Jonathan Light1, Michele Retrouvey2, Richard M Conran3. 1. School of Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School/Medical Center Radiologists, Norfolk, VA, USA. 3. Department of Pathology & Anatomy, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Abstract
The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, see http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040.1.
The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, see http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040.1.
Objective MS1.1: Categories of Bone Tumors. Describe examples of
bone forming, cartilage forming, and other common bone tumors including the
clinicopathologic features, radiological features, treatment, and prognosis of
each.Competency 2: Organ System Pathology; Topic: MS: Musculoskeletal System; Learning
Goal 1: Bone Neoplasia.
Patient Presentation
A 9-year-old previously healthy boy without recent illness presents to his
pediatrician with severe left lower extremity pain for 4 months that seems worse at
night and sometimes awakens him from sleep. Treating with ibuprofen tended to help
him with the pain initially, but the pain persists. His soccer coach talked to him
about his leg pain and said the associated limp could be due to shin splints or a
bone bruise from overexertion or forgetting to wear shin guards during practice
based on his experience with the other players. The boy says he wears his shin
guards everyday, and the pain began before soccer season. Also, he says he does not
have bruises on his shins. He denies any history of trauma to his leg. He denies any
recent fever, malaise, cuts on his skin, or redness of the affected area on his left
leg. His only concern is his left leg pain exacerbated by walking. His recent sports
physical examinations have been routine without concerning findings, and he is up to
date on all childhood vaccinations. His mother is concerned for her child and asks
the pediatrician for further evaluation.
Diagnostic Findings, Part 1
The patient’s height is 4 feet, 5 inches, and he weighs 61 pounds. Vital signs are
blood pressure 118/78 mmHg, heart rate 105 beats per minute, respiratory rate 20
breaths per minute, and temperature 99.5°F. There is tenderness to palpation with
mild inflammation of the left anterior tibial diaphysis without warmth, erythema, or
crepitus, on physical examination; no palpable deformity or mass of the affected
left leg is visible. There is a normal range of motion of the left hip and knee. The
skin is intact without evidence of abrasion, laceration, or puncture wound on the
extremities. No rash is visible. A singular café au lait macule is evident on the
patient’s right trunk, present since birth. Neurovascular exam of the affected lower
extremity is unremarkable. No palpable lymph nodes are evident. His heart
examination revealed normal S1, S2 sounds, regular rate and rhythm with no rubs,
gallops, or murmurs. Lungs are clear to auscultation; no wheezing is evident.Complete blood count and markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP] and
erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) are unremarkable. Conventional radiographs of
the tibia and fibula are obtained (Figure 1). On the tibial diaphysis, there is a cortically based lesion.
There is no associated periosteal reaction. Although the anteroposterior (AP) and
lateral conventional radiographs of the lower extremity demonstrate a bone lesion
without a nidus, in many cases for a patient with the same bone lesion, a nidus is
visible. An AP radiograph from a different patient with the same bone lesion
demonstrates a lytic lesion at the lateral aspect of the talus, with a subtle
central sclerotic focus suggestive of a nidus (Figure 2).
Figure 1.
(A) Anteroposterior (AP), (B) Lateral. Radiograph of the lower extremity
demonstrates thickening of the lateral cortex of the tibial diaphysis
(arrow). There is suggestion of a small lytic focus within the cortex.
Figure 2.
Anteroposterior radiograph of the left lower extremity demonstrates a lytic
lesion at the lateral aspect of the talus, with a subtle central sclerotic
focus suggestive of a nidus (arrow). Mild sclerosis is noted surrounding the
lytic lesion.
