Literature DB >> 34926879

Tunnel Architectures in Enzyme Systems that Transport Gaseous Substrates.

Sukhwinder Singh1, Ruchi Anand1.   

Abstract

Molecular tunnels regulate delivery of substrates/intermediates in enzymes which either harbor deep-seated reaction centers or are for transport of reactive/toxic intermediates that need to be specifically delivered. Here, we focus on the importance of structural diversity in tunnel architectures, especially for the gaseous substrate translocation, in rendering differential substrate preferences and directionality. Two major types of tunnels have been discussed, one that transports stable gases from the environment to the active site, namely, external gaseous (EG) tunnels, and the other that transports molecules between active sites, namely, internal gaseous (IG) tunnels. Aspects as to how the gaseous tunnels have shaped during the course of evolution and their potential to modulate the substrate flow and enzymatic function are examined. In conclusion, the review highlights our perspective on the pulsation mechanism that could facilitate unidirectional translocation of the gaseous molecules through buried tunnels.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34926879      PMCID: PMC8674909          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Tunnels connect the protein surface to the active site or one active site with the others and serve as conduits for the convenient delivery of molecules. Tunnels transferring small molecules such as N2, CH4, C2H6, O2, CO, NH3, H2, C2H2, NO, and CO2 are termed gaseous tunnels.[1a,1b] Conduits that have a surface accessible connection and can accept gases from the surroundings are named external gaseous (EG) tunnels.[2,3] Whereas, buried gaseous tunnels that do not emerge to the surface are named internal gaseous (IG) tunnels.[4,5a,5b] In some cases, the tunnels can be preformed, permanently visible within the protein structure such that the natural breathing motions in proteins do not alter the tunnel dimensions to the extent that the radius of the gaseous tunnel falls below the minimum threshold diameter, e.g., carbamoyl phosphate synthetase (CPS) has a preformed tunnel.[6a] In contrast, it can be transient such that the tunnel diameter is not sufficiently wide enough to allow the incoming molecule to pass through it or certain constrictions in the tunnel block its delivery. This could be either to control the frequency of molecules traveling across or to coordinate and facilitate coupled reaction rates.[6b,6c] Another possible scenario of transient tunnel formation is one in which the tunnel is nonexistent in the apo state, and only upon significant conformational change, under appropriate cues, is the tunnel formed.[7] In several cases transient tunnels require intermediate/substrate-induced conformational changes in the tunnel residues to open up for the transport of the incoming molecule, within the respective enzyme.[8] These tunnels undergo enormous fluctuations and switch between open and close states, as in formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthetase (FGAM synthetase) and phosphoribosylpyrophosphate (PRPP) amidotransferase.[8,9] It is remarkable that the presence of these conduits, which are as long as 20–30 Å and even longer like 96 Å in CPS,[6a] run inside the protein body, forming pores that serve as highways for transport of these gaseous molecules. In several cases, an added level of tuning into the tunnel architecture is introduced by incorporating gating mechanisms into the EG and IG tunnel architectures.[6a,10,11] Gates serve as checkpoints and vary from system to system; some are as simple as an amino acid blocking the path which moves out upon receiving appropriate cues such as the swinging door type in cytidine triphosphate synthase (CTP)[12] and in others more complex arrangement of amino acids come together to form control units such as aperture gates, drawbridge, and shell type gates.[13] These tunnels and their gates are connected via an active communication network that spans between distal centers and hence introduces both conformation and dynamic allostery into the protein systems.[8] It is not uncommon to observe long distance allosteric networks that can be dynamic in nature and transiently formed via the motion of loop elements, secondary structural rearrangements, or of entire domains.[7,8] In this mini-review, we describe several tunnel architectures and show how they facilitate enzymatic functions. The flow is divided into discussion of EG and IG tunnels and, in both cases, the unique features and adaptations that the enzymes undertake to perform the requisite function are described. The discussion transitions from architectural preferences and connects the function for enzymes that have a plethora of connected tunnels with the ability of free diffusion to those that have stringent gating requirements for the timely passage of intermediates. Emphasis on directionality and fluctuation in gaseous tunnels that may prevent unnecessary wastage and reflux of the transferred gases is also highlighted.

External Gaseous (EG) Tunnel Architectures

EG tunnels connect the bulk solvent with the active site of an enzyme. These tunnels are found in several enzymes that accept gaseous substrates to facilitate their delivery to the buried active site. A class of predominant gaseous substrates are alkanes such as methane and ethane gases that are oxidized aerobically or via anaerobic pathways. Recently, Wagner and co-workers determined the crystal structure of the enzyme that anaerobically oxidizes ethane to ethylCoM from Candidatus Ethanoperedens thermophilum and named it ethylCoM reductase (Scheme S1).[14] The enzyme belongs to the broad methylCoM reductase superfamily, which oxidizes methane. It was noted that while none of the methane oxidizing enzymes from this superfamily, such as Methanothermobacter marburgensis and the other anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea, harbor a tunnel (Figure S1), the ethylCoM reductase counterpart has a 33 Å tunnel that runs across the length of the protein. Interestingly, the EG tunnel present in ethylCoM reductase has some very unique features. At the end of the tunnel, near the Ni-cofactor F430 active site, there are several residues that are post-translationally modified. Methylated amino acids, such as S-methylcysteine, 3-methylisoleucine, 2(S)-methylglutamine, and N2-methylhistidine line the tunnel (Figure A). It is likely that these residues tune the enzyme to select for ethane by creating a very hydrophobic environment and prevent similar-sized hydrophilic molecules such as methanol from reaching the active center. The larger hydrophobic alkanes are selected out via optimization of the tunnel diameter, which is fit to accommodate ethane.
Figure 1

