.3% impurity attributed to magnesium citrate. 1: 1H NMR (D2O, 400 MHz): δ 3.76 (s, 2H,
H2), 3.38 (s, 2H, H1). ESMS m/z: [Mg (G2) + H+]+ calcd for Mg(C4H7N2O3) 155.4; found 155, [1 + H+]1+ calcd for [MgC4H12N2O6 + H+]1+ 209.5; found 210 (Figure S1). (Mg(C4H7N2O3)(H2O)(OH)): By ICP calcd: Mg, 8.66%; N, 9.99%;
found: Mg, 8.78%; N, 9.89%; calcd ratio Mg:N = 0.87, found ratio Mg:N
= 0.89 (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Synthetic Approach to the Synthesis of 1
Culturing of CaCo-2 Cells
CaCo-2
cells were cultured from liquid N2 frozen stocks and rapidly
thawed to RT using a water bath at 37 °C; cryopreservation media
was removed with a micropipette after cells were pelleted via centrifugation
for 5 min at 125 g. Cells were resuspended in 1 mL of room temperature
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and cultured in 14
mL of DMEM (total volume of 15 mL) with a seeding density of 3.6 ×
104 cells/cm2 (CaCo-2) in a T-75 cm2 culture flask and left to grow in an incubator at 37 °C and
5% CO2. Cells were subcultured at 90% confluency, and subculturing
occurred in a minimum of five times before use in uptake assays. When
cultures reached 90% confluency, media was removed and 3 mL of trypsin/EDTA
was added; the trypsinized culture flask was placed back in the incubator
for ∼10 min to detach cells. Once detached, cells were confirmed
under a microscope, the culture flask was rinsed with 6 mL of fresh
media to neutralize the trypsin/EDTA, and cells for uptake assays
were then counted utilizing a DeNovix CellDrop. Once counted, cells
were pelleted down via centrifugation at 125 g for 10 min, and the
supernatant was removed via pipetting. Cells were resuspended in 5
mL of room temperature magnesium assay buffer for cellular uptake
assay.
Determination of Magnesium Uptake in CaCo-2
Cells
A colorimetric magnesium uptake assay kit for use with
a 96-well plate was purchased from BioVision (Milpitas, CA, US). Sample
solutions for use with the kit were prepared in house utilizing magnesium-/calcium-free
Hank’s balanced salt Solution (HBSS). The samples tested were
magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2× 6 H2O), 1, MgBG, and MgG3. The
kit provided standard for linearity confirmation consists of a 150
nm/μL stock; as such, MgCl2× 6
H2O, utilized as an internal standard, was prepared at
this concentration containing 17.93 mM Mg2+. All samples
were prepared to contain the same amount of Mg2+ so as
to evaluate magnesium uptake in a relative fashion. DMEM was removed
from the plated cells, and cells were subsequently washed three times
with HBSS in 100 μL volume. All samples were administered at
150 μL/well as triplicate independent dilutions. Cells were
treated for 1–2 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After
incubating, the sample volume was removed from each well and the cells
were again washed three times with HBSS. Cells were lysed utilizing
200 μL of kit assay buffer, the post-lysis volume was collected,
and each sample was centrifuged at 14,000g for 10
min. The resulting supernatants were replated in the same order in
50 μL volume. Fifty microliters of kit-provided enzyme/buffer/developer
mix was added to each well with a multichannel micropipette, and the
plate was allowed to incubate for 40 min at 37 °C. Some wells
were left blank for required background subtraction. The kit-provided
standard was diluted to 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 nmol/μl in DI
H2O and administered and developed in the same volumes
as the samples and was used only to determine kit linearity (see Figure S12). Each well was analyzed for endpoint
value over nine full-plate scans with triplet scans/well/plate scan
(a total of 27 scans per well), and the reported value of each well
was the average value of these scans after background subtraction.
All samples were analyzed in triplicate. Data was collected at 40
min. Raw data was reduced and plotted as absorbance against magnesium
concentration of each well. All assays were repeated in triplicate—error
bars were shown in a graph (Figure ) (SEM: MgCl2 = 0.0006, MgBG = 0.0006, 1
= 0.0007, MgG3 = 0.001; upper 95% C.I.: MgCl2 = 0.004, MgBG = 0.003, 1 = 0.004, MgG3 = 0.006; lower
95% C.I.: MgCl2 = 0.001, MgBG = 8.98 × 10–5, 1 = 1.11 × 10–5, MgG3 = 0.0005).