(A) Anteroposterior (AP), (B) Lateral. Radiograph of the lower extremity
demonstrates thickening of the lateral cortex of the tibial diaphysis
(arrow). There is suggestion of a small lytic focus within the cortex.Anteroposterior radiograph of the left lower extremity demonstrates a lytic
lesion at the lateral aspect of the talus, with a subtle central sclerotic
focus suggestive of a nidus (arrow). Mild sclerosis is noted surrounding the
lytic lesion.Further imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI;
Figures 3 and 4) are obtained for the
patient in the clinical vignette. Computed tomography images of the affected left
leg demonstrate a cortically based tibial diaphysis lesion measuring approximately 1
cm. No central nidus is visible. On MRI, the lesion is T1 dark and T2 bright. There
is intramedullary and periosteal edema.
Figure 3.
(A) Axial, (B) Sagittal, (C) Coronal. Computed tomography images of the lower
extremity demonstrate a cortically based lytic lesion with surrounding
sclerotic reactive bone (arrow). No central sclerotic focus is noted to
suggest a nidus. There is no periosteal reaction.
Figure 4.
(A) T1 sag, (B) Axial T2 fat saturated. Magnetic resonance imaging of the
lower extremity demonstrates significant osseous and periosteal edema at the
tibial diaphysis. Cortical thickening is noted at the anterior tibial
cortex, with a small T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense lesion (arrow).
There is no soft tissue component.
(A) Axial, (B) Sagittal, (C) Coronal. Computed tomography images of the lower
extremity demonstrate a cortically based lytic lesion with surrounding
sclerotic reactive bone (arrow). No central sclerotic focus is noted to
suggest a nidus. There is no periosteal reaction.(A) T1 sag, (B) Axial T2 fat saturated. Magnetic resonance imaging of the
lower extremity demonstrates significant osseous and periosteal edema at the
tibial diaphysis. Cortical thickening is noted at the anterior tibial
cortex, with a small T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense lesion (arrow).
There is no soft tissue component.
Questions/Discussion Points, Part 1
What Is in the Differential Diagnosis for Childhood Bone Lesion of the
Diaphysis?
The differential diagnosis of childhood bone lesion of the diaphysis includes
osteoid osteoma, osteomyelitis, Brodie abscess, stress fracture, pathologic
fracture, and ossifying fibroma.Radiographs are considered as an initial diagnostic step when a patient presents
with symptoms concerning for bone fracture, tumor, or infection. The bone lesion
location facilitates diagnostic evaluation as presentations generally follow
patterns based on the patient’s age and growth plate status, the involved bone,
and region of the bone (outer surface of the bone, cortex, medullary cavity,
diaphysis, metaphysis, and epiphysis).
Approximately 50% of all stress fractures of the lower extremity in
children occur in the tibia.
Around 50% of osteoid osteomas and 80% of subacute osteomyelitis
(Brodie’s abscess) arise in the femur or tibia.
Additionally, boys are affected by osteoid osteoma and osteomyelitis
twice as often as girls.
Bone tumors are usually classified based on the normal bone cell or
matrix they secrete.
Benign bone tumors are more common than their malignant counterparts,
especially in children and most bone neoplasms are osteolytic.
The most common benign bone tumors are osteochondroma, nonossifying
fibroma, and osteoid osteoma
; an osteoid osteoma represents 10% of all benign bone tumors.
Discuss the Benign Bone Tumor Classifications as It Relates to the Substance
That They Produce
The long bones are formed by endochondral ossification, which requires a
cartilaginous model to be secreted initially. The tibial nutrient artery enters
its respective long bone periosteal collar through a foramen, permitting blood
access to the bone marrow. The major cellular constituents of bone arise from
mesenchymal cells such as osteoblasts and chondrocytes. Primary bone tumors
develop from bone and cartilage forming resident cells, and the tumors are
classified by the matrix they secrete, summarized in Table 1.
Benign bone-forming tumors include osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.
Cartilage-forming tumors are osteochondroma, chondroma (enchondroma and
juxtacortical chondroma), chondroblastoma, and chondromyxoid fibroma.
Additionally, fibrous, cystic, and vascular bone lesions also present in
childhood. Vascular lesions of lower extremity bone in childhood that leads to
localized osteolysis include epithelioid hemangioma, Kaposiform
hemangioendothelioma, and angiosarcoma.