EG tunnel architectures: (A) hydrophobic tunnel in ethylCoM reductase harboring post-translationally modified residues near active site end (PDB ID 7B2C, Ni-cofactor F430 not shown). Adapted from ref (14), with permission from AAAS. (B) EG tunnel in MMOH and MMOB complex of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b is shown in green and the blocked hydrophilic passage in light blue color. The gating residues, W308, F282, E240, and P215, are shown as red sticks, and the di-Fe center is shown as magenta spheres (PDB ID 6YDI). Adapted with permission from ref (15a). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (C) The main EG tunnel in soybean lipoxygenase-1 is highlighted in yellow, and the subsidiary tunnels congruent to the view are shown in light blue. Nonheme iron in the active site is shown as a magenta sphere (PDB ID 1YGE). Adapted from ref (2). (D) Two EG tunnels (EG tunnel A in light blue and EG tunnel B in salmon) of Ralstonia eutropha NiFe hydrogenase (PDB ID 3RGW). Adapted with permission from ref (3). Copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons. (E) Inaccessible EG tunnel B and functional EG tunnel A of E. coli NiFe hydrogenase are shown in cyan and blue colors. Bulky residues F203 and M129 are depicted as green sticks (PDB ID 3UQY). Adapted with permission from ref (3). Copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons. (F) Ten EG tunnels of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, CYP102A1, i.e., 2a, 2b, 2d, 2f, W, Walt, S, 5, 3 and 1a (PDB ID 2HPD). Adapted with permission from ref (16). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. Tunnels identified, in this figure and all the subsequent figures, are drawn using CAVER 3.0 PyMOL plugin.[15b] The asterisk (*) represents the external end of the tunnel.