Structural
Characterization of 1 Via Infrared
Spectroscopy
The FT-IR of 1 relative to HG2 exhibited a substantial change in the frequency region that
corresponds specifically to the −OH stretching mode attributed
to the carboxylic acid of the HG2 ligand at 3287 cm–1. HG2 exhibited a sharp stretching band
in this region that is not observed for 1, providing
support for the deprotonation of the acid (pKa = 3.14). Additionally, HG2 exhibits a broad signal
at 2055 cm–1, which is attributed to the terminal
amine (−NH3+),[21] a signal not observed for 1. This implicates that both
the terminal amine and the terminal acid are in coordination. The
FT-IR spectra of HG2 and 1 are provided as Figure . IR values are provided
as Table .
Figure 2
FT-IR spectrum
of HG2 and 1 in KBr.
Table 1
Infrared Spectroscopy Values for HG2 and 1
complex
IR frequency
(cm–1)
assignment
HG2
3287
v(OH), C–OH
2055
v(−NH3+)
1
3360
v(OH), H2O
v(−NH3+)
FT-IR spectrum
of HG2 and 1 in KBr.
Determining the Chemical Composition of 1
Via ICP and Thermal Analyses
Duplicate independent ICP analyses
were conducted on 1 from the same synthetic batch. Acquisition
of nitrogen values is complicated by the substantially hygroscopic
nature of 1. ICP analysis elucidated the percent magnesium present
in the samples and thus provided compositional insight utilizing a
Mg:N ratio. The ICP provided values of Mg = 8.78% and N = 9.89% (Figure S11). The values are consistent with a
species of composition Mg(G2)(H2O)(OH) × 5 H2O. The theoretical nitrogen and magnesium
values for this species are Mg = 8.66% and N = 9.99%. Utilizing the
Mg:N ratio, the experimental ratio of M:N = 0.89 and is consistent
with the theoretical value of Mg:N = 0.87.TGA of HG2 exhibited a single, gradual percent weight decrease onset at 220
°C (inflection point observed at 270 °C), which is consistent
with the melting point of HG2 at 220 °C. TGA analysis
of 1 indicated a gradual decline in percent weight onset
from 30 °C until just before 200 °C. The weight change accounts
for a loss of 21%, which is consistent with the loss of 2 waters (calculated
to 19%) (Figure ).
This result is consistent with the tendency of magnesium to take on
water in a rapid fashion,[22,23] thus suggesting the
core magnesium species Mg(G2)(H2O)(OH) where
rapid acquisition of subsequent water molecules is likely.
Figure 3
Overlay of
HG2 TGA (green) and TGA of 1 (red).
Overlay of
HG2 TGA (green) and TGA of 1 (red).
Structural Characterization
of 1 Via 1D and 2D 1H/13C NMR
Further
support for the coordination mode of 1 was provided in
the form of solution-state NMR analysis at equimolar concentration. 1H NMR of 1 was conducted relative to the HG2 ligand. The 1H NMR spectrum of HG2 exhibited
two proton signals with a combined integration of two (2) (not sure
what this 2 means); the observed signals were a sharp singlet at 3.84
ppm (H1) and a doublet centered around 3.80 ppm (H2; Figure ;
full spectra 1H NMR of HG2 available as Figure S2). Additionally, the 1H NMR 1 exhibited a combined integration of four (4). These observations
were consistent with the hypothesized observations. Like the 1H NMR spectrum of HG2, spectral analysis of 1 exhibited two proton signals with a combined integration
of four (4). Unlike HG2, the observed proton signals of 1 were both singlets, and each singlet exhibited a substantial
upfield shift: H1 = 3.38 ppm (Δppm = 0.46) and H2 = 3.76 (Δppm = 0.04) (Figure ; full 1H NMR spectrum of 1 is provided as Figure S3). Furthermore,
spectral analysis of 1 revealed a quartet between 2.50–2.70
ppm attributed to magnesium citrate of a 1:1 magnesium:citrate composition
when compared to a magnesium citrate standard, which is a result of
citric acid utilization during synthesis (Figure and Figure S5). Full spectra 1H NMR overlay indicating solvent calibration
is provided as Figure S4.
