Literature DB >> 34924220

Reduced risk of severe COVID-19 in more than 1.4 million elderly people aged 75 years and older vaccinated with mRNA-based vaccines.

Jérémie Botton1, Rosemary Dray-Spira2, Bérangère Baricault2, Jérôme Drouin2, Marion Bertrand2, Marie-Joëlle Jabagi2, Alain Weill2, Mahmoud Zureik3.   

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials have shown mRNA-based vaccines to be 92-95% effective to prevent COVID-19 in adults. We aimed to estimate the impact of vaccination on the risk of severe COVID-19 (requiring hospitalization) in elderly people. Each 1,422,461 vaccinated subject aged 75 or older was matched to two unvaccinated subjects of same age, sex, administrative region, and type of residence. They were followed from date of first injection between 27 December 2020 and 24 February 2021 to 20 March 2021 for COVID-19 hospitalization. Mean age was 82.4 years (SD, 5.7) and median follow-up was 38 days [IQR, 17-54]. Adjusted Hazard Ratio for COVID-19 hospitalization from day 7 after the second dose was estimated at 0.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.17), i.e. an estimated 86% risk reduction in people aged 75 and older, highlighting the major impact of mRNA vaccination on reducing the risk of COVID-19 among elderly people.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Effectiveness; Epidemiology; Public Health; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34924220      PMCID: PMC8664658          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


Vaccination campaigns were initiated in Europe immediately following EMA approval of mRNA-based vaccines. Randomized clinical trials have shown mRNA-based vaccines to be 92–95% effective to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in persons 16 years of age or older [1], [2]. However, these trials were conducted under highly controlled conditions and included limited numbers of elderly subjects. Real-world studies are crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly population, which has been shown to be the population most vulnerable to COVID-19 and which may present a suboptimal immune response to vaccination due to the weakened immune system. A first Israeli post-marketing study showed that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was 87% (95 %CI, 55–100) effective in reducing hospitalization at 7 or more days after the second dose [3]. More specifically, in about 80,000 vaccinated subjects aged 70 years or older, the effectiveness of vaccination on symptomatic illness was estimated to be 98% (90–100). In a US study, adjusted vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization among adults aged 65 years or older was estimated to be 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 49%–99%) for full vaccination [4]. To date, other studies reported estimation of high effectiveness (87–98%) of mRNA-based vaccines on severe-COVID-19 in fully vaccinated elderly people in the 1–6 months following vaccination [5], [6], [7], [8], reporting the results with different age limits. Data from other settings in large datasets are useful to refine this findings and evaluate whether the estimates are consistent across diverse populations. In France, COVID-19 vaccination started on 27 December 2020, initially targeting elderly people living in long-term nursing homes and retirement homes, followed by people aged 75 or older and people at high risk of severe forms of COVID-19 starting from 18 January 2021. mRNA-based vaccines were mainly used and two doses were required. In this study, we aimed to estimate the impact of vaccination on the risk of severe COVID-19 in more than 1.4 million elderly people vaccinated during the first two months of the vaccination campaign in France, using data of the French National Health Data System [9] (SNDS, Système National des Données de Santé) linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database called VAC-SI. We constructed a cohort of subjects aged 75 or older vaccinated between 27 December 2020 and 24 February 2021 (i.e. the 60 first days of vaccination campaign). Each vaccinated subject was matched to two unvaccinated subjects of the same age (same year of birth), sex, administrative region, and type of residence (i.e. personal home or Residential Care Homes for dependent elderly persons, with or without a pharmacy), and the trios formed in this way were followed from the date of the first vaccine injection of the vaccinated subject (index date). Unvaccinated subjects (controls) could only be matched to one vaccinated person. If a control subject was vaccinated during follow-up, follow-up was stopped for the whole trio, and the subject was then eligible to be included again in the cohort as a vaccinated subject. The endpoint of interest was hospitalization for COVID-19 during follow-up. Each subject was followed from the index date until hospitalization for COVID-19, death, or the end of follow-up on 20 March 2021, whichever occurred first. Different time windows were considered: from the first dose of vaccine until the end of follow-up, from first dose until day 13, from day 14 until the second dose, from the second dose until the end of follow-up, and from day 7 after the second dose until the end of follow-up. For the analysis from day 14 to the second dose, vaccinated subjects who did not receive the second injection after 6 weeks (42 days) were censored at that date. The COVID-19 hospitalization rate in vaccinated subjects was compared to that in unvaccinated controls by Cox models adjusted for individual comorbidities [10] (see Table 1 ) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and taking matched variables into account. Social deprivation index and lifestyle habits (i.e. smoking and alcohol use disorders) were also included in calculation of the propensity score. Risk reduction was defined as the percent reduction in risk, calculated as 1 minus the Hazard Ratio (HR).
Table 1

Characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects. Controls who were subsequently vaccinated are included only in the control group. Comorbidities were assessed during the previous year.