EG tunnel architectures: (A) hydrophobic tunnel in ethylCoM reductase harboring post-translationally modified residues near active site end (PDB ID 7B2C, Ni-cofactor F430 not shown). Adapted from ref (14), with permission from AAAS. (B) EG tunnel in MMOH and MMOB complex of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b is shown in green and the blocked hydrophilic passage in light blue color. The gating residues, W308, F282, E240, and P215, are shown as red sticks, and the di-Fe center is shown as magenta spheres (PDB ID 6YDI). Adapted with permission from ref (15a). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (C) The main EG tunnel in soybean lipoxygenase-1 is highlighted in yellow, and the subsidiary tunnels congruent to the view are shown in light blue. Nonheme iron in the active site is shown as a magenta sphere (PDB ID 1YGE). Adapted from ref (2). (D) Two EG tunnels (EG tunnel A in light blue and EG tunnel B in salmon) of Ralstonia eutropha NiFe hydrogenase (PDB ID 3RGW). Adapted with permission from ref (3). Copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons. (E) Inaccessible EG tunnel B and functional EG tunnel A of E. coli NiFe hydrogenase are shown in cyan and blue colors. Bulky residues F203 and M129 are depicted as green sticks (PDB ID 3UQY). Adapted with permission from ref (3). Copyright 2016 John Wiley and Sons. (F) Ten EG tunnels of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, CYP102A1, i.e., 2a, 2b, 2d, 2f, W, Walt, S, 5, 3 and 1a (PDB ID 2HPD). Adapted with permission from ref (16). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. Tunnels identified, in this figure and all the subsequent figures, are drawn using CAVER 3.0 PyMOL plugin.[15b] The asterisk (*) represents the external end of the tunnel. Another example of an alkane transporting tunnel exists in soluble methane monooxygenase (sMMO) that performs C–H functionalization by breaking the strongest C–H bond, among saturated hydrocarbons, in methane and aerobically oxidizes it to form methanol. In methanotrophs, these enzymes are tightly regulated, and the complex formation between the two proteins, hydroxylase MMOH and regulatory protein MMOB, is required for function. The EG tunnel formed in this system is very hydrophobic, and the diameter is such that it only allows for smaller gases such as methane and O2 to percolate into the di-Fe cluster harboring active site.[1a] In Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, half of the tunnel is at the interface of the MMOH/MMOB complex, and another half of the tunnel is buried within MMOH, where the oxidation reaction is catalyzed (Figure B).[15a] As an added control feature, the complex has multiple gates to regulate its function. Residues W308 and P215 guard the entrance of the substrate molecules and block the formation of the EG tunnel in the absence of the complex between MMOH and MMOB. Upon complexation, a conformational change is triggered, and these residues move out of the path, opening the passage for the entire tunnel. When the upper gating residues move upon MMOB/MMOH complex formation, another residue F282 right near the active site also concomitantly undergoes a shift, allowing methane and oxygen to access the di-Fe center. MMOH also has an alternative secondary hydrophilic passage, accessible only when MMOB/MMOH complex dissociates which allows the polar methanol product to be released through it. The gating residues, F282 in the hydrophobic EG tunnel and E240 in the hydrophilic passage, switch between open and close states alternately upon binding/unbinding of MMOB and hence opens one of the two tunnels at a time. This regulates the flow of substrates and products and avoids overoxidation of methanol by releasing it through the hydrophilic passage prior to the entry of substrates in the active site via the hydrophobic EG tunnel. One of the most common gaseous substrates for which several examples of tunneling enzymes exist is O2.[2,3,16] It is used in several important oxidation reactions for the generation of essential pathway intermediates and also is a key transport gas in cells. Interestingly in several cases, oxygen is transported to the desired site via molecular tunnels, perhaps to modulate its flow. There are two types of tunnel architectures that are prevalent and have evolutionarily evolved: first, where there is a main tunnel connected to several subsidiary tunnels, and second, those with fewer tunnels but with stringent gating controls.[10,11,16] For instance, soybean lipoxygenase-1 is an example of a multitunnel system that has eight EG tunnels, out of which the one that is formed by hydrophobic residues, such as L496, I553, I547, and V564, has the highest throughput and is identified as the main gaseous tunnel for delivering O2 to the reaction center (Figure C).[2] It catalyzes the stereospecific peroxidation of linoleic acid via forming a pentadienyl radical intermediate (Scheme S2). Under oxygen-deficient conditions, the intermediate escapes from the active site to the bulk and forms four products, i.e., 13S-, 13R-, 9S-, and 9R-hydroperoxy-octadecadienoic acid, in equal distributions.[2] However, under ambient O2 conditions, the EG tunnel delivers O2 efficiently into the active site which has a properly positioned and oriented radical intermediate. Here, O2 is delivered by the EG tunnel such that it stereo- and regiospecifically attacks (Figure S2) the radical intermediate to yield 13S-hydroperoxy-octadecadienoic acid as a major product with ∼90% yield.[2] It has also been shown that when the EG tunnel residue L496 is mutated to a bulky tryptophan, it opens up a new gaseous tunnel for O2 delivery, where it attacks at the different side of the pentadienyl intermediate, preferring the formation of 9S- and 9R-products.[2] This example showed the importance of the gaseous tunnel in determining the stereo- and regiospecificity for product formation. Another example of a multitunnel system includes NiFe hydrogenases that catalyze the reversible heterolytic dissociation of H2 generating H2O. These enzymes are divided into two classes, O2 sensitive and O2 tolerant.[3] A greater number of accessible gaseous tunnels in these NiFe hydrogenases leads to O2 sensitivity in these enzymes, and shutting down the accessibility in some of the EG tunnels renders O2 tolerance. For instance, in Desulfovibrio vulgaris NiFe hydrogenase, there is a network of tunnels that connect the NiFe reaction center to the external environment that allows multiple access routes for O2, rendering this system O2 sensitive.[3] Whereas O2 tolerant membrane-bound NiFe hydrogenase from Ralstonia eutropha harbors only two hydrophobic EG tunnels, tunnel A and tunnel B (Figure D).[3] The two tunnels with different entrances merge before extending to the NiFe active site. In E. coli, the junction point of these EG tunnels A and B has bulky gating residues F203 and M129, which permanently shut tunnel B, while the EG tunnel A remains operative (Figure E). This variation in tunnel accessibility changes the profile of the enzyme from the less O2 tolerant to a more tolerant system in E. coli, which essentially means that the E. coli enzyme is more robust and can withstand higher external O2 concentrations. Regulation of O2 in these systems is important as excess O2 leads to oxidation of the NiFe metal center leading to enzyme inactivation. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, CYP102A1, from Bacillus megaterium also possesses a tunnel network comprising several shared tunnels for delivering substrates of diverse types, i.e., gaseous substrate O2, and an organic substrate, fatty acid.[16] A large number of access points to O2 likely are a result of the importance of maintaining the integrity of this reaction as metabolism of the fatty acid variants, steroids, and synthesis of hormones are crucial and essential for cell survival. For O2 delivery from bulk to the active site, ten EG tunnels have been identified in CYP102A1, which are the 2a, 2b, 2d, 2f, W, Walt, S, 5, 3, and 1a tunnels (Figure F).[16] The EG tunnels 2a, 2b, 2d, and 2f transfer not only the gaseous substrate O2 but also the fatty acid substrates. The tunnel S, a short tunnel with a small diameter, possesses the least activation barrier for the O2 delivery and is accessible to the solvent molecules as well. Tunnel W offers the highest activation barrier and is the least preferred EG tunnel for O2 delivery to the active site.[16] Another remarkable feature of this tunnel design is that a tunnel-to-tunnel O2 transfer takes place between the two EG tunnels 2b and 2f. This unusual transfer has been proposed to occur via transiently formed bridges between these tunnels.[16] Another example where O2 tunnels exist is in nitric oxide and oxygen-binding domain (H-NOX) proteins, which are heme-based sensing proteins known to deliver O2 in the tumor cells under hypoxic conditions.[17a] Ligand coordination is strengthened here by back bonding between metal d orbitals and ligand π* antibonding molecular orbitals. The EG tunnel network in H-NOX has been studied in three bacterial species, i.e., Nostoc sp. (Ns), Kordia algicida (Ka), and Caldanaerobacter subterraneus (Cs). Three EG tunnels have been identified in H-NOX (Figure A) and, out of which, at least two tunnels are preferred for the substrate translocation in Ns H-NOX, Ka H-NOX, and Cs H-NOX. Out of three EG tunnels, one is a long hydrophobic tunnel (tunnel-I), while the other two are short and slightly polar (tunnel-II and tunnel-III).[17a] Tunnel-I is accessible and is utilized for substrate translocation in both Ns H-NOX and Ka H-NOX, making the escape of O2 very facile through it. A unique aspect of this O2 transport in this system is that the tunnel provides a funneling effect which helps regulate O2 release and additionally provides specificity to the transport process when compared with other heme systems like myoglobin which also act as oxygen carriers.
Figure 2

EG tunnel architectures: (A) tunnel I (blue), tunnel II (red), and tunnel III (cyan) are shown in H-NOX. The protein structures of Nostoc sp. (Ns), Kordia algicida (Ka), and Caldanaerobacter subterraneus (Cs) are very similar; hence, representative tunnels are drawn on the Ns protein structure (PDB IDs 6MX5, 1U55, 6BDD). Adapted from ref (17a). (B) Three phenylalanine residues, F158, F215, and F173, form an O2 retention zone as depicted in tFprA (PDB IDs 2OHI, 2OHH). Adapted from ref (11) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) A long (gray) and a short (green) EG tunnel in Mt2/2HbN is depicted. The heme group and a gating residue F62 are shown as red sticks (PDB ID 5AB8). Adapted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons. (D) Two EG tunnels in AlkB (brown and black) connecting to the active site are shown. The gating residue W178 is shown as gray sticks (PDB ID 2FDG). Adapted from ref (18) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. (E) The four EG tunnels present in nitrogenase: IS, AI, AII, and ammonia egress tunnel (PDB IDs 4WNA, 4WN9). The zoomed view of the AII tunnel is shown in the inset. Adapted with permission from ref (20) (direct link https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi501313k). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. The asterisk (*) represents the external end of the tunnel.