Table 1.
Benign Bone Lesion Classification Based on Matrix Secreted.
Benign Bone Lesion Classification Based on Matrix Secreted.* Most common site for lesion.
Based on the Clinical Presentation and Imaging What Is the Most Likely
Diagnosis?
Based on the patient’s age, history of nocturnal pain relieved by ibuprofen, and
CT findings, the most likely diagnosis is an osteoid osteoma. The lack of
periosteal reaction is essential in ruling out osteomyelitis, a clinically
significant concern due to associated morbidity.
What Long Bone Location Is the Most Common Presentation for an Osteoid
Osteoma?
Although the proximal femur is the most common site for an osteoid osteoma,
they can be present in any bone.
A CT of a patient with an osteoid osteoma of the proximal femur is
demonstrated in Figure
5.
Figure 5.
Computed tomography image of the right proximal femur reveals a
cortically based lesion with central nidus with ill-defined surrounding
sclerosis (arrow). There is no periosteal reaction.
Computed tomography image of the right proximal femur reveals a
cortically based lesion with central nidus with ill-defined surrounding
sclerosis (arrow). There is no periosteal reaction.
Discuss the Typical Imaging Modalities Used to Diagnose Benign Bone Forming
Neoplasms and Fracture
The combination of imaging modalities such as conventional radiography, bone
scintigraphy, CT, and sometimes MRI are generally sufficient to diagnose osteoid
osteoma and osteoblastoma.
The imaging modality of choice has been CT for osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.
A conventional radiograph of a cortical osteoid osteoma typically reveals
an oval osteolytic nidus less than 2 cm in diameter surrounded by an area of
reactive sclerotic bone plus or minus periosteal osteogenesis.
In contrast to osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma radiographically appears
wider in diameter (>2 cm) with decreased surrounding sclerosis and enhanced
cortical thickening.
A study by Park et al found that 28.6% of osteoid osteoma cases showed no
abnormal findings on conventional radiographs despite clinical indications.
Additionally, intramedullary or paraspinal osteoid osteoma or
osteoblastoma may be challenging to diagnose due to the limitations of
radiographs requiring other imaging modalities such as bone scintigraphy, CT, or MRI.Nuclear medicine scans or bone scintigraphy is 100% sensitive but has low
specificity for osteoid osteoma and has high sensitivity but low specificity for osteoblastoma.
The affinity of technetium Tc-99m-labeled diphosphonates for osteoblastic
deposition of bone and remodeling activity favors bone scintigraphy over
conventional radiographs for localizing osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma.
Computed tomography scan provides added specificity in osteoid osteoma cases
that are anatomically difficult to uncover by conventional radiography, such as
intra-articular lesions.
A previous study by Hosalkar et al demonstrated that board-certified
musculoskeletal attending radiologists with at least 5 years’ experience
correctly diagnosed osteoid osteoma by CT in 67% of scans compared to only 3%
with MRI scans.
The features of osteoblastoma by MRI are equivocal due to the surrounding
inflammation and significant marrow edema.The evaluation of long bone diaphysis stress fracture by radiography is also
limited. The first sign of stress fracture on conventional radiograph is the
“grey cortex” sign due to the presence of a cortical microcrack or lucency in
the bone and osteoclastic resorption.
The chronicity of a stress fracture is important radiographically as
callus formation and periosteal thickening rules in bone tumor or osteomyelitis
until proven otherwise. Magnetic resonance is the imaging modality of choice for
stress fractures and has almost 100% sensitivity.
