CD8 + T‐Lymphocyte-Driven Limbic Encephalitis Results in Temporal Lobe
EpilepsyPitsch J, Loo KMJ, Gallus M, et al. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(4):666-685.
Objective
Limbic encephalitis (LE) comprises a spectrum of inflammatory changes in affected brain
structures including the presence of autoantibodies and lymphoid cells. However, the
potential of distinct lymphocyte subsets alone to elicit key clinicopathological
sequelae of LE potentially inducing temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with chronic
spontaneous seizures and hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is unresolved.
Methods
Here, we scrutinized pathogenic consequences emerging from CD8+ T cells
targeting hippocampal neurons by recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated expression
of the model-autoantigen ovalbumin (OVA) in CA1 neurons of OT-I/RAG1−/− mice (termed
“OVA-CD8+ LE model”).
Results
Viral-mediated antigen transfer caused dense CD8+ T cell infiltrates
confined to the hippocampal formation starting on day 5 after virus transduction. Flow
cytometry indicated priming of CD8+ T cells in brain-draining lymph nodes
preceding hippocampal invasion. At the acute model stage, the inflammatory process was
accompanied by frequent seizure activity and impairment of hippocampal memory skills.
Magnetic resonance imaging scans at day 7 of the OVA-CD8+ LE model revealed
hippocampal edema and blood-brain barrier disruption that converted into atrophy until
day 40. CD8+ T cells specifically targeted OVA-expressing, SIINFEKL-H-2Kb
-positive CA1 neurons and caused segmental apoptotic neurodegeneration, astrogliosis,
and microglial activation. At the chronic model stage, mice exhibited spontaneous
recurrent seizures and persisting memory deficits, and the sclerotic hippocampus was
populated with CD8+ T cells escorted by NK cells.
Interpretation
These data indicate that a CD8+ T-cell-initiated attack of distinct
hippocampal neurons is sufficient to induce LE converting into TLE-HS. Intriguingly, the
role of CD8+ T cells exceeds neurotoxic effects and points to their major
pathogenic role in TLE following LE.
Commentary
Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is a common type of epilepsy characterized by focal seizures
that can be drug-resistant.
In TLE, the hippocampal and amygdala brain regions are typically damaged and, as a
result, cognitive deficits often develop along with recurrent unprovoked seizures.[1,2] Severe neuronal loss, gliosis, and
inflammation in the hippocampus are some of the neuropathological hallmarks of TLE. These
can result as a consequence of brain injuries from events such as trauma, stroke, and status
epilepticus (SE), as well as from limbic encephalitis (LE).
LE results from the inflammation of the medial temporal lobe and limbic areas of the
brain provoked by the production of autoantibodies that target one’s own cells or
tissues.[3,4] Autoimmune LE with
spontaneous seizures is associated with antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase 65
(GAD65), the gamma-amino-butyric B receptor (GABABR), and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
(NMDAR), among others.[3-5] Interestingly, LE is associated with new
onset TLE in adults
; though how exactly LE leads to the development of TLE is not definitively known.
While the presence of autoantibodies is well known to be a primary trigger for inflammatory
responses responsible for LE, less is known on the role that the accompanying T-cell
infiltrates have on the neuropathology and pathophysiology of LE and TLE.In the study by Pitsch et al
recently published in Annals of Neurology, a mouse model of LE (OVA-CD8+
LE) was developed to determine if a CD8+ T-lymphocyte driven attack that
specifically targets excitatory hippocampal neurons, rather than an autoantibody response,
is sufficient to cause unprovoked seizures and cognitive decline along with the
neuropathology typically seen in TLE. CD8+ T lymphocytes are part of the adaptive
immune system that becomes activated via major histocompatibility complex class I (MHCI)
peptides on the surface of infected cells. Most CD8+ T-cells are cytotoxic in the
effector mode and kill targeted cells. Thus, to achieve this effect on hippocampal neurons,
the authors used T-cell receptor (TCR) transgenic (OT-1) mice deficient in the recombination
activating gene 1 (RAG1) (denoted as OT-1 mice). All peripheral T-cells in these mice
specifically recognize the restricted ovalbumin (OVA) for chicken peptide SIINFEKL (OVA
257-264), when presented by MCHI. To incite a MCHI-dependent CD8+ T-cell driven
attack on hippocampal neurons, recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) encoding for
synapsin-driven OVA-SIINKFEL (rAAV-OVA) or control (GFP) proteins was injected bilaterally
into the CA1 hippocampal area of adult mice. Therefore, only the cells that received the
specific instructions to transcribe the SIINFEKL peptide were targeted by the
CD8+ T-cells. These were compared to C57Bl6/N mice with similar rAAV injections
as the OT-1 mice.This is an interesting model that recapitulates the pathophysiology seen in models of
acquired epilepsy generated by electrically or chemically-induced SE.