EG tunnel architectures: (A) tunnel I (blue), tunnel II (red), and tunnel III (cyan) are shown in H-NOX. The protein structures of Nostoc sp. (Ns), Kordia algicida (Ka), and Caldanaerobacter subterraneus (Cs) are very similar; hence, representative tunnels are drawn on the Ns protein structure (PDB IDs 6MX5, 1U55, 6BDD). Adapted from ref (17a). (B) Three phenylalanine residues, F158, F215, and F173, form an O2 retention zone as depicted in tFprA (PDB IDs 2OHI, 2OHH). Adapted from ref (11) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. (C) A long (gray) and a short (green) EG tunnel in Mt2/2HbN is depicted. The heme group and a gating residue F62 are shown as red sticks (PDB ID 5AB8). Adapted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2015 John Wiley and Sons. (D) Two EG tunnels in AlkB (brown and black) connecting to the active site are shown. The gating residue W178 is shown as gray sticks (PDB ID 2FDG). Adapted from ref (18) with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. (E) The four EG tunnels present in nitrogenase: IS, AI, AII, and ammonia egress tunnel (PDB IDs 4WNA, 4WN9). The zoomed view of the AII tunnel is shown in the inset. Adapted with permission from ref (20) (direct link https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bi501313k). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. The asterisk (*) represents the external end of the tunnel. An upgrade into O2 tunneling enzymes are systems that possess fewer O2 tunnels but stringent gating controls. Flavodiiron protein tFprA, an oxidase found in Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus, is one such example.[11] The Fe-containing enzyme converts O2 into two molecules of H2O by using flavin mononucleotide (FMN) and the reduced form of deazaflavin derivative F420H2 as cosubstrates.[11] An EG tunnel with two entrances helps in transferring O2 from bulk to the active site (Figure B). The bifurcated EG tunnel in tFprA merges to a region containing three phenylalanine residues that are responsible for regulating the O2 flow. This creates a high O2 affinity region at the junction point of the tunnels forming an oxygen-retention zone in the middle of the EG tunnel, which decreases the O2 flow toward the active site of tFprA, thereby preventing inactivation of the enzyme.[11] Other examples of the enzyme with complex control for delivery of O2 are in the oxygen-sensing regime.[17b] For instance, the hypoxia inducible factor-I (HIF-I) and prolyl hydroxylase domain enzyme 2 (PHD2) play an essential role by participating in an oxygen-sensing system that senses hypoxia in animals.[17b] HIF-1 comprises two separate subunits, HIF-α and HIF-β; here, the hydroxylation of P402 and P564 in HIF-α by PHD2, using α-ketoglutarate, and O2, under normal O2 conditions, prevents HIF-α to form a complex with HIF-β.[17b] Though PHD2 performs hydroxylation of HIF-α using O2 under normal conditions, the rate of this reaction is very slow. This is attributed to the presence of the hydrophobic EG tunnel that has a narrow entrance, which slows down the transport of O2 to the active site present in PHD2. In this case residues from both PHD2 and HIF-α participate to form a functional EG tunnel. The lower reaction rate in this enzymatic system tuned by the presence of the hydrophobic tunnel is a desirable property to create an efficient O2 sensing system, highly sensitive to the hypoxic environment. This example shows that gaseous tunnels do not always ease the substrate transportation, rather both in the HIF-α/PHD2 system and tFprA, the tunnels impose a fine control on reactivity by slowing down the substrate diffusion. To keep the accessibility of molecular tunnels intact for the gaseous substrates, the structural aspect of the protein also plays a significant role, as is the case of Mt2/2HbN, found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This enzyme is evolutionarily distinct and possesses a unique structural feature that is not found in other truncated hemoglobins. It possesses an oxygen-dependent NO dioxygenase activity for relieving nitrosative stress.[10]Mt2/2HbN has two hydrophobic EG tunnels that are nearly orthogonal to each other, a long EG tunnel and a short EG tunnel (Figure C).[10] In deoxygenated form, phenylalanine (F62), a gating residue in the long EG tunnel, attains a conformation where the tunnel is closed and partially blocks O2 delivery. Therefore, O2 is proposed to be transferred via the short EG tunnel. Once O2 binds with heme, it induces conformational changes that allow NO to enter through the long EG tunnel. Mt2/2HbN has another unique feature, it harbors a N-terminally located pre-A region whose truncation promotes dimerization.[10] As a result of truncation in Mt2/2HbN-ΔpreA, the accessibility to the gaseous substrates is lost via the short tunnel as it extends from the active site to the dimeric interface, and thus, it is completely blocked. The dimerization also restricts the F62 in a closed conformation, thereby tuning access to NO via the long EG tunnel and results in the reduction of NO dioxygenase activity by 35-fold in Mt2/2HbN_ΔpreA.[10] Apart from complexation, gating, and multiple passages, another route adopted by enzymes to control O2 delivery is to introduce fluctuations in the tunnel. Enzymes such as E. coli AlkB, which performs an oxidative dealkylation of the alkylated bases in the damaged DNA, adopt this approach.[18] Two EG tunnels have been identified for delivering O2 to the reaction center, with one of the EG tunnels having a lesser curvature than the other. This tunnel also harbors a gating residue W178 for regulating the flow of O2 through it and is the main EG tunnel in AlkB (Figure D). The fluctuating nature of this gaseous tunnel affects the time spent by the O2 molecule in the active site, thereby controlling its reactivity. The fluctuations in the tunnel could be altered by mutating the tunnel residues.[18] For instance, by mutating the gating residue, tryptophan, to tyrosine, the fluctuations in the tunnel became diminished, and as a result, O2 spends more time in the active site of AlkB.[18] Thus, dynamics within the gaseous tunnel help hold the substrate in the active site and affects the enzyme activity. Besides O2, there are enzymes that tunnel other stable gas molecules, such as CO2 and N2. For instance, a class of carbonic anhydrase (CA) enzymes, namely, zeta (ζ) CA, catalyzes the hydration of CO2 to HCO3– and H+, harboring a CO2 tunnel.[19] Such a tunnel has not been observed in the other studied members of the CA family (α and β CA).[19] Recent structural and theoretical studies performed on ζ CA have revealed an L-shaped hydrophobic EG tunnel that additionally allows these enzymes to accept a more hydrophobic substrate, CS2.[19] Thus enabling ζ CA to catalyze the conversion of CS2 into H2S. Nitrogenase catalyzes the conversion of highly inert and stable gaseous molecular N2 into NH3 by consuming six protons and six electrons.[20] This enzyme houses an unusual homocitrate bonded molybdenum–iron (MoFe) cluster in its active site that has adequate reducing potential to carry other reactions such as reduction of two H+ ions into H2 and can reduce nonphysiological gaseous substrates such as acetylene and propyne.[20] For the transport of nonpolar gaseous molecules, such as N2, H2, etc., three EG tunnels have been identified, namely, AI, AII, and IS tunnels (Figure E).[20] The two predominantly hydrophobic EG tunnels, AI and IS, originate from different regions of the protein surface but fuse in the middle giving a Y-shaped architecture. Since N2 reduction generates two polar NH3 molecules, to avoid interference, a separate EG tunnel called the ammonia egress tunnel,[20] which is primarily hydrophilic, facilitates the release of ammonia to the bulk. This system showcases a fascinating tunnel architecture having separate hydrophobic and hydrophilic conduits for polar and nonpolar gaseous moieties. As the last example of an EG tunnel, we discuss a case where O2 is a product of the reaction. A unique gaseous tunnel network has been found in Photosystem II (PSII). PSII catalyzes the conversion of water into O2 along with the reduction of plastoquinone using solar energy.[21] It has three EG tunnels for ejecting the O2 molecule into the lumen and five water channels for transferring H2O to the active site containing the Mn4CaO5 cluster.[21] These EG tunnels, for O2 transfer, are not hydrophobic but significantly overlap with the water-conducting channels. H2O and O2, which have entirely different polarities and different sizes, share the common tunnel network but are transferred in the opposite direction. The permeability of the tunnels is different for these two molecules. The rate of O2 permeation through these tunnels is 1100 times faster than the H2O permeation rate as these tunnels offer a lower activation barrier to O2.[21] Thus, the tunnel framework is such that it helps in ejecting O2 from the active site very quickly and avoid the formation of reactive oxygen species that are detrimental to the function of PSII.

