Background: Limb-salvage surgery for primary bone sarcomas are preceded by X-ray and MRI for surgical planning. However, the accuracy of X-ray and MRI predicted margins are not well described. Our study examined these questions: (1) How accurately do X-ray and MRI margin measurements reflect the true margin on pathology reports? (2) Do X-ray or MRI margin measurements have smaller differences compared to pathology reports? (3) How many X-ray or MRI margin measurement differences were greater than 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm from pathology reports? (4) Is there an X-ray or MRI view that consistently results in a smaller difference from pathology reports? Methods: This retrospective chart review examined patients with primary bone sarcoma treated with limb-salvage surgery. Reviewers used electronic measurement tools to determine margins from X-ray or MRI based on the resection length of the pathologic specimen. Mean differences of margin measurements to pathology reports were calculated. We determined outliers of imaging margin measurements at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm differences to pathology reports. Results: In the total cohort of 39 patients, the mean difference of X-ray and MRI margins compared to pathology reports were 1.09 cm (st dev 0.79 cm) and 0.71 cm (st dev 0.70 cm), respectively. MRI margin measurements had smaller differences compared to pathology reports than X-ray in 32 of 38 cases (84%) with complete imaging. X-ray outliers at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm differences were 36, 14 and 2 respectively for 70 margin measurements and MRI outliers at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm differences were 17, 6, and 0 respectively for 66 margin measurements. The views with the smallest difference were anterior-posterior X-rays and MRI views with the closest predicted margin. Conclusion: Electronic MRI margin measurements with the closest predicted margin provided the smallest differences with pathology reports and are therefore the most accurate for preoperative planning. When there is adequate residual diaphysis for reconstructive fixation, surgeons should plan for a 3 cm bone margin using MRI measurements to ensure complete removal of the intramedullary extent of sarcoma.Level of Evidence: IV.
Background: Limb-salvage surgery for primary bone sarcomas are preceded by X-ray and MRI for surgical planning. However, the accuracy of X-ray and MRI predicted margins are not well described. Our study examined these questions: (1) How accurately do X-ray and MRI margin measurements reflect the true margin on pathology reports? (2) Do X-ray or MRI margin measurements have smaller differences compared to pathology reports? (3) How many X-ray or MRI margin measurement differences were greater than 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm from pathology reports? (4) Is there an X-ray or MRI view that consistently results in a smaller difference from pathology reports? Methods: This retrospective chart review examined patients with primary bone sarcoma treated with limb-salvage surgery. Reviewers used electronic measurement tools to determine margins from X-ray or MRI based on the resection length of the pathologic specimen. Mean differences of margin measurements to pathology reports were calculated. We determined outliers of imaging margin measurements at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm differences to pathology reports. Results: In the total cohort of 39 patients, the mean difference of X-ray and MRI margins compared to pathology reports were 1.09 cm (st dev 0.79 cm) and 0.71 cm (st dev 0.70 cm), respectively. MRI margin measurements had smaller differences compared to pathology reports than X-ray in 32 of 38 cases (84%) with complete imaging. X-ray outliers at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm differences were 36, 14 and 2 respectively for 70 margin measurements and MRI outliers at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 3 cm differences were 17, 6, and 0 respectively for 66 margin measurements. The views with the smallest difference were anterior-posterior X-rays and MRI views with the closest predicted margin. Conclusion: Electronic MRI margin measurements with the closest predicted margin provided the smallest differences with pathology reports and are therefore the most accurate for preoperative planning. When there is adequate residual diaphysis for reconstructive fixation, surgeons should plan for a 3 cm bone margin using MRI measurements to ensure complete removal of the intramedullary extent of sarcoma.Level of Evidence: IV.
Authors: Elżbieta Kuleta-Bosak; Ewa Kluczewska; Joanna Machnik-Broncel; Wojciech Madziara; Monika Ciupińska-Kajor; Dorota Sojka; Wojciech Rogala; Jan Juszczyk; Robert Wilk Journal: Pol J Radiol Date: 2010-01