The rAAV injections encoding the SIINFEKL peptide in hippocampi of OT-1 mice provoked
the development of interictal activity and spontaneous seizures that were first evident at 4
days, and were more frequent at 5 days after rAAV-OVA injection. Seizures were frequent in
the first week (∼13.8 seizures/week) but declined substantially (∼.5 seizures/week) by weeks
7 and 8. Despite the drastic decline, these animals developed long-lasting cognitive
deficits that were present at both 1 and 7 weeks after rAAV-OVA injections. The initial
seizure spike suggests the possibility that these seizures themselves may further disrupt
the neuronal circuitries to potentiate epileptogenic processes, similar to SE-induced TLE models.
It is intriguing that the seizure frequency decreased over time in this model because
it contrasts with the increase in seizure severity typically found in chemoconvulsant models
of SE and acquired TLE.
This could be due to differences in the extent of injury in this LE model vs the
kainate or pilocarpine models, which may produce variable latent periods for the generation
of epileptic circuitries. Because the study was limited to 8 weeks after the rAAV-OVA
delivery, the full impact that the CD8+ T-cell “attack” on CA1 hippocampal
neurons has on chronic epilepsy is yet to be determined.For a successful CD8+ T-cell driven attack on OVA-SIINKFEL positive hippocampal
neurons, these immune cells must migrate to the hippocampus. The study shows that the
infiltration of CD8+ T-cells into the brain occurred alongside progressive
increases in other peripheral immune cells such as natural killer cells, neutrophils, and
monocytes. However, it is not clear what directly triggered the blood brain barrier (BBB)
disruption that would allow the extravasation of these cells into the brain. The evidence
presented confirms BBB leakage through the presence of albumin in the hippocampus at 5 days
following the rAAV-OVA injection, when the seizure frequency was highest. This suggests that
the seizures per se may be causal to BBB disruption and the accompanying migration of
peripheral cells and increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can further aggravate
the neurodegeneration in the hippocampus. Nevertheless, selective expression of SIINFEKL by
CA1 neurons, and their association with the CD8+ T-cells, indicates they were
preferentially targeted as early as 2 days after the rAAV-OVA injection. This evidence
suggests that the CD8+ T-cells may have triggered the initial neurodegeneration
that led to the subsequent development of spontaneous recurrent seizures and the TLE
pathology.The neuropathology of the OVA-CD8+ LE mice closely resembled that of the kainate
or pilocarpine-induced animal models of TLE. This suggests that common primary mechanisms
that trigger seizures in these experimental models—chemoconvulsants or directed
CD8+ T-cell attack—may underlie secondary pathogenesis including gliosis, BBB
disruption, peripheral immune cell infiltration, inflammatory cytokine release, and synaptic
network remodeling. In addition to the infiltration of peripheral immune cells, the loss of
hippocampal CA1 neurons correlated with microgliosis and astrogliosis between 3 and 28 days
after rAAV-OVA injection. The spatiotemporal profile of these cellular changes is similar to
those found following SE events, which also parallel seizure generation and cognitive
decline.[7-9] These findings support that immune and
inflammatory events are comparable across pre-clinical models of TLE. However, a limitation
is that these pathological parallels make it difficult to interpret which processes may play
a major mechanistic role in the epileptogenic hippocampal remodeling. To narrow down the
main contributors to the epilepsy pathology, it would be valuable to interrogate in detail
the temporal evolution of the cellular and molecular changes that occur from viral delivery
to the initiation of seizures in the OVA-CD8+ LE mice. In addition, quantitative
analyses of the neuropathological alterations throughout this study could have provided some
objective correlational data useful to determine the extent to which the severity of
seizures at 1 week after rAAV-OVA injection is associated with the neuropathology in each
animal.In summary, Pitsch et al developed a novel mouse model of OVA-CD8+ LE that
reproduced the peripheral immune cell infiltration, gliosis, and neuroinflammation in the
hippocampus that is representative of human LE. The authors demonstrated that a
CD8+ T-cell-mediated loss of CA1 hippocampal neurons is sufficient to produce
an epileptic brain with characteristics of TLE. An advantage of novel mouse models of
epilepsy such as the OVA-CD8+ LE mice is that it provides us with new tools to
further investigate how the development and progression of LE results in chronic epilepsy.
In addition, this model can be useful to interrogate how severe immune responses and
inflammatory conditions modify specific brain areas, such as the hippocampus, to promote
hyperexcitable circuits that result in epilepsy and memory deficits. While animal models do
not fully reproduce the neuropathology or pathophysiology of human epilepsy, they are
excellent tools to investigate the mechanisms underlying disease development and
progression. This, in turn, is critical for the identification and development of successful
therapeutic treatments for epilepsy.
Authors: Julika Pitsch; Karen M J van Loo; Marco Gallus; Andre Dik; Nico Melzer; Albert J Becker; Delara Kamalizade; Ann-Kathrin Baumgart; Vadym Gnatkovsky; Johannes Alexander Müller; Thoralf Opitz; Gordon Hicking; Venu Narayanan Naik; Lydia Wachsmuth; Cornelius Faber; Rainer Surges; Christian Kurts; Susanne Schoch Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Nicole D Schartz; Season K Wyatt-Johnson; Lauren R Price; Samantha A Colin; Amy L Brewster Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 5.996