Internal Gaseous (IG) Tunnel Architectures

While the EG tunnels transport gases and have pores that are accessible to the surface, there is another class of tunnels formed within the core of the enzyme system, buried in the body of the protein, called the IG tunnels. The need for IG tunnels arose to efficiently translocate reactive gaseous molecules that can either be toxic to the cell or are reactive intermediates that need to be delivered to complete a coupled reaction. These systems generally have the tunnel connecting two reactive centers, and the product of one reaction is transported to the second active site. In some cases, an IG tunnel network, instead of leading to another active site, can also lead to the lipid membrane so as to directly access the active site of membrane-bound enzymes.[5a] An example of such systems where enzymes embedded in the lipid bilayer have gaseous tunnels facing the lipid membrane are the O2 and NO transporting class of cytochrome ba3, cytochrome aa3, and cytochrome c dependent nitric oxide reductase cNOR.[5a] These enzymes belong to the heme-copper oxidoreductase superfamily, containing multiple heme centers. While cytochrome ba3 and cytochrome aa3 catalyze the reduction of O2 to H2O, cNOR catalyzes the conversion of NO to nitrous oxide.[5a] These enzymes have hydrophobic tunnels and absorb NO and O2 from the lipid membrane. Cytochrome ba3 has two IG tunnels, A and B, which merge to form a single tunnel that leads to the active site, whereas cytochrome aa3 has an additional IG tunnel C along with A and B (Figure A).[5a] However, in each system, the diameter of these tunnels varies, i.e., in cytochrome ba3, tunnels are larger in diameter as opposed to the narrow tunnels in cytochrome aa3, which has constrictions. Consequently, O2 transport is 10 times slower in the latter enzyme. Similarly, cNOR, which has four IG tunnel entrances (IG tunnel A1, A2, B, and C), has two bottlenecks in NO transferring tunnels and results in a 3-fold decrease in the rate of substrate delivery as compared to cytochrome ba3.[5a]
Figure 3

IG tunnel architectures: (A) IG tunnels in Cytochrome ba3, Cytochrome aa3, and Cytochrome c dependent nitric oxide reductases cNOR (PDB IDs 1XME, 1AR1, 5GUX). Adapted from ref (5a), Copyright 2018, with permission from Elsevier. The asterisk (*) represents the tunnel entry point(s). (B) Porous IG tunnel in CaCODH/ACS and sealed IG tunnel in MtCODH/ACS. CaCODH/ACS has seven EG tunnels connected to the IG tunnel; a putative CO2 delivery tunnel (blue), tunnel b (green), channel c (red), tunnel d (pink), tunnel e (cyan), tunnel f (red), and tunnel g (gray) (PDB ID 6YTT). MtCODH/ACS has a sealed IG tunnel (dark green) (PDB ID 1MJG). Adapted from ref (4), Copyright 2021, with permission from Elsevier.