Additionally, nonossifying fibroma only presents with periosteal reaction
when a fracture is present, which is excluded by MRI in this patient.Based on the clinical picture, radiographic appearance of the left tibia shows
periosteal thickening of the diaphysis, which is inconclusive, requiring further
workup. Computed tomography scan and MRI demonstrate an intracortical
oval-shaped osteolytic lesion located in the left anterolateral tibia diaphysis,
less than 2 cm in diameter. The surrounding bone is sclerotic with minimal
periosteal thickening supporting the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma over
osteomyelitis and stress fracture. Further evaluation by histology of the
affected area is needed if there is diagnostic doubt of a benign or malignant
tumor based on imaging
or concern for osteomyelitis.A cortically based osteoid osteoma stimulates a significant amount of sclerosis,
which explains why a nidus may not always be apparent radiographically.
Computed tomography imaging for best visualization of the nidus is required.
A CT from a patient with an osteoid osteoma of the anterior tibia with a
tiny punctate central sclerotic focus representing a nidus is seen in Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Computed tomography image of the right tibia and fibula. At the anterior
tibia, there is a small cortically based lesion with surrounding
sclerosis. A tiny punctate central sclerotic focus represents a nidus
(arrow). There is no periosteal reaction.
Computed tomography image of the right tibia and fibula. At the anterior
tibia, there is a small cortically based lesion with surrounding
sclerosis. A tiny punctate central sclerotic focus represents a nidus
(arrow). There is no periosteal reaction.
Discuss How Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis Is
Differentiated Clinically From Osteoid Osteoma
Within the medullary cavity and proximal to the epiphysis at the extremely
vascular metaphysis, congestion of vessels occurs especially when bacteria such
as Staphylococcus aureus adhere to the surrounding bone
extracellular matrix at these localities. Bacterial adhesins attach to bone
extracellular matrix elements such as fibrinogen and fibronectin, which bridges
S aureus and osteoblasts.
Most cases of osteomyelitis occur in the metaphysis within the medullary
cavity due to the sinusoidal blood flow architecture at this region of the long bone.
The diffusion of S aureus via lamellar Haversian
channels to subperiosteal elements permits intramedullary bacterial seeding in
the diaphysis or epiphysis.
The abscess is lucent on conventional radiograph and is not cortically
located. Stress fracture and hematogenous spread of bacteria may cause
osteomyelitis within the tibial diaphysis without skin barrier breakage.
Imaging, labs, or biopsy are needed to clinically differentiate osteomyelitis
from osteoid osteoma.Radiographic findings and MRI may be misleading in the case of subacute
osteomyelitis. Markers of inflammation such as CRP and ESR are the most
sensitive markers for osteomyelitis, which are negative in this patient.
Surgical biopsy is required when there is any question that the lesion is
subacute osteomyelitis (Brodie’s abscess) or bone neoplasm.
Diagnostic Findings, Part 2
A bone resection is performed due to the absence of a nidus on imaging in this
patient (Figures 7, 8, 9, and 10).
Figure 7.
The section of cortical bone shows a nidus represented by a well demarcated
red oval lesion surrounded by a hypervascular rim (arrow).
Figure 8.
Femur. This femoral specimen shows an approximately one cm diameter ovoid
nidus with surrounding white sclerotic bone is easily demarcated from the
normal cortical bone (arrow).
Figure 9.
The nidus (arrowheads) is composed of woven bone in a loose fibrovascular
stroma surrounded by sclerotic bone (H&E, intermediate
magnification).
Figure 10.
Section of nidus (N) showing central area of irregular woven bony trabeculae
(arrow) rimmed with osteoblasts distributed in a loose fibrovascular stroma
surrounded by a rim of reactive sclerotic bone (B) (H&E, intermediate
magnification).
The section of cortical bone shows a nidus represented by a well demarcated
red oval lesion surrounded by a hypervascular rim (arrow).Femur. This femoral specimen shows an approximately one cm diameter ovoid
nidus with surrounding white sclerotic bone is easily demarcated from the
normal cortical bone (arrow).The nidus (arrowheads) is composed of woven bone in a loose fibrovascular
stroma surrounded by sclerotic bone (H&E, intermediate
magnification).Section of nidus (N) showing central area of irregular woven bony trabeculae
(arrow) rimmed with osteoblasts distributed in a loose fibrovascular stroma
surrounded by a rim of reactive sclerotic bone (B) (H&E, intermediate
magnification).
