| Literature DB >> 34925074 |
Chang'an Wang1,2, Baohui Su2, Shaoxia Lu1, Shicheng Han1, Haibo Jiang3, Zhuang Li4, Yang Liu1, Hongbai Liu1, Yuhong Yang2.
Abstract
This study aimed to demonstrate the effects of dietary glutathione (GSH) on growth, intestinal antioxidant capacity, histology, gene expression, and microbiota in juvenile triploid rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Different diets (G0-control, G100, G200, G400, and G800) containing graded levels of GSH (0, 100, 200, 400, and 800mgkg-1) were fed to triplicate groups of 30 fish (initial mean weight 4.12±0.04g) for 56days. G400 had significantly improved weight gain and feed conversion rate. Based on the broken-line regression analysis, the optimum dietary GSH level was 447.06mgkg-1. Catalase and superoxide dismutase activities were significantly higher in G200-G800. G200 had significantly lower malondialdehyde content. The height of the intestinal muscular layer in G400 was significantly higher than that of the control group. Intestinal PepT1 and SLC1A5 gene expression was significantly increased, and the highest was observed in G400. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-8 expression were significantly decreased than that of G0. Next-generation sequencing of the 16S rDNA showed a significant difference in alpha diversity whereas no differences in beta diversity. On the genus level, LefSe analysis of indicator OTUs showed Ilumatobacter, Peptoniphilus, Limnobacter, Mizugakiibacter, Chelatococcus, Stella, Filimonas, and Streptosporangium were associated with the treatment diet, whereas Arcobacter, Ferrovibrio, Buchnera, Chitinophaga, Stenotrophobacter, Solimonadaceae, Polycyclovorans, Rhodococcus, Ramlibacter, and Azohydromonas were associated with the control diet. In summary, feeding juvenile triploid O. mykiss 200-800mgkg-1 GSH improved growth and intestinal health.Entities:
Keywords: glutathione; growth; intestinal health; microbiota; triploid O. mykiss
Year: 2021 PMID: 34925074 PMCID: PMC8680104 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.784852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Formulation and chemical proximate composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredients (gkg−1) | G0 | G100 | G200 | G400 | G800 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean protein concentrate | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 |
| Fish meal | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Wheat middling | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Extruded soybean | 145 | 145 | 145 | 145 | 145 |
| Chicken meal | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
| Fish oil | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Soybean oil | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Soybean phospholipid | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Calcium dihydrogen phosphate | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Vitamin premix | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Mineral premix | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| GSH (mgkg−1) | 0 | 100 | 200 | 400 | 800 |
| Glycine | 6 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.2 |
| Proximate analysis of experimental diet | |||||
| Moisture | 9.23 | 9.18 | 9.19 | 9.20 | 9.21 |
| Crude protein | 437.1 | 436.8 | 436.6 | 435.8 | 436.9 |
| Crude lipid | 109.3 | 108.6 | 109.1 | 109.2 | 109.5 |
| Ash | 6.68 | 6.71 | 6.53 | 6.61 | 6.56 |
| Gross energy (MJkg−1) | 18.65 | 18.59 | 18.61 | 18.56 | 18.62 |
Dalong Feed Company, Harbin, China.
Dalong Feed Company, Harbin, China.
Huada Feed Company, Harbin, China.
Dalong Feed Company, Harbin, China.
Dalong Feed Company, Harbin, China.
Huludao Chia Tai Feed Corporation, Huludao, China.
Vitamin premix (mgkg.
Mineral premix (mgkg.
Primers sequence and annealing temperature in RT-PCR.
| Target genes | Forward primer (5ʹ-3ʹ) | Reverse primer (5ʹ-3ʹ) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|
| β-Actin | F: GGACTTTGAGCAGGAGATGG | R:ATGATGGAGTTGTAGGTGGTCT | XM_042314795.1 |
| SLC1A5 | F:CCTGTCAATCAACGCTGGT | R:CACTGCCCATAATGAACACG | KY775396.1 |
| PepT1 | F: CTGGGAGAGGAGGGAGAGAT | R: TCCACGATCTTCCCTGCTAC | XM_014213484.1 |
| IL-1β | F:ACATTGCCAACCTCATCATC | R:GTTCTTCCACAGCACTCTCC | LR584424.1 |
| IL-2 | F:TGATGTAGAGGATAGTTGCATTGTTGC | R:GAAGTGTCCGTTGTGCTGTTCTC | NM_001164065.2 |
| IL-8 | F:CACAGACAGAGAAGGAAGGAAAG | R:TGCTCATCTTGGGGTTACAGA | AY160981.1 |
| TNF-α | F:GTTGGCTATGGAGGCTGTGT | R:ACCCTCTAAATGGATGGCTG | NM_001124357.1 |
Growth performances of O. mykiss fed the experimental diets (mean±SD, n=3).