IG tunnel architectures: (A) IG tunnels in Cytochrome ba3, Cytochrome aa3, and Cytochrome c dependent nitric oxide reductases cNOR (PDB IDs 1XME, 1AR1, 5GUX). Adapted from ref (5a), Copyright 2018, with permission from Elsevier. The asterisk (*) represents the tunnel entry point(s). (B) Porous IG tunnel in CaCODH/ACS and sealed IG tunnel in MtCODH/ACS. CaCODH/ACS has seven EG tunnels connected to the IG tunnel; a putative CO2 delivery tunnel (blue), tunnel b (green), channel c (red), tunnel d (pink), tunnel e (cyan), tunnel f (red), and tunnel g (gray) (PDB ID 6YTT). MtCODH/ACS has a sealed IG tunnel (dark green) (PDB ID 1MJG). Adapted from ref (4), Copyright 2021, with permission from Elsevier. Another class of IG tunnels are those that are involved in the transport of reactive gases such as CO and NH3. Since CO can be toxic to the surrounding environment and may get oxidized to CO2 under aerobic conditions, coupled active site systems that generate CO and later use it as a substrate for the subsequent reaction have IG tunnels. There are multiple types of CO transporting systems with different architectural preferences, which impresses the impact of evolution on gaseous tunnels. For instance, the IG tunnel in carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl CoA synthase (CODH/ACS) enzyme isolated from two species, namely, Moorella thermoacetica and Clostridium autoethanogenum, harbor varied tunnel architectures.[4] CODH/ACS is a multisubunit bifunctional enzyme where the CO2 is converted to CO at the first active site having a Fe-[NiFe3S4] cluster which is then transported to the second active site via a 70 Å long IG tunnel.[4] At this receiver active site, CO is incorporated into HSCoA via another Fe–S–Ni cluster which utilizes three different sized substrates, i.e., HSCoA, CO, and methyl bonded corrinoid FeS protein, thereby catalyzing the synthesis of acetyl CoA. The IG tunnels for transporting CO in CaCODH/ACS and MtCODH/ACS are quite different. The former has an IG tunnel with many accessory EG tunnels linked to a long central tunnel, while the latter has a totally sealed IG tunnel (Figure B). There is a total of seven EG tunnels in CaCODH/ACS, out of which two are hydrophobic.[4] One of these hydrophobic EG tunnels is hypothesized to be a putative CO2 delivery tunnel, which facilitates CO2 transport between bulk and CODH active site. The porous nature of the IG tunnel in CaCODH/ACS is advantageous during high CO concentration in the system, and it is envisioned that the accessory EG tunnels provide bidirectionality to CO in CaCODH/ACS. On the contrary, the lack of accessory EG tunnels in MtCODH/ACS seems to point toward a unidirectional transport system and is likely a thermophilic adaptation aimed to limit diffusion of CO at elevated temperatures by providing a compact architecture. Moreover, it was noticed that the putative CO2 delivery tunnel in CaCODH/ACS is a preformed one. However, the tunnel in MtCODH/ACS for CO2 delivery is dynamic in nature as it could not be trapped in its static X-ray crystal structure.[22] MD simulations on the MtCODH/ACS also reveal that during the oxidative addition reaction of CO2 itself, an intermediate state is formed where a hydroxyl group is ligated to the metal center in CODH active site and gets involved in the formation of a strong H-bonding network toward the dynamic CO2 delivery tunnel side, thereby occluding this path for CO to escape after release.[22] This directs the CO solely toward the ACS active site via the long hydrophobic IG tunnel providing directionality. The next class of gaseous tunnels, which are ubiquitous in nature and exist with several architectural preferences, are the NH3 transporting tunnels. These tunnels are either preformed as in an example of CPS discussed subsequently or can be transient. In most cases, an IG tunnel is necessary as NH3 released in the coupled reaction system acts as a nucleophile in the second reaction, and therefore, it has to be protected from the solvent to prevent the formation of NH4+ ion. Glutamine amidotransferases (GATases) are the enzymes that synthesize ammonia via the conversion of glutamine to glutamate.[1b] They have two primary classes: while Class II has a N-terminal cysteine residue which facilitates the reaction, Class I harbors a cysteine, histidine, and aspartic/glutamic acid catalytic triad that catalyzes the formation of ammonia.[1b,23] To facilitate ammonia transfer, two broad strategies are exploited by nature. In the first, the GATase is a separate enzyme, and only upon complexation with the receiver domain, it gets activated and, subsequently, NH3 is channeled. In the second, the GATase and receiver domain exist as subunits within the larger polypeptide, and activation of the amidotransferase unit occurs when substrates are present in both the active sites. Concomitantly in these cases, the NH3 tunnel is formed via appropriate conformation changes. The de novo purine biosynthetic pathway responsible for the synthesis of purine bases, which serve as precursors to DNA and RNA, is an example where several NH3 tunneling enzymes exist. For instance, the first step of the pathway is catalyzed by PRPP amidotransferase, a class II enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of PRPP to phosphoribosylamine. Smith and co-workers demonstrated that in the presence of diazo-5-oxonorleucine and a carbocyclic analogue of PRPP, ∼20 Å hydrophobic tunnel is formed that connects the amidotransferase domain with the PRPP active site.[9] Several structural elements, including bending of the helix that caps the PRPP moiety, and conformational changes such as the ordering of flexible loop formed by Val 325 to Arg 354 as well as the reorientation of loop region formed by Arg 73 to Ser 79 participate in completing the tunnel.[9] Another example of the transient NH3 tunnel system is the fourth enzyme in the purine biosynthetic pathway, FGAM synthetase. This enzyme exists in two forms. In eubacteria and eukaryotes, it is a large protein of over 1200 amino acids having a single polypeptide chain that harbors both the GATase and FGAM synthetase catalytic domains, namely, lgPurL.[6b] In archaea and Gram-positive species such as Bacillus subtills, three different proteins, i.e., a GATase, FGAM synthetase, and an adaptor protein, come together in the presence of ADP to form a functional complex.[8] NH3 that is produced in the GATase domain, named G-site, is channeled via a transient tunnel, ∼25 Å long, to the FGAM synthetase domain, named the F-site. Like PRPP, it has been shown by Anand and co-workers by studying Salmonella typhimurium lgPurL as a model system that only when substrates are present in both the G- and the F-sites is the tunnel fully formed.[8] A striking feature of this enzyme is the presence of two gates, one formed at the mouth of the tunnel near the GATase site, comprising of residues R1263, D657, N1051, and S1052 and another at the base (end-gate), consisting of H296 and T310 near the F-site.[8] The mouth gate operates by forming a dynamic hydrogen bonding network and controls NH3 transport (Figure A).[8] The end-gate seems to play a dual role and signals the entry of the substrate formylglycinamide ribonucleotide (FGAR) and ATP to the rest of the protein and also participates in the formation of the iminophospohate intermediate.[8,6b] Moreover, it initiates a complex and intricate relay of allosteric communication that originates at the synthetase site and transports the signal via the N-terminal adaptor domain to the G-site. The transient tunnel formed is mostly hydrophobic, and it has been established via MD simulation that during the course of the reaction, the tunnel fluctuates between open and closed phases somewhat like a breathing motion (unpublished results). Whether this helps in reducing wasteful ammonia leakage or it is to provide directionality to the process is unclear and needs to be further explored.
Figure 4