Questions/Discussion Points, Part 2
Describe the Gross and Histologic Findings From a Patient With Osteoid
Osteoma as Depicted in Figures 7, 8, 9, and
10
A bone resection from a patient with osteoid osteoma is shown to demonstrate how
an osteoid osteoma appears on gross exam. While en bloc surgical resection of an
osteoid osteoma in the long bone was historically performed, a more conservative
approach is now utilized by clinicians. En bloc resection is intact removal of
the entire lesion, which increases morbidity. However, en bloc resection is a
standard of care for an osteoid osteoma in the hand; curettage is another.Within the section of cortical bone, there is a well-demarcated round to oval
red-brown lesion (arrow) that represents the nidus surrounded by hemorrhage and
sclerotic bone (Figures 7 and 8). Figure
9 shows a 1-cm diameter nidus composed of woven bone in a loose
fibrovascular stroma surrounded by thickened sclerotic bone on histological
examination. Figure 10
demonstrates the nidus consisting of irregular woven bony trabeculae rimmed with
osteoblasts distributed in a loose fibrovascular stroma surrounded by a rim of
reactive sclerotic bone.
What Is the Diagnosis Based on the Above Findings?
Based on the size of the lesion less than 2 cm and the pathologic features, the
diagnosis is osteoid osteoma. Morphologically identical lesions but 2 cm or more
in diameter defines an osteoblastoma.
Discuss the Gross and Histomorphologic Features of Osteoid Osteoma
The usual gross appearance of osteoid osteoma on biopsy is a round or oval
central nidus (the neoplasm) hyperemic with red to pink hue due to the vascular trabeculae.
The surrounding reactive osteosclerosis is white and well-delineated from
the nidus.
The neoplasm is softer than the surrounding dense bone. The histological
distinction between osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma may not be possible
without imaging and size to confirm the diagnosis.
Current treatment strategies such as CT-guided radiofrequency ablation
for osteoid osteoma rarely leave intact specimens for histopathological evaluation.The characteristic appearance of osteoid osteoma on histology is a
well-circumscribed nidus of immature woven bone with variable mineralization and
interconnecting trabeculae.
The trabeculae may be thin or thick with a bordering singular layer of osteoblasts.
Additionally, many osteoclasts are located within the neoplasm.
The lack of cellular pleomorphism, small tumor size, and discrete margins
guides the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma, ruling out any concern for malignancy.
By comparison, osteosarcoma is a malignant tumor of undifferentiated
cells producing osteoid matrix. Furthermore, osteosarcoma is generally located
in the proximal tibial metaphysis, not diaphysis. The radiographic hallmarks of
osteosarcoma are a Codman triangle shadow and “sunburst” appearance due to the
destruction of the surrounding periosteum, which is not observed on imaging in
this patient.
Discuss the Possible Treatments of Osteoid Osteoma and Associated
Outcomes
Benign tumors have a staging system. Stage 1 tumors are latent and commonly asymptomatic.
They can progress but generally self-resolve.
An osteoid osteoma is typically a stage 1 lesion, requiring only
symptomatic relief with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs NSAIDs (ibuprofen
or naproxen) until the tumor spontaneously regresses, generally within 2 to 3 years.
Surgical resection of the entire osteoid osteoma has been the only
curative treatment for decades and is warranted if the patient fails treatment
with NSAIDs.
Still tibial diaphysis bone defect status post-surgery requires
counseling the patient to limit physical activities and weight-bearing.
If the tumor approximates the tibia epiphyseal growth plates, limb-length
differences or osteoarthritis are possible without surgical intervention.
The bur-down technique better controls excessive removal of sclerotic
bone following curettage of the nidus.
Osteoblastoma by comparison can be stage 1 or 2.