| Indices | G0 | G100 | G200 | G400 | G800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBW | 4.10 ± 0.12 | 4.13 ± 0.16 | 4.15 ± 0.13 | 4.11 ± 0.13 | 4.12 ± 0.17 | 0.991 |
| FBW | 19.89 ± 0.35a | 20.04 ± 0.40a | 20.71 ± 0.16ab | 22.05 ± 1.00c | 21.74 ± 0.64bc | 0.003 |
| WGR | 385.45 ± 18.42a | 385.62 ± 27.76a | 398.93 ± 12.64ab | 436.83 ± 17.97b | 428.59 ± 33.24ab | 0.049 |
| SGR | 2.82 ± 0.07a | 2.82 ± 0.10a | 2.87 ± 0.05ab | 3.00 ± 0.06b | 2.97 ± 0.12ab | 0.052 |
| FCR | 1.02 ± 0.06b | 1.01 ± 0.04b | 0.97 ± 0.02ab | 0.92 ± 0.01a | 0.98 ± 0.04ab | 0.083 |
| DFI | 1.44 ± 0.02a | 1.46 ± 0.03ab | 1.51 ± 0.01b | 1.51 ± 0.06b | 1.50 ± 0.03ab | 0.035 |
| CF | 1.27 ± 0.01 | 1.28 ± 0.01 | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 1.29 ± 0.03 | 0.659 |
| Survival (%) | 90.67 ± 3.06a | 92.67 ± 3.06ab | 92.00 ± 2.00ab | 98.00 ± 2.00c | 95.33 ± 1.15bc | 0.023 |
Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).
IBW, initial body weight.
FBW, final body weight.
WGR, weight gain rate.
SGR, specific growth rate.
FCR, feed conversion rate.
DFI, daily feed intake.
CF, condition factor.
Figure 1Relationship between weight gain and dietary GSH for O. mykiss as described by a broken line regression (n=3). The breakpoint in the broken line is 447.06mgkg−1.
Effects of dietary GSH on body composition of O. mykiss (mean±SD, n=12).
| Groups | Moisture (%) | Crude protein (%) | Crude lipid (%) | Ash (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | 74.76 ± 1.05 | 18.48 ± 0.72 | 7.25 ± 0.64 | 2.21 ± 0.13 |
| G100 | 74.47 ± 0.70 | 17.82 ± 0.17 | 6.61 ± 0.95 | 2.06 ± 0.08 |
| G200 | 74.25 ± 0.77 | 18.13 ± 0.47 | 7.35 ± 0.41 | 2.28 ± 0.16 |
| G400 | 73.84 ± 0.66 | 17.68 ± 0.71 | 6.59 ± 0.52 | 2.05 ± 0.08 |
| G800 | 73.96 ± 0.11 | 17.93 ± 0.40 | 7.00 ± 0.72 | 2.17 ± 0.15 |
| 0.555 | 0.448 | 0.536 | 0.206 |
Effects of dietary GSH on the antioxidant capacity of mid-intestine in O. mykiss (mean±SD, n=9).
| Groups | SOD/(U mg−1 protein) | CAT/(Umg−1 protein) | GR/(Umg−1 protein) | GSH/(μmolg−1 protein) | MDA/(nmolg−1 protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | 303.60 ± 16.80a | 306.33 ± 12.50a | 46.94 ± 2.64 | 37.88 ± 5.28 | 0.95 ± 0.03c |
| G100 | 320.40 ± 4.33a | 328.33 ± 30.35ab | 46.04 ± 1.54 | 36.08 ± 3.09 | 0.90 ± 0.01bc |
| G200 | 384.40 ± 33.13b | 391.67 ± 14.22d | 46.20 ± 1.74 | 36.40 ± 3.48 | 0.77 ± 0.11a |
| G400 | 382.80 ± 5.23b | 368.33 ± 3.51cd | 47.44 ± 0.21 | 38.88 ± 0.42 | 0.83 ± 0.03ab |
| G800 | 361.20 ± 14.55b | 349.00 ± 26.00bc | 46.02 ± 0.98 | 36.04 ± 1.96 | 0.87 ± 0.01bc |
| 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.771 | 0.770 | 0.018 |
The superscript small letters in the same column mean the significant difference at p<0.05.
