Literature DB >> 34925746

One-stop shop for variceal surveillance: integration of unsedated ultrathin endoscopy into the routine clinic visit.

Ali Eqbal1, Tehara Wickremeratne1, Stephanie Turner1, Sarah Elizabeth Higgins1, Andrew Sloss1, Jonathan Mitchell1, James O'Beirne1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic appearance of oesophageal varices determines the need for prophylaxis. However, as the point prevalence of varices is low (25%), the majority of surveillance endoscopies are unnecessary and costly. Narrow diameter, ultrathin (UT) endoscopes are more tolerable than conventional upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopes and can be used without sedation. We hypothesised that unsedated UT endoscopy for variceal surveillance could be implemented during the routine outpatient clinic visit allowing accurate diagnosis of varices and the timely provision of prophylaxis.
METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis awaiting surveillance endoscopy were identified. UT endoscopy was scheduled during routine clinic review at the same time as ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma. UGI endoscopy was performed unsedated using the E.G Scan II disposable endoscope. Varices were graded using the modified Paquet classification. Video recordings of procedures were reviewed by blinded assessors and agreement was assessed using the kappa statistic.
RESULTS: 40 patients (80% male) underwent unsedated UT endoscopy. All procedures were successful and tolerated well in 98% of cases. Median procedure time was 2 min (IQR 1-3). Varices were found in 37.5% (17.5% grade 1 and 20% grade 2). Patients with grade 2 varices were prescribed non-selective beta blockers at the clinic appointment. Kappa statistic for the finding of any varices was 0.636 (p=0.001) and 0.8-1.0 for diagnosis of grade 2 varices (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient unsedated ultrathin endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis is accurate, safe and feasible. This integrative care model is convenient, particularly for regional communities, and is likely to result in significant cost savings associated with variceal surveillance. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cirrhosis; clinical decision making; endoscopy; health economics; oesophageal varices

Year:  2021        PMID: 34925746      PMCID: PMC8640389          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2020-101680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  17 in total

1.  The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel A Leffler; Rakhi Kheraj; Sagar Garud; Naama Neeman; Larry A Nathanson; Ciaran P Kelly; Mandeep Sawhney; Bruce Landon; Richard Doyle; Stanley Rosenberg; Mark Aronson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-25

2.  Agreement among multiple observers on endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal varices before bleeding.

Authors:  F Bendtsen; L T Skovgaard; T I Sørensen; P Matzen
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  [Interobserver and intercenter agreement of gastro-esophageal endoscopic signs in cirrhosis. Results of a prospective multicenter study].

Authors:  P Calès; L Buscail; J F Bretagne; B Champigneulle; P Bourbon; B Duclos; M Dapoigny; R Dumas; R Pierrugues; T Davion
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  1989-12

4.  Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Lucio Trevisani; Viviana Cifalà; Sergio Sartori; Giuseppe Gilli; Giancarlo Matarese; Vincenzo Abbasciano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: ultra-thin gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Tehara Wickremeratne; Stephanie Turner; James O'Beirne
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  Nonselective β-blockers do not affect mortality in cirrhosis patients with ascites: Post Hoc analysis of three randomized controlled trials with 1198 patients.

Authors:  Lars Bossen; Aleksander Krag; Hendrik Vilstrup; Hugh Watson; Peter Jepsen
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Ruel T Garcia; John P Cello; Mindie H Nguyen; Stanley J Rogers; Alex Rodas; Huy N Trinh; Neil H Stollman; Gail Schlueck; Kenneth R McQuaid
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Use of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy for the Diagnosis and Grading of Esophageal Varices in Patients With Portal Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas R McCarty; Yuliya Afinogenova; Basile Njei
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.062

9.  Factors related to early mortality in cirrhotic patients bleeding from varices and treated by urgent sclerotherapy.

Authors:  O Le Moine; M Adler; N Bourgeois; M Delhaye; J Devière; M Gelin; A Vandermeeren; A Van Gossum; A Vereerstraeten; P Vereerstraeten
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Validation of the Baveno VI criteria to identify low risk cirrhotic patients not requiring endoscopic surveillance for varices.

Authors:  James B Maurice; Edgar Brodkin; Frances Arnold; Annalan Navaratnam; Heidi Paine; Sabrina Khawar; Ameet Dhar; David Patch; James O'Beirne; Raj Mookerjee; Massimo Pinzani; Emmanouil Tsochatzis; Rachel H Westbrook
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 25.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.