Stage 2 lesions are generally active and do not resolve on their own,
commonly requiring surgical intervention.
Stage 3 benign bone lesions are destructive and treatment is generally en
bloc resection.Contemporary surgical treatments for osteoid osteoma include percutaneous
CT-guided radiofrequency ablation in the outpatient setting.
These new techniques offer a low recurrence rate of osteoid osteoma and
decreased hospital cost and inpatient stay.
Computed tomography scan in this patient (Figure 3) shows a superficial bone tumor
that is accessible, making surgical resection a good option and radiofrequency
ablation a good to excellent option.
An osteoid osteoma has a low risk of malignant potential.
Identify Why Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Pharmacotherapy
Works for Osteoid Osteoma but Not Osteoblastoma
The mainstay pharmacotherapy for osteoid osteoma are NSAIDs. While a reduction in
cyclooxygenase pathway end-products somehow relieves pain in patients with
osteoid osteoma, the specific pathogenesis of osteoid osteoma is currently unknown.
The increased osteoblastic expression of cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme and
elevated levels of prostaglandin E2 and prostacyclin are found within
the osteolytic nidus in osteoid osteoma.
The contributory pain in osteoid osteoma is due to unmyelinated nerve
fibers within the neoplastic nidus and peripherally, at the junction between the
nidus and sclerotic bone.
The increased prostaglandin synthesis leads to vasodilation and
compression of proximal nerves fibers via tissue edema, which induces pain, and
is reversible after surgical removal of the lesion.Whereas pain fiber modulation occurs by prostaglandin E2 induced
vasodilation of the surrounding vasculature within the osteoid osteoma nidus,
the same has yet to be documented for osteoblastoma.
Osteoblastoma has a progressive growth tendency but a decreased bone
reaction compared to osteoid osteoma.
Thus, local pain in osteoblastoma is thought to be secondary to increased
pressure on adjacent structures due to neoplastic expansion.
Additionally, posterior vertebral involvement of osteoblastoma and
proximity to spinal nerve roots leads to different symptoms than osteoid osteoma
such as paresthesia and paraparesis and sometimes dull pain.Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone-forming tumor that typically affects
children in the second decade and more commonly affects boys than girls.Osteoid osteoma involves the bone cortex and most frequently the metaphysis
of the femur, or tibia, but any bone may be affected by the benign
lesion.The most common benign bone tumors are osteoid osteoma, osteochondroma, and
nonossifying fibroma, which frequently affect the femur and tibial
metaphysis.The radiographic appearance of osteoid osteoma may be nonspecific, requiring
a CT scan to further characterize the lesion and facilitate clinical
decision-making.Magnetic resonance is the imaging modality of choice for osteomyelitis when
conventional radiographs are inconclusive, but CT is the gold standard for
the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma.Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma histologically are the same, requiring
imaging to confirm the diagnosis based on morphometry and respective lesion
size of <2 cm and >2 cm.Single cortical lesions of the tibia are unlikely to be
Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis based on
intramedullary seeding within the metaphysis.Histopathological examination of osteoid osteoma shows prominent osteoblasts
that rim thin or thick trabeculae with variable mineralization of a central
nidus surrounded by sclerotic bone.Osteoid osteoma-induced nocturnal pain typically responds to NSAID therapy
due to increased prostaglandin E2, and the tumor can
spontaneously heal.Osteoblastoma does not usually respond to NSAID therapy and is typically
located in the axial skeleton: spine or sacrum.Computed tomography–guided radiofrequency ablation or curettage are treatment
options for osteoid osteoma when NSAID therapy fails or when long-term
salicylate use is not possible.
Authors: Kivanc I Atesok; Benjamin A Alman; Emil H Schemitsch; Amos Peyser; Henry Mankin Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Niels van der Naald; Diederik P J Smeeing; Roderick M Houwert; Falco Hietbrink; Geertje A M Govaert; Detlef van der Velde Journal: J Bone Jt Infect Date: 2019-01-24