| Literature DB >> 34926812 |
Pallvi Kaul1, Priyanka Kaul2, Dharma Ram Poonia3, Ashish Jakhetiya4, Vipin Arora5, Pankaj Kumar Garg6.
Abstract
Background Central compartment lymph node dissection (CLND) is a part of the surgical management of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Therapeutic CLND is done to address clinically significant central compartment nodes in patients with DTC, while prophylactic CLND is performed in the presence of high-risk features in the absence of clinically significant neck nodes. Removal of thymus-unilateral or bilateral-during CLND to achieve complete clearance of level VI and VII lymph node stations and address thymic metastasis is debatable. Objective The present systematic review was conducted to summarize the evidence, delineating the role of thymectomy during CLND in patients with DTC. Methods Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from their inception to July 2020 using keywords-thyroid neoplasms or tumors, thyroidectomy, and thymectomy-to identify the articles describing the role of thymectomy during CLND in DTC. A pooled analysis of surgicopathological outcomes was performed using metaprop command in STATA software version 16. Result A total of three studies and 347 patients-total thyroidectomy (TT) with bilateral thymectomy in 154, TT with unilateral thymectomy in 166, and TT alone in 27 patients with DTC-were included in the systematic review. The pooled frequency of thymic metastasis was a mere 2% in patients undergoing either unilateral or bilateral thymectomy. The routine addition of thymectomy does not result in better lymph node clearance. Unilateral and bilateral thymectomy were associated with high chances of transient hypocalcemia (12.0% and 56.1%, respectively). Conclusion Routine thymectomy is not warranted during CLND, considering minimal oncological benefit and high risk of postoperative hypocalcemia. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).Entities:
Keywords: Central compartment node dissection; Head And Neck Cancer; Thymectomy; Thyroid neoplasms; Thyroidectomy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34926812 PMCID: PMC8674089 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg J (N Y) ISSN: 2378-5128
Fig. 1Surgical boundaries of the central compartment node dissection (dotted lines)
Fig. 2PRISMA chart
Characteristics of the included studies in the review
| Authors | Year | Country | Research design | Study groups | Sample size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | ||||
|
Khatib et al
| 2010 | France | Retrospective review | TT + BT | TT + UT | 45 | 93 |
|
Huang et al
| 2014 | China | Retrospective review | TT + UT | TT + BT | 73 | 82 |
|
Li et al
| 2019 | China | Randomized controlled trial | TT | TT + BT | 27 | 27 |
Abbreviations: BT, bilateral thymectomy; TT, total thyroidectomy; UT, unilateral thymectomy.
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics reported in the included studies
| Variable |
Khatib et al
|
Huang et al
|
Li et al
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT + BT | TT + UT | TT + UT | TT + BT | TT | TT + BT | |
|
| ||||||
| Age (years) |
46 (17–85)
|
45 (6–78)
|
48.1 ± 10.7
|
48.7 ± 10.4
|
45.3 ± 7.8
|
47.3 ± 11.6
|
| Gender (M/F) | 15/38 | 27/66 | 11/62 | 17/65 | 5/22 | 6/21 |
| BMI (kg/m 2 ) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 24.6 ± 4.06 | 25.2 ± 3.19 |
|
| ||||||
| Size (mm) |
11.2 (< 1–55)
|
18.1 (< 1–55)
|
27.6 ± 12.3
|
25 ± 12.0
|
9.78 ± 6.4
|
8.85 ± 4.9
|
| Histology | ||||||
| Papillary | 42 | 75 | 73 | 82 | 27 | 27 |
| Follicular | 0 | 2 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Medullary | 3 | 17 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
| Risk stratification (MACIS) (< 6/> 6) | NA | NA | 7/73 | 16/82 | NA | NA |
Abbreviations: BT, bilateral thymectomy; TT, total thyroidectomy; SD, standard deviation; UT, unilateral thymectomy.
Median (range)
Mean ± SD
Average (range)
Operative parameters and surgical outcomes reported in the included studies
| Variable |
Khatib et al
|
Huang et al
|
Li et al
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT + BT | TT + UT | TT + UT | TT + BT | TT | TT + BT | |
| Operative duration (min) ± SD | NA | NA | NA | NA | 129.52 ± 31.73 | 121.30 ± 33.10 |
| Hospital stay (days) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6.22 ± 1.97 | 6.93 ± 2.17 |
| Parathyroid removal/ transplant rates | 7 (15.6%) | 8 (8.6%) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 5.2 ± 1.3 | 2 (7.4%) | 8 (29.6%) |
| POD1 PTH levels | NA | NA | NA | NA | 25.46 ± 14.72 | 11.07 ± 6.03 |
| Vocal fold palsy | ||||||
| Permanent | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.7%) |
| Transient | NA | NA | NA | NA | 5 (18.5%) | 3 (11.1%) |
| Hypoparathyroidism | ||||||
| Permanent | 1 (2.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.6%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (14.8%) |
| Transient | 16 (35.5%) | 10 (10.7%) | 10 (13.7%) | 43 (52.4%) | 7 (25.9%) | 19 (70.4%) |
Abbreviations: TT, total thyroidectomy; UT, unilateral thymectomy; BT, bilateral thymectomy
Fig. 3( A ) Pooled analysis of postoperative permanent hypocalcemia in patients undergoing bilateral thymectomy during central compartment lymph node dissection (CLND) ( B ) Pooled analysis of thymic metastasis in patients undergoing thymectomy during CLND
The pathological outcomes reported in the included studies
| Variable |
Khatib et al
|
Huang et al
|
Li et al
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT + BT | TT + UT | TT + UT | TT + BT | TT | TT + BT | |
|
| ||||||
| Central compartment | 20 (44.5%) | 53 (57%) | NA | NA | 14 (51.9%) | 14 (51.9%) |
| Lateral ipsilateral | 13 (28.9%) | 37(39.8%) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Lateral contralateral | 1 (2.2%) | 8 (8.6%) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Thymic metastases | 2 (4.4%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.7%) | 3 (3.6%) | Nil | Nil |
Abbreviations: BT, bilateral thymectomy; MC, medullary carcinoma; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; TT, total thyroidectomy; UT, unilateral thymectomy.