Unvaccinated
Vaccinated
N = 2,023,680%N = 1,095,820%
Age (years), mean (SD)82.3 (5.6)82.4 (5.7)
Women, N (%)1,190,45658.8%636,50958.1%
Region, N (%)
 Ile de France274,14613.5%152,64813.9%
 Grand Est172,8948.5%92,7068.5%
 Hauts-de-France135,0766.7%72,3116.6%
 Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes252,97012.5%136,49312.5%
 Bourgogne-Franche-Comté111,7255.5%60,6135.5%
 Centre-Val-de-Loire93,3834.6%50,1444.6%
 Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur176,6278.7%95,9628.8%
 Occitanie211,26910.4%114,23710.4%
 Nouvelle-Aquitaine227,69611.3%123,00211.2%
 Normandie107,7915.3%57,9325.3%
 Pays de la Loire115,9005.7%61,5245.6%
 Bretagne115,5445.7%62,0485.7%
 Corse13,8760.7%8,0110.7%
 Guadeloupe1,6190.1%8830.1%
 Martinique2,2280.1%1,2220.1%
 Guyane6440.0%4070.0%
 La Réunion10,0800.5%5,5210.5%
 Mayotte2120.0%1560.0%
Social deprivation index (quintiles), N (%)
 1 (least deprived)355,61017.6%225,39420.6%
 2364,06018.0%199,21918.2%
 3411,55420.3%221,69020.2%
 4429,22321.2%222,95120.3%
 5 (most deprived)412,82720.4%197,31318.0%
 Unknown50,4062.5%29,2532.7%
Population, N (%)
 At home1,839,76790.9%1,001,18491.4%
 Retirement home without pharmacy159,7717.9%80,4407.3%
 Retirement home with pharmacy24,1421.2%14,1961.3%
Lifestyle habits, N (%)
 Smoking40,3342.0%19,6151.8%
 Alcohol use disorders14,0730.7%5,6070.5%
Comorbidities, N (%)
Cardiorespiratory
 Obesity14,9030.7%7,4590.7%
 Diabetes376,90318.6%171,45415.6%
 Dyslipidaemia and lipid-lowering drugs707,82635.0%400,99336.6%
 Hereditary metabolic diseases or amyloidosis6,4460.3%3,6120.3%
 Hypertension1,328,35265.6%707,77664.6%
 Coronary heart disease251,13912.4%145,23713.3%
 Peripheral arterial disease83,5374.1%42,9983.9%
 Cardiac arrhythmias or conduction disorders267,85013.2%148,68213.6%
 Heart failure126,8656.3%60,9475.6%
 Valvular heart disease112,9415.6%61,5655.6%
 Stroke120,8606.0%63,3075.8%
 Pulmonary embolism19,6921.0%10,9681.0%
 Chronic respiratory diseases (excluding cystic fibrosis)209,42310.3%108,2059.9%
Cancers
 Female breast cancer (active)12,9590.6%7,4810.7%
 Female breast cancer (under surveillance)50,5742.5%30,1002.7%
 Colorectal cancer (active)12,1250.6%6,1510.6%
 Colorectal cancer (under surveillance)31,8381.6%17,3321.6%
 Lung cancer (active)4,9140.2%2,7080.2%
 Lung cancer (under surveillance)5,4630.3%3,4060.3%
 Prostate cancer (active)24,6081.2%14,7181.3%
 Prostate cancer (under surveillance)50,9942.5%32,5143.0%
 Other cancers (active)70,9173.5%42,8343.9%
 Other cancers (under surveillance)107,1485.3%64,6715.9%
Inflammatory and skin diseases
 Chronic inflammatory bowel diseases7,3210.4%4,1540.4%
 Rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases25,9791.3%13,5601.2%
 Ankylosing spondylitis and related diseases7,4860.4%4,2590.4%
 Psoriasis14,7540.7%7,9210.7%
Psychological and neurodegenerative diseases
 Neurotic and mood disorders, use of antidepressants314,54715.5%175,68116.0%
 Psychotic disorders, use of neuroleptics45,4632.2%23,3422.1%
 Epilepsy15,7440.8%7,9610.7%
 Multiple sclerosis2,1630.1%9790.1%
 Dementia (including Alzheimer's disease)156,5807.7%92,2678.4%
Other diseases
 HIV infection1,4110.1%7720.1%
 Liver diseases18,5790.9%8,8520.8%
 Chronic dialysis / Renal transplant5,8450.3%8,0180.7%
Characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects. Controls who were subsequently vaccinated are included only in the control group. Comorbidities were assessed during the previous year. A total of 1,422,461 vaccinated persons (i.e. 89% of the total number of vaccinated persons recorded over the study period in France) and 2,631,108 controls were included and followed for a median of 40 days [Interquartile range, IQR, 19–55] and 38 days [IQR, 17–54], respectively. Median follow-up from day 7 after the second dose was 18 days [IQR, 9–28] and 17 days [IQR, 9–28], respectively, with a maximum of 66 days. Ninety-two percent of vaccinated people had received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 8% had received the Moderna vaccine. The median interval between doses among subjects who had received two doses was 28 days [IQR, 26–30]. Matched vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects were fairly similar in terms of comorbidities and lifestyle habits (Table 1, in this table controls who were subsequently vaccinated were only included in the control group). Over the follow-up from day 7 after the second dose, 113 and 1406 events were recorded respectively. In adjusted Cox models using IPTW, vaccinated subjects compared to unvaccinated subjects had a HR for hospitalization for COVID-19 between day 7 after the second dose and the end of follow-up of 0.14 (95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.17) (Table 2 ), i.e. a risk reduction (1-HR) of 86% (95 %CI = 83%–89%). The risk difference was greater among people aged 75–84 years compared to those aged 85 years and older (HR = 0.10; 0.07–0.13 versus HR = 0.19; 0.15–0.25) (Table 3 ). The results remained unchanged (HR = 0.14; 0.12–0.17) when the analysis was restricted to subjects vaccinated with the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine. The risk of death from COVID-19 more than 7 days after the second dose was also reduced by 91% [87%−93%] in the vaccinated group.
Table 2

Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95 %CI) between vaccination and the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 and the related risk reduction by windows of follow-up. Adjustment for age, sex, region, type of residence by matching and for other variables of Table 1 (including comorbidities) using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

PopulationUnvaccinatedVaccinated
Follow-up after the 1st dose
Number of events/at-risk population6,580/2,631,1081,463/1,422,461
Median follow-up and interquartile range (days)38 [17–54]40 [19–55]
HR (95 %CI)10.40 (0.38–0.42)
Risk reduction (95 %CI)60% (58%–62%)
Follow-up from 1st dose to day 13
Number of events/at-risk population2,795/2,631,108685/1,422,461
Median follow-up and interquartile range (days)14 [14–14]14 [14–14]
HR (95 %CI)10.45 (0.41–0.49)
Risk reduction (95 %CI)55% (51% − 59%)
Follow-up from day 14 after the 1st dose to the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population1,616/2,091,749594/1,145,854
Median follow-up and interquartile range (days)12 [7–13]12 [7–13]
HR (95 %CI)10.66 (0.60–0.72)
Risk reduction (95 %CI)34% (28%–40%)
Follow-up after the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population2,142/1,692,867175/935,987
Median follow-up and interquartile range (days)22 [12–34]22 [12–34]
HR (95 %CI)10.14 (0.12–0.17)
Risk reduction (95 %CI)86% (83%–88%)
Follow-up from day 7 after the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population1,406/1,511,628113/840,546
Median of follow-up and interquartile range (days)17 [9–28]18 [9–28]
HR (95 %CI)10.14 (0.11–0.17)
Risk reduction (95 %CI)86% (83%–89%)
Table 3

Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95 %CI) between vaccination and the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 and related risk reduction by windows of follow-up, stratified by age and sex. Adjustment for region, type of residence and other variables of Table 1 (including comorbidities) using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