Figure 4
1HNMR overlay
of HG2 (top) and 1 (bottom) conducted in D2O. Asterisks indicate peaks attributed
to magnesium citrate.
1HNMR overlay
of HG2 (top) and 1 (bottom) conducted in D2O. Asterisks indicate peaks attributed
to magnesium citrate.As previously reported
by Case et al. when analyzing a triglycine
chelate of magnesium, the more substantial upfield shift of the proton
nearest the terminal amine (H1) implicates the participation
of this moiety in coordination.[20] Additionally,
coalescing of the H2 proton signal for 1 relative
to HG2 suggests coordination to the carboxylic acid that
results in an even distribution of electron density and subsequent
lack of observed splitting. Furthermore, the observation of upfield
proton shifting coincides with generalized magnesium coordination
and may be observed for the α-proton adjacent to the point of
coordination and as far-reaching as the γ-proton.[24−27] Conserved integration of the HG2 proton signals is consistent
with no formation of new ligand-based product and is consistent with
the 1:1 stoichiometric yield of the previously discussed synthesis.13C NMR was conducted with the aim of confirming the
conclusions derived from infrared and 1H NMR analyses and
is supported as a more sensitive method for determining the mode of
magnesium coordination.[26,27] The 13C
NMR of 1 was conducted relative to HG2. Spectral
analysis HG2 revealed four carbon signals: two signals
between the range of 40–50 ppm attributed to the sp3-hybridized R–CH2–R carbon moieties (C1, 40.7 ppm; C3, 43.4 ppm) and two signals between
160–180 ppm attributed to the sp2-hybridized R–CO–R
moieties (C2, 167.1 ppm; C4, 176.4 ppm) (Figure ). 13C
analysis of 1 exhibited four carbon signals in the same
regions as the free HG2 ligand. In contrast to the 13C spectrum of HG2, the signal separation was substantially
diminished, which is a result of the downfield shift of the C1 (Δppm = 3) and C2 (Δppm = 8) signals
to 43.2 ppm and 175 ppm, respectively. These observations are consistent
with those reported by Drevenṧek et al.[24] and Chang et al.[27] in their
studies of magnesium testosterone and magnesium ofloxacin/levofloxacin,
respectively and are consistent with magnesium coordination in regions
adjacent to these moieties. Additionally, in agreement with 1H NMR analysis, 13C NMR analysis of 1 exhibited
four signals attributed to magnesium citrate (Figure and Figures S7 and S8), and no new ligand-based carbon signals were observed, further
supporting the formation of 1 as a 1:1 complex.
Figure 5
13C NMR overlay of HG2 and 1 sp3-hybridized carbons (top) and HG2 and 1 sp2-hybridized carbons (bottom) conducted inD2O. Asterisks
indicate peaks attributed to magnesium citrate.
13C NMR overlay of HG2 and 1 sp3-hybridized carbons (top) and HG2 and 1 sp2-hybridized carbons (bottom) conducted inD2O. Asterisks
indicate peaks attributed to magnesium citrate.Both 2D 1H/13C heteronuclear single quantum
coherence (HSQC), which shows correlations between a defined proton
and the carbon a single bond distance away, and heteronuclear multiple-bond
correlation (HMBC), which confirms the interaction defined proton
and corresponding carbons over multiple bond lengths, confirmed all
proton and carbon signal assignments. The HSQC spectrum of HG2 (Figure )
indicated two correlation points: one point attributed to H1 and one point attributed to H2. The point attributed
to H1 corresponded to the carbon signal at 40.7 ppm, confirming
this to be C3, and the point attributed to H2 corresponded to the carbon signal at 43.4 ppm, confirming this carbon
to be C1. The HMBC of HG2 (Figure ) showed three correspondence
points of ratio 1:2. The proton signal attributed to H2 exhibited two correspondence points. Given that H1 is
within range of only one carbon, this indicates that the observed
correspondence point for H1 at 167.1 ppm is attributed
to C2. Additionally, H2 shows two correspondence
points. Given that the C2 carbon signal corresponds to
two protons, this confirms the assignment of the C2 proton
given its proximity to both protons, and the remaining carbon signal
at 176.5 ppm is confirmed as C4 given that it is out of
range of the H1 proton (Figure ).
