| Literature DB >> 34924559 |
Zeead M AlGhamdi1, Dhuha N Boumarah2, Shadi Alshammary2, Hatem Elbawab1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyogenic liver abscess is an uncommon entity that is potentially lethal. Pleural empyema and mediastinal collection are 2 rare complications of hepatic abscess that negatively impact the prognosis. CASE REPORT Herein, we report 3 cases of pyogenic liver abscesses complicated by pleural empyema, each approached differently, along with a succinct review of the literature. Case 1: A 29-year-old man diagnosed with Crohn's disease presented with Crohn's disease-associated hepatic abscess complicated by pleural empyema and concurrent mediastinal collection. The patient demonstrated significant improvement after administration of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy. Case 2: A 42-year-old man with unremarkable past medical history presented with abdominal pain and dyspnea. Upon investigation, he was found to have massive pleural empyema secondary to liver abscess. In contrast to case 1, case 2 required pleural debridement via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery followed by formal decortication through a posterolateral thoracotomy. Thereafter, a dramatic clinical improvement was observed. Case 3: A 26-year-old man with history of brucellosis 6 months before was transferred to our facility as a case of pleural empyema secondary to transdiaphragmatic extension of liver abscess. Unlike case 1 and 2, this patient was managed by drainage of hepatic and pleural collections under radiological guidance only, without the need for intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy or surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS The current paper sheds light on one of the uncommon complications of hepatic abscess and contributes to this scant literature by summarizing pertinent publications. Adequate drainage remains the cornerstone of any pus collection management despite the complexity of some encountered cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34924559 PMCID: PMC8711258 DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.935169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Case Rep ISSN: 1941-5923
A brief summary of all pleural empyema cases developing secondary to liver abscess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valero et al (1985) | 28/M | Dyspnea and chest pain | CD |
| Chest tube drainage followed by surgical drainage | Complete resolution after 1 month |
| Luthariana et al (2005) | 24/M | Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and anorexia after history of fever nd weight loss | None | Negative culture | Chest tube drainage | LOS was 1 month |
| Loulergue et al (2009) | 57/M | Chest pain, anorexia, watery diarrhea and weight loss | None |
| Pleural drainage for 10 days | Uneventful and no recurrence until 6 months |
| Chang et al (2011) | 27/M | Dyspnea and abdominal pain | None | Entamoeba histolytica | Chest tube drainage | LOS was 1 month. No recurrence until 1 year |
| Sano et al (2015) | 64/M | Dyspnea and fever | None | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Chest tube drainage followed by thoracotomy for decortication and drainage | Uneventful |
| Ahmed et al (2015) | 21/M | Fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea and weight loss followed by respiratory distress | None | Fusobacterium | Chest tube drainage followed by VATS for partial decortication and drainage | Developed intra-abdominal abscesses managed with IV Ertapenem and complete resolution was achieved after 9 weeks of treatment |
| Pandhi et al (2017) | 20/M | Chest pain, abdominal pain, fever, dyspnea and cough | HIV |
| Chest tube drainage | Uneventful |
| Nasrullah et al (2017) | 42/M | Dyspnea, fever, chest pain and cough | IHD and HTN |
| Chest tube drainage followed by VATS for decortication and drainage | The patient’s symptoms failed to resolve initially, necessitating laparotomy to drain the liver abscess |
| Doh Kim (2018) | 47/M | Dyspnea, fever, chest pain, and abdominal pain | None |
| Percutaneous drainage through a pig-tail catheter | Symptoms improved after management, with no evidence of recurrence until 6 months |
| Sheih et al (2018) | 49/F | Abdominal pain and fever | DM |
| Thoracentesis followed by VATS for decortication and drainage | LOS was 49 days |
| Cho et al (2018) | 65/M | Dyspnea, fever and abdominal pain | None |
| Pigtail catheter drainage | Pt had also pericardial effusion, progressed, necessitating surgical pericardiostomy and was discharged 25 days of surgery |
| Lee et al (2019) | 81/F | Dyspnea and fever | HTN | Chest tube drainage for 28 days | Improvement was observed after hepatic abscess drainage | |
| Gohar et al (2019) | 54/M | Dyspnea, fever, chest pain, night sweats, weight loss and abdominal pain | Non | Fusobacterium | Chest tube drainage for 7 days | LOS was 7 days. No recurrence until weeks of follow-up |
| Yi et al (2019) | 10 out of 234 developed empyema (median age was 60.2±14.5) 4 of these cases were males | – | DM, HTN, CKD, heart disease and 1 pt was smoker | Chest tube drainage in 5 pts, 5 pts required VATS for surgical decortication (3 patients underwent initial chest tube drainage, and 2 patients underwent initial VATS drainage without chest tube insertion) | Median LOS was 38.5±12.7 days |
M – male; F – female; RUQ – right upper quadrant; Abx – antibiotics; LOS – length of stay; Pt – patient; IHD – ischemic heart disease; HTN – hypertension; IV – intravenous; VATS – video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; CKD – chronic kidney disease; DM – diabetes mellitus; HIV – human immunodeficiency virus; CD – Crohn’s disease.