AgeLess than 85 years85 years or older
PopulationUnvaccinatedVaccinatedUnvaccinatedVaccinated
Follow-up after the 1st dose
Number of events/at-risk population3,604/1,781,722667/949,4802,976/849,386796/472,981
HR (95 %CI)10.34 (0.32–0.37)10.47 (0.43–0.50)
Follow-up from 1st dose to day 13
Number of events/at-risk population1,440/1,781,722324/949,4801,355/849,386361/472,981
HR (95 %CI)10.42 (0.37–0.47)10.48 (0.42–0.54)
Follow-up from day 14 after the 1st dose to the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population942/1,467,684281/788,082674/624,065313/357,772
HR (95 %CI)10.55 (0.48–0.63)10.81 (0.70–0.92)
Follow-up after the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population1213/1,191,87758/644,505929/500,990117/291,482
HR (95 %CI)10.09 (0.07–0.11)10.21 (0.17–0.25)
Follow-up from day 7 after the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population797/1,062,15242/576,800609/449,47671/263,746
HR (95 %CI)10.10 (0.07–0.13)10.19 (0.15–0.25)



SexWomen
Men
PopulationUnvaccinatedVaccinatedUnvaccinatedVaccinated

Follow-up after the 1st dose
Number of events/at-risk population3,230/1,537,209693/820,2743,350/1,093,899770/602,187
HR (95 %CI)10.39 (0.36–0.43)10.41 (0.37–0.44)
Follow-up from 1st dose to day 13
Number of events/at-risk population1,400/1,537,209317/820,2741,395/1,093,899368/602,187
HR (95 %CI)10.42 (0.37–0.48)10.48 (0.42–0.53)
Follow-up from day 14 after the 1st dose to the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population754/1,207,043295/652,050862/884,706299/493,804
HR (95 %CI)10.71 (0.62–0.81)10.61 (0.54–0.70)
Follow-up after the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population1057/977,38576/532,2821085/715,48299/403,705
HR (95 %CI)10.13 (0.10–0.16)10.15 (0.12–0.19)
Follow-up from day 7 after the 2nd dose
Number of events/at-risk population696/855,00948/468,481710/624,06965/354,859
HR (95 %CI)10.12 (0.09–0.16)10.16 (0.12–0.20)
Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95 %CI) between vaccination and the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 and the related risk reduction by windows of follow-up. Adjustment for age, sex, region, type of residence by matching and for other variables of Table 1 (including comorbidities) using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95 %CI) between vaccination and the risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 and related risk reduction by windows of follow-up, stratified by age and sex. Adjustment for region, type of residence and other variables of Table 1 (including comorbidities) using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The early 55% risk reduction observed during the first two weeks after the first dose could not be due to the vaccination by itself, but probably to the higher risk of infection (and then the higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalization) for unvaccinated subjects compared to vaccinated subjects because people with warning symptoms (at higher risk for severe COVID-19) were less likely to be instantly vaccinated. This is among the first time that risk reduction of COVID-19 hospitalization after mRNA vaccination has been measured on such a large population of elderly people. This study provides evidence supporting the high level of effectiveness of vaccination in people aged 75 years or older, with an overall efficacy of 86% and 90% in the 75–84 year age-group. Evidence from both clinical trials and real-world studies now accumulates on the high effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccine in elderly people. Longer follow-up will allow determination of the longer-term impact of vaccination on the risk of severe forms of COVID-19. In conclusion, with an estimated 86% risk reduction based on data from more than 1.4 million vaccinated people aged 75 or older in France, these results highlight the major impact of mRNA vaccination on reducing the risk of severe forms of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization among elderly people.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  10 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study.

Authors:  Jamie Lopez Bernal; Nick Andrews; Charlotte Gower; Chris Robertson; Julia Stowe; Elise Tessier; Ruth Simmons; Simon Cottrell; Richard Roberts; Mark O'Doherty; Kevin Brown; Claire Cameron; Diane Stockton; Jim McMenamin; Mary Ramsay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  Chronic diseases, health conditions and risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and in-hospital mortality during the first wave of the epidemic in France: a cohort study of 66 million people.

Authors:  Laura Semenzato; Jérémie Botton; Jérôme Drouin; François Cuenot; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Alain Weill; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-07-16

3.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

Authors:  Lindsey R Baden; Hana M El Sahly; Brandon Essink; Karen Kotloff; Sharon Frey; Rick Novak; David Diemert; Stephen A Spector; Nadine Rouphael; C Buddy Creech; John McGettigan; Shishir Khetan; Nathan Segall; Joel Solis; Adam Brosz; Carlos Fierro; Howard Schwartz; Kathleen Neuzil; Larry Corey; Peter Gilbert; Holly Janes; Dean Follmann; Mary Marovich; John Mascola; Laura Polakowski; Julie Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; Hamilton Bennett; Rolando Pajon; Conor Knightly; Brett Leav; Weiping Deng; Honghong Zhou; Shu Han; Melanie Ivarsson; Jacqueline Miller; Tal Zaks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data.