Figure 6
2D HSQC of HG2 (top) and HSQC (bottom)
of 1 conducted in D2O. “Sol”
represents the
residual HOD peak.
Figure 7
2D HMBC of HG2 (top) and HMBC (bottom) of 1 conducted in D2O. Asterisks indicate signals attributed
to magnesium citrate. “Sol” indicates the residual HOD
signal.
2D HSQC of HG2 (top) and HSQC (bottom)
of 1 conducted in D2O. “Sol”
represents the
residual HOD peak.2D HMBC of HG2 (top) and HMBC (bottom) of 1 conducted in D2O. Asterisks indicate signals attributed
to magnesium citrate. “Sol” indicates the residual HOD
signal.HSQC analysis of 1 (Figure ) indicates
two correspondence points like
that of the free HG2 ligand (Figure ). In contrast to the HMBC of the free HG2 ligand, the ratio of correspondence points observed for 1 is switched (2:1) (Figure ). Given the observations made for the HMBC of HG2, this indicates that the more substantial upfield shift attributed
to the H1 proton during 1H NMR analysis is consistent,
with terminal amine participation in coordination. Additionally, the
HMBC confirms the H2 assignment and implicates the terminal
carboxylic acid moiety, which was previously supported by infrared
analysis.A combination of both 1D and 2D 1H/13C NMR
provides insight into the overall coordination mode of the HG2 ligand and indicates that the ligand acts as a tridentate
chelate that coordinates via an N2O donor set. This coordination
is achieved via the terminal amine, the backbone amide, and the terminal
carboxylic acid. These results are consistent with magnesium chelate
ligands assuming higher-order coordination modes that favor entropically
stable complexes,[28−30] as well as previous studies that indicate the tendency
of ligands such as HG2 and triglycine to act as tri- and
tetradentate magnesium chelates.[15,19] Lastly, all
NMR analyses of 1 exhibit minimum amounts of magnesium
citrate, confirming an 82.6% purity of 1.
Overall Discussion on the Structure of 1
The combined solution- and solid-state data is
consistent with the structure as shown in Figure . The HG2 ligand acts as a tridentate
magnesium chelate and assumes an N2O donor set to form
an entropically-favored complex. Additionally, the six-coordinate,
octahedral coordination sphere is completed by two waters and one
hydroxide. Confirmation of the presence of a hydroxide anion was provided
by a series of potentiometric experiments evaluating the conductivity
of 1 relative to potassium chloride (KCl; a 1:1 electrolyte).
Solutions of both KCl and 1 were prepared at concentrations
of 1, 10, and 100 mM, respectively. At 100 mM, data indicated that
KCl has a conductivity of 13.11mS and 1 has a conductivity
of 5.08 mS (approximately 2.5× less than that of KCl). These
data indicate that 1 acts as a 1:1 electrolyte with only
partial dissociation, which is consistent with the previously reported
MgG3.[20] Conductivity values
for both KCl and 1 trend linearly at the given concentration
range with R2KCl = 1.0000 and R2 = 0.9995.
Figure 8
The predicted
chemical structure of 1 based on solution-
and solid-state analyses. Waters of crystallization are
omitted for clarity.
The predicted
chemical structure of 1 based on solution-
and solid-state analyses. Waters of crystallization are
omitted for clarity.
Determining
the Water Solubility of 1
The solubility of 1 was determined via triplicate independent
analyses and compared to other reported magnesium chelate complexes.
Analysis indicated that 1 has a water solubility of approximately
39 g/100 mL. While more soluble than MgO, 1 is less soluble
than MgCl2 and about one fifth as soluble as MgG3, which is previously reported by Case et al. (Table ).[20] The water
solubility of 1 is attributed in part to the inherent
change to a more polar complex given the substantial electropositive
character of the divalent magnesium and the dipole alteration generated
upon ligand coordination. Additionally, as was the case with MgG3,[20] it is likely that the extensive
hydrogen bond network of the HG2 ligand is efficacious
in generating increased water solubility.