Different ammonia tunnels: (A) hydrophobic transient ammonia tunnel in FGAM synthetase has a mouth gate formed by residues S1052, N1051, R1263, and D657 and an end gate formed by T310 and H296 (PDB ID 1T3T). NH3 tunnel is transient in FGAM synthetase, and only upon appropriate conformational changes originating at the end gate, it becomes accessible. (B) NH3 tunnel in dmCTP Synthase has a GTP binding site. The tunnel lining residues are represented as blue sticks (PDB IDs 6L6Z, 6LFG, 7DPT, 7DPW). Adapted from ref (12). (C) NH3 tunnel in CPS originates from the S1 active site and ends at the L1 active site via a triangular gate A314-A251-C232 (PDB ID 1C3O). Adapted with permission from ref (6a). Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society. (D) The IGPS ammonia tunnel (green) passes through the (β/α)8 barrel. The charged gating residues in the middle of the tunnel are shown in purple (PDB ID 1JVN). Adapted from ref (24), Copyright 2001, with permission from Elsevier.

Different ammonia tunnels: (A) hydrophobic transient ammonia tunnel in FGAM synthetase has a mouth gate formed by residues S1052, N1051, R1263, and D657 and an end gate formed by T310 and H296 (PDB ID 1T3T). NH3 tunnel is transient in FGAM synthetase, and only upon appropriate conformational changes originating at the end gate, it becomes accessible. (B) NH3 tunnel in dmCTP Synthase has a GTP binding site. The tunnel lining residues are represented as blue sticks (PDB IDs 6L6Z, 6LFG, 7DPT, 7DPW). Adapted from ref (12). (C) NH3 tunnel in CPS originates from the S1 active site and ends at the L1 active site via a triangular gate A314-A251-C232 (PDB ID 1C3O). Adapted with permission from ref (6a). Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society. (D) The IGPS ammonia tunnel (green) passes through the (β/α)8 barrel. The charged gating residues in the middle of the tunnel are shown in purple (PDB ID 1JVN). Adapted from ref (24), Copyright 2001, with permission from Elsevier. Guanosine 5′-monophosphate synthetase (GMPS) is another enzyme that harbors a transient tunnel. In this enzyme, ammonia is transferred from the GATase domain to the ATP pyrophosphatase domain, which converts an ATP activated xanthine monophosphate to guanosine monophosphate.[7] It has been proposed in the Plasmodium falciparum version of the enzyme by Balaram and co-workers that the formation of the transient NH3 tunnel in GMPS is driven by the 85° rotation of the entire GATase domain, which purports the conformational changes in a helix stretch, spanning residues 371–395, and another 25 amino acid long loop linked to this helix, which seals the external environment creating the ammonia tunnel.[7] A differential way of modulating transient tunnel formation that showcases the vast architectural diversity in the NH3 tunnel design is in CTP synthase. The Drosophila melanogaster CTP synthase (dmCTP) harbors a class I amidotransferase domain that connects to an acceptor amination domain.[12] The tunnel in dmCTP has some similarities with FGAM synthetase. For instance, in the absence of the substrates, it has several bottleneck residues such as V58, E57, and P52 (Figure B) that do not allow the tunnel to be fully formed.[12] Like FGAM synthetase, it also has histidine as a gating residue which exhibits a swinging door motion for opening and closing of the NH3 tunnel. When ATP and/or UTP binds in the active site of the amination domain, it results in the conformational change leading to tunnel formation. However, a unique feature of this tunnel architecture is that the tunnel formation creates a binding site for GTP. This GTP molecule acts as a plug, and binding of GTP blocks access from the external environment and stabilizes the NH3 tunnel.[12] Apart from tunnels that are transient, there are also examples of preformed tunnels, with the classic example being CPS that catalyzes the conversion of bicarbonate to carbamoyl phosphate via a carbamate intermediate.[6a] This conversion utilizes glutamine and two molecules of ATP. CPS has one small subunit and another large subunit. The former has one active site (S1), while the latter has two active sites (L1 and L2).[6a] All three active sites are connected with the help of two internal tunnels. The final tunnel is 96 Å long, with one part transporting NH3 and the other transporting carbamate. NH3 is transferred from the S1 active site to the L1 active site in the large subunit via an NH3 tunnel. A triangular gate formed by three residues, i.e., A314, A251, and C232, is present in the middle of the NH3 tunnel (Figure C).[6a] A notable feature here is that while the first half of the ammonia tunnel from the S1 active site to the triangular gate is hydrophilic, the latter half, to the active site L1, is hydrophobic. Similarly, imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase (IGPS) is another GATase that exhibits a hybrid character within its NH3 tunnel, where the first half of the tunnel from the glutaminase domain until the middle is hydrophilic, and the second half leading to the acceptor domain (cyclase domain) is hydrophobic (Figure D).[24] The hydrophobic part of the tunnel passes through the (β/α)8 barrel. In the middle of the ammonia tunnel, four charged residues, R239, E293, K360, and E465, act as a gate that facilitates the transition between the two halves.[24]