Authors:  Eric J Haas; Frederick J Angulo; John M McLaughlin; Emilia Anis; Shepherd R Singer; Farid Khan; Nati Brooks; Meir Smaja; Gabriel Mircus; Kaijie Pan; Jo Southern; David L Swerdlow; Luis Jodar; Yeheskel Levy; Sharon Alroy-Preis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting.

Authors:  Noa Dagan; Noam Barda; Eldad Kepten; Oren Miron; Shay Perchik; Mark A Katz; Miguel A Hernán; Marc Lipsitch; Ben Reis; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Antihypertensive Drugs and COVID-19 Risk: A Cohort Study of 2 Million Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Laura Semenzato; Jérémie Botton; Jérôme Drouin; Bérangère Baricault; Clémentine Vabre; François Cuenot; Laetitia Penso; Philippe Herlemont; Emilie Sbidian; Alain Weill; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines Against COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Adults Aged ≥65 Years - United States, January-March 2021.

Authors:  Mark W Tenforde; Samantha M Olson; Wesley H Self; H Keipp Talbot; Christopher J Lindsell; Jay S Steingrub; Nathan I Shapiro; Adit A Ginde; David J Douin; Matthew E Prekker; Samuel M Brown; Ithan D Peltan; Michelle N Gong; Amira Mohamed; Akram Khan; Matthew C Exline; D Clark Files; Kevin W Gibbs; William B Stubblefield; Jonathan D Casey; Todd W Rice; Carlos G Grijalva; David N Hager; Arber Shehu; Nida Qadir; Steven Y Chang; Jennifer G Wilson; Manjusha Gaglani; Kempapura Murthy; Nicole Calhoun; Arnold S Monto; Emily T Martin; Anurag Malani; Richard K Zimmerman; Fernanda P Silveira; Donald B Middleton; Yuwei Zhu; Dayna Wyatt; Meagan Stephenson; Adrienne Baughman; Kelsey N Womack; Kimberly W Hart; Miwako Kobayashi; Jennifer R Verani; Manish M Patel
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 35.301

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Characteristics associated with the residual risk of severe COVID-19 after a complete vaccination schedule: A cohort study of 28 million people in France.

Authors:  Laura Semenzato; Jérémie Botton; Jérôme Drouin; Bérangère Baricault; Marion Bertrand; Marie-Joëlle Jabagi; François Cuenot; Stéphane Le Vu; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Alain Weill; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-06-30

2.  Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection against symptomatic infections and severe Covid-19 outcomes in adults aged 50 years and over, France, January to mid-December 2021.

Authors:  Milena Suarez Castillo; Hamid Khaoua; Noémie Courtejoie
Journal:  Glob Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Investigation of outbreak cases infected with the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.640 variant in a fully vaccinated elderly population, Normandy, France, November to December 2021.

Authors:  Brice Mastrovito; Chloé Naimi; Leslie Kouam; Xavier Naudot; Lucie Fournier; Guillaume Spaccaferri; Jean-Christophe Plantier; Anaïs Soares; Fabienne De Oliveira; Marie Gueudin; Véronique Jacomo; Céline Leroy; Alice Moisan; Mélanie Martel
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2022-02

4.  Assessing the impact of COVID-19 at 1-year using the SF-12 questionnaire: Data from the Anticipate longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Brendan O'Kelly; Louise Vidal; Gordana Avramovic; John Broughan; Stephen Peter Connolly; Aoife G Cotter; Walter Cullen; Shannon Glaspy; Tina McHugh; James Woo; John S Lambert
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 12.074

5.  Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

Authors:  Mohamed J Saadh; Saif Aldeen Jaber
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.848

6.  Vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 outcomes within the French overseas territories: A cohort study of 2-doses vaccinated individuals matched to unvaccinated ones followed up until September 2021 and based on the National Health Data System.

Authors:  Laura Semenzato; Jérémie Botton; Bérangère Baricault; Jacqueline Deloumeaux; Clarisse Joachim; Emmanuelle Sylvestre; Rosemary Dray-Spira; Alain Weill; Mahmoud Zureik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.