Table 2
Water Solubilities
of Previously Reported
Magnesium Chelate Complexes and Common Magnesium Compounds
complex name
molecular
weight (g/mol)
formula
% Mg in compound
solubility (g/100 mL)
ref
MgG3
265.5
[Mg(C6H10N3O4)(H2O)2]OH
9.2
169 ± 12.5
(20)
MgCl2
95.2
MgCl2
25.5
54
(31)
MgO
40.3
MgO
60.3
0.010
(12)
1
191.5
Mg(G2)(H2O)(OH)•XH2O
11.6
39.40 ± 2.84
this work
In Vitro Cellular Uptake of 1
Cellular uptake of 1 was evaluated in a lower
intestinal colorectal carcinoma (CaCo-2) cell line relative to select
previously reported magnesium chelate complexes and MgCl2 (Figure ). Uptake is plotted as a linear regression.Cellular uptake
of 1 (orange) plotted with magnesium
bisglycinate (red), magnesium triglycine (green), and MgCl2 (blue) in CaCo-2 cells. Slope/R2 MgCl2: 5 × 10–5/0.7373. Slope/R21: 5 × 10–4 /0.7231.
Slope/R2 MgBG: 5 × 10–4/0.8477. Slope/R2 MgG3: 7
× 10–4/0.8019. SEM: MgCl2 = 0.0006,
MgBG = 0.0006, 1 = 0.0007, MgG3 = 0.001; upper
95% C.I.: MgCl2 = 0.004, MgBG = 0.003, 1 =
0.004, MgG3 = 0.006 ; lower 95% C.I.: MgCl2 =
0.001, MgBG = 8.98 × 10–5, 1 = 1.11 ×
10–5, MgG3 = 0.0005. Kit linearity provided in Figure S12.Analysis of cellular uptake data indicates that 1 exhibits
uptake less than that of MgCl2 and comparable to MgBG.
Furthermore, observed uptake of 1 was only about half
that of the previously reported MgG3 complex.[20] Uptake increases with increased peptide length
from MgBG, 1, and MgG3. This is consistent
with the uptake observed in humans for the free mono-, di- and tripeptide
glycine ligands observed by Craft et al.[18] Craft explains that the rate of cellular uptake of the free ligands
is directly related to the available mole quantity of the ligand and
the corresponding rate of uptake as it pertains to the amount of ligand
available.[18] It is believed that in the
case of the uptake of magnesium chelates of glycine-based complexes
as reported, Craft’s discussion supports the observable uptake
trend. The trend of increasing uptake with a corresponding increase
in peptide length is also supported by the findings of Hellier et
al., who observed greater intestinal absorption of HG2 relative
to glycine in human studies.[32]Additionally,
uptake appears to exhibit trending relative to complex
solubility. Further in vivo testing is required to confirm this uptake
trend at concentrations near complex solution saturation.
Conclusions
Both solution- and solid-state methods
confirm the successful synthesis
of a 1:1 magnesium-HG2 complex: 1. Both 1D
and 2D 1H/13C NMR as well as FTIR confirm that
the HG2 ligand acts as a tridentate chelate and coordinates
via an N2O donor set utilizing the terminal amine, the
backbone amide, and the terminal carboxylic acid. This coordination
mode is consistent with the hypothesis previously reported by Martell
et al.[15,19] Additionally, 1 has a predicted
distorted octahedral geometry with the remaining three coordination
sites not utilized by the HG2 ligand, occupied by water
and a hydroxide anion for charge balance, which was subsequently confirmed
utilizing conductivity. Furthermore, solid-state analyses indicate
the propensity of 1 to adsorb water. This is observed
in both the ICP and thermal analyses of 1, exhibiting
pentahydrate and tetrahydrate composition, respectively. The in vitro
uptake of 1 was comparable to that of the bisglycine
chelate MgBG, although both were significantly lower than that of
MgCl2 or the triglycine chelate MgG3, indicating
a trend of increasing uptake with increasing peptide length and higher-order
coordination (bi-, tri-, and tetradentate). Further in vivo testing
is required to confirm the observed in vitro trends.
Authors: Rebecca B Costello; Ronald J Elin; Andrea Rosanoff; Taylor C Wallace; Fernando Guerrero-Romero; Adela Hruby; Pamela L Lutsey; Forrest H Nielsen; Martha Rodriguez-Moran; Yiqing Song; Linda V Van Horn Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 8.701