Perspective and Conclusions

Here, we discussed several examples of both EG and IG tunnel architectures. In EG tunnels, since the reactant is a stable gas molecule, present in abundance in the surrounding environment, the challenge is to maintain optimal substrate concentration and to limit the amount that reaches the highly reactive centers. Several of these enzymes harbor metal clusters, such as MoFe, NiFe, etc., that catalyze difficult reactions where the transition states involve metals that need to achieve unstable oxidation states.[15a,20] Therefore, to prevent the inactivation of the metal center as well as to avoid side reactions, the substrate flow is tightly regulated. On the contrary, in the IG tunnel, the scenario is opposite; here, the substrate is generated within one of the active centers and is in the limiting amount as well as it could be toxic or unstable in the presented environment. Therefore, to ensure it reaches the destination reaction center, nature has devised strategies by constructing IG tunnels which, in several instances, are transient tunnels that only form upon entry of substates and have much more controlled and complex gating architectures. Other deciding factors that are paramount for specificity of transport via a tunnel are the nature of residues that line the passage and diameter as well as the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity status of the tunnel interior. However, in PSII, the situation is rather unique; a common tunnel is used for transport of both H2O and O2. Here, instead of the usual hydrophobic O2 tunnel, the conduit is significantly hydrophilic to allow H2O passage but is also wider such that it enables 1100-fold increased permeation of O2 relative to H2O.[21] Overall, a variety in tunnel architectures is observed for the same substrate, and this is evident by examples of various kinds of tunnel architecture that are adopted in the case of EG tunnels for O2 transport and IG tunnels for NH3 transport. An interesting question that comes to light by studying various tunnel architectures is how do gases move to the active site or between active sites in a unidirectional way? Is there significant reflux or leakage of the gases within the tunnel, and does diffusion through peripheral regions pose a problem with the efficiency of the transport? A well-studied protein, myoglobin, does not possess any gaseous tunnel, but it has internal hydrophobic gaseous cavities.[25] Theoretical and time-resolved crystallographic methods have shown that the CO, which is released after the photoinduced dissociation of the CO–myoglobin complex, migrates via these internal cavities.[25] As the CO travels ahead in the hydrophobic cavity, it leads to the correlated fluctuations in the cavity volume, and the cavity squeezes the CO molecule from the back and pushes it ahead. Similarly, it has been shown that the fluctuations in the main EG tunnel of AlkB regulate the flow of the substrate to the active site.[18] A fluctuating tunnel that is akin to breathing motions also appears to be the likely mechanism of NH3 transport in FGAM synthetase system. We believe that it is also possible like gaseous cavities in myoglobin and the fluctuations in the EG tunnel of AlkB, the IG tunnels in enzymes, such as MtCODH/ACS, and the transient ammonia tunnel in FGAM synthetase and NAD+ synthetase[6c] possess fluctuating motion that help to push the gas in the forward direction and facilitate its translocation from one active site to the other. Instead of the gas transport being a completely passive process, we propose that the protein tunnel acts as a breathing entity that brings directionality to the delivery process. This pulsation delivery mechanism would ensure the unidirectional transfer of gaseous substrates and prevent wastage, reflux, or any other polar molecules from entering the tunnel. These aspects of correlation in tunnel architectures and dynamic fluctuations need to be experimentally established, which we believe is an important aspect in understanding tunnel driven transport of gaseous molecules.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Enzymes with molecular tunnels.

Authors:  Frank M Raushel; James B Thoden; Hazel M Holden
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 22.384

Review 2.  The mechanism of glutamine-dependent amidotransferases.

Authors:  F Massière; M A Badet-Denisot
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Control of the Position of Oxygen Delivery in Soybean Lipoxygenase-1 by Amino Acid Side Chains within a Gas Migration Channel.

Authors:  Lara Collazo; Judith P Klinman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The N-terminal pre-A region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 2/2HbN promotes NO-dioxygenase activity.

Authors:  Alessandra Pesce; Juan P Bustamante; Axel Bidon-Chanal; Leonardo Boechi; Darío A Estrin; Francisco Javier Luque; Anne Sebilo; Michel Guertin; Martino Bolognesi; Paolo Ascenzi; Marco Nardini
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.542

5.  Visualizing breathing motion of internal cavities in concert with ligand migration in myoglobin.

Authors:  Ayana Tomita; Tokushi Sato; Kouhei Ichiyanagi; Shunsuke Nozawa; Hirohiko Ichikawa; Matthieu Chollet; Fumihiro Kawai; Sam-Yong Park; Takayuki Tsuduki; Takahisa Yamato; Shin-Ya Koshihara; Shin-Ichi Adachi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Different ways to transport ammonia in human and Mycobacterium tuberculosis NAD+ synthetases.

Authors:  Watchalee Chuenchor; Tzanko I Doukov; Kai-Ti Chang; Melissa Resto; Chang-Soo Yun; Barbara Gerratana
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Zeta-carbonic anhydrases show CS2 hydrolase activity: A new metabolic carbon acquisition pathway in diatoms?

Authors:  Vincenzo Alterio; Emma Langella; Martina Buonanno; Davide Esposito; Alessio Nocentini; Emanuela Berrino; Silvia Bua; Maurizio Polentarutti; Claudiu T Supuran; Simona Maria Monti; Giuseppina De Simone
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures.

Authors:  Eva Chovancova; Antonin Pavelka; Petr Benes; Ondrej Strnad; Jan Brezovsky; Barbora Kozlikova; Artur Gora; Vilem Sustr; Martin Klvana; Petr Medek; Lada Biedermannova; Jiri Sochor; Jiri Damborsky
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Active site coupling in Plasmodium falciparum GMP synthetase is triggered by domain rotation.

Authors:  Lionel Ballut; Sébastien Violot; Santosh Shivakumaraswamy; Lakshmi Prasoona Thota; Manu Sathya; Jyothirmai Kunala; Bauke W Dijkstra; Raphaël Terreux; Richard Haser; Hemalatha Balaram; Nushin Aghajari
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Role of allosteric switches and adaptor domains in long-distance cross-talk and transient tunnel formation.

Authors:  Nandini Sharma; Navjeet Ahalawat; Padmani Sandhu; Erick Strauss; Jagannath Mondal; Ruchi Anand
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.