Effects of dietary GSH on micro-morphology of the intestine of O. mykiss (mean±SD, n=9).
| Groups | muscular layer (μm) | villus height (μm) | villus width (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | 120.94 ± 8.95a | 626.04 ± 36.51 | 208.06 ± 16.52 |
| G100 | 128.70 ± 4.67ab | 634.04 ± 33.48 | 214.78 ± 21.11 |
| G200 | 131.04 ± 11.87ab | 636.96 ± 87.82 | 219.98 ± 36.43 |
| G400 | 142.16 ± 9.44b | 685.73 ± 12.11 | 234.90 ± 53.65 |
| G800 | 137.58 ± 10.91ab | 655.93 ± 50.01 | 232.47 ± 45.83 |
| 0.020 | 0.628 | 0.884 |
The superscript small letters in the same column mean the significant difference at p<0.05.
Figure 2The light micrograph in the triploid O. mykiss fed GSH diets. VH, VW and MT represent villus height, villus width and muscular thickness.
Figure 3The gene expression of the intestine in each group (mean±SD, n=3). (A) SLC1A5, (B) pepT1, (C) TNF-α, (D) IL-1β, (E) IL-2, and (F) IL-8 [β-actin was chosen as a reference gene to normalize the results, different letters indicate significant differences between the different groups (p<0.05)].
Effects of dietary GSH on alpha diversity index of intestinal microbiota in O. mykiss (mean±SD, n=3).
| Groups | OTU | ACE index | Chao1 index | Shannon index | Coverage(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | 1282.67 ± 658.73 | 1222.18±91.65a | 1052.81±77.73a | 6.05±0.04a | 99.88 |
| G100 | 1069.67 ± 189.83 | 1213.19±48.52a | 1246.05±49.31a | 6.12±0.13ab | 99.85 |
| G200 | 2572.00 ± 1587.76 | 3978.54±208.12bc | 4007.93±216.42cb | 6.76±0.35c | 98.84 |
| G400 | 2881.00 ± 1317.55 | 4211.87±233.62c | 4304.58±205.83c | 6.62±0.22c | 98.44 |
| G800 | 2431.33 ± 1022.59 | 3060.39±137.16b | 3139.11±196.50b | 6.47±0.03bc | 99.41 |
| 0.485 | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.043 | — |
The superscript small letters in the same column mean the significant difference at p<0.05.
Figure 4Composition and relative abundance of bacterial community-based 16S rDNA sequences in phylum level (n=3).
Figure 5Composition and relative abundance of bacterial community-based 16S rDNA sequences in genus level (n=3).
Figure 6Heatmap analysis of the species abundance clustering in the top 20 on the phylum level (mean±SD, n=3).
Figure 7Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on weighted-unifrac (A) and unweighted-unifrac (B) analysis of bacterial profiles from intestines of O. mykiss (n=3).
Linear discriminant analysis effect size (Lefse) of indicator bacteria species that were significantly (p<0.05) associated with each group.
| Groups | Phylum | Family/Genus | LDA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.712 | 0.028 |
| G0 | Bacteroidetes |
| 2.696 | 0.040 |
| G0 | Acidobacteria |
| 2.318 | 0.019 |
| G0 | Proteobacteria | Solimonadaceae | 2.312 | 0.035 |
| G0 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.259 | 0.032 |
| G0 | Actinobacteria |
| 2.230 | 0.035 |
| G0 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.193 | 0.039 |
| G0 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.100 | 0.014 |
| G0 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.056 | 0.026 |
| G0 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.008 | 0.045 |
| G200 | Actinobacteria |
| 2.021 | 0.029 |
| G200 | Bacteroidetes |
| 2.023 | 0.039 |
| G400 | Actinobacteria |
| 2.763 | 0.029 |
| G400 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.265 | 0.034 |
| G400 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.235 | 0.042 |
| G400 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.161 | 0.039 |
| G800 | Proteobacteria | Rhodobacteraceae | 3.514 | 0.042 |
| G800 | Firmicutes |
| 2.511 | 0.041 |
| G800 | Proteobacteria |
| 2.365 | 0.043 |
Figure 8Microbial functions in the top 10 of level-2 for intestine samples (mean